These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
A call for ALL new land release to be URGENTLY SUSPENDED |
|
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
![]() Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
07-13-2005 21:26
are you suggesting that ellie and blaze is manipulating the forum discourse?
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/
read my blog Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate |
Ananda Sandgrain
+0-
Join date: 16 May 2003
Posts: 1,951
|
07-13-2005 21:28
Hold on, Ananda. If you are right I have misunderstood this change. That would be entirely different. I'd better make it my priority to check it out. You don't have a link do you, forum keyword search is not working for me? Are they both to be fixed price ? The same price ? If this is true then ultimately land prices will be determined by the rate at which land barons care to invest. There are so few big ones that their whims will cause substantial proce fluctuations. So my cry for the Lindens to take stbilising action, as they undertook to do, is totally dead ? No more stabilising action via land supply ever ? A completely uncontrolled economy ? No alternate control proposals ? Are you SURE, Ananda? Seems completely crazy to me - a recipe for disaster. Boom bust boom bust. I gotta go check. Well, no, I can't be SURE, but based on the transcript from Philip's town hall, full sims on demand is how it will work starting on the 15th. You do raise a good point though - price stability will depend on there being more than just a couple people willing to buy whole sims and parcel them out. The point of the change though is that all new mainland sims will start out at the same price - $1000 - and very few will go for much more than that. Therefore, as long as mainland prices stay below that point, no one will buy new sims. And when the resale price goes up above that, you'll see speculators buying them up, and also groups forming to buy neighborhoods together. If I spent more time in SL than I do, I'd probably want to start organizing neighborhood groups myself! Places like Gray and Seacliff and Numbakulla are just a few examples of what can happen under that model. I don't know if the new system will really result in more places like this, but at least it no longer actively discourages cooperative enterprise. What if people continue to migrate to the superior price/zoning of Island land? That can continue to contribute to the falling land prices, even with the new structure in place. As also noted in the announcement, initial island prices are now going to be higher than for mainland sims. But you're right; if people keep buying islands instead, mainland prices will tend to stay low. I seriously doubt they will drop out entirely, unless the majority of landowners were actually owning as an investment! In the meantime, just remember to buy low and sell high. ![]() _____________________
|
Caliandris Pendragon
Waiting in the light
![]() Join date: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 643
|
07-13-2005 21:32
All I'm suggesting is that the the Lindens should reactivate their stated policy of stabilising the economy by controlling the supply of land. unless they care to re-stabilize at a new lower level, things have sunk so low that we would need a temporary cessation of release (two weeks ?) to get back up to the previous level. But it would have to include exercising control over the rate at which private islands are supplied. Unless I have it wrong, these are still freely available. We are not told how many are being sold. In my opinion these are the root cause of the present drop. ...snipped Ellie, the economy has been rising and falling since I joined 16 months ago, and I wouldn't say that the control of sim release has had a noticeably stabilising effect on prices. I bought snow land when it was scarce and expensive last year, and sold it when it was very cheap. I have not made money but lost money on virtually every land deal I have done, either because I chose to sell at a low rate in order to lose tier, or because I sold to friends, or because I had to get the best deal I could get, and it wasn't possible to even break even. I was willing to take those losses when I could afford them, because I regarded my tier and my investment as payment for the enjoyment I get from the game. Once I couldn't afford them, I got out of land and tiered down to basic. According to people who watch the auctions, contrary to your statement, land will be limitless and uncontrolled, mainland as well as island sim. The effect of the new changes is to prevent one person from controlling the price of land by winning all the auctions. Unless she has a bottomless pit of money and can afford to bid on endless auctions, she will be unable to keep starting a new auction at the end of the last. That means that land will be in the hands of other people, but only ones who can afford whole sims. One the mainland. As for the effect of Hiro Queso's operation, Blaze, I don't think you can conclude that he has affected the buying market with his rentals, necessarily. A lot of the people renting from him have got out of the real estate dealing business because the price of good land was too high, because they no longer wanted to live next to laggy clubs and malls, and because they need to be able to close their land/shop/account overnight when necessary rather than waiting to be able to sell their land, possibly incurring another month's tier. People's reasons for having land are many and varied, and their reasons for renting it rather than buying it are also many and varied. The tenor of this thread is to suggest that land is land is land, but we all know that there is a wide variance in prices according to location near to telehub or not etc. Buying wisely is difficult to do in SL. Renting wisely is easy. That's why I live in Hiroland ![]() Cali |
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
07-13-2005 21:47
Renting wisely is easy. That's why I live in Hiroland ![]() Neualtenburg is the solution! Second Life's only nonprofit land cooperative and democratic republic. Own your own share of a private sim. Decide how you want it to evolve. This is a paid advertisement of Neualtenburg LLC not affiliated with Neualtenburg Nonnutritive Serial Varnish and Shoe Tongues of Hoboken. ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
07-13-2005 21:53
Got the landlord blues? Wish you could own a share of your own sim? Tired of paying LL and a middleman, when land is so cheap? Neualtenburg is the solution! Second Life's only nonprofit land cooperative and democratic republic. Own your own share of a private sim. Decide how you want it to evolve. This is a paid advertisement of Neualtenburg LLC not affiliated with Neualtenburg Nonnutritive Serial Varnish and Shoe Tongues of Hoboken. ~Ulrika~ ![]() shit, now I will get banned for a personal attack, and they will take my game away too. Oh the horror. |
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
![]() Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
07-13-2005 22:02
CAPITALIST! Death to capitalist pigs! ~Ulrika~ _____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
07-13-2005 22:36
Jonquille, we have varying financial resources, varying motives or indeed needs for playing. Has it never occurred to you that this may be a resource for severely disabled or bedridden or otherwise housebound people who may have made serious financial sacrifice to be here and for whom a bit more land than 512m may be pschologically a life saver? That recovering a few hundred dollars when they can no longer play may be very significant in such circumstances ? I'm trying to work out how this is significant.. Sorry don't see it.. I'm not about to feel guilty because someone may (or may not) have something wrong with them -- and if I'm reading this correctly was quite irresponsible by spending more then they could afford on entertainment?.. It would make me feel psychologically better if I got half the money back for every DVD I rented too.. or half the money back on my cable bill when I stopped using the internet.. but it aint gonna happen.... and more importantly why should I feel guilty if it doesn't? If you pooh-pooh my request for stability and control, will you start complaining when that same lack of control takes it back up to L$9/m ? Will you still be applauding then, Jonquille? Nah I'd say just like me, she won't buy it.. and I guess a lot of other people won't either... and that will force the price back on down... So that is the real question I am asking, J. Do we need LL acting to hold prices stable, or do you really want them doing nothing and letting land and exchange rate swing all over the place? You can't REALLY think that good, can you ? Any of you ? I think it would ROCK! I think the price should be dictated by what people want to spend.. And honestly I think the whole thing is just a bout of tough titties because someone may lose a few bucks.... Honestly... you went into a high risk buisness, and at the first sign of things not going 100% your way you're crying foul.. When the market was high people were screaming 'free market free market!' well now that the market is swinging the other way your screaming 'regulate! regulate!' Sorry - you don't get to have it both ways. Now excuse me while I go and do a find on land prices to see if I can continue to wear my shit-eating grin tomorrow as well. _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-13-2005 22:37
I'd say that is only 1/2 accurate since Robin said in the announcement - "Auctions for mainland regions will run until the land is sold, and we'll make sure there is enough land available at any one time so interested buyers will have a choice of terrain and location." That sounds like there will always be land available for auction regardless of demand. Which doesn't fit into my definition of rationing. I just don't understand this. What does it mean to say that an auction will run until the land is sold ? When is the land sold if not when the auction reaches its timelimit ? Surely anything else is not an auction ? Does everyone else understand this ? Am I just tired? It reads like rubbish to me. |
Jonquille Noir
Lemon Fresh
![]() Join date: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,025
|
07-13-2005 22:47
I just don't understand this. What does it mean to say that an auction will run until the land is sold ? When is the land sold if not when the auction reaches its timelimit ? Surely anything else is not an auction ? Does everyone else understand this ? Am I just tired? It reads like rubbish to me. I believe they mean that if there are no bids, the land will remain on auction until there is a bid. _____________________
Little Rebel Designs
Gallinas |
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-13-2005 23:15
I think it would ROCK! I think the price should be dictated by what people want to spend.. your screaming 'regulate! regulate!' Oh dear, I'm so weak. I can't resist one more try. I'm not asking for SL to regulate something they are not involved in. They can't help being involved in the price. They are the manufacturer and supplier of this product. They face a steadily increasing demand (new players) and up until now they have met every week to make a decision. "How many sims shall we put up for auction". I'm not propose some interfering outside busybody sticks their nose in. I'm just trying to influence a decision they have had to make every week. Would you accuse a glove manufacturer of trying to regulate the price of gloves when he adjusts his production schedule to meet demand? The interesting thing coming out of this thread now, is that people are suggesting LL intend to change their strategy for control. Previously they regulated the supply, and let players decide the price in auction. This confused stuff I am now reading about an auction that is not an auction seems to imply that they are going to directly control the price instead. Instead of controlled supply with a freely determined price, we will get unlimited supply, but a controlled price. Is that it? Its not clear - this not-quite-an-auction confusion obscures it. If there really are an unlimited number of auctions to chose from, they are no longer auctions. Each person just bids the minimum $1000 on his own auction. Why should anyone then compete ? They just put in the same $1000 bid on one of their own. That would be just a disguised $1000 fixed price. If this is right, we are gaining less control, not more. A less realistic market not a more realistic one. A fixed wholesale price for all land. Small buyers excluded. Retail prices fixed by the margins a few big buyers choose. And no anti-monopoly or anti-cartel provisions in the TOS to protect us. If the big dealers stubbornly refuse to drop prices on reduced demand, we could get into a stalemate situation. Before we could always go to the auctions ourselves, and drink from the same well as they do. No more. Now I'm even more worried. As well as being confused about the true nature and implications of these proposed non-auctions. |
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-13-2005 23:33
I believe they mean that if there are no bids, the land will remain on auction until there is a bid. But what then? Does it sell to that first $1000 bid ? Thats not an auction. Or then start running for 3 days more ? But why compete - just bid on a different one, since there is always a good selection available, and an unlimited supply. Why would there even be a second bid, unless the supply is limited ? This proposal really needs clarifying. The whole future direction of the SL economy hangs on it, yet its is as clear as mud. At least that's how it seems to me. |
Ardith Mifflin
Mecha Fiend
Join date: 5 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,416
|
07-13-2005 23:36
Oh dear, I'm so weak. I can't resist one more try. I'm not asking for SL to regulate something they are not involved in. They can't help being involved in the price. They are the manufacturer and supplier of this product. They face a steadily increasing demand (new players) and up until now they have met every week to make a decision. "How many sims shall we put up for auction". I'm not propose some interfering outside busybody sticks their nose in. I'm just trying to influence a decision they have had to make every week. Would you accuse a glove manufacturer of trying to regulate the price of gloves when he sets up his production schedule? The interesting thing coming out of this thread now, is that people are suggesting LL intend to change their strategy for control. Previously they regulated the supply, and let players decide the price in auction. This confused stuff I am now reading about an auction that is not an auction seems to imply that they are going to directly control the price instead. Instead of controlled supply with a freely determined price, we will get unlimited supply, but a controlled price. Is that it? Its not clear - this not-quite-an-auction confusion obscures it. If there really are an unlimited number of auctions to chose from, they are no longer auctions. Each person just bids the minimum $1000 on his own auction. Why should anyone then compete ? They just put in the same $1000 bid on one of their own. That would be just a disguised $1000 fixed price. If this is right, we are gaining less control, not more. A less realistic market not a more realistic one. A fixed wholesale price for all land. Small buyers excluded. Retail prices fixed by the margins a few big buyers choose. And no anti-monopoly or anti-cartel provisions in the TOS to protect us. If the big dealers stubbornly refuse to drop prices on reduced demand, we could get into a stalemate situation. Before we could always go to the auctions ourselves, and drink from the same well as they do. No more. Now I'm even more worried. As well as being confused about the true nature and implications of these proposed non-auctions. I'm afraid that I'm the one that is confused, now. You've been arguing this entire time that you believe that the Lindens need to act to stabilize the economy, but now you're suddenly arguing that the Lindens need to destabilize the economy to prevent the monopolization of the economy by a few individuals. It doesn't make any sense from a economic point of view. Artificially controlling the price of land, which is ultimately what this will accomplish, is exactly the remedy for the kind of fluctuations which you've been vehemently arguing against. It may ruin the fun for a couple of small-time speculators and hustlers, but it should be of widespread benefit to the rest of SL. At this stage in SL development, land must cease to be a scarce commodity or we risk alienating new users and halting the growth of the world. I don't believe that's a wise move, and I view these new auction rules as a strong step in ensuring that the greed and avarice of a few individuals does not stand in the way of the community prospering. Quite simply, strong price controls promote high volume of land sales by reducing the profit margins. The stalemate situation which you've forseen makes little sense, as any would-be land baron who attempts to sell the land for too much risks alienating his customers, who can just go to the auction and buy their own sim at the same wholesale rate. |
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
07-13-2005 23:44
Oh dear, I'm so weak. I can't resist one more try. I'm not asking for SL to regulate something they are not involved in. They can't help being involved in the price.. No, instead you wish to regulate availabilty.... suppy , demand, all that rot. Now when land prices were high, and supply was low, it was all 'free market , let the free market dictate the price!' Now the price is low it's 'No no, this is terrible, think of the newbs' Although how high priced land helps the newbs is totally beyond me... Or better still 'think of the disabled people who may or may not be playing secondlife' Siggy. _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
![]() Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
07-14-2005 00:00
/me grabs Siggy's hand
Everybody sing! There comes a time When we head a certain call When the world must come together as one There are people dying And it's time to lend a hand to life The greatest gift of all We can't go on Pretneding day by day That someone, somewhere will soon make a change We are all a part of God's great big family And the truth, you know love is all we need [Chorus] We are the world We are the children We are the ones who make a brighter day So let's start giving There's a choice we're making We're saving our own lives It's true we'll make a better day Just you and me Send them your heart So they'll know that someone cares And their lives will be stronger and free As God has shown us by turning stone to bread So we all must lend a helping hand [Chorus] We are the world We are the children We are the ones who make a brighter day So let's start giving There's a choice we're making We're saving our own lives It's true we'll make a better day Just you and me When you're down and out There seems no hope at all But if you just believe There's no way we can fall Well, well, well, well, let us realize That a change will only come When we stand together as one [Chorus] We are the world We are the children We are the ones who make a brighter day So let's start giving There's a choice we're making We're saving our own lives It's true we'll make a better day Just you and me ![]() _____________________
|
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
![]() Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
|
07-14-2005 00:17
Death to capitalist pigs! /me snorts with porcine indignation Say, now. I resent that! _____________________
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court. Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags? |
Alexa Hope
Registered User
Join date: 8 Dec 2004
Posts: 670
|
07-14-2005 00:19
Ellie
Combined with the brilliantly innovative step of persuading the "renter" to reimburse your entire land purchase price, and obligating him to find a substitute to take his place if he leaves. Despite his complete lack of any real ownership rights or enforceable contract, and his need for absolute obedience to his landlord, who can run off with the cash at any moment, with no violation even of the TOS. It shows us just how lawless and anarchic and ugly many people must think mainland SL is, that they find this so attractive. Personally the mainland offends me less, and attracts me more, each month. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ellie, this may occur on some islands but not on Hiro Queso's. I sold my land to rent from him and if I decide tomorrow that I no longer wish to do so, I inform Hiro and leave the island that day. No having to find someone to take over my bit of land. I love the island and have no plans to return to the mainland and purchase land. The island has a no malls or clubs or events policy and that is perfect as far as I am concerned. As for you panic selling your land, I don't understand your logic. If you hold onto it for a while, prices will rise again, as they have in the past, but obviously that is your choice. Alexa _____________________
Hiroland resident
|
Liberty Tesla
Perpetual Newbie
![]() Join date: 1 Sep 2003
Posts: 173
|
07-14-2005 00:28
But what then? Does it sell to that first $1000 bid ? Thats not an auction. Or then start running for 3 days more ? But why compete - just bid on a different one, since there is always a good selection available, and an unlimited supply. Why would there even be a second bid, unless the supply is limited ? This proposal really needs clarifying. The whole future direction of the SL economy hangs on it, yet its is as clear as mud. At least that's how it seems to me. Philip Linden: Also, we will stop trying to guess at the number of sims to put online in mainland auctions... Philip Linden: instead we will switch to a system where there is lots of land online, Philip Linden: and the first bid on a parcel triggers a 48 hour auction. Philip Linden: This will allow people to pick a plot of land, Philip Linden: make a first bid above a minimum to start the auction, Philip Linden: and then compete at auction as appropriate. |
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
![]() Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
07-14-2005 05:35
If you watch this thread very very closely knowing what is known about the admitted behavior of some posters in it, it is truly fascinating - almost an art form what has been done in this thread. Bravo. Indeed. I was thinking as much last night when I was posting. _____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-14-2005 07:01
The first bid starts a 48-hour "shot clock", and whoever enters the high bid by the end of that time, wins the auction. Here is the stranscript of Philip's Town Hall on the subject. Thankyou Liberty. The forum keyword search facility is recently not working for me, which is why I have been unable to dig this out for myself. Now I understand what is proposed, I need to go away and think. About why there would ever be a second bid if there are many of these auctions sitting waiting to be triggered, and whether in effect this is almost the same as a $1000 fixed price. For all the people thinking me inconsistent, I'm not. I am NOT asking for prices not to drop. I am asking for them to be STABILIZED. At what level is another matter. Its naive to think I am asking for some entirely new LL interference. They can't help interfering. Looks like now they have newly decided to fix the Goddam wholesale price, for heavens sake. What sort of interference is that ? Will they manipulate that to stabilise the economy ? Why did they pledge to work for stability, so vital for business growth in RL, if they now decide it doesn't matter ? I think fixing the wholesale price of all land will provide some stability, as controlling the supply did before. It is an alternative method. Maybe it will work. But its effect on the exchange rate will be more indirect, and that may start fluctuating more. If the control is passive, boom and bust cycles are likely to occur. Where are all the economics PHD's here ? Can someone properly analyse the likely outcomes for us? I'm a mere mathematician. |
Ellie Edo
Registered User
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,425
|
07-14-2005 07:20
Ellie, this may occur on some islands but not on Hiro Queso's. Absolutely, Alexa. Hiro's business is pure rental and none of my warnings or restrictions or criticisms apply. My concern is when the renter re-imburses the landlord for buying the sim, ie when he buys a lease, and yet never actually owns the land, or has any rights to any protection, despite this capital investment. LL have pointed out they will not interfere or punish a fraudulent landlord, and many people don't seem to realise this. Someone, sooner or later, will take advantage of this unless it is changed. So yes. Hiro's business I totally approve as safe and straightforward for the customer. If I disinvest from land myself, that is probably where I will go. I don't understand how he can do it without charging lots more than the LandLeasers, who get their purchase money back (and more? - I haven't checked) as soon as a renter appears. Time I updated my Land Business spreadsheet. (Which, incidentally, taught me not to get involved). |
Yanne Proudfoot
Registered User
Join date: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 19
|
A call for ALL new Land release to be URGENTLY SUSPENDED
07-14-2005 07:20
I too rent from Hiro Queso, it is the best decision I have made in SL. I have bought land in the past, had a wonderful home built (it was in a fairly new sim) and before I knew it I had a sex club on one side of my land and a dungeon on the other...don't get me wrong, I love the diversity of SL! But OMG! the lag, I couldn't even invite friends over!
I don't profess to understand about land economy, but I now live on a wonderful little island...no clubs, malls..The only real rule is no posting of events, which I can handle via invitations to friends. I didn't have to buy the island with Lindens or USD and pay tier..all I do is pay my tier to Hiro...I am allowed to create just as if I owned the island, no restrictions. Hiro Queso is very fair, caring landlord...and as long as he rents islands I will be his tenant! And if he makes a profit doing this, KUDOS to him. ![]() |
Travis Lambert
White dog, red collar
![]() Join date: 3 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,819
|
07-14-2005 08:05
I am not concerned.
Although, I do find it fascinating that there seem to be two polar-opposite styles of 'gameplay' here that are at odds. Neither side seems to be capable of empathizing with the other. And it ain't the first time. Maybe we'll have a civil war and split into two grids..... or not ![]() _____________________
------------------
The Shelter The Shelter is a non-profit recreation center for new residents, and supporters of new residents. Our goal is to provide a positive & supportive social environment for those looking for one in our overwhelming world. |
Jellin Pico
Grumpy Oldbie
![]() Join date: 3 Aug 2003
Posts: 1,037
|
07-14-2005 08:24
Here's another reason I think it does matter. Is it fair that two new players, arriving here four months apart, should have entirely different land-purchase costs when each comes to the natural point to spread themselves a little? Probably by a factor of three? The lucky get gets three times the land for his money. They then sit there for the next three years (never dealing) but one has an estate three times bigger than the other ? . No, it's not fair that one poor guy had to pay outrageous prices because he bought before the prices dropped. The prices should have been rock bottom to begin with. Hopefully the land market will crumble and everyone getting into the game in the future will be able to easily get as much land as they want at affordable prices. _____________________
![]() ![]() Jellin, you are soooooo FIC! Fabulous, Intelligent and Cute |
Jellin Pico
Grumpy Oldbie
![]() Join date: 3 Aug 2003
Posts: 1,037
|
07-14-2005 08:27
A deflationary cycle is highly destructive in any free market, which is what we're going through right now. It causes panic sales and pushes people the sidelines in terms of purchases to wait for it to settle down .. which just causes a downward deflationary spiral, not to mention nobody does anything for fear of losing their investment, and we are left with a stale, dying world that just depresses people. Or, everyone can afford a good chunk of land and the future market lies with products and services, not land speculation. _____________________
![]() ![]() Jellin, you are soooooo FIC! Fabulous, Intelligent and Cute |
Anshe Chung
Business Girl
Join date: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1,615
|
07-14-2005 15:18
It is very troublesome when you do marketing and advertise something as "investment" and then let it devalue.
Now I meet people at regular basis who are very unhappy with Linden Lab. They bought land a while ago and, for whatever reason, need to sell it now. They realize they lost hundreds of US$ just for playing one game for two months. I heared quite a few comments that I better not quote here ![]() Some people left Second Life or decided not to buy land anymore after "being burned once" ![]() This weekend I just liquidated yet another huge land baron: 400000 sqm of land that had been sitting priced outside market is now flooding in, increasing land for sale by 15% within just a few days. _____________________
ANSHECHUNG.COM: Buy land - Sell land - Rent land - Sell sim - Rent store - Earn L$ - Buy L$ - Sell L$
SLEXCHANGE.COM: Come join us on Second Life's most popular website for shopping addicts. Click, buy and smile ![]() |