These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Sad Story |
|
Nowun Till
Anarchy in the UK Limited
Join date: 4 May 2006
Posts: 227
|
06-15-2006 05:25
First name Linden may be OK.....
|
Doc Nielsen
Fallen...
Join date: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,059
|
06-15-2006 05:25
While I'll agree it crappy if some people took offense to the name LL had the right to do it without warning that to is stipulated in the ToS. They can end your service for any reason they deem fit. This is usually held to certain standards such as offensive names, racist comments in world, harassment, using some type of hack (not really rellevant to SL though...), and a few other things. LL had the right to do it but i do agree some fair warning or a chance to change the name somehow would of been a better way to go about it. Being a GM in another game in the past I can tell you a few things. The job itself is pretty stressful for starters and the multitude of people that IM with problems and such is vast. Its not really abuse of power, but it could of been gone about better. If one person found the name offensive in alot of virtual worlds something would be done be that banning that account or that character or whatever. They dont need to give fair warning but it is nice when they do. Thats how these companies work. If you recall there was something with World Of Warcraft that was similar awhile back. Someone made a guild with a name that offended some people. They that guild i believe it was. Thats why most people dont go pick a name like Skinhead as a game tag because it raises to be offensive to some people and then LL has to do something about it. Did they go about it right? Who knows really. Did they have a right to do it ? yeah they did. Is it going to happen again? most likely. If a name is found to be offensive good standing or not its bound to happen to some people. This also means that a few people actually reported him for the name. So more then one person took offense to it. While it is a little short sited they cant know all the worlds trends or take on every meaning of the word and ask which the guy means really. Unless you want them to slap a big disclaimer on him saying which meaning it is really. People arnt going to guess which he means really. The name can be taken offensively to people and thats where the problem itself lies even if it was intended differently people arnt really going to know that ![]() And the way it appears in context if someone thats more used to the racist side of the term skinhead see's it they may take offense to it plain and simple. As i said though terminating the account could of been done better even though it was done within LL's rights. You lose more customers by not handeling things with a softer glove =P. Dont hate me for this post I'm just throwing out some base knowledge as a GM ![]() Well a name like Lina offends my delicate sensibilities greatly, being as it is an offensive term for female genitalia in my native Croat dialect. And doubtless a few other Croats who've read the thread will feel the same. What say we all AR you for an offensive name? That be OK with you if you get your account closed with no discussion as a result? _____________________
All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
|
Doc Nielsen
Fallen...
Join date: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,059
|
06-15-2006 05:27
First name Linden may be OK..... NOT to us tree worshipers - that's BLASPHEMY that is! _____________________
All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
|
kalik Stork
Registered User
Join date: 1 Mar 2006
Posts: 79
|
torley lindens comment
06-15-2006 05:46
|
Lina Pussycat
Texture WizKid
Join date: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 731
|
06-15-2006 06:26
Well a name like Lina offends my delicate sensibilities greatly, being as it is an offensive term for female genitalia in my native Croat dialect. And doubtless a few other Croats who've read the thread will feel the same. What say we all AR you for an offensive name? That be OK with you if you get your account closed with no discussion as a result? Difference here is regardless of my name that isnt up for discussion and its not racist to a bit of a majority of people. While it may be in your tounge it is an actual real world name and is quite often used in sweden and other places in this spelling. I use a real world name like John, Paul, George, Ringo, Bobby, Grace, Jack, well you get the idea here. There would be a difference there as it is an actual name and not a said group or object to a big group of people. Skinheads are associated with racism and that is actually in a clause as being a problem. My name on the other hand isnt Skinhead or something you wouldnt normally name someone. There is a vast different between Lina being female parts in your language and SkinHead being a cultural racial epifet that offends entire race's and cultures of people. Most people get the point of my name being an actual name. Where as skinhead really could of been a problem. My name wouldnt raise flags nor could they actually ask me to change it due to the fact that it is actually a LEGAL name for a person. If you named your child Skinhead in real life what would happen? There would be schooling issues and issues with people in real life. Dont try to compare a name that is an actual name in msot cultures if it helps better for you its pronounced Lee Na. I doubt thats how its spoken in your tounge. Difference is most people know that Skinhead has racially connected undertones most people wouldnt know that lina means what you stated. And its seldom used in the english language as meaning such. I'll agree some discussion would of been better but its not up to LL to have to discuss that. Its a clause in the ToS that they can terminate service at any time they deem fit. They could boot us all out tommorow and give no warning if they really wanted to. While i dont agree with how it was went about it was fully in LL's right to do so and an abuse report had to of been filed. And the name itself should of raised flags on creation and he should of been asked to leave or change it close to when he first got in. To many people here are running around saying it was just a linden kicking someone because that linden found the name offensive. I ask you to prove that to be the case. Simply put none of us other then LL themselves know the whole truth of the matter not even the guy that was kicked knows 100% of what happened. I was jsut throwing in my knowledge here as a GM so there was no reason to try and attack me directly by using my name to fit your agenda. The name was offensive to enough people obviously to warrant this and you cannot prove otherwise. I'll agree it should of been gone about differently however and should of been discussed. It wasnt neccessary but you attract more bee's with honey as they say =P. You gotta use soft gloves as a GM or in this case Linden. Sadly with the name skinhead it was kind of inevitable that he'd run into some trouble. This just kind of shows that you should be careful naming yourself after groups. |
Kiari LeFay
Lemon Flavored Fish Treat
![]() Join date: 27 Jan 2003
Posts: 223
|
06-15-2006 06:42
I don't think he should keep the name if it is explained to him that in America it is highly linked to racial hatred. I am sure that any offensive name we could come up with has someplace that it is an aceptable. That doesn't mean it has to be accepted here. It does seem if there was never any racial intention or actions in SL, that there might be a better solution. Perhaps having him move all assets over to an account with a different name. I too would like to hear LLs side to this. The Lindens should also delete the characters of anyone named 'Black'... they should force those people to use "African Linden" because in America, Black can be considered offensive by some groups. Indeed, maybe my good friend Pommie should be deleted too, since some Brits would be offended ![]() If this truly happened, I believe LL owes Skinhead an apology and whatever of his property they can salvage. |
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
06-15-2006 06:45
I'm afraid the view being taken is that a Linden decision has been taken and because it involves 'customer confidentality' it is not possible to discuss the matter. Any discussion must take place between the parties concerned - LL and Skinhead - and LL probably don't care to discuss it... By extension I suppose the same rules can and will be used to avoid discussion of the entire subject - viz: Just WHAT names are currently, or will be within, say six months to pull a number out of the air, considered 'offesnsive' by ANY member of LL staff who happens to notice them? Likewise I suppose any discussion of the absurdly variable and open ended TOS arising from this thread is out of court? I guess when LL gets a Jehova's Witness on the staff I'll be in for the chop - after all, THEY don't like Doctors! ![]() Well, if you didn't laugh you'd have to cry... Picking a first name in LL is now a risky guessing game. First you have to thoroughly research the bigoted sensibilities of 'little America' in detail and carefully avoid anything that might annoy them. Then you need to check out the bleeding heart liberals, which is probably easier to research, given their penchant for self publicity, but none the less a tedious job. Next thoroughly research every MINORITY group in existence so as to aviod giving offense Lastly, being a reasonable person you will of course avoid anything that really is offensive - to the MAJORITY of people OK, so, what's left? Jane - or John? Hmmmm.... decisions, decisions... ![]() OK - Jane ![]() *Jane skips happily off to explore an oddly underpopulated SL..* *Six months later... Jane is enjoying her house and land, she's a bit lonely here in SL though, 'cos there aren't that many people about* HANG ON A MINUTE BUSTER - GENDER SPECIFIC NAMES? THAT MIGHT OFFEND SOMEONE OF UNDIFERENTIATED GENDER - YOU ARE BANNED! Hey! Where'd they all go? Uh... Phil? Er, Mr Rosedale? I think we may have a problem... . My names banned because the possible communist leaning. ![]() |
Arahan Claveau
Arthole
![]() Join date: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 42
|
06-15-2006 06:56
Check out the films 'No Skin Off My Ass' and 'Skin Flick' by gay Canadian filmmaker Bruce LaBruce, far removed from the usual expectations and stereotypes. 'No Skin Off My Ass' actually explains in voiceover the history of the skinhead and it's long association with black music (SKA).
The skinhead look in gay culture is long established, the exaggeration of male aggressiveness and sexuality being part of its obvious fetishistic attraction. And let's not forget black, gay skinheads! Where do they fit in Linden Lab's utopian vision? |
Kiari LeFay
Lemon Flavored Fish Treat
![]() Join date: 27 Jan 2003
Posts: 223
|
06-15-2006 06:58
Lina, this is what I get from your post:
It doesn't matter what your name is because your name isn't offensive in your country. Just to Croats. It's also a -real- name, not like Skinhead. Allow me to rebut: It doesn't matter what Skinhead's name is because Skinhead isn't offensive in Skinhead's country. Just to uneducated Americans. And what does a real name have to do with anything, have you -seen- the names people come up with in SL? |
Rev Eponym
21st Century Schizoid Man
Join date: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 21
|
06-15-2006 07:13
LL were completely within their rights to shut down the guy's avatar without prior word. That is well within the scope of LL policy, but for crying out loud like a lost dog, was that the best thing to do? Did they think to perhaps ask the guy a few questions first? Perhaps negotiate a name change? Did they consider that their customer service rep is already garbage, and they need some seriously positive PR in that realm?
My next alt will be named 'Peckerwood' or 'Cracker' or --my favorite Caucasian epithet-- 'Casper'. Can they get me for that? .R. |
Selador Cellardoor
Registered User
![]() Join date: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
|
06-15-2006 07:38
Interesting that Torley's response is not at all like her usual ones. Normally she is at pains to explain a situation, but in this response she puffs out a lot of smoke, and ultimately says that it's something that can only be discussed between LL and the resident. Whom they have banned. As I said in another posting, it might well be the case that there is more to the issue than has been made apparent to us; we have after all only heard one side of the story. However, if that is the case, then Torley should say so. Otherwise she appears to be making excuses for a peremptory and unjust decision. As it is, none of us can feel secure. If the Lindens have arbitrarily started to ban residents for obscure reasons then we will all start to be afraid to do or say anything. Let them either have the good grace to admit they made a mistake, and put it right, or let them tell us that the version we have heard is not the full story. One or the other, please! _____________________
|
Freya Junot
Registered User
Join date: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 32
|
06-15-2006 09:13
'When they came for the socalists and took them away, I said nothing - I wasn't a socalist. When they came for the liberals, I said nothing - for I wasn't a liberal. When they came for the Jews, I did nothing - after all, I wasn't a Jew. When they came for me - there was no one left to say anything...' QFE ![]() |
Robin Linden
Linden Lifer
![]() Join date: 25 Nov 2002
Posts: 1,224
|
06-15-2006 09:39
As you all know, I can't comment on the specifics of an individual account or the decision that we made. But let me say this: Skinhead came to our attention for valid reasons and was asked to change his name, and did. Now he's actively involved in SL once again.
I know I've said this before, but before you jump to conclusions when something appears unfair, please try to remember that there are two sides to every story, and generally you're only hearing one side. It's tough to make some of these decisions, but we try hard to be as fair as we can be, and to work within the same community standards we ask you to follow. I heard an interesting interview recently where someone (the founder of a Christian college for home-schooled students in the US) said that by banning hate-speech 'liberals' are actually guilty of the same intolerance they're purportedly trying to eliminate. We disagree. We've taken the position here that symbols and other references to behaviors that belittle or defame whole groups of people in the real world work against the type of world we'd like to see SL become. We have the opportunity to do better, and we've decided to go for it. _____________________
|
pandastrong Fairplay
all bout the BANG POW NOW
![]() Join date: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,920
|
06-15-2006 09:42
As you all know, I can't comment on the specifics of an individual account or the decision that we made. But let me say this: Skinhead came to our attention for valid reasons and was asked to change his name, and did. Now he's actively involved in SL once again. I know I've said this before, but before you jump to conclusions when something appears unfair, please try to remember that there are two sides to every story, and generally you're only hearing one side. It's tough to make some of these decisions, but we try hard to be as fair as we can be, and to work within the same community standards we ask you to follow. I heard an interesting interview recently where someone (the founder of a Christian college for home-schooled students in the US) said that by banning hate-speech 'liberals' are actually guilty of the same intolerance they're purportedly trying to eliminate. We disagree. We've taken the position here that symbols and other references to behaviors that belittle or defame whole groups of people in the real world work against the type of world we'd like to see SL become. We have the opportunity to do better, and we've decided to go for it. I imagine all of Robin's posts being written on feather-like parchement as she sits under the bodhi tree. ![]() I feel enlightenment everytime she posts! ![]() _____________________
"Honestly, you are a gem -- fun, creative, and possessing strong social convictions. I think LL should be paying you to be in their game."
~ Ulrika Zugzwang on the iconography of pandastrong in the media "That's no good. Someone is going to take your place as SL's cutest boy while you're offline." ~ Ingrid Ingersoll on the topic of LL refusing to pay pandastrong for being in their game. |
Artemis Cain
Take it or Leave it
Join date: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 116
|
06-15-2006 09:55
This is a quite unfortunate incident. However, to play Devil's Advocate for a moment, look at it from the perspective of LL.
Say they allow this gentleman back into SL with the name Skinhead. What happens when someone who has something like GrandWizard such and such as a name. couldn't that be construed to have ties to the Ku-Klux Klan? I guess my point is, allowing this name regardless of the person with the name's views would be a double standard with a policy to ban offensive names. I am sure that a lot of names that could be banned. This is most unfortunate, but allowing one based on LL's "ignorance" could open the door for a lot more offensive names to be disputed in the case of a ban. just my L$4 (approximately $.02) |
Doc Nielsen
Fallen...
Join date: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,059
|
06-15-2006 10:01
As you all know, I can't comment on the specifics of an individual account or the decision that we made. But let me say this: Skinhead came to our attention for valid reasons and was asked to change his name, and did. Now he's actively involved in SL once again. I know I've said this before, but before you jump to conclusions when something appears unfair, please try to remember that there are two sides to every story, and generally you're only hearing one side. It's tough to make some of these decisions, but we try hard to be as fair as we can be, and to work within the same community standards we ask you to follow. I heard an interesting interview recently where someone (the founder of a Christian college for home-schooled students in the US) said that by banning hate-speech 'liberals' are actually guilty of the same intolerance they're purportedly trying to eliminate. We disagree. We've taken the position here that symbols and other references to behaviors that belittle or defame whole groups of people in the real world work against the type of world we'd like to see SL become. We have the opportunity to do better, and we've decided to go for it. That sounds very much as though you are stating that LL policy from this point on is going to be that anything inworld that fits LL's unpublished definitions of what amounts to belittlement or defamatory will be open to punitive action? Or am I completely misinderstanding? Hmmm, come back George Orwell - where are you when we need you? Still, looking on the bright side, a sizeable porportion of the AVs in SL will either be changing their names - or becoming unpersons shortly... As for belittling people - bye bye Goreans... I'll shut up now before something nasty happens _____________________
All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
|
Nowun Till
Anarchy in the UK Limited
Join date: 4 May 2006
Posts: 227
|
06-15-2006 10:15
It appears that the international community is to be belittled under this stated policy.
If americans don't like it tough luck the rest of the world. Now is that not to belittle whole groups of people. There is also comment on defame. I wonder whether to decide all skinheads are racists is not a defamation. It's hypocrytical, but at least it is clear. LL decide what is OK based on......... |
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
|
06-15-2006 10:35
Well, I was about to climb down from this bandwagon anyway.
On the basis of having learned last night that there was more to this than met the eye, including (but not limited to) the fact that skinheads in Europe apparently aren't, as a group, as harmless as suggested they are in this thread. coco _____________________
|
Doc Nielsen
Fallen...
Join date: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,059
|
06-15-2006 10:46
Well, I was about to climb down from this bandwagon anyway. On the basis of having learned last night that there was more to this than met the eye, including (but not limited to) the fact that skinheads in Europe apparently aren't, as a group, as harmless as suggested they are in this thread. coco Quite right CoCo. The first European skinhead you meet as just as likely to kick you to death with his DMs as the first black person you meet is to mug you and rape your wife... Now please climb down carefully and have a nice day in stereotype-land _____________________
All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
|
Selador Cellardoor
Registered User
![]() Join date: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
|
06-15-2006 11:02
I know I've said this before, but before you jump to conclusions when something appears unfair, please try to remember that there are two sides to every story, and generally you're only hearing one side. It's tough to make some of these decisions, but we try hard to be as fair as we can be, and to work within the same community standards we ask you to follow. Robin, Thank you for your response, even if it is a bit late. ![]() However, the real issue, to me, was not to do with the fact that the name was found to be offensive. It was that the claim was made that the account was deleted without any warning or discussion. I appreciate the fact that we have heard only one side, but what I find worrying is that one day a Linden might take offence to something I say or do and suddenly delete my account. I appreciate the fact that you feel you cannot speak freely. But I have to say, in my experience transparency is the only thing that quells misapprehensions. _____________________
|
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
|
06-15-2006 11:09
Doc, I have not made a study of this yet, so I would appreciate it if you would keep the belittling comments full of unwarranted conclusions to yourself.
I felt it necessarily to announce that I was climbing off the bandwagon until facts were known, and after I went to bed (very late) I was wishing I had taken the time to do it already. I said there appears to be more than meets the eye, including, but not limited to, the fact that skinheads in Europe apparently aren't, as a group, as harmless as suggested they are in this thread. Meaning further study was warranted on my part. Because as you may know, I very much support LL's policy of not allowing anti-semitic or racist names, objects, and actions in the game. That does not translate into any sort of stereotyping on my part. The other aspect to it was something another poster alluded to earlier in this thread, and I didn't intend to, for obvious reasons. The third aspect was the possibility that LL had already taken care of this situation in a more equitable manner, which, as we see, Robin has said they did. So kindly don't try to make anything stereotypical out of what I said. It was important that I withdraw my support for this cause until I learned more details. coco _____________________
|
Doc Nielsen
Fallen...
Join date: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,059
|
06-15-2006 11:27
Doc, I have not made a study of this yet, so I would appreciate it if you would keep the belittling comments full of unwarranted conclusions to yourself. I felt it necessarily to announce that I was climbing off the bandwagon until facts were known, and after I went to bed (very late) I was wishing I had taken the time to do it already. I said there appears to be more than meets the eye, including, but not limited to, the fact that skinheads in Europe apparently aren't, as a group, as harmless as suggested they are in this thread. Meaning further study was warranted on my part. Because as you may know, I very much support LL's policy of not allowing anti-semitic or racist names, objects, and actions in the game. That does not translate into any sort of stereotyping on my part. The other aspect to it was something another poster alluded to earlier in this thread, and I didn't intend to, for obvious reasons. The third aspect was the possibility that LL had already taken care of this situation in a more equitable manner, which, as we see, Robin has said they did. So kindly don't try to make anything stereotypical out of what I said. It was important that I withdraw my support for this cause until I learned more details. coco I'm sorry? LL took care of this situation in a more equitable manner? By forcing the guy to change his name because it didn't fit in with their unpublished standards of right and wrong? Well sure, if you say so... Look CoCo, in case you haven't noticed, Robin's post is notice that LL is going to pick and choose it's standards in a purely abritary fashion from some madly varying palette created by the SF hippie/liberal mob. Don't you find that just the tiniest bit worrying? We have to stay within the rules - but the rules are arbitary and unwritten! And this is a company that has managed to raise tens of millions in funding and expects us to pay dearly for it's 'services'. Give us your money, oh, and play by the rules - which we won't tell you Bah - I'm going for a walk before I blow a gasket - this is such utter crap! _____________________
All very well for people to have a sig that exhorts you to 'be the change' - I wonder if it's ever occurred to them that they might be something that needs changing...?
|
Phoenix Psaltery
Ninja Wizard
![]() Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,599
|
06-15-2006 11:39
I imagine all of Robin's posts being written on feather-like parchement as she sits under the bodhi tree. ![]() I feel enlightenment everytime she posts! ![]() As she floats in the air, 18 inches above the ground, sitting in the Lotus position. ![]() P2 _____________________
![]() |
Vivianne Draper
Registered User
Join date: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,157
|
06-15-2006 12:03
Wow! One game company, with 100K users, by banning or changing the name of ONE person, has the power to belittle the entire international community.
Wow. Just wow. Phear da powah! Now you have me wondering if Philip utters the internationally renown villians laugh (muhahahahaha) every night before he goes to bed, such is his power to offend all of the rest of the world. I mean shit, this is some heady stuff! It appears that the international community is to be belittled under this stated policy. If americans don't like it tough luck the rest of the world. Now is that not to belittle whole groups of people. There is also comment on defame. I wonder whether to decide all skinheads are racists is not a defamation. It's hypocrytical, but at least it is clear. LL decide what is OK based on......... |
Lina Pussycat
Texture WizKid
Join date: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 731
|
06-15-2006 12:04
Ok first off Black is also a color and is more commonly referenced to that as opposed to people of african american persuasion. Ill bring up what Robin said as well. You only know one side of the story here. There could be alot more to it but they are not allowed to say. We only hear his side of it and you jump on LL for it. And no the policy change isnt on international people but consider a name before you do it a bit more. Some names in SL may be odd sure but most arnt really offensive at all.
Just because someone doesnt know all the international group of the word skin head they are uneducated american's. Well pardon but most people that are educated are NOT taught that in the united states that doesnt mean they are uneducated. The point here is LL was within their rights to do so. They could of went around it differently but like Robin said again we dont know the whole story. While he may have good standing with some people that may not be so for everyone. It may be sad but it was all within their policy. There is a difference between the name skinhead and the name black as well. Most people arnt going to take black to mean african american by default unless you are speaking directly to someone of that persuasion. I myself understand the reasoning behind people finding the name skinhead offensive as i have had run-in's with that set group of people before and it was a hurtful experience. Someone that hasnt gone thru that or dealt with that group may not understand it, but you get the point there. I was not offering my own opinion on the matter but rather what policy stipulates. My personal feelings is that things could have been gone around differently. I wont make up a total opinion because frankly i dont know the linden's side of the story thus making it impossible. Alot of you construde it out of proportion and you dont actually know all the facts. Its all just opinion and the guys side of the story which of course is going to be harsh towards LL as he doesnt really wanna be banned. If it was jsut a name infraction I'd think it highly likely that something would be done to change that im pretty sure there is alot more to it then simply that but thats information we dont know and we wont know. All im saying look at it from LL's view point instead of this guys. You gotta take it that there are always 2 sides of the equation especially when forming opinions about the company that did so. Re-read the ToS and you will see that LL were actualyl within their rights. Ill note also most people dont bother reading them. Im forming an argument from stuff i know and have experience in rather then jsut simply stating an opinion. I was putting in what was what from experience yet someone felt the need to bring my own name into it. That was uncalled for really its not like i was attacking you or even giving an opinion. |