just ignore and let this one die

QFT

(although if I quote this and mention how utterly spot-on Love is in her assessment of pippy's mental state he'll leap right in there to call me emotional like that's a bad thing and declare in wide-eyed amazement how everyone else is creating havoc in the Thread and he, himself, with his personal definition of levity, is perfectly innocent in his pursuit to make sure everyone adheres to his particular, peculiar and quixotical wordview. Of course, it's probably my turn again to bear the brunt of his self-congratulating, if tiresomely repetitive, 'witticisms' meant to amaze and astound the less attentive visitors to the fora. So what the heck, QFT)

PS - super shoes, Claire

I wish I DIDN'T know what they are. In college they were all I ate, for 6 straight years, because they were all I could afford. Hey when 'anything' is '10 packs for $1' that's what starving college kids buy! Blech, hope I never see another bowl of 'em.

It reassures me that both of you well-balanced (qv) "ladies" feel the same way. Since *you* have added nothing I need not bother responding, other than to point out that I have never described you as being emotional, which can be quite a good thing if allied with even a smidgeon of logic.

Pep (now, "over-emotional", that's another kettle of fish)

PS Is that "wordview" or "worldview"? Using these third languages can be difficult at times, eh!

I'm off work this week, so I went straight to brunch..



Pep (and a mint cappuccino topped with white chocolate shavings; my current favourite)

And yet could not resist the urge to do just that.



I think, considering the intended recipient, that either interpretation would be apt.

Oar is taht knot waht ewe mint?

It's just as well that I'm here to point out the jokes Brann didn't realise she had made, eh?

Pep (And that you are there in case someone missed my point.)

PS I can resist anything except temptation.

/me shrugs

I prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt.

Pep, I was pointing out not the absence of breakfast, but the reason for it's absence.

Yeah, I can understand that all those kitsch LOLCATs could put some people off their breakfast.

Pep (can't wait for the next one)

*sigh* Should one choose to be deliberately obtuse, I cannot force illumination.

Not so much. You took a shot at Lexxi, and I called you out on it. You took a shot at 3Ring, and I called you out on it. You've taken a few others which I'm sorry to say I didn't (nobody's perfect after all). Perhaps they really are your version of humour; I don't really know or care.

Look at it this way. You are such an asshole everywhere else in the forums, it's only natural to expect the same behaviour here. And in fact, your actions here back that assumption up quite strongly.




So if you really want to live to the spirit of this thread, consider that when you write something ambiguous like that, it *will* get misinterpreted (presuming you meant as well as you can, of course). And given that knowledge, if you continue to do it, then we all know that you really *do* intend to be mean spirited.




Have you noticed that I'm ignoring your nastiness everywhere else these days? I've only responded to you when you've abused this thread. And I'm not going to back down either. Keep being an asshole to people here, and I'll keep drawing attention to it.

At least one person has already left this thread solely because of *you*. And that's one too many.

If any one has an overwhelming desire for Ramens in world... there is a bowl available either free or as a dollarbie- i forget- in my TF Decor shop

There was snow here. I had to push about an inch of it off my car this morning.

If someone's free, could you whip up a heapin' helpin' of this and ship it to my office? Thksbai!!

http://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/emeril-lagasse/chicken-marsala-recipe/index.html

And Pep- just as I spoke up the other day whe I felt a comment was unjust and mean towards you- I agree- you took a shot at 3 here and that's just wrong. I'll defend who in my perhaps twisted view deserves it, but this time- it isn't you Fair's fair.

OK, it's time to officially designate Mr. Daniels as a member of the Troll Family. Please Do Not Feed.

aww. I'm sure the right name will come t'ya.



She came with the name Ruby, an was an owner surrender from the local shelter.



Oh ya, that thing was really amazing. I don't know if it is still in the air above IBM 6 (58, 48, 2500), but I know Spiral also has it is his store f'r about L$300. Only hard part is finding space f'r it. It's like 100m



Thankoo! It's part of a photo contest where you hafta use a lot of the products of the particular maker (-RC- Cluster) and try to be funny. So there's that.

Ya know, I gotta agree. That's not the basis of a relationship. An ya, like someone else said, this is all about you being a "father" and not about being a "partner," from my perspective. The exchange with you waiting in the car for her is oh-so-very much that.

sounds yummy!

here ya go:

What you are doing is coming into an existing place, with already established expectations (such as they are) of its members, and trying to change long-standing traditions (also such as they are) through a subtle form of blackmail. That's not a "deal."

That sounds wonderful. I'm going to make one this week.

Wrong on both counts.

Now that's a reasonable attitude isn't it . . .

I point out the dumbness of people around the forums. I don't in this thread or I would have a field day! Nevertheless, if your bigoted monomaniac mind looks for it then it will surely find it.

I write intentionally ambiguously most of the time, I agree. In this thread I try to be careful not to hurt, but if you are going to get unnecessarily over-sensitive and over-protective then you had better get a good stock of high-caffeine drinks in, because I refuse to toe any arbitrarily drawn and ludicrously politically correct line.

What's to ignore?

Haven't done it, except in your deluded view.

You think *I* am? ROFLMAO! Not while you are still vindictively and inaccurately calling me a liar.

You mean "Keep making jokes I don't really understand and I will invent interpretations that suit my warped argument", don't you?

I noticed *you* taking responsibility for one! Changed your mind?

Pep (Well, that's a "woman's" prerogative, isn't it)

Oh dear, another one who doesn't actually know what a troll is.

Pep (Back to school for you, Lindal!)

Who? Nevermind, you're a troll.

Anyway, I've just received a PM. The count is now at least two people who have left this thread solely because of you.

3Ring has chided me in an equivalent fashion here. I'm till waiting for any response from her to my jibe. If she admits that her sensitivity is such that it failed to tickle her notoriously scatological sense of humour then I will retract.

Pep (I respect your opinion Amaranthim, but obviously not Love's)