Who thinks the 2004 election was "stolen" ?

a machine recount will result in the same exact count. sheeeesh. Do you not understand that it's the software at issue --not the ballot?

Having an agenda is not a bad thing. Using distored facts and lies is.

...

In short, recounts do not create a more accurate result. And you're still missing my main point - that 118,000+ votes is too large a margin to recount, no matter the election. In recounts, it's not the percentage difference that's important, but the difference in vote totals. A 500-vote difference is small and can conceivable be changed in a recount, whether it's 1% of the vote or 10%. A 118,000 vote difference probably is too much for the overall outcome to be changed in a recount, whether that 118,000 votes is 10%, 5%, or 1%.

This may seem obvious, but in recounts, the odds of overturning the result decrease with the larger the separation in votes. Over 10,000 votes and the odd of changing the overall result is about the same as the odd of the best DNA sample being wrong. At 118,000 votes the election wasn't worth recounting, and Kerry knew that.

I love how you said the exact same thing as before, but quoted my entire post in it without responding to it. Very clever.

I love how you said the exact same thing as before, but quoted my entire post in it without responding to it. Very clever.


Watches Reitsuki's point sail over Kendra's head

Having an agenda is not a bad thing. Using distored facts and lies is.

Proof please.

simply because you two did not like my answer --does not mean I didn't answer.

point me to a right wing site that backs up it's claims with links and sources at the same level as the sites that I have used.

What answer was that? Link?

are you that bereft of energy that you can't scroll up?

Kendra, honestly, I realize this is the Internet, but must we totally butcher the Noble Apostrophe?

It's = It is

So therefore, "back up it's claims" means "back up it is claims". Now I think we can all agree that doesn't make any sense. After a possessive it there is no apostrophe, just like there isn't for "hers". As in, the bike was hers. Now, if you wrote that the bike belonged to a specific person, or to people in general, you would need a posessive apostrophe: The bike was Mike's, or The bike was [nobody's/anybody's/someone's].

BTW, I'm only mentioning this because you ragged on someone's spelling earlier.

a little bedtime reading on your favorite politician

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/8343403/detail.html
http://www.11alive.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=83191
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASUS_12/4869_12.htm

theres alot about her that yall don't see that our local news covers

are you that bereft of energy that you can't scroll up?

ragging on my spelling isn't hard, I have never claimed to be a decent speller (?) its something I struggle with.

Oh, gee. The ADL condemns her. That's like a compliment.

Anyway, what does this have to do with the points I made about what she's contributed (almost alone)? Nobody addresses that ... just sidesteps to picking at what faults they can get at.

Meh. I give up. We deserve what we're getting, and we deserve what we're going to get all too soon. I'm beginning to welcome it.

True. But I was trying to make a point about glass houses, rocks, etc. Now If I were to rag on your spelling, that'd be totally OK.

EDIT: Hey, I think this was my 500th post! Yay!

I'm just saying, if you want to celebrate her despite her faults and the fact that her own district couldn't stomach her complaining anymore, go right ahead. Yeah we have all seen what she has contributed there is a reason she lost in the primary.

Of course, there's nothing to complain about. Ingsoc is doubleplus good, after all. I welcome the new completely spineless and/or hopelessly corrupt Congress and am personally glad that its members will no longer presume to question our Emporer about anything truly serious.

Yippie.

I don't mind strong willed congressmen, however when one is a racist and a moron like McKinney they shouldn't be let anywhere near Washington.

For a moron, she sure seemed to be aware rather quickly of the 9/11 deceptions and conflicts of interest, not to mention gutsy enough to speak out.

But I guess safer is better. We wouldn't want any boats rocked.

For a moron, she sure seemed to be aware rather quickly of the 9/11 deceptions and conflicts of interest, not to mention gutsy enough to speak out.

But I guess safer is better. We wouldn't want any boats rocked.

Kendra, honestly, I realize this is the Internet, but must we totally butcher the Noble Apostrophe?

It's = It is

So therefore, "back up it's claims" means "back up it is claims". Now I think we can all agree that doesn't make any sense. After a possessive it there is no apostrophe, just like there isn't for "hers". As in, the bike was hers. Now, if you wrote that the bike belonged to a specific person, or to people in general, you would need a posessive apostrophe: The bike was Mike's, or The bike was [nobody's/anybody's/someone's].

BTW, I'm only mentioning this because you ragged on someone's spelling earlier.

Sigh....

I suppose if someone believes in 9/11 conspiracy theories.....