Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Tier fees increased by tax

Flowerdew Zagoskin
Registered User
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 31
09-28-2007 12:11
Linden are slowing going to lose european people in SL. I live in UK and will have to pay tax, Im not going to buy any land so there Linden!!!! This is another way that SL will end up going offline because of lack of funds.

Who makes these policies in Linden and have they do think about people outside the US?
Victorria Paine
Sleepless in Wherever
Join date: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 1,110
09-28-2007 12:15
From: Flowerdew Zagoskin
Linden are slowing going to lose european people in SL. I live in UK and will have to pay tax, Im not going to buy any land so there Linden!!!! This is another way that SL will end up going offline because of lack of funds.

Who makes these policies in Linden and have they do think about people outside the US?


Um, Did LL make the tax laws in the UK?
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
09-28-2007 12:16
From: Flowerdew Zagoskin
Linden are slowing going to lose european people in SL. I live in UK and will have to pay tax, Im not going to buy any land so there Linden!!!! This is another way that SL will end up going offline because of lack of funds.

Who makes these policies in Linden and have they do think about people outside the US?

It is your tax-happy government that is the problem. LL's only fuckup was not telling you about the change in a meaningful and timely manner.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims!

House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60

http://cristalleproperties.info
http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
Jelena DeVinna
Registered User
Join date: 2 Feb 2007
Posts: 1
09-28-2007 12:17
Hi,

It's in any way not according to any regulation in the EU to do it in this way.
Any consumer organisation in the EU would confirm this.
First you give notice to the customer of the change, they firm gives the option to agree or not and this to go effective on the next billing period. NOT ON THE CURRENT.
This is just not to believe!!
Great promotion Of SL :(

Regards
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
09-28-2007 12:20
From: Cristalle Karami
It is your tax-happy government that is the problem. LL's only fuckup was not telling you about the change in a meaningful and timely manner.


It is not LL's only mistake. They are continuing to not advise EU users on their pricing page that pricing does not include VAT. That's a huge mistake to be making and something that should be rectified ASAP unless LL want to get themselves into a shed load more trouble.
Walker Moore
Fоrum Unregular
Join date: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1,458
09-28-2007 12:21
From: Cristalle Karami
It is your tax-happy government that is the problem. LL's only fuckup was not telling you about the change in a meaningful and timely manner.
Wrong.

LL's biggest fuckup was setting up in Brighton at all without considering the taxation consequences.

If they hadn't setup there, the VAT situation would be unenforcable.

That's why they haven't been charging VAT since 2003.

They had no business presence in the EU.
_____________________
It's only a forum, no one dies.
Sy Beck
Owner of Group ???
Join date: 9 Feb 2007
Posts: 202
09-28-2007 12:23
From: Raymond Figtree
Well if anyone talks to a Linden live or inworld, please report it here. And please urge them to break the silence.


There is a new blog post about a restart postponement (obviously more important to LL). Some people are posting to it asking for a blog post on the VAT charges. Some are then having their posts deleted by LL, this really sucks.
Walker Moore
Fоrum Unregular
Join date: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1,458
09-28-2007 12:24
From: Ciaran Laval
It is not LL's only mistake. They are continuing to not advise EU users on their pricing page that pricing does not include VAT. That's a huge mistake to be making and something that should be rectified ASAP unless LL want to get themselves into a shed load more trouble.
...and they're processing American's payments in the UK without charging them 17.5% extra. Whooopsie!
_____________________
It's only a forum, no one dies.
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
09-28-2007 12:26
From: Walker Moore
Wrong.

LL's biggest fuckup was setting up in Brighton at all without considering the taxation consequences.

If they hadn't setup there, the VAT situation would be unenforcable.

That's why they haven't been charging VAT since 2003.

They had no business presence in the EU.

True, that's the even bigger fuckup.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims!

House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60

http://cristalleproperties.info
http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
09-28-2007 12:26
A cultural difference which I think many in the US (and clearly not LL) don't realise is that over here in the UK (and I believe other places in the EU), the price advertised *is* the price you pay.

In the US, (I'll use a shop analogy but the same applies online), the price tag is the base price. When you go to the till they add any appropriate sales taxes, so the price they ring up is often higher than the price on the tag. This comes as a surprise to many UK (and EU) visitors, since they are expecting to pay the price on the tag.

Here, when a price tag says £5, you expect to take the item to the till, hand over a five pound note and thats it - is the cashier said "sorry, that will be £5.50", they'd get short shrift. Any tax/VAT due is the responsibility of the seller and comes out of that £5.

If VAT were to increase (and it did increase from 15% to 17.5% about 15 or so years ago), prices would not increase overnight. Often the sellers would cover the increase themselves, and gradually increase prices over time.

As such, when we agreed to pay LL say $295 for an island, or $195 for a mainland sim etc. we expected to pay $295 or $195 per month - no more and no less. If any tax, VAT or whatever is due, when expect that to be LL's responsibility and to come out of that $295 or $195 a month (indeed under UK and I believe German law, the price quoted *must* include VAT unless explicitly indicated otherwise).

Also, over here, we expect (and indeed are legally entitled) to be given notice of at least a billing period (i.e. a month) for any increase to that amount.

That is why LL will lose EU customers - it has essentially increased its fees by 17.5% - sent out the e-mail notice *after* doing so, and for people paying mainland tier this is effectively retrospectively applied to the current billing period (under UK and I believe EU consumer law they could be taken to court over that, and we know the TOS clauses trying to limit liability to be covered under California can be overturned by the courts).

So to summarise, it is breaking EU laws by displaying prices which do not include VAT without explicitly stating so, and by increasing charges previously agreed without prior notice.

What LL should have done would be to announce a new charging policy - namely that EU customers would be charged in Euros (including VAT), and given a Euro price list such as

Monthly Island Fee: US: $295; EU: 245 Euro
etc.

(if you do the math you'll see that the EU price includes VAT)

Then given a date when the new policy would take place - allowing at least a month notice - e.g. 1 November if announced now.

Matthew
Yuriko Nishi
Registered User
Join date: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 288
09-28-2007 12:32
From: Ciaran Laval
They are continuing to not advise EU users on their pricing page that pricing does not include VAT. That's a huge mistake to be making and something that should be rectified ASAP unless LL want to get themselves into a shed load more trouble.



yes thats against the law at least in germany.
Tiziana Catteneo
Registered User
Join date: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 187
09-28-2007 12:33
I think they are taxing EU residents twice

First when they buy l$ and after when they pay land fees using already taxed l$ converted in us dollars.

here in italy 20 + 20 is 40%
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
09-28-2007 12:35
From: Jelena DeVinna
Hi,

It's in any way not according to any regulation in the EU to do it in this way.
Any consumer organisation in the EU would confirm this.
First you give notice to the customer of the change, they firm gives the option to agree or not and this to go effective on the next billing period. NOT ON THE CURRENT.
This is just not to believe!!
Great promotion Of SL :(

Regards
Is there a lawyer in the house?
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
Yuriko Nishi
Registered User
Join date: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 288
09-28-2007 12:36
From: Matthew Dowd
A cultural difference which I think many in the US (and clearly not LL) don't realise is that over here in the UK (and I believe other places in the EU), the price advertised *is* the price you pay.

In the US, (I'll use a shop analogy but the same applies online), the price tag is the base price. When you go to the till they add any appropriate sales taxes, so the price they ring up is often higher than the price on the tag. This comes as a surprise to many UK (and EU) visitors, since they are expecting to pay the price on the tag.

Here, when a price tag says £5, you expect to take the item to the till, hand over a five pound note and thats it - is the cashier said "sorry, that will be £5.50", they'd get short shrift. Any tax/VAT due is the responsibility of the seller and comes out of that £5.

If VAT were to increase (and it did increase from 15% to 17.5% about 15 or so years ago), prices would not increase overnight. Often the sellers would cover the increase themselves, and gradually increase prices over time.

As such, when we agreed to pay LL say $295 for an island, or $195 for a mainland sim etc. we expected to pay $295 or $195 per month - no more and no less. If any tax, VAT or whatever is due, when expect that to be LL's responsibility and to come out of that $295 or $195 a month (indeed under UK and I believe German law, the price quoted *must* include VAT unless explicitly indicated otherwise).

Also, over here, we expect (and indeed are legally entitled) to be given notice of at least a billing period (i.e. a month) for any increase to that amount.

That is why LL will lose EU customers - it has essentially increased its fees by 17.5% - sent out the e-mail notice *after* doing so, and for people paying mainland tier this is effectively retrospectively applied to the current billing period (under UK and I believe EU consumer law they could be taken to court over that, and we know the TOS clauses trying to limit liability to be covered under California can be overturned by the courts).

So to summarise, it is breaking EU laws by displaying prices which do not include VAT without explicitly stating so, and by increasing charges previously agreed without prior notice.

What LL should have done would be to announce a new charging policy - namely that EU customers would be charged in Euros (including VAT), and given a Euro price list such as

Monthly Island Fee: US: $295; EU: 245 Euro
etc.

(if you do the math you'll see that the EU price includes VAT)

Then given a date when the new policy would take place - allowing at least a month notice - e.g. 1 November if announced now.

Matthew


perfect explanation :)
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
09-28-2007 12:36
From: Tiziana Catteneo
I think they are taxing EU residents twice

First when they buy l$ and after when they pay land fees using already taxed l$ converted in us dollars.


Indeed - VAT should only be charged on any outstanding balances charged to a credit card or paypal after any US$ you have in you account have been used to pay fees.

We'll have to see if LL have implemented the system like that.

Matthew
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
09-28-2007 12:38
From: Matthew Dowd
A cultural difference which I think many in the US (and clearly not LL) don't realise is that over here in the UK (and I believe other places in the EU), the price advertised *is* the price you pay.


Web businesses are as pissed about this tax as their EU customers are. No one will redesign their online shops to give us the correct pricing. I recently bought some shareware and was also given the price without VAT that everyone outside the EU pays. Only during checkout the EU VAT was added. We'll either have to live with that or emigrate.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
09-28-2007 12:40
@ Walker Moore: LOL at your new signature. Thanks for the smile today. I needed it.
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
Walker Moore
Fоrum Unregular
Join date: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1,458
09-28-2007 12:45
From: Raymond Figtree
@ Walker Moore: LOL at your new signature. Thanks for the smile today. I needed it.


hehe! You're welcome! What a nightmare trying to submit it though.
503 .. 503 .. 503 ..
_____________________
It's only a forum, no one dies.
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
09-28-2007 12:45
From: Jelena DeVinna
Hi,

It's in any way not according to any regulation in the EU to do it in this way.
Any consumer organisation in the EU would confirm this.
First you give notice to the customer of the change, they firm gives the option to agree or not and this to go effective on the next billing period. NOT ON THE CURRENT.
This is just not to believe!!
Great promotion Of SL :(

Regards


http://www.out-law.com/page-717

Quote:

"The European Commission has proposed a new Directive that will force non-EU companies to pay VAT on a range of goods delivered electronically.

Under the new rules, any company not registered in the EU but which has annual sales of internet services and paid-for TV in excess of 100,000 Euros (£62,000) to EU customers will have to register in a member state and pay VAT at the prevailing national rate."

The article is from September 2000. This law has been in place for 7 years now, and all major non-EU companies like SOE or Blizzard add this tax. We could ask a European and an American WoW player and compare their monthly fees.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
09-28-2007 12:47
From: Walker Moore


hehe! You're welcome! What a nightmare trying to submit it though.
503 .. 503 .. 503 ..

503 is the New 42. Oh and based on the past 2 days I'm suggesting we change the group name to The ______ Cartel.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
09-28-2007 12:50
From: Aleister Montgomery
Web businesses are as pissed about this tax as their EU customers are. No one will redesign their online shops to give us the correct pricing. I recently bought some shareware and was also given the price without VAT that everyone outside the EU pays. Only during checkout the EU VAT was added. We'll either have to live with that or emigrate.


True - but at least you were told the total price before you confirmed the purchase (I hope). If you were buying from LL, I wouldn't be surprised you would confirm one price on the web based system - and *then* get an e-mail saying they'd charged you that price plus VAT.

Matthew
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
09-28-2007 12:51
Still 65 open comments on the latest non VAT blog post to ask for a VAT blog post:
http://blog.secondlife.com/2007/09/28/rolling-restart-monday-oct-1st/#comments
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
09-28-2007 12:52
From: Aleister Montgomery
http://www.out-law.com/page-717

Quote:

"The European Commission has proposed a new Directive that will force non-EU companies to pay VAT on a range of goods delivered electronically.

Under the new rules, any company not registered in the EU but which has annual sales of internet services and paid-for TV in excess of 100,000 Euros (£62,000) to EU customers will have to register in a member state and pay VAT at the prevailing national rate."


Agreed - but that directive just means that LL needs to pay VAT on its sales to EU customers. It does not permit LL or any other company to increase the amount a customer has previously agreed to pay without prior notice.

Matthew
Farallon Greyskin
Cranky Seal
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 491
09-28-2007 12:57
From: Tiana Whitfield
But Gaming is gaming.... hmmmm


"Gaming" as far as gvernments are concerned means "Gambling" It's the official term for it. So they are talking about slot machines etc as "games".
Walker Moore
Fоrum Unregular
Join date: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1,458
09-28-2007 12:59
From: Brenda Connolly
503 is the New 42. Oh and based on the past 2 days I'm suggesting we change the group name to The ______ Cartel.
LOL. It wouldn't surprise me if the next time I visit, all the textures are replaced with MISSING IMAGE. :D
_____________________
It's only a forum, no one dies.
1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21