These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
A call for ALL new land release to be URGENTLY SUSPENDED |
|
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
|
07-14-2005 15:39
What solution do you propose Anshe? What do you see as the problems?
_____________________
Taken from The last paragraph on pg. 16 of Cory Ondrejka's paper "Changing Realities: User Creation, Communication, and Innovation in Digital Worlds :
"User-created content takes the idea of leveraging player opinions a step further by allowing them to effectively prototype new ideas and features. Developers can then measure which new concepts most improve the products and incorporate them into the game in future patches." |
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
07-14-2005 15:40
I don't see a problem
![]() _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Ananda Sandgrain
+0-
Join date: 16 May 2003
Posts: 1,951
|
07-14-2005 16:04
I don't either.
![]() _____________________
|
Einsman Schlegel
Disenchanted Fool
![]() Join date: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 1,461
|
07-14-2005 16:22
omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg!!!!
Is it TRUEEEEEEEEEEEEE???? I can buy 'LAND'......??????? Again......??? with my stipend?????? Could it beeeeeeeeeee???? *gasp*! _____________________
|
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
![]() Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
07-14-2005 18:16
One thing to think about when trying to understand land values in SL. Land in RL has value and increases in value because there is a finite amount of land, in SL there is an infinite amount of land. It is not logical to buy land expecting it to increase in value like land in RL, because of this fact. This is SL, not RL. Please, evoke a little logic.
_____________________
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
07-15-2005 08:46
I would like to see 100,000 lindens = $10.00 bucks.
_____________________
|
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-15-2005 08:52
I think it is important for us all to realise that LL can do anything they like with both the price of land, and the exchange rate (the price of money). They ultimately control the supply of both.
Anyone thinking of holding either has nothing to trust and hold onto except LL's declared policies and intentions. They declared a policy a few months ago (I wish I could find the quote) of holding both stable at the then current level. They have all the tools to do that if they so wish. It seems now that they don't so wish. The question is - why ? They remain silent, so lets consider some possibilities 1. They have reconsidered, and think lower land prices would mean happier players, so they are letting them drop to some new level. 2. They want to experiment with an alternative model for controlling the economy (a bit less control, perhaps, or different?), and what we see are the birthpangs of the changeover. 3. They are perturbed at the growth of Anshe's economic dominance (and maybe at her little acts of defiance) and have decided to quietly break her without ever having to admit to such an intention. 4. They just want to keep changing things around, so that the whole thing remains fluid and no particular interest or player strategy can become entrenched (sort of generalised version of number 3). 5. They can't be bothered. It doesn't matter. What the heck, let it just cycle all over the place as it likes. Can't think of any more off the cuff. There must be others. Anyone ? Remember, the fact that land even has a selling price at all is just an LL choice. Anyone care to come up with some thoughts on the days when it didn't, and whether that worked better? Could give us further insight.... One thing I know. I have been accused of Anshe-bashing, and I don't like some details of how she has operated, and if she is to get this big I want two or three others up there with her, to avoid monopoly power. But overall what she has done, breaking land bulk, forming new communities, acting as emergency-buyer-of-last-resort, showing us all that SL can really be more than a game, and supply a RL income - All this has been positive for SL in the eyes of those of us who see it becoming more than a game, which is LL's declared intent. If they burn her off now, and wipe her out, it will be a long time before anyone takes it as seriously again. And the rest of us who happen to hold a bit of land, while losing much less, will hesitate to trust them again too. Remember, we only have 20,000 odd members. When we get to a million, how many Anshe's will we have room for ? And be easily able to accomodate and welcome them, even if we do complain now and again? Lots and lots. What amazes me is how easily LL could stop all this slide. One clear posting in "Announcements" is all it would take, saying what new level they will actively control to, and how the control will be done. (To pretend they are not still making the decisions is nonsense, even inaction is a big decision). Except that if they remain silent much longer no-one may believe them when they do speak. |
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
![]() Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
07-15-2005 08:58
Or maybe all the land speculators have fucked themselves. Don't blame LL, look in the mirror. The land market has defied logic and economics for a long time. It is adjusting itself, adjust with it, or die. Have a nice weekend
![]() _____________________
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
07-15-2005 09:00
I would like to see 100,000 lindens = $10.00 bucks. Yea, that would be great! Then a 1024 plot of land would cost $L 1,600,000 and we'd all be zillionaires. |
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-15-2005 09:10
Or maybe all the land speculators have fucked themselves. I don't really see any signs of much speculating in land, here, Eboni. Surely speculating involves buying in the hope the price will rise with time, doing nothing but wait, then selling on. I see no signs that Anshe, for example, has ever done that. Buying something in bigger amounts than people want, for amounts of cash bigger than people can afford, then dividing it up, and selling it again in affordable chunks..... Having meanwhile taken the risk (and born the cost) of having to hold it for a while..... Is that speculating? Every small shopkeeper does that with a case of baked-bean tins. Are they doing nothing worthy of making a living ? Are they all parasites and speculators ? |
Travis Lambert
White dog, red collar
![]() Join date: 3 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,819
|
07-15-2005 09:25
Yea, that would be great! Then a 1024 plot of land would cost $L 1,600,000 and we'd all be zillionaires. Heh - be careful what you wish for. Personally, I'd really rather not go THERE. ![]() _____________________
------------------
The Shelter The Shelter is a non-profit recreation center for new residents, and supporters of new residents. Our goal is to provide a positive & supportive social environment for those looking for one in our overwhelming world. |
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
![]() Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
07-15-2005 09:28
I don't really see any signs of much speculating in land, here, Eboni. Surely speculating involves buying in the hope the price will rise with time, doing nothing but wait, then selling on. I see no signs that Anshe, for example, has ever done that. Buying something in bigger amounts than people want, for amounts of cash bigger than people can afford, then dividing it up, and selling it again in affordable chunks..... Having meanwhile taken the risk (and born the cost) of having to hold it for a while..... Is that speculating? Every small shopkeeper does that with a case of baked-bean tins. Are they doing nothing worthy of making a living ? Are they all parasites and speculators ? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-38,GGLD:en&oi=defmore&q=define:speculator Please review the definition of a speculator. Purchasing something and hoping to later sell it for a profit is speculating. There has been little reason using known economic facts to expect that land speculation in SL would last for any period of time. Also, I didn't mention Anshe, why did you bring her up? I am directly addressing your whining here about losing money on something you should have never logically expected to profit on. Lets keep the focus on you, your thread, and your issue. _____________________
|
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-15-2005 09:54
I am directly addressing your whining here about losing money on something you should have never logically expected to profit on. Lets keep the focus on you, your thread, and your issue. I am a little iritated at losing a little money, but its a small amount personally and losing it is no more than a slight irritation. I never dreamed of a profit. You must surely have seen by now that it is not my issue, but whether SL should stick to their declared intention of keeping the economy moderately stable. You seem to have reduced and personalised this issue rather than answer a simple question - is a baked-bean-selling-small-shopkeeper speculating? Notice I m not saying anything about your motives for posting, or any possible agenda. As is proper in the forum. How could I know or even guess ? Please do me the same courtesy. If I have done this to you, please point it out and if valid I will apologise. On second thoughts. Don't bother answering the question. I guess if you wish to adopt a bizarre interpretation of "speculating" that's your affair, Eboni. It hardly matters to the issue of the thread - should LL choose the actions they already have to take, so that they stabilise the economy? or is uncontrolled boom and bust ok ? Looks like most people here think boom and bust is ok. Perhaps some welcome the opportunity it provides for genuine speculation. For that purpose boom and bust cycles are perfect. |
Camille Serpentine
Eater of the Dead
![]() Join date: 6 Oct 2003
Posts: 1,236
|
07-15-2005 09:58
*sighs*
I liked the days when you could still find land for L$1 per m2. Seemed like it was actually worthwhile to own then. _____________________
|
Jonquille Noir
Lemon Fresh
![]() Join date: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,025
|
07-15-2005 10:03
Looks like most people here think boom and bust is ok. Perhaps some welcome the opportunity it provides for genuine speculation. For that purpose boom and bust cycles are perfect. Or we like having the chance, every now and then, to buy land without also paying a Speculator's mortgage in the process. I don't see why people wanting to buy land to use, without much thought to reselling it, is such a hard concept to grasp. _____________________
Little Rebel Designs
Gallinas |
Roseann Flora
/wrist
Join date: 7 Feb 2004
Posts: 1,058
|
07-15-2005 10:04
As someone who buys land to actually use it, and not to resell for profit, I welcome the lower land prices. dito _____________________
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
07-15-2005 10:09
I don't really see any signs of much speculating in land, here, Eboni. Surely speculating involves buying in the hope the price will rise with time, doing nothing but wait, then selling on. I see no signs that Anshe, for example, has ever done that. Buying something in bigger amounts than people want, for amounts of cash bigger than people can afford, then dividing it up, and selling it again in affordable chunks..... Having meanwhile taken the risk (and born the cost) of having to hold it for a while..... Is that speculating? Every small shopkeeper does that with a case of baked-bean tins. Are they doing nothing worthy of making a living ? Are they all parasites and speculators ? I think that's too narrow a definition for "speculation". Speculation does not require an overall increase in property values. Speculators may be gambling that they will be able to find a buyer for a particular property at a higher price, not necessarily that "prices will go up". It is the gambling aspect of it that makes it speculation. Uncertainty. There is a LOT of land speculation in SL. Buster |
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
![]() Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
07-15-2005 10:30
Looks like most people here think boom and bust is ok. Perhaps some welcome the opportunity it provides for genuine speculation. For that purpose boom and bust cycles are perfect. I recently sold 12K M2 for a loss. Well not a complete loss, and I honestly can't remember what I paid for all of it since I bought it in parts. The only pieces that I purchased cheaply were the plots Beryl sold me *flash FIC card* other than that I bought most of it at that market rate of $10L per m2, then I sold it for like $7L per M2. The land was some of the most unique mainland in SL, for several reasons, and could have in the past fetched a price more than $10L per m2, but not in todays market. I sold it quickly and at a "loss" for several reasons. The sim was buggy and slow and had more active scripts than a shopping sim, there are new sims out there that are faster, and more than anything, the land served its purpose and I didn't need it anymore. I bought the land to build my faux SL dream house and so my friends would have a place to live, that was the sole purpose of the land. The land did what it was supposed to do, when I tired of it, I sold it. It is not about boom or bust it is about a market. I personally find the current market a little thrilling. There is a glut of land, so land is cheap. Economics at its finest at work, you learn about supply and demand in HS and now you can apply it to SL! Wow, get the kiddies in here and team them a lesson ![]() If you were really concerned about losing money you would just keep the land until the market stabalizes which it will probably in the fall, or you can panic and sell now. Personal choice. _____________________
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
07-15-2005 10:40
If you were really concerned about losing money you would just keep the land until the market stabalizes which it will probably in the fall, or you can panic and sell now. Personal choice. You are forgetting one thing: TIER. You have to figure out how likely you think it is that the land value will go up enough to cover the tier. For example, if you have an extra 512 m2 that is costing you an extra $5 per month, at 260 $L per US$, you are paying $L 1,300 per month, or $2.53 per m2 per month. If you could sell it for L $2000 today, you'd have to get $3,300 for it after your next billing date. You'd have to get $4,600 for it after the next billing date. And so on. Your logic is only correct if you are at a higher tier and selling the land would not move you to a lower tier category. Buster |
Strife Onizuka
Moonchild
![]() Join date: 3 Mar 2004
Posts: 5,887
|
07-15-2005 10:46
Sounds to me like we need more L$ sinks. Maybe a L$ tax on land transfers.
_____________________
Truth is a river that is always splitting up into arms that reunite. Islanded between the arms, the inhabitants argue for a lifetime as to which is the main river. - Cyril Connolly Without the political will to find common ground, the continual friction of tactic and counter tactic, only creates suspicion and hatred and vengeance, and perpetuates the cycle of violence. - James Nachtwey |
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
![]() Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
07-15-2005 10:52
You are forgetting one thing: TIER. You have to figure out how likely you think it is that the land value will go up enough to cover the tier. For example, if you have an extra 512 m2 that is costing you an extra $5 per month, at 260 $L per US$, you are paying $L 1,300 per month, or $2.53 per m2 per month. If you could sell it for L $2000 today, you'd have to get $3,300 for it after your next billing date. You'd have to get $4,600 for it after the next billing date. And so on. Your logic is only correct if you are at a higher tier and selling the land would not move you to a lower tier category. Buster Which is actually part of how you have to speculate; If the market changes and I have to shoulder some land, how is this going to effect me in relation to my tier? Should I sell off a little quickly to decrease my tier? Should I take advantage of the lower prices now and buy more to fill my tier? Etc, etc. _____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
![]() Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
07-15-2005 10:53
You are forgetting one thing: TIER. You have to figure out how likely you think it is that the land value will go up enough to cover the tier. For example, if you have an extra 512 m2 that is costing you an extra $5 per month, at 260 $L per US$, you are paying $L 1,300 per month, or $2.53 per m2 per month. If you could sell it for L $2000 today, you'd have to get $3,300 for it after your next billing date. You'd have to get $4,600 for it after the next billing date. And so on. Your logic is only correct if you are at a higher tier and selling the land would not move you to a lower tier category. Buster Well yes, there is the tier to consider, it seems more logical to sell at a low price rather than pay more in tier than what the land is worth. Again it is all personal choice and the whole community shouldnt be affected because one person, or several people made some poor land deal choices. _____________________
|
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-15-2005 14:05
I think that's too narrow a definition for "speculation". Speculation does not require an overall increase in property values. Speculators may be gambling that they will be able to find a buyer for a particular property at a higher price, not necessarily that "prices will go up". It is the gambling aspect of it that makes it speculation. Uncertainty. There is a LOT of land speculation in SL. Buster Forget the precise definition of the word. It was used I think to imply parasitic activity of no value to anyone but the perpetrator. Like the baked bean seller, this is not in general fairly applied to our landbarons. |
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
07-15-2005 14:37
Forget the precise definition of the word. It was used I think to imply parasitic activity of no value to anyone but the perpetrator. Like the baked bean seller, this is not in general fairly applied to our landbarons. hahah 'forget what the word means... here use this definition' _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-15-2005 14:43
Mind you, we wouldn't need people to split up the baked bean crates if you could buy individual tins direct from the wholesaler.
I think the decision to only auction whole sims is appalling, and makes us need barons more, not less. I noticed Phillip said they would reconsider this if people objected, but that they did it because very very few of us ever bought in the auctions. I guess we brought it on ourselves. If we haven't the guts to buy smaller plots wholesale when we can, we get stuck with retail only except for a whole sim. |