...I also liked how OnRez DIDN'T take a commission on sales. Will SL incorporated that feature?
Sorry Doc... LL is keeping the commission structure in place. Sucks for the merchants.
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Xstreet SL and OnRez to Join Linden Lab! |
|
Stiggs McMinnar
Registered User
Join date: 6 Nov 2008
Posts: 6
|
01-21-2009 08:38
...I also liked how OnRez DIDN'T take a commission on sales. Will SL incorporated that feature? Sorry Doc... LL is keeping the commission structure in place. Sucks for the merchants. |
Vryl Valkyrie
Owner of 3D Concepts
![]() Join date: 30 May 2006
Posts: 257
|
01-21-2009 08:38
You're absolutely correct. LL is within their rights to be as monopolistic inworld as they want. I just think it's bad for merchants and residents. That's all. If you think it is so bad, then blaim Virtuatrade and Electric Sheep Company for selling out and not for Linden Lab for seizing a good business opportunity. Better yet, create your own trade site. Personally, I just get tired of all the Linden bashing when people are clueless to the why's here. Stop assuming the worst. Linden Lab is not the big bad wolf who is out to eat you. If you hate it so much then leave. Otherwise, try to be a bit positive. _____________________
Visit 3D Concepts for the best professional legal and licensed textures in SL: http://slurl.com/secondlife/3D%20Concepts/128/225/31
|
Darien Caldwell
Registered User
![]() Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
|
01-21-2009 08:39
After having had a chance to sleep on this. I can see possible ways it could be beneficial. However, I can also see ways it could be detrimental. It will all depend on how LL implements it. And given their past track record, I don't expect they will be giving residents what they want. So still negative overall.
*waits to see how long before all adult categories are removed from XStreet.* _____________________
|
Kely Streeter
Registered User
Join date: 4 Jun 2007
Posts: 10
|
01-21-2009 08:40
I also liked how OnRez DIDN'T take a commission on sales. Will SL incorporated that feature? I'm guessing this is why they are going with Street not Onrez. |
Michelle Morphett
Metamorph Maven
![]() Join date: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 28
|
01-21-2009 08:40
My wishlist for XStreet SL improvements ...
1) A "Skybox" Category ... I've asked Xstreet SL staff over an over for a specific category for skyboxes, and it's always "at the top of the to-do list." This is my NUMBER ONE NEED in XStreet. 2) Ability to Group Similar Products for Updates ... I have many products that are 20 copies of the same thing in different sizes or colors. Xstreet's template feature is a first step, but I'd like to see a better model for grouping nearly identical products so that I can update them all at once, instead of taking half an hour to add a note to the text of each of them, or to change the price or the photo on them all individually. In particular, I've found a need for a "grouped" text section and a separate section that's info specific to that particular item. And, as I have hundreds of products, make this something I can use for managing existing listings, not just new ones as the current templates are. 3) Ability to Categorize Products in a "Storefront" ... I oftentimes send people directly to a XStreet search for my name, which then shows all of my products at once. Instead of the chaos of hundreds of products all listed alphabetically, I'd prefer a "storefront" concept that lets me present my items to my customers by theme ... a folder for skyboxes, for scripts, for furniture, etc. 4) Make New Product/Image Uploads Faster ... this is my number one time waster. 5) Tracking XStreet & SL Income Separately ... from the FAQ on this, I see you're planning on merging SL and XStreet accounts and combining the L$ balances of both. XStreet's tracking of sales and income is much superior to SL's, whose 1-month archive limit is frustrating for real businesspeople. Also, having my XStreet sales wrapped into my SL transaction record would make it very difficult for me to pull my SL and XStreet sales apart, so I can see how much I'm making from each venue. Thanks for listening! _____________________
![]() Visit us at Undiscovered (128, 120, 403) ![]() |
DolphPun Somme
The Pun is its own reword
Join date: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 309
|
01-21-2009 08:41
Please leave the forums at Xstreet/slX alone. I don't come here anymore because all the "fun" of visiting the forums was removed when you took out general discussion, etc.
However I don't like the fact that SL seems that SL is no longer a group effort involving a wide variety of companies and people... now it is just LL. _____________________
|
Velvet Beaumont
Registered User
Join date: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 1
|
01-21-2009 08:41
Some things I'd like to see:
1)Anyone with a SL account would be able to buy from Xstreet without having to register for an account there, by just by using their SL acct. 2) The ability to sell directly from my own website to anyone with a SL account via the dropboxes I use for Xstreet. 3) Lower commission for premium SL members selling on Xstreet, even none, since we're already paying for SL services and this is now under that "umbrella". |
BW Jinxing
Registered User
Join date: 2 Oct 2006
Posts: 7
|
Dear LL
01-21-2009 08:42
I think this is a ligement question. How much did LL spend for both xstreetsl and Onrez?
|
Jeep Tenk
Registered User
Join date: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 469
|
X-street > PayPal revisited...
01-21-2009 08:43
I have a couple of questions - along with lots of other people:
1)Will X-street US$ withdrawals to PayPal be left unchanged - at the speed and fees we know today? 2)Will VAT be added for European merchants, making it harder for us to compete on X-street? (as it already is in the private land business) I know there is not much hope of an answer to these questions; but we can at least try. |
Doc Kyger
Registered User
![]() Join date: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 13
|
01-21-2009 08:44
You're absolutely correct. LL is within their rights to be as monopolistic inworld as they want. I just think it's bad for merchants and residents. That's all. Corporations (and governments) big or small will always move in the direction of their own best interests regardless of of the effect on the public or the world. The only thing that keeps any of them in check is 'self interest" and the power of the buyer or voter. If whichever of those 'checks & balances' losses its power then there is no longer anything to hold back the natural progression of the entity toward what they perceive as their own best interests. |
Doc Wrangler
Registered User
Join date: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 2
|
01-21-2009 08:44
Linden Lab:
Please reconsider shutting down OnRez. Their in-world vendor service -- where merchants can put their products into merchant packs and then link them to their own customizable in-world vendors -- isn't available on XStreet. I will lose a very valuable tool for selling my work in SL. XStreet is not a replacement for me. I understand that XStreet is much bigger than OnRez, but OnRez is by far the better system. I'm not thrilled with LL buying these services in the first place, but if you must, find a way to integrate the OnRez in-world vendor system into XStreet first. |
Doc Kyger
Registered User
![]() Join date: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 13
|
01-21-2009 08:48
If you think it is so bad, then blaim Virtuatrade and Electric Sheep Company for selling out and not for Linden Lab for seizing a good business opportunity. .... If you hate it so much then leave. Otherwise, try to be a bit positive. Hum. "My country love it or leave it." Where have I heard this before? ![]() |
Noirran Marx
Registered User
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 444
|
01-21-2009 08:50
From a seller standpoint:
1. Keep the XStreet forums, would be nice if you didn't censor them or cut off the ability to add links and pictures. Announcing new products is useless on the "official SL forums" because of this. 2. Incorporate the OnRez item listing interface or one like it into XStreet. As a seller, the batch editing for listings rules. XStreet's does not...well there isn't any batch editing on XStreet so you kinda get my point. If you want to list or delete a few items on XStreet you gotta pack a lunch because you are going to be there awhile. 3. I personally don't want to use my SL password for my XStreet account, I do not want them migrated together. Not everyone uses their Second Life AV name for their XStreet account. I don't see how you will handle failed transactions and LL transfers better than the XStreet staff, the occasions I have seen this inworld, unless the av had a paid account they were waiting a few weeks for you to get around to giving them their lindens. On the good side, having XStreet search ability incorporated into the SL Search will be a great thing. |
AAngel Braveheart
Registered User
Join date: 5 Nov 2008
Posts: 12
|
Fair Trade or Meglomaniac Monopoly
01-21-2009 08:50
To buy up the major competitors maybe keeping on with Microsoft's megalomaniac plans;
but in England -such a monopoly might be referred to the Dept Trade & Industries Monopolies Commission. Its not in the best interest of fair competition or the customers. |
Vryl Valkyrie
Owner of 3D Concepts
![]() Join date: 30 May 2006
Posts: 257
|
01-21-2009 08:50
Hum. "My country love it or leave it." Where have I heard this before. ![]() This is not a country. It is an online 3D virtual program owned by a corporation called Linden Lab. _____________________
Visit 3D Concepts for the best professional legal and licensed textures in SL: http://slurl.com/secondlife/3D%20Concepts/128/225/31
|
Quiet Sinatra
Registered User
Join date: 5 Jan 2007
Posts: 3
|
01-21-2009 08:51
Hey FlameRose, We will be keeping the commission and most other features of Xstreet. We will also look at additional ways to help merchants sell their goods and services. I apologize that you'll be losing a free service, but I've seen evidence that Xstreet supplies well more value to the merchants than they pay back in fees. And those fees allow us to provide that service and value. For us to succeed, our merchants have to succeed, so we'll do what we can to provide you new services to help you in that endeavor at reasonable rates to support those services. Thanks for the input --Colossus Imagine that, the Lindens see far more service provided than the fees charged. What a surprise that they buy two services and kill the free one. OTOH, LL always claims they are doing great moneywise then they add another way of getting more money out of its most active residents. |
Terri Razor
Registered User
Join date: 3 Sep 2008
Posts: 11
|
Hippo ??? With Xstreet ??
01-21-2009 08:53
Somewhere as i was reading i saw mention of Hippo working with Xstreet.
This is the first I have ever heard of this. If anyone has more information please post it so that we can read this. I still agree with everyone that the OnRez Vendor system should be kept up and running in SL. LL please do not take this awesome feature away from the people who have spent hours setting up their merchandise. Now your going to make us spend more hours setting it up all over again which is totally NOT COOL. |
Liam Tairov
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 58
|
Search censorship
01-21-2009 08:55
The search option is SL is TERRIBLE. I hate having to use it for shopping. I will either buy a product via Xstreet or hope that the merchant bothered to post an in-world location. I always tell people to use Xstreet to find what they're looking for. But, it makes no sense to have to go outside of SL in order to shop for something inside of SL. ! Also the search functions in SLX and OnRez didn't seem to be censored. Try searching for "Poker" using the search option in SL. I wonder if the SL new search rules will apply to the new SLX. |
Darkness Anubis
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,628
|
01-21-2009 08:57
My take on this
The L$ exchange on XStreet will be a thing of the past as will XStreet directly doing the paypal transfers. It makes absolutely no sense for LL to maintain 2 separate monetary exchanges and paypal systems. I do STRONGLY suggest the folks at LL have some serious conversations with the XStreet folks and find out what they do to expidite paypal transfers. It might be that LL can learn how to make thier own system MUCH more efficient I do think LL needs to be a bit careful in how many 3rd party sites they swallow up. Competition is actually a good thing. It drives innovation. |
Pol McLaglen
Registered User
Join date: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 12
|
01-21-2009 08:58
Only the successful ones ![]() Or, as LL put it in the FAQs: Is Linden Lab considering acquiring additional Resident-owned businesses? Linden Lab has always employed a strategy wherein we create a platform and let our Residents build product offerings on top of that platform. We enjoy seeing the success some of our Residents have achieved, and we only examine business relationships with Resident-owned businesses when we believe integrating a Resident-created product offering into our core platform will drastically improve our Residents' experience. So Javier Puff had better watch out in case Linden Lab effectively "de-knacker" him? ![]() |
Proxima Saenz
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 107
|
01-21-2009 09:00
This is not a country. It is an online 3D virtual program owned by a corporation called Linden Lab. I think your mind is a bit clouded. Every human being can conclude that the Lab lacks several things. Service...? A stable grid? ''Unpleasant'' surprises? |
Tebow McMillan
Registered User
Join date: 3 Apr 2007
Posts: 15
|
SL... Consistently contemptuous
01-21-2009 09:01
SL has been proving itself to be very unreliable and a cause for stress, anxiety, and lack of FUN that most of us had come on here for. Now you take away the stores that allowed us to have a little bit of a breather from LL's rather disgustingly tight grip on the prices of everything inworld. First, it was the constant/near constant database failures, then it was the extreme and *UNNECESSARY* price hikes to not only the sims people may want to buy, but also the exchange rate. Now, it is taking away that freedom. Do you guys have any sense of humanity left? Any? Or are you just trying to find as many ways to rip off YOUR CUSTOMERS as possible? Because you're doing a bang up job. How about instead of ripping us off, go back to the excellent service that used to be, where prices were reasonable and service was good. We all need an escape from RL or we want someplace to expand our horizons creatively (or for some rather pathetic folks, dig into the dark sides of infidelity and sex *rolls eyes*). Your place was said to offer that and be affordable. Now, like any once enjoyable commodity, it has gone down the tubes with greed and incompetence. WAKE UP LL! STOP THINKING WITH YOUR WALLETS AND START THINKING WITH YOUR BRAINS AND HEARTS! That has been proven time and time again, to be the PRIMARY objective of LL. Me thinks they often forget the hands that FEED them... How about fixing your own mess before making a mess of services that actually do work, the only reason xstreet is ever down is because of LL's database not being able to hack it. I only give you a few hundred dollars a month but would be more impressed with the acquisition of decent database software and not the freest thing you can find. Not Impressed. Agreed Ewan... their "Search" cesspool would be an EXCELLENT start! How about defunct sites? Keyword abuse? What's wrong with honoring creativity, hard work, supporting those who ACTUALLY provide GOOD service (i.e. the higher the popularity/traffic, the better the position on the search listing)? Wouldn't THAT more aptly encourage a higher and better quality commercial experience? Some business owners forget that THEY need US... there are PLENTY more shops in-world; and SOME of them actually respect their consumers! HAHA HAHAHAHA and heres your other quote "... and they will be able to receive support for Xstreet purchases by contacting the same professionals that support the Second Life world" The same professionals who delay 12 days plus before even activating a support ticket? The same professional response to ARs.. a simple 'received' email with no answer, no indication of what action was taken... and usually no results? ![]() Absolutely JubJub! Of particular note and insight is TL's reply "Support is one of the key reasons that we are happy that the XStreet team is joining the lab. And since the marketplace is a new area that [BOLD][UNDERLINE]we are investing in[/BOLD][/UNDERLINE], it's highly unlikely that we'd limit support." Its clearly defines the source of their motivation. Improving our (Residents) what??? Pish! We're not concerned LL will "limit support". We're vexed at the probability that it will become synonymous with LL's CURRENT level of support... Monopolistic behaviour... taking over competing businesses whilst not fixing your own. Lemme make a few predictions... Any search functions will be soon replaced by a bidding system similar to inworld classifieds.. pay higher for better placement..leading to much conning of customers by using keywords that are nothing to do with product, and domination of ads by large bidders. The formerly 24hr response time of support..will be replaced by LL current 12-14 day wait for ticket support... any complicated ARs will simply be ignored. Exchange rates will be synchronised (Xstreets was better) and withdrawals will be downgraded to LL's standard wait times and rules. Dubious items, such as prim copiers which clearly violate LL TOS will be allowed to remain as they are in-world. (At least Apotheus understood the ethical boundaries these scripts clearly cross) There was absolutely no reason for LL to buy these businesses except to retain monopoly control of sales in SL. They could have developed their own website (competition is healthy)...they could have purchased one business (competition is healthy)..they could have used the time spent doing this deal to fix their own system/improve service/improve support/etc etc No valid reason...except MONOPOLISTIC BEHAVIOUR...and... where there is a monopoly it WILL be abused. I challenge LL to openly state their reason for purchasing two competing websites and don't give us any crap about "protecting the children" or "fraud/misuse" excuses. Hear HEAR! Well said... Lastly; (I know, I know - Thank God =]) Its MHO, that this is a veiled maneuver to circumvent the anticipated dirge of revenue stemming from the tide of Commercial Vendors closing up In-world businesses; as a means of avoiding yet ANOTHER LL attempt of abusive exploitative capitalism - visa vies the rumored/pending Commercial land tax expected to be imposed on in-world businesses. Way to dig even DEEPER into your PRIME CONSTITUENCIES' pockets LL... when will ENOUGH be enough??? How about ACTUALLY improving the quality of our in-world life, in lieu of the expanse of your bank accounts??? Why isn't THAT your primary object - for SL to be a pleasant CONTRAST to RL? Just so you know, I KNOW - there ARE other venues I COULD be "investing" MY revenue. Keep motivating me to explore my options... |
Uccello Poultry
Registered User
![]() Join date: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 5
|
Many Concerns
01-21-2009 09:03
Consolidated passwords. Sounds very unsafe. Especially after the recent warnings in the official blog about password safety (http://blog.secondlife.com/2009/01/16/is-your-password-safe/).
And to think I just got the OnRez vendors in prep to migrate from my previous vendors. :::deleting vendors::: Will the asset server problems be sorted out before Xstreet and OnRez content is brought into the Search database? Huge potential for lag here. I'm going to miss keeping some of my funds in my Xstreet and OnRez accounts for when in-world balance issues pop up. What is going to happen to the OnRez viewer? More "knee-jerk" reactions on my blog (http://poultryreport.blogspot.com). _____________________
Uccello (It means "Bird," darn it!)
--------------------------------------------------------------- "Iron rusts from disuse, stagnant water loses its purity, and in cold weather becomes frozen, even so does inaction sap the vigors of the mind. - Leonardo Da Vinci --------------------------------------------------------------- |
Sabre Xue
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 3
|
leing
01-21-2009 09:04
they are lieing they said they wont change anything in th currency excahnge yet,,but yu can go see yur self,,they already changed the structure of BUY and SELL system,,they made it thesame as lindens exchange,,,DAMN,,,i knew that was gonna happen,,,BYE BYE xstreetsl im out,,,
|
Darien Caldwell
Registered User
![]() Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
|
01-21-2009 09:07
Corporations (and governments) big or small will always move in the direction of their own best interests regardless of of the effect on the public or the world. The only thing that keeps any of them in check is 'self interest" and the power of the buyer or voter. If whichever of those 'checks & balances' losses its power then there is no longer anything to hold back the natural progression of the entity toward what they perceive as their own best interests. Very well put. This is sadly the state we are in, where we Residents have nobody with any authority to look out for our best interests. _____________________
|