Oh gone are the good days
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
05-05-2009 09:43
From: Imnotgoing Sideways See, this is the fun part. I never suggested grid wide LOLcubes. I'm not umbrella-ing that EVERYONE loves bedlam. I have friends that enjoy playing dollie and dressup. And, guess what? That's fun too. (^_^) The quote I keep reiterating is 'Be the change YOU want to see'... Not 'Be the change I want to see'. I'm having my fun. You having an issue with it is your ulcer, not mine. (^_^) Which is exactly the point - you're having your fun without caring what anyone else thinks about it. And that's fine, but if everyone does it, it's ultimately destructive. What if people don't want to hear your sound effects or walk on your bridge in the sandbox, and especially if they don't want to have cubes dropped on their heads? From: someone And, thank you for the Bloodlines example. It helps me prove my point. Guess what? I ~do~ RP once in a while. But, here's the thing: I do things in context. In the sandbox, I do sandbox-y things. When I want to RP, I go to the RP sim I like. Sure, but context on its own isn't enough (and I'm doubtful that "breaking the security" of sandboxes remains in context for them) - you also need consideration.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
05-05-2009 09:47
Is Yumi still complaining about me nibbling on her toes? I didn't MEAN to bite that hard. I'm SORRY already!
|
|
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
|
05-05-2009 09:53
From: Chaos Borkotron Since the new CEO has "taken over" Second Life operations the place has become kind of shit
Yes it has been busier and there's no longer miles and miles of adfarms & brothels, but also the colourful character SL used to have is now also gone.
About 2 years ago you could go up and speak to anyone, you were guaranteed that they were either a greifer, a bot or a genuine person, things were pretty black & white then.
now SL reminds me more of London, or New York. It's all about the money, the business and status.
gone are the days of chilling at some party, the really funny protests & marches and the good 'ol RPing at some really kool but random tripped out sim.
Now nearly ALL of the mainland is just houses or the same malls over & over.
Before when i flew across the mainland I'd see all sorts of crazy and random builds, some great & some just awful, but now its just sooo so bland and boring. with the same prefabricated houses set for sale.
There are currently 4 main DarkRP/combat sims i know of, and 1 of them is shit (i'm sure some of the older forum dwellers will know what one i am talking of)
to add salt to injuries absolutely NO technicle progress has been made what so ever, all these new rules and polacies are great, but they must come with technical advancements to.
Where are our shared Windlight sky settings, are infinitely visible terrains, volumetric clouds, shaders, speedtree vegitation and the list goes on & on.
Either SL will end up folding in on itlself or they are planning something really big (SL 2.0?) that will blow us all away.
What are your opinions and thoughts on the issues? Dark RP sims are PRIVATE sims, Chaos, and if those are shit, that is not because of the new CEO. There have been technical improvements, and a lot of improvement to stability - otherwise you would be bitching about how SL is never up. We have per pixel lighting coming and shadows. Sculptmaps were modified to include oblong sculpts. But if you don't do sculpties, you wouldn't know or care. Sharing windlight is possible but not easy. It's probably coming, but I'll take the shadows first! As for flying across mainland... yes, there is a lot of repetition as certain builders seem to be ubiquitous but there is a lot of creativity still. Just because the sex clubs will be moving to Ursula doesn't mean that SL has lost its whimsy completely, it's just more restrained. SL is expensive to do just for art's sake, and that hasn't changed with the new CEO. The only thing that HAS gotten more expensive is the homesteads & openspaces, and those weren't suitable for prim intensive usage anyway.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims! House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60http://cristalleproperties.info http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
05-05-2009 09:53
From: Argent Stonecutter Is Yumi still complaining about me nibbling on her toes? I didn't MEAN to bite that hard. I'm SORRY already! I'm more complaining about never getting to nibble any toes myself 
|
|
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
05-05-2009 10:11
From: Yumi Murakami Which is exactly the point - you're having your fun without caring what anyone else thinks about it. And that's fine, but if everyone does it, it's ultimately destructive. What if people don't want to hear your sound effects or walk on your bridge in the sandbox, and especially if they don't want to have cubes dropped on their heads? No. I care. I care about the people in my direct vicinity. When I have the urge to make a mess, I go to a place where messes are welcome and grenade the place. When it's time to play dressup, I find my dollie friends and we pull out the frilly skirts. When someone asks for help, I *GASP* answer their questions to the best of my knowledge. I'm being "me" and apparently there are a couple people that actually like that. (^_^)y From: someone Sure, but context on its own isn't enough (and I'm doubtful that "breaking the security" of sandboxes remains in context for them) - you also need consideration. Consideration, yes, but not to the point of beige life. The thread started with complaints that SL has relatively worn out it's own buzz. I say, boring is boring because boring people make it that way. Have some fun, live a little, keep all this "responsibility" mess in RL, and just maybe we'll find a bit of fun around. (^_^)y
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
05-05-2009 10:15
From: Imnotgoing Sideways No. I care. I care about the people in my direct vicinity. When I have the urge to make a mess, I go to a place where messes are welcome and grenade the place. When it's time to play dressup, I find my dollie friends and we pull out the frilly skirts. When someone asks for help, I *GASP* answer their questions to the best of my knowledge. Where is "a place where messes are welcome"? Not a sandbox, by any chance?  From: someone Consideration, yes, but not to the point of beige life. The thread started with complaints that SL has relatively worn out it's own buzz. I say, boring is boring because boring people make it that way. Have some fun, live a little, keep all this "responsibility" mess in RL, and just maybe we'll find a bit of fun around. (^_^)y Sure, and as I've said, this only works because you're one of a small number of people doing it. If everyone did it, the result would be chaos in which no-one could do everything. Beige Life is ultimately the only scalable model in which nobody jumps in front. Sad but true.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
05-05-2009 10:23
From: Imnotgoing Sideways Consideration, yes, but not to the point of beige life. Yay! I'm gonna start calling it "Beige Mars"!
|
|
Rime Wirsing
Color me gone
Join date: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 345
|
05-05-2009 10:24
Google this
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
05-05-2009 10:26
From: Yumi Murakami Where is "a place where messes are welcome"? Not a sandbox, by any chance?  Sure, and as I've said, this only works because you're one of a small number of people doing it. If everyone did it, the result would be chaos in which no-one could do everything. Beige Life is ultimately the only scalable model in which nobody jumps in front. Sad but true. Isn't that the whole point of sandboxes? To make a mess? Chaos is a great thing, it leads to innovation. It leads to growth.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
05-05-2009 10:28
From: Chris Norse Isn't that the whole point of sandboxes? To make a mess? Depends if other people are trying to build serious things there. From: someone Chaos is a great thing, it leads to innovation. It leads to growth. Again, you're talking about controlled experimentation. Chaos can never become anything except more chaos; even the concepts of innovation and growth require some kind of order.
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
05-05-2009 10:35
From: Yumi Murakami Depends if other people are trying to build serious things there.
Again, you're talking about controlled experimentation. Chaos can never become anything except more chaos; even the concepts of innovation and growth require some kind of order. I disagree. The advances in this world have come from the dreamers, the guys in their garages, barns, basements and back rooms doing what everyone else said was impossible. They weren't controlled, they operated out of chaos. Things blew up, projects failed, but they keep the dream alive. Do some research on spontaneous order. I know it is an alien concept to you. But it is how most people live their lives.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
05-05-2009 10:41
From: Chris Norse I disagree. The advances in this world have come from the dreamers, the guys in their garages, barns, basements and back rooms doing what everyone else said was impossible. They weren't controlled, they operated out of chaos. Things blew up, projects failed, but they keep the dream alive.
Do some research on spontaneous order. I know it is an alien concept to you. But it is how most people live their lives. Right, exactly. Spontaneous order. The spontaneous order that we have in SL is what gives us the situation that we have now. I'm not talking about experimenting and making new things because you want to. I'm talking about what Immy's referred to flying around dropping cubes on people or blowing them all over sandboxes, "breaking security", firing gesture particles around in WAs, etc - which, in practice, are really ways of making oneself the centre of attention. If everyone did that the ultimate result would be that nobody could do anything in SL because they kept having cubes dropped on them, and no sandbox would stay up for more than 10 seconds before 20 people's physics explosions crashed the sim. Moreover, not everyone can be the centre of attention by definition, so certainly it wouldn't be the same experience.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
05-05-2009 10:43
Fnord.
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
05-05-2009 10:49
From: Yumi Murakami Right, exactly. Spontaneous order. The spontaneous order that we have in SL is what gives us the situation that we have now.
I'm not talking about experimenting and making new things because you want to. I'm talking about what Immy's referred to flying around dropping cubes on people or blowing them all over sandboxes, "breaking security", firing gesture particles around in WAs, etc - which, in practice, are really ways of making oneself the centre of attention. If everyone did that the ultimate result would be that nobody could do anything in SL because they kept having cubes dropped on them, and no sandbox would stay up for more than 10 seconds before 20 people's physics explosions crashed the sim. Moreover, not everyone can be the centre of attention by definition, so certainly it wouldn't be the same experience. There is nothing wrong with the situation we have now in SL, other than the things caused by control from above, namely the current adult rules. Then Yumi, it is up to the landowner to exercise control over his property. If the landowner bans Immy, then she can't very well drop cubes on people on that plot of property can she? (disclaimer: I have no clue if Immy drops anything other than her knickers when she streaks the hangout) If enough land owners ban Immy, then she will learn that dropping cubes is not acceptable behavior, spontaneous order. Tell me Yumi, why don't most people steal, kill and rape? Is it because of laws and control or because most people know those activities are morally wrong? We can all be the center of attention, because we don't have the same experiences. My "attention" will by definition be different than yours. You may want the attention of people congratulating you on a nice build. I may want the attention of people laughing at my jokes.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
|
Kokoro Fasching
Pixie Dust and Sugar
Join date: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 949
|
05-05-2009 10:53
From: Yumi Murakami There's nothing wrong with being active and contributing to surroundings. My issue is with contributing in ways that conflict, or potentially conflict, with others. I have an issue with it because, if everyone does it, the result is bedlam that nobody enjoys. The key here I think is with Immy, and myself, since I do it very often also, that when someone in the 'crowd' displays that they have a true problem with it, we will tend to 'leave' them out of the play more often that not. I tend to be very interactive with the surrounding - at times to an ultra annoying degree. Some will enjoy it, some will be annoyed, and some will just go ballistic. The point here is that I view myself as a agent of inertia - most beings will stay in the same path without some sort of outside push, and that is what I exist for. To provide that push to see something outside of their path. Does it always work for the best, of course not. Someone in power gets upset, and I get a new banned location. I shrug, move on, and continue to be myself. The key for me is perception and I am always in search of ways to expand my perception. I can only expand my perceptions by explosions of other's perceptions. The best way to cause a explosion is random friction.  Well, plastic explosives work sometimes, but they are messy also. Intent is a important factor also. I rarely will be a pest just to cause someone harm, unless they have tried to harm someone already, then I will respond in kind. In many ways I am like LSD - I am here to expand one's perceptions. ;P
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
05-05-2009 10:55
From: Chris Norse Then Yumi, it is up to the landowner to exercise control over his property. If the landowner bans Immy, then she can't very well drop cubes on people on that plot of property can she? (disclaimer: I have no clue if Immy drops anything other than her knickers when she streaks the hangout) If enough land owners ban Immy, then she will learn that dropping cubes is not acceptable behavior, spontaneous order. Tell me Yumi, why don't most people steal, kill and rape? Is it because of laws and control or because most people know those activities are morally wrong?
You've contradicted yourself there, though, and you've emphasized my point. People don't steal, kill and rape. But what you're saying is that they should try out stealing or kiling once, and if they get jailed/banned for it then they can realise it is wrong. I'm sure you can see the problem with everyone doing that - namely, that after everyone has tried killing once, there will be only one person left standing. From: someone We can all be the center of attention, because we don't have the same experiences. My "attention" will by definition be different than yours. You may want the attention of people congratulating you on a nice build. I may want the attention of people laughing at my jokes. If nobody is even present, they can't give any attention of any kind.
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
05-05-2009 10:57
From: Kokoro Fasching The key here I think is with Immy, and myself, since I do it very often also, that when someone in the 'crowd' displays that they have a true problem with it, we will tend to 'leave' them out of the play more often that not. But that isn't enough - because it means they get left out. Whereas, if you weren't there "playing", the crowd may have been doing something else which would have included them. From: someone I tend to be very interactive with the surrounding - at times to an ultra annoying degree. Some will enjoy it, some will be annoyed, and some will just go ballistic. The point here is that I view myself as a agent of inertia - most beings will stay in the same path without some sort of outside push, and that is what I exist for. To provide that push to see something outside of their path. But how many people do you actually push squarely back ONTO their path, by giving them the feeling that the world will allow others to express themselves but not them?
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
05-05-2009 11:01
From: Yumi Murakami You've contradicted yourself there, though, and you've emphasized my point. People don't steal, kill and rape. But what you're saying is that they should try out stealing or kiling once, and if they get jailed/banned for it then they can realise it is wrong. I'm sure you can see the problem with everyone doing that - namely, that after everyone has tried killing once, there will be only one person left standing.
Not at all. I am saying most people do not harm others because they know it is wrong, not because of dictates from on high. Do you require a law to keep you from stealing or killing?
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
|
Kokoro Fasching
Pixie Dust and Sugar
Join date: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 949
|
05-05-2009 11:14
From: Yumi Murakami But that isn't enough - because it means they get left out. Whereas, if you weren't there "playing", the crowd may have been doing something else which would have included them. Perhaps they would, perhaps they wouldn't. I can not predict the future, all I know for sure is the present. Any interaction brings change with out any means to know if that change is good, bad, or just different. From: Yumi Murakami But how many people do you actually push squarely back ONTO their path, by giving them the feeling that the world will allow others to express themselves but not them?
To me there is not a single path, but a huge interchange of paths. Is any one path the perfect path? I do not know. But for me, as long as there are still options to my paths, I feel that I have the 'free will' left to make the decision on which path I will walk at that particular time. This is where the personal perceptions come in to play, in that while yes, outside forces can put much pressure to take a particular path, as long as I accept the visible options to another path, I am free to take a different path. Many times there are worse pitfalls in the path I took than the path that was being pressed on me, but I know that "I" chose that path, and that keeps me going to the next decision. I learn from each decision. And even with that learning, I will continue to make mistakes because thankfully I am not 'perfect', since the perfect has no options - they can only be 'perfect'. No options means they don't even have free will, they can only be 'perfect'. Whereas since I have not perfect, I can continue to make mistakes, have fun, cry, feel happy and sad at the same time, and continue to meet new beings who continue to expand my perceptions. Some will love me, some will hate me, some will ignore me - but all of them touch me in some way, and help shape my ever expanding perceptions, so a piece of them will always live on as long as I live.
|
|
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
05-05-2009 11:28
From: Kokoro Fasching ...Does it always work for the best, of course not. Someone in power gets upset, and I get a new banned location. I shrug, move on, and continue to be myself... OMG! If you're the one actually getting banned, I gotta work harder! Xd
|
|
Kokoro Fasching
Pixie Dust and Sugar
Join date: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 949
|
05-05-2009 11:45
From: Imnotgoing Sideways OMG! If you're the one actually getting banned, I gotta work harder! Xd *laughing* It usually isn't that hard, just start with the "why" circle..  Normally it is just because I am not aiming to be banned, just trying to understand their perception on the matter, and they either do not want to explain it, or do not want to examine their own take on the matter, and it is easier to just kick/ban and go back to their narrow path. Although back when the world was smaller and I loved to explore even more, many of the bans were from the Gor sims, since they had such beautiful builds, but I would not 'grow taller' just to make them happy. I will always try to expore with either camera, or when no one else was there, but often times I would be looking around in the public areas, someone would log in or teleport in, and before I could teleport out I gained a new ban.  In the real early days it was the Blue Box of Linden God saying "children are not allowed here" "you are being teleported home" before I could even say anything. *grins* Those were the fun days when the gods would kick you.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
05-05-2009 11:52
I got banned from Gorean sims a couple of times, apparently they don't have ferrets in Gor. And I hadn't even tried to bite anyone!
|
|
Damien1 Thorne
Registered User
Join date: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,877
|
05-05-2009 11:55
From: Argent Stonecutter I got banned from Gorean sims a couple of times, apparently they don't have ferrets in Gor. And I hadn't even tried to bite anyone! "The Ferrets of Gor" is the next book.
_____________________
As we fade into the darkness...
|
|
Lolita Pro
www.PhotosByLolita.com
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 273
|
05-05-2009 12:27
From: sable Valentine I miss the casinos ... would ask baby you need some money to buy you a new little pretty dress and I would bat my lashes and say yes Daddy.
Oh yes ... Wandering through the casinos and someone would hit it big and share it with girls who happened to be around him at the time. Meeting someone and getting invited to go shopping with them and they bought you an outfit. Where have all those men gone? Maybe that contributed to my decision on SL Men ... they aren't like they were 3 years ago.
|
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
05-05-2009 12:28
From: Chris Norse Not at all. I am saying most people do not harm others because they know it is wrong, not because of dictates from on high. Do you require a law to keep you from stealing or killing? As I pointed out, though, your principle and your example contradicted each other. You said that people don't need a law to tell them not to steal or kill; but, at the same time, your example was Immy learning not to drop cubes on people because she was banned for doing it. So do people get to do the action once, to see if it's OK, or not? Now, it can be great if you do something like this and find that the other people _don't_ mind. But that only works as long as only a small number of people are doing it. If too many people are doing it, then you on your parcel have cubes dropped on you 100 times a night "just in case you wouldn't mind". And that's what basically happened with Bloodlines - no matter how many times people were told to stop, they would keep trying just in case. From: Kokoro Fasching Perhaps they would, perhaps they wouldn't. I can not predict the future, all I know for sure is the present. Any interaction brings change with out any means to know if that change is good, bad, or just different.
*nod* But you don't have to choose to do an interaction that defines the social situation to the extent that anyone not involved in it is just left out. The rest of what you posted was very beautiful, but not really relevant, because it was all about you and your path, not anyone else.
|