Tired of trying to find ACTUAL EVENTS? Tired of sorting through tringos & thongs?

Considering that I've posted maybe THREE posts total in all of those threads, I have NO IDEA what you're talking about. I haven't made any claims at all much less as you're asserting.

If this is that alt shit, see below.



I can certainly see that posting it wasn't a good idea because I'm having this stupid friggin' argument with you. But I DID NOT post it with any sort of agenda attached.

To turn your words around, what good comes from posting stuff like you did?. Do you think think that people are going to rally around you and say "Great Job Nolan, you really told her"?

All it does is provoke people into keep the thread off topic longer as people argue about stuff.



I'm sorry, who are you talking to here? Because I haven't posted much at all in the couple or three recent contentious topics.

If you're playing that tired old alt card, you can cut that shit out right now. I'm not associated in ANY way with he-who-shall-not-be-named. I've had exacty ONE IM with said person.

I have exactly one ALT, for your information. A male AV named Quillian Asturias, which I haven't used much at all and certainly not on the forum.



Gee. That looks suspiciously like the daddy card being played.

I was responding to you, because you can't let it go. In fact, Are you not telling people their "motivations" for doing things in multiple threads simultaneously? Classic "not letting go."

Quite telling.

Here we go again, with the assumptions. I am referring to what YOU said silly. About your belief people supposedly talking about a particular person, in a subversive fashion. Nothing about alts, or any association you may or may not share with he-who-will-not-be-named. There's nothing read between lines that do not exist my friend.

Nah, I am not the one telling you to not reply to my public posts. "Don't start with me!", etc. I could care less if you do reply to me, just don't expect that you will silence me with your broken record of circular logic. You, on the other hand, are trying to mommy people into some sort of behavior you deem appropriate.

Get your last word in, because we have belabored this ridiculous claim of yours long enough, and I won't be drawn back into it.

I wasn't assuming anything. I'm genuinely puzzled, because I have not, in any way, made comments nor implied that would lead anyone (except you, of course) to come to the conclusion that I believe in those threads, that people are talking about one particular person.

Just didn't happen, Nolan. You're either very confused or your just making shit up.



Riight. And of course, you comments aren't in any way an attempt to get me to not post my comments. Quite hypocritical. But also par for the course.



I haven't made ANY claim. None at all. Stop making shit up, Nolan.

Can SOMEONE, ANYONE (besides Nolan), please tell me where, in any of the threads (public figures and this thread) I have said or implied that *I* though the threads were about a specific person?

Perhaps!

What in that post would give you the impression that I think Aimee's threads were about he-who-must-not-be-named?

I'm not arguing the point, it's an honest question.

From another thread:



You did basically agree with Coco when she said something quite similiar, earlier in this thread, you quoted her in fact.

So maybe you didn't mean it was about he-who-will-not-be-named specifically, being as you are so adamant about it, although you do seem to be agreeing with Coco, who has been implying just that, all week.

No, I don't agree with Coco.

Ok, good. Thank you, and you have my apology for misreading your replies as agreement to that end.

Ok, now that that's over. Time for another story.....

KIDDING!


Anyway...



Y'know what could be cool... Anonymous, private feedback for the host on the event. If it sucked - say so! If you liked it - say so! Anonymous and Private to keep it honest.

Thoughts?

For the second time today, I agree with you.

I like DogSpot.

That's a great idea, Travis. So often we hear event hosts wonder aloud why their event didn't garner the enthusiasm they had hoped for. Anonymity might be enough to get attendees to submit honest feedback.