Overzealous Security and Rude Landowners
|
|
Ranma Tardis
沖縄弛緩の明確で青い水
Join date: 8 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,415
|
07-17-2006 04:49
From: Seola Sassoon Oh and even though you aren't giving any details cause you don't want to, I will glady post some of my info because I am easily able to have proof of military and flight info, whereas, you are lacking. It's not straight out of Lackland, he started at Lackland, but was sent off to Keesler, then to RAFB, and now currently somewhere in the West (no I won't tell you that one, you seem the stalker type). ETA: fixed silly html bracket. You are a sad person and I am adding you to my ignore and mute listings. I would rather stalk a garbage truck than you. Just because the Air Force teaches you something does not make it true. The flight rules for civilians are very different from the military. Also learn to lighten up, you will ruin your health with all of your stress! From: Seola Sassoon Women in the army have ZERO tough jobs. I know, my ex-husband was Army. (Stationed out of Fort Benning.) When I considered enlisting, no challenging jobs were available. Also, Army accepts ANYONE. My congrats to your ex and you do not know what you are talking about! You do not know my job and you do not know me. *shanks head sadly* Good Luck in your USAF career because you are going to need it! Well goodbye Airman and once again Good luck!!!
|
|
Ranma Tardis
沖縄弛緩の明確で青い水
Join date: 8 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,415
|
07-17-2006 04:59
From: Ryan00 Odets God you make me ill with your stupidity and assumptions. I am hoping your not refering to me on the fort rucker comment? As for cadets being lower in the miltary structure as responed to above you are wrong! I did my time dealing with cadets at Fort Lewis WA. during summer camp training for them. Insult a cadet and it will comeback to bite you in the ass. My best friend at the time made a joke about a cadets name and the very next yr guess who was in charge of him that cadet that had just graduated and commisioned. He paid for the simple joke for months, before approaching the officer and made amends. Yes technically that was abuse of power but it happens the Officer didnt really do anything quite over the line but just enough to make his life hell. I never said anything was wrong with flying helicopters. See just another ploy to make yourself appear intelligent. Now I am done with you and your ignorance..why dont you go and fly your plane instead of proving yourself to be a utter and total bean head! I stand corrected Seola you are right I got the variation mixed up with the army. As for the Army being the worst branch of service, well if it wasnt for the Army Air Corp the Air Force wouldnt exisist. But you are allowed your opinion but plz refrain from implyin all Army personel are total morons. I take offense to that. No you didnt outright call Army people morons but you did imply it. Oh yea the pay was good, considering the military paid all my badic bills, ex.. utility, food, medical, and dental plus they paid me for vacation. Edited to add somethings I missed.. No I will not insult myself Hooah! Well one down and one to go! The same as the above will apply to you. You need to lighten up and why the sign "just a stupid redneck" if you don't want feedback? Fort Rucker is in the heart of the southern countryside or what is often refered to as rednecks. About cadets, making jokes about them where your superiors can hear you is not very smart. Never make jokes of cadets from the academy. They will never forgive you and that goes for the other services as well. Goodbye and Good Luck to you!
|
|
Tiger Zobel
hoarder
Join date: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 391
|
07-17-2006 05:11
From: Alex Fitzsimmons It's not two wrongs. I don't do it out of revenge, to "get back at them." I do it reluctantly in order to remove the attacker so that I and others are no longer under a sustained assault. You would probably be surprised at how restrained I am. And needless to say, I can count on one hand the number of times I've used my orbiter seriously (as opposed to consensual playing with a friend). As far as it goes, LL apparently agrees with me since, at the very least, Mistress had occasion to orbit a griefer who attacked the club we were dancing in and then reported both the attack and Her response. (A lot of others reported the griefer as well, since it was an attack on a crowd.) The griefer shortly disappeared and didn't come back. No action whatsoever was taken against Mistress. See... now you're clarifying what you said earlier. If you'd mentioned such details in the first place, a lot of the back and forth between us could have been avoided. Case in point, up until this post, the impression your posts were giving was that you were rather trigger-happy and orbitted griefers all the time... From: someone Most do. Some do not, and yes, I've personally experienced the latter. The ones that give a delay often give a very SHORT delay -- get snagged on an obstacle or happen to commit the crime of having a slow system that bogs down loading stuff sometimes, and you might get hit. That's not exactly kosher in my book, at least. *cue the standard responses* "only the inexperienced will be unable to leave the area before xx seconds have passed, so it's their fault" "If you get snagged, it's your own fault" "If you suffer lag, get a better computer" Now that those are out of the way, I can reply seriously... as orbs are used as privacy/anti-griefing tools, users have 2 nasty problems to deal with. 1: Set the delay too low, and annoy the innocent passerby... Set it too high, and it's no longer an anti-griefing tool. 2: Have the range too low, and not have it covering the area you want it to cover... (been there... ended up with a fairly large chunk being unprotected. Not what you want from an anti-griefing tool) Have the range too high, and seriously annoy passerbys/violate ToS. With those two in mind, it's pretty easy to understand how hard it can be getting it just right... and when you get people telling you that you need to increase the delay/reduce the protected area simply because some users have failed to solve those problems, it's also easy to see why orb users get very annoyed. (Case in point... Me being lumped in with griefers simply because I use an orb set to 30M radius with an 8 second delay up at 300M on a very fast, lag free sim...) From: someone There was no poll asking how people felt about being teleported home. Don't speculate. From: someone Speculating is fun... in fact, speculating that simply because one of the options can be taken to mean someone is against orbs when that is only conditional means that they are against orbs when those conditions aren't met is a lot of fun... Kindly don't ask me to refrain from what you yourself have done... From: someone And as far as it goes, I'm among the 70 percent. I believe there are responsible applications of security systems, just as I believe there are responsible applications of orbiters. My issue is that too many seem to feel that security-orb owners don't need to be held responsible for how they use their devices. I believe that users of any attack device -- whether personal orbiters, guns, or security orbs -- need to be held responsible for how they use them. Funny... but we seem to agree there. What we don't agree on is how to deal with the irresponsible/inexperienced users. You seem to be on the "Ban the swines and burn their property to the ground" side of the line, while I'm on the "coddle them and help them see the errors of their ways" side... (please note that I exaggerated here for comic effect, not because I truely believe that those statements are indicative of your position) Maybe a middle line would be better... give them some advice on using it responsibly/help on setting it up properly before slapping them with a griefer label. From: someone Simply put, there is a right (responsible) way, and there is a wrong way. Yes, I know LL currently gives griefing with security orbs a free pass, but we're talking here about what ought to be, not what is. Actually, LL doesn't... If orbs push outside the parcel boundries, it griefing and they do come down on it. Other than that, they'd prefer that push wasn't used at all, (something I agree with 100% unless it's rented land and the landlord hasn't given you access to the eject landtool... had that before too) they'd prefer a warning but it isn't required and that they'd prefer people not to use tp home. (that, I fully agree with...) As you can see... it's not quite a free pass after all...
|
|
Ryan00 Odets
just a stupid redneck!
Join date: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 289
|
07-17-2006 15:03
No I get the last word!
_____________________
~~~~~~~ryan00~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://forums.secondcitizen.com/
|
|
Seola Sassoon
NCD owner
Join date: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,036
|
07-17-2006 15:42
From: Ranma Tardis You are a sad person and I am adding you to my ignore and mute listings. I would rather stalk a garbage truck than you. Just because the Air Force teaches you something does not make it true. The flight rules for civilians are very different from the military. Also learn to lighten up, you will ruin your health with all of your stress! Is that cause you need to scrounge for food? lol And darlin', I don't think it's me who needs to lighten up, all you ever post are complaints. From: someone My congrats to your ex and you do not know what you are talking about! You do not know my job and you do not know me. *shanks head sadly* Good Luck in your USAF career because you are going to need it! Well goodbye Airman and once again Good luck!!! My congrats on idiot of the day! I still have not said I have served. You STILL seem to think you know it all. This might be why you have a know it all attitude, you read partial information, THEN decide you know EVERYTHING. And please, shank your head again, that's hilarious. And know I don't know your job, but YOU said you love YOUR job defending our country, which obviously would make you military. So you are simply lying about everything darling. Trust me, life is much simpler when you can tell the truth! Then you don't get caught in lies and have to steep to insults when someone proves you wrong. I do love how you like to reply without reading the full of what is said. Again, military pilots in planes (not helos of course, which is what you seem to imply you are into, or your husband or something or other, maybe it's a dog too, who knows?), they HAVE to learn civilian flight information too. In fact, a way you can do it WITHOUT being a cadet is to get certification from civilian classes and teachers, and logging flight hours with a civilian, THEN cross over. But of course, I am sure you knew that, being that you know everything (even though you don't know basic common military knowledge, nor seem to know military procedure). Oh, btw, no comment on your VFR lowbie flying? You can't even fly at night or in clouds! lol Let alone give training. Called you out! Neener neener!  Another no comment on NOT knowing cadets can't be married? In fact, no rebuttal whatsoever on anything I have proven you wrong in. Silence is more than golden in my argument. *blows kisses* *greatly anticipates another hilarious posting from the oblivious patho*
|
|
Seola Sassoon
NCD owner
Join date: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,036
|
07-17-2006 15:50
From: Alex Fitzsimmons God, I've already half-forgotten how this stuff is listed, but ... AFSC 3N051. Public affairs newspaper staff. Actually, I loved my job. My concern has far more to do with conclusions I've come to regarding our nation's history and present course via independent research than anything to do with my experiences while I served. Oh, TIS was four years, and yes, I was in when 9/11 hit. I shot them and left them alive and unhurt, actually. The pay was fine. Not the problem.  That was actually a part I considered serving in. I love that kind of stuff. I totally understand where you can come into your own thoughts, many have. It just seemed the way you said it, that you gleaned that opinion from being Air Force. I also agree, there are many other jobs that are quite as unrewarding as US military. One I hold high is anything in education. Especially the way some parents raise their children now, but ultimately, paying back student loans on a teacher's salary is impossible, since their overall pay is junk, even more so when you consider recent inflation in not only things like gas, but interest rates on student loans. The pay is 'alright' I would say. Depending on the career field and prior stuff. Techs get junk compared to the rest of the civies. What he does, he can easily make more, but then again, no job offers full medical.  Then again, you can't sue them if they screw up lol. I don't think staying enlisted would have been a good thing for pay, but retiring as an officer, the benefits are defintely nice. Major catalyst for us to make that decision, especially considering we want a large family. 
|
|
Alex Fitzsimmons
Resu Deretsiger
Join date: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,605
|
07-17-2006 16:13
From: Tiger Zobel Actually, LL doesn't... If orbs push outside the parcel boundries, it griefing and they do come down on it. Other than that, they'd prefer that push wasn't used at all, (something I agree with 100% unless it's rented land and the landlord hasn't given you access to the eject landtool... had that before too) they'd prefer a warning but it isn't required and that they'd prefer people not to use tp home. (that, I fully agree with...) As you can see... it's not quite a free pass after all... They don't? I was under the impression that LL didn't take any action at all against security-orb griefers, but maybe I was mistaken. What's their stance on no-warning teleport-home orbs? Mistress and I got hit by one of those just the other day while we were out walking a sim (just for a change of pace and because She needed to sort some things out in Her head -- drama, you know). One moment we're walking along, the next, poof. Teleported. I guess it's experiences like that that make me tense up when I see people defending these things. Maybe LL acts against such people when they're reported, but I've yet to see any evidence of it.
_____________________
"Whatever the astronomers finally decide, I think Xena should be considered the enemy planet." - io Kukalcan
|
|
Ranma Tardis
沖縄弛緩の明確で青い水
Join date: 8 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,415
|
07-17-2006 16:26
From: Alex Fitzsimmons They don't? I was under the impression that LL didn't take any action at all against security-orb griefers, but maybe I was mistaken. What's their stance on no-warning teleport-home orbs? Mistress and I got hit by one of those just the other day while we were out walking a sim (just for a change of pace and because She needed to sort some things out in Her head -- drama, you know). One moment we're walking along, the next, poof. Teleported. I guess it's experiences like that that make me tense up when I see people defending these things. Maybe LL acts against such people when they're reported, but I've yet to see any evidence of it. I dont think they do anything either. I dont know how many times have been hit by push attacks either by a security orb without warning or a griefer with a push weapon. Perhaps my Red Tarn makes a nice target for griefers. As far as I know the Lindens never did a thing to the residents responsible. Update 09:21pm *Would like to say I did not respond to their rude flames. I wonder if all USAF are so rude?*
|
|
Frank Genosse
Registered User
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 3
|
I think security orbs and such are ok
07-17-2006 16:57
as long as they have a reason to use it like griefers causing trouble, but i dont like the fact that ppl have objects for public use but their land defense systems kick all who are on it cept for thier group or whatever.
|
|
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
07-17-2006 16:59
From: Frank Genosse as long as they have a reason to use it like griefers causing trouble, but i dont like the fact that ppl have objects for public use but their land defense systems kick all who are on it cept for thier group or whatever. That means they aren't public use and you're mistaken.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
|
|
SuezanneC Baskerville
Forums Rock!
Join date: 22 Dec 2003
Posts: 14,229
|
07-17-2006 18:57
I keep reading this thread's title as "rude lawnmowers".
_____________________
-
So long to these forums, the vBulletin forums that used to be at forums.secondlife.com. I will miss them.
I can be found on the web by searching for "SuezanneC Baskerville", or go to
http://www.google.com/profiles/suezanne
-
http://lindenlab.tribe.net/ created on 11/19/03.
Members: Ben, Catherine, Colin, Cory, Dan, Doug, Jim, Philip, Phoenix, Richard, Robin, and Ryan
-
|
|
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
Overzealous Flyers and Rude Trespassers
07-17-2006 21:31
This title is more appropriate.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
|
|
Maklin Deckard
Disillusioned
Join date: 9 Apr 2005
Posts: 459
|
07-17-2006 21:39
From: Lewis Nerd What about me being willing to stand up for the right of those who like to explore freely the whole grid for the pure purpose of pleasure?
You can yell for the rights of landowners to do what they like with their land - but I'm quite sure that if the landowner next to you made a 100m tall bright purple fully illuminated glowing tower that ruined your view and tainted the colour of everything in your house (and half the sim), you'd soon have something to say about it, even though they are "doing what they like" with their land.
Have you seen what's next to my property? Do I like it? Not one little bit. Can I do anything about it? Nope.
Lewis Sorry, but when YOU are paying the RL $$$$ for his tier, THEN you can require free passage over his land. He may be rude and come off like a paranoid survivalist, but Jonas is paying the bills for his land if if he doesn't want anyone exploring over it, its his call. Those USD he spends for it buy him that right to restrict others on his land, same as your USD spent give you the right to allow free and open access to your land.
|
|
Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
|
07-17-2006 23:15
From: Maklin Deckard Sorry, but when YOU are paying the RL $$$$ for his tier, THEN you can require free passage over his land. Ah that old chestnut... didn't work last time someone tried to pull that card, and doesn't work this time either. Let's say you've made a fantastic looking house in the middle of a beautiful garden. You have a security system so I can't get onto your land, but I can look from a distance and enjoy your creation. Does that mean I should be paying to simply look at your land and its contents from a distance? If you reply yes, then either you totally misunderstand why people create things, and the way SL works. If you reply no, then what's the difference between looking at the content from ground level, or from above as you fly over? A dislike of griefers coming on to your property, leaving crap (which can be autoreturned), harrassing you (which you'd actually need to be there to realise) or using push weapons is one thing.... which I would support. Lumping everyone in the same pot and ejecting them from your little plot of land with insufficient or no warning, for no reason, is the problem I am trying to address here - and so far nobody has actually provided a suitable answer as to why they feel the need to do that. "Because I can" or "It's my land" is NOT justification. Lewis
|
|
Devlin Gallant
Thought Police
Join date: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 5,948
|
07-18-2006 03:58
Sure it is.
_____________________
I LIKE children, I've just never been able to finish a whole one.
|
|
Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
|
07-18-2006 04:13
From: Devlin Gallant Sure it is. No it's not. Lewis
|
|
Warda Kawabata
Amityville Horror
Join date: 4 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,300
|
07-18-2006 04:19
From: Lewis Nerd No it's not.
Lewis I'm sorry, this is getting hit on the head lessons. Arguments are next floor up.
|
|
Ranma Tardis
沖縄弛緩の明確で青い水
Join date: 8 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,415
|
07-18-2006 04:34
From: Warda Kawabata I'm sorry, this is getting hit on the head lessons. Arguments are next floor up. Being RUDE seems to be the new fad. I suppose this goes along with the gangster rap that is so popular in the host country. Still say the only way to deal with rude landowners is to give them a taste of their own medicine and ban them in return! It is not out of spite but to correct their offensive actions and help them grow as people 
|
|
Kokoro Fasching
Pixie Dust and Sugar
Join date: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 949
|
07-18-2006 04:57
From: Lewis Nerd "Because I can" or "It's my land" is NOT justification.
Actually, it is justification - to the person making the justification. Just like harrasement, it is the individual that makes the determination, not everyone else around. No one else has to agree with the justification, but that doesn't make it any less valid.
|
|
Devlin Gallant
Thought Police
Join date: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 5,948
|
07-18-2006 05:12
From: Lewis Nerd No it's not.Lewis Yes it is! Neener, neener, neeeeenerrrr!
_____________________
I LIKE children, I've just never been able to finish a whole one.
|
|
Ranma Tardis
沖縄弛緩の明確で青い水
Join date: 8 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,415
|
07-18-2006 05:42
From: Kokoro Fasching Actually, it is justification - to the person making the justification. Just like harrasement, it is the individual that makes the determination, not everyone else around. No one else has to agree with the justification, but that doesn't make it any less valid.[/QUOT Well when RUDE expect rude treatment in return. If you show some consideration you just might recieve some in return. Life is a give and take relationship.
|
|
Tiger Zobel
hoarder
Join date: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 391
|
07-18-2006 05:58
From: Ranma Tardis Well when RUDE expect rude treatment in return. If you show some consideration you just might recieve some in return. Life is a give and take relationship.
Considering how you take every compromise people make and give nothing but a lot of whine, I'd say you should be expecting people to be rude to you... It'd just be returning the favour...  From: Ranma Tardis Still say the only way to deal with rude landowners is to give them a taste of their own medicine and ban them in return! It is not out of spite but to correct their offensive actions and help them grow as people  Saying that you're banning someone and justifying it by saying "If I can't fly then you can't either" is just rude and spiteful... Which is why I've not banned anyone.
|
|
Ranma Tardis
沖縄弛緩の明確で青い水
Join date: 8 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,415
|
07-18-2006 06:20
From: Tiger Zobel Considering how you take every compromise people make and give nothing but a lot of whine, I'd say you should be expecting people to be rude to you... It'd just be returning the favour... Saying that you're banning someone and justifying it by saying "If I can't fly then you can't either" is just rude and spiteful... Which is why I've not banned anyone. Trying to make a point oh RUDE one. You want to have a secure lot but still be able to fly over others land. You have made no compromising and that includes your alts. Anyway I did not start this by banning peaceful residents using security orbs in the guise of protecting themselves. I call again for peaceful residents to close their airspace to no warning security orb and white list users. Just like them you need no reason to close your airspace to any resident! In RL a country that closes its airspace to anothers aircraft will have the same done to them. It is not quite the same but close enough for me.
|
|
Kokoro Fasching
Pixie Dust and Sugar
Join date: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 949
|
07-18-2006 06:40
From: Ranma Tardis From: Kokoro Fasching Actually, it is justification - to the person making the justification. Just like harrasement, it is the individual that makes the determination, not everyone else around. No one else has to agree with the justification, but that doesn't make it any less valid.[/QUOT Well when RUDE expect rude treatment in return. If you show some consideration you just might recieve some in return. Life is a give and take relationship. I'm sorry - where did I talk about being rude at all? Please show where I was talking about attitudes at all - rather, what I was saying is to try and understand that each person has different perceptions and justifications. You may not agree with them, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
|
|
Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
|
07-18-2006 06:48
From: Ranma Tardis In RL a country that closes its airspace to anothers aircraft will have the same done to them. It is not quite the same but close enough for me. That's usually a step or two before an official declaration of hostilities. In SL terms, that's griefing from security system users getting griefed back from the people they are affecting. Lewis
|