Snipped
Bradley your post summed up exactly what I have been trying to say. Thank you

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Policing this forum |
|
|
Tiana Whitfield
Forever And A Day
Join date: 1 Apr 2007
Posts: 702
|
03-28-2008 14:35
Snipped Bradley your post summed up exactly what I have been trying to say. Thank you ![]() |
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
03-28-2008 14:54
It is this stated concern that has led me to the conclusion the best thing to do is to reopen the General and the Off-topic forums. Thus sorting out the threads based on content. I can't agree with you more. I would love to see those old forums reopened. If that was the case I'd post there and be about as goofy as they come. _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-28-2008 14:54
And that use to be true here. Questions were answered and debated and then once it became obvious that the thread had outlived it's usefulness (obviously subjective) then someone would bring up pie. That's not true anymore. It's pie pie pie all the time. I'm amazed more haven't gotten tired of it. I'll give my personal perspective on when I came to the forums. When I first came to find answers I was frustrated by all the pie and pantie jokes because it became hard to search through a thread to find answers - and many times very good answers come after the pie, etc discussions. As a newbie to the forum it made it difficult. Eventually I got acclimated to the forums and joined in the fun. I was honored when people started referring to me as a member of the so called clique. I had come to understand what I stated above, that despite the silliness, the work always got done and I had great fun with it. That tide has turned. It appears to me that we have a vast number of newer people that started coming in at the end of last year who I don't think have ever posted a question or answered one. They see this as a Fun and Conversation Only Forum. I don't blame them, it's the perspective they saw as it was headed that way. Many of our regulars who I had high regard for rarely seem to be answering questions anymore either. They only come on now to join in the fun too. Sometimes they get in really heated arguments as well, but that's not the same as assisting. Love and others have expressed they don't see questions not being answered and maybe that's true. My observation is that they are not answered nearly as well because not as many are giving feedback as in the past. In addition, there are a lot less questions being asked than I can recall. Granted, I don't have actual numbers, but it's my observation. If they have reduced, as I believe they have, I think it has to do with the change of the tone of the forums also. As I said before, I think the turning tide occurred when we lost a moderator. We always had silly threads and I joined in many, but Strife would come in and lock them. That kept them from getting too long or the forum having too many at one time. If this forum is going to be like SLU then why have this forum at all?The tone has changed dramatically here. Obviously I'm in the minority and most seem happy about that. As much as I wish I had the power to change it to what I prefer, I know that is not the case. I don't have to like what I see happening though, and will likely to continue to grumble about it because I see it as a very sad turn of events. Oh, very much so. I am quite happy with pie-specific threads, myself, even if they could do with their own forum, but pie posts which are deliberately made on an existing thread basically in order to close the discussion down by means of spam - spam pie - because a few people are uncomfortable or bored with the topic, well, no, I am not happy with that. That isn't as prevalent as it has been and sometimes is on other forums, but it was the major cause of my basically abandoning SC before it closed down anyway, and is the main reason that I do not tend to contribute to many others now. In practice, SC threads were closed down not with pie but with flirting and assorted sexual references, as well as smileys, but the content is less the issue than the mechanism. If every on-topic comment is then followed by a page or two of irrelevancy, that constitutes a conscious or unconscious attempt to shut the topic down. _____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names |
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
03-28-2008 14:58
I can't agree with you more. I would love to see those old forums reopened. If that was the case I'd post there and be about as goofy as they come. Its such and obviously problem free solution its amazing the powers that be haven't done it. AT this point in time there is no downside that doesn't already exist. |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-28-2008 15:00
Bradley your post summed up exactly what I have been trying to say. Thank you ![]() he is right . I can't speak for myself, since I'm the last person with a helpful answer usually, but I imagine some of the Regulars are tired of answering those same questions over and over, or a lot are not questions where the answer resides here. Some point to threads that are full of fluff before the question gets answered, which is fair enough, but i wonder how many of those threads would have fallen off the first couple of pages unanswered. All the complaints are valid. But Human nature is what it is. A strictly moderated forum is one that I would no longer visit, but I have no vast knowledge to take with me so it's no loss to anyone. The answer is simple. Give people a place to do their general conversing. LL show you customers you care by doing this, or, if you feel the forum is irrelevant and useles, shut it down. _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Tiana Whitfield
Forever And A Day
Join date: 1 Apr 2007
Posts: 702
|
03-28-2008 15:20
he is right . I can't speak for myself, since I'm the last person with a helpful answer usually, but I imagine some of the Regulars are tired of answering those same questions over and over, or a lot are not questions where the answer resides here. Some point to threads that are full of fluff before the question gets answered, which is fair enough, but i wonder how many of those threads would have fallen off the first couple of pages unanswered. All the complaints are valid. But Human nature is what it is. A strictly moderated forum is one that I would no longer visit, but I have no vast knowledge to take with me so it's no loss to anyone. The answer is simple. Give people a place to do their general conversing. LL show you customers you care by doing this, or, if you feel the forum is irrelevant and useles, shut it down. I can only speak for myself but the same questions over and over truly do not bother me, if I can help I try to, if I cant then I usually stand back.. sometimes I have been known to IM the person if I am in world and offer to pop over.... I have learnt so much from RA and met some wonderful people along the way. I think back to when I first started using this forum and how much info and great tips I picked up.. that is just not the case these days. Sadly I have seen it where a poster has taken it upon themselves to derail a thread with "pie this" and "pie that" before the question is answered.. and this may sound so stupid as in the scale of things I am still a "newbie".. but it never use to be like that... questions did use to get answered and then of the course the obligatory banter would ensue in the thread... I may sound hypocritical but I don't see anything wrong with that.. as the main reason for RA being here was being taken advantage of.. Answering residents questions. I think L providing a general forum would be fantastic, I just don't get why they dont..a real sense of community could be forged and not such a tentative one based on who likes pie and who doesn't ![]() I do agree though..as much as I really despair of the pie stuff and I mainly despair because its thrown in when someone is either in the middle of asking a genuine question or having one answered, but as much as I despair, a forum that was ruled with an iron rod would not be one I visited either. |
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
03-28-2008 15:20
The answer is simple. Give people a place to do their general conversing. LL show you customers you care by doing this, or, if you feel the forum is irrelevant and useles, shut it down. QFT isn't good enough. I must say... AMEN! _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-28-2008 15:23
AMEN! That's all very well, but LL deliberately closed down an existing "general" forum. They have also been closing down various unmoderated mailing lists (granted, because one of them was getting some absolutely ridiculous posts, but that isn't usually a reason to close down _all_ of them or indeed _any_). I have to suspect that an open forum is unlikely to happen; thus we must make do for the moment. _____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names |
|
Ann Launay
Neko-licious™
Join date: 8 Aug 2006
Posts: 7,893
|
03-28-2008 15:29
I do get mildly cranky when someone comes along and asks a question which was just answered - like still on the first or second page - because it says to me that the OP didn't even TRY to find the answer for themselves.
And, I admit, I do occasionally report posts, but generally not until they get to the point where people are just going, "Yes, you do," "No, I don't" and pretty much everyone agrees that it needs to die, but people won't stop posting. If we had an actual moderation pool, I wouldn't bother, but with (probably) just one person trying to keep on top of things, I don't see the harm in bringing something to his or her attention when it's degraded that far. _____________________
~Now Trout Re-Re-Re-Certified!~
I am bumping you to an 8.5 on the Official Trout Measuring Instrument of Sluttiness. You are an enigma - on the one hand a sweet, gentle, intelligent woman who we would like to wrap up in our arms and protect, and on the other, a temptress to whom we would like to do all sorts of unmentionable things. Congratulations and shame on you! You are a bit of a slut. |
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
03-28-2008 15:33
That's all very well, but LL deliberately closed down an existing "general" forum. They have also been closing down various unmoderated mailing lists (granted, because one of them was getting some absolutely ridiculous posts, but that isn't usually a reason to close down _all_ of them or indeed _any_). I have to suspect that an open forum is unlikely to happen; thus we must make do for the moment. This was Brenda's post: The answer is simple. Give people a place to do their general conversing. LL show you customers you care by doing this, or, if you feel the forum is irrelevant and useles, shut it down. I agreed with it. Whether or not it's something LL is likely to do has no bearing on whether it's the right thing to do. I can always hope. _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-28-2008 15:37
I think that you have mixed up the quoting there.
But to be frank it is all rather academic whether they _should_, unless anyone has a good suggestion for bringing that about. There have been various efforts to do so over the years, none of which have had an effect. I would be very happy to see a new idea, but I am not all that interested in stamping my foot for the millionth time and saying "well they _should_!" My foot has begun to hurt. _____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names |
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
03-28-2008 15:39
I don't see what the big deal is in reopening the forum. Pride? Its not like half the posters here were even there when they closed the General.
Yeah some idiots would gloat for a while. But that wouldn't amount to anything in the end. A lot of people would salute LL for being rational for once about the forums. On those other forum sites they still complain about the official forums. |
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-28-2008 15:42
I think that you have mixed up the quoting there. But to be frank it is all rather academic whether they _should_, unless anyone has a good suggestion for bringing that about. There have been various efforts to do so over the years, none of which have had an effect. I would be very happy to see a new idea, but I am not all that interested in stamping my foot for the millionth time and saying "well they _should_!" My foot has begun to hurt. To add to this - if people could just not post their stupid joke pie spam posts in their dozens on threads which _they_ think are pointless but where other people might be interested in discussing a topic, that would help. And that has nothing to do with not having an off-topic forum, it is simple politeness. _____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names |
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
03-28-2008 15:43
I think that you have mixed up the quoting there. But to be frank it is all rather academic whether they _should_, unless anyone has a good suggestion for bringing that about. There have been various efforts to do so over the years, none of which have had an effect. I would be very happy to see a new idea, but I am not all that interested in stamping my foot for the millionth time and saying "well they _should_!" My foot has begun to hurt. I'd join any group that is willing to get a response, any kind of "official" response from LL. Not just telling one or two people who chat. Let's go as a group to their office meetings. (I don't know which one is appropriate). Let's email or petition or just start a thread asking them to please give us a response (We know for a fact they've been reading us these days). All I want is a clear all answer once and for all. If they say they'll open them back up then wonderful. I'll have a great time joining the fun there while feeling useful here. If they say it's never going to happen then fine I'll probably just leave the forums. Until then, I'll just continue doing what I'm doing and hoping something changes, having a little fun here and there and bugging everyone with my grumbling too. _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Osprey Therian
I want capslocklock
Join date: 6 Jul 2004
Posts: 5,049
|
03-28-2008 15:44
If I ruled the forum I'd make a stream of consciousness or tickertape forum that would have just one page. Anyone could post anything there, but once it scrolled off the page it would be gone forever. Resident Answers would be kept for resident answers, and if someone posted drivel there they would be confined to the stream of consciousness forum forever after.
The best thing about a stream of consciousness forum is that people would get to vent their feeling but then there would be an auto-flushing action ![]() New! Stream of Consciousness Forum with Modern, Hygienic Auto-Flush Action! _____________________
|
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
03-28-2008 15:45
To add to this - if people could just not post their stupid joke pie spam posts in their dozens on threads which _they_ think are pointless but where other people might be interested in discussing a topic, that would help. And that has nothing to do with not having an off-topic forum, it is simple politeness. As low as the odds are that LL will ever reopen General and Off Topic Forums, I think the odds of this ever happening are next to nil. _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-28-2008 15:46
I'd join any group that is willing to get a response, any kind of "official" response from LL. Not just telling one or two people who chat. Let's go as a group to their office meetings. (I don't know which one is appropriate). Let's email or petition or just start a thread asking them to please give us a response (We know for a fact they've been reading us these days). All I want is a clear all answer once and for all. If they say they'll open them back up then wonderful. I'll have a great time joining the fun there while feeling useful here. If they say it's never going to happen then fine I'll probably just leave the forums. Until then, I'll just continue doing what I'm doing and hoping something changes, having a little fun here and there and bugging everyone with my grumbling too. Take a look at the JIRA; it has been ignored and rejected. _____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names |
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-28-2008 15:47
As low as the odds are that LL will ever reopen General and Off Topic Forums, I think the odds of this ever happening are next to nil. Quite, which is why selected blogs and Twitter and so on are the only real medium for coherent discussion these days. _____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-28-2008 15:48
Take a look at the JIRA; it has been ignored and rejected. I'd prefer to ignore and reject the JIRA actually. I must not be geeky enough, but it makes my eyes bleed trying to figure it out. _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-28-2008 15:49
I'd prefer to ignore and reject the JIRA actually. I must not be geeky enough, but it makes my eyes bleed trying to figure it out. As little as it is, it is all we have. _____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names |
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
03-28-2008 15:53
I'd prefer to ignore and reject the JIRA actually. I must not be geeky enough, but it makes my eyes bleed trying to figure it out. another vote for Jira being too geeky. ------------------------------- Jira should have been made part of the main website then its response might have been better. Part of why these forums are so loved is that its all just a part of your Second Life account The Geeks need to come down from on high and talk to all us noobs sometime. |
|
Vikki Svenska
Registered User
Join date: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 27
|
03-28-2008 15:53
Can't possibly read pages and pages of this.
My thought... I typically do a "New Posts" search and view the threads that way. If I'm going after something specific I might go into a specific forum and do a search there... otherwise I browse over the thread subjects and frankly don't really care where they are located. Many of us are new here.. and there are a lot of people who are super helpful and cut us a lot of slack. Some have been around long enough to see the same old questions time and time again. I know the feeling, I am in forums elsewhere and get bitter myself at times... then I just have to step back for a while is all.. no sense taking it out on those who are new. Huge thanks to everyone who takes the time to reply to people's questions no matter how silly or common. Without these forums I'd likely have been gone from SL long ago. |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-28-2008 15:54
As little as it is, it is all we have. But it seems to me that if suggestions can be arbitrarily shelved by anyone, for god knows what reason, maybe no one likes the person suggesting it, it is not a very valid tool. It's great the community can make suggestions, but should they be able to decide what gets fixed or not. Or am I off base with my grasp of the concept,? I've only looked at it a couple of times, I really can't deal with it. _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-28-2008 15:58
But it seems to me that if suggestions can be arbitrarily shelved by anyone, for god knows what reason, maybe no one likes the person suggesting it, it is not a very valid tool. It's great the community can make suggestions, but should they be able to decide what gets fixed or not. Or am I off base with my grasp of the concept,? I've only looked at it a couple of times, I really can't deal with it. It is a bug reporting system, not social justice. It doesn't pretend to be the latter, really. But there is no point not using whatever tools are available, proposing issues for fixing or changing, voting on them, commenting on them - it's a lot more productive than saying anything here. _____________________
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/forum/ - visit Ordinal's Scripting Colloquium for scripting discussion with actual working BBCode!
http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/ - An Engine Fit For My Proceeding, my Aethernet Journal http://www.flickr.com/groups/slgriefbuild/ - Second Life Griefbuild Digest, pictures of horrible ad griefing and land spam, and the naming of names |
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
03-28-2008 16:22
Take a look at the JIRA; it has been ignored and rejected. I found one JIRA similar to that. It had 0 votes and was listed as Resolved. I couldn't find it when I look back for it so I can't remember the details. There also is a JIRA to get a moderator that has 46 votes that is listed as Unresolved. Do you know what the one your referring to was called or have a link? I can't find it. _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|