Thanks. And exactly my point. This can be just the start of LL taking over what content creators has made popular item categories.
The only reason people wont see this is becuase as you say.....right now THEY are not the ones who are getting their financial basis wiped by unfair competition from LL.
I actually DO understand that OnRez users want a replacement for the vendors they had there. A very nice solution from OnRez btw. But since LL dont wanna let OnRez continue then the only decent way to deal with this is to make it possible for the existing vendor creators to make those vendors for that.
The only reason people wont see this is becuase as you say.....right now THEY are not the ones who are getting their financial basis wiped by unfair competition from LL.
I actually DO understand that OnRez users want a replacement for the vendors they had there. A very nice solution from OnRez btw. But since LL dont wanna let OnRez continue then the only decent way to deal with this is to make it possible for the existing vendor creators to make those vendors for that.
I do wish you would quit using the word "competition" though, Zep. Competition is a good thing. But when it is LL it isn't competition. Trust me, if LL releases a networked vendor system they will not do it with competition in mind. Everyone will be *required* to use it. That is not competition. It is the point Snickers doesn't get, and will hold true for any sort of content LL decides to produce to *replace* (not compete with) existing resident-created content.
