Calling for a Boycott of the fundamentalist State of South Dakota
|
|
Toni Bentham
M2 Fashion Editor
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 560
|
03-20-2006 09:11
From: Reitsuki Kojima I copy/pasted exactly what you wrote, Toni, in, I feel I should point out, a discussion on Roe V. Wade If we're refering to some mythic universal constant of agreement/disagreement with the SCOTUS, don't bother - We're discussing this case. Again, very creative, but again I was discussing reality beyond this specific topic. Bizarrely enough, you don't determine what I'm writing about. From: someone
This did not.
Yes, it did. From: someone
No, it isn't,
Yes, it is From: someone Don't even need to do any work. You're right, I don't need to do any work - because you're wrong.
_____________________
Register today at SLorums.net for great discussions, good features, and a friendly staff - all you'd expect from a good forums site! 
|
|
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
03-20-2006 10:31
Ok you guys, which one of you got the patent on circular conversation? Fess up!
|
|
nimrod Yaffle
Cavemen are people too...
Join date: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,146
|
03-20-2006 10:40
From: Toni Bentham Again, very creative, but again I was discussing reality beyond this specific topic. Bizarrely enough, you don't determine what I'm writing about.
Yes, it did.
Yes, it is
You're right, I don't need to do any work - because you're wrong. Hahaha, all of you people in the forums brighten my day!
_____________________
"People can cry much easier than they can change."
-James Baldwin
|
|
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
03-20-2006 11:26
From: Toni Bentham Again, very creative, but again I was discussing reality beyond this specific topic. Bizarrely enough, you don't determine what I'm writing about. Person 1: I think the color red is ugly. Person 2: You're wrong Person 1: How am I wrong? Person 2: Red is better than no color. Imagine how much the world would suck without colors! Same thing. If you are going to shift into some mythical universal constant, indicate as such. Otherwise, common sense says you have not shifted topics. From: Toni Bentham Yes, it did.
Yes, it is
You're right, I don't need to do any work - because you're wrong. Chapter and verse please.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
|
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
03-20-2006 11:26
From: Eboni Khan Ok you guys, which one of you got the patent on circular conversation? Fess up! We're both paying liscence fees to Prokofy.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
|
Toni Bentham
M2 Fashion Editor
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 560
|
03-20-2006 11:49
From: Reitsuki Kojima Same thing. If you are going to shift into some mythical universal constant, indicate as such. Otherwise, common sense says you have not shifted topics. You're right, they're the same thing, if things that were totally different from each other were exactly alike. That was a terrible example that bore no relation to what was actually written. If you're going to write a reply to imaginary stuff I never wrote, then try to justify it by making no sense, have fun. This may be difficult to get across, but when I write about something, I actually mention it. I specifically did not refer to Roe in order to make a generic example. You seem to be replying to posts I made in some nearby parallel universe where I did mention it, so I'm going to reply to other fictional posts where you admitted you were wrong. Apology accepted.
_____________________
Register today at SLorums.net for great discussions, good features, and a friendly staff - all you'd expect from a good forums site!
|
|
Kiari LeFay
Lemon Flavored Fish Treat
Join date: 27 Jan 2003
Posts: 223
|
03-20-2006 11:54
A question that has little to do with the actual arguement at hand... I just got curious after someone posted about the constitution....
If abortion opponents want to extend the "Born or naturalized" definition cover fetuses... does that mean any child concieved during a weekend vacation to Vegas is an American Citizen. After all, it's 'life' started in America.
|
|
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
|
03-20-2006 12:05
From: Kiari LeFay A question that has little to do with the actual arguement at hand... I just got curious after someone posted about the constitution....
If abortion opponents want to extend the "Born or naturalized" definition cover fetuses... does that mean any child concieved during a weekend vacation to Vegas is an American Citizen. After all, it's 'life' started in America. ROFL.. You know what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas... 
_____________________
Surreal
Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004
Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43)
|
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
03-20-2006 12:10
From: Cristiano Midnight but but but...what about revisionist interpretation? My profound question was rudely ignored 
_____________________
Cristiano ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. 
|
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
03-20-2006 12:10
From: Surreal Farber ROFL.. You know what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas... Ask Schwanson - what happens on Yahoo also stays on Yahoo.
_____________________
Cristiano ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more.
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:13
From: Kendra Bancroft I'm sure that now they have a stacked court they'll "flip-flop" on this one as they have on many issues. Very True, the Repubniks love re-writeing history to their image er twisted image |
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:20
From: Kiamat Dusk Forgetting the whole MAP/rape kit thing for a second...it's nice to see the Goreans coming out strong in earth politics. You guys could settle this whole thing if you'd just send us some of that potion that you give your slaves and Free Women to keep them from getting knocked up.
Oh, and that "object" you keep referring to-I'm not sure what the Gorean word for it is-but here on earth we call it an innocent child. I know, I know, it's easier to hate when you objectify and dehumanize, but it's true.
Speaking of rape...tell me again what you Goreans do to our earth women after you've kidnapped them?
-Kiamat Dusk Post reported to the Lindens as an attack on a life style and belief system. In other words, Hate. |
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:22
From: Reitsuki Kojima I'm assuming you mean of 1789, since there was no act of 1791... No, not enough said. It doesn't change the fact that the SC doesn't pass laws. Do you have the faintest notion of how our legal system actually works, Magnum?
Go back and re-read your beloved act. Pay particular attention to, oh... sections 13-17, for a start, and then anything after about 22. The powers of the Supreme Court are *clearly* spelled out, and the ability to make laws is NOT one of their powers. Period.
The supreme court cannot make laws, according to the provisions of the act you yourself hold up in arguement against me. There really isn't any debate here, Magnum. The supreme court is given appellete power, power to act in certain quasi-international matters, some civil powers, etc. The supreme court is just like any other court, effectively, in that regard. It decides how to interperate existing laws, it doesn't make new ones.
Until you are willing to bitch slap me down with your holy writ, section by section, line by line, or come up with one of these other acts you vaugley mention that says "The Supreme Court, and not the legislature, is now invested with the ability to make laws" don't bother to tell me it's 'enough said' again. I understand it far better than you by all evidence presented here.
Your current logic makes as much sense as saying that having a gun permit gives a person the right to kill people, and is just as wrong. 1791 try looking a little harder |
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:24
From: Reitsuki Kojima Nonsense.
Roe V Wade, anyone? Yes Roe V Wade is good law Thanks for pointing that out |
|
Toni Bentham
M2 Fashion Editor
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 560
|
03-20-2006 13:25
From: Magnum Serpentine 1791 try looking a little harder Yeah, nope. That would be 1789: Judicary Act of 1789
_____________________
Register today at SLorums.net for great discussions, good features, and a friendly staff - all you'd expect from a good forums site!
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:27
From: Reitsuki Kojima Roe V Wade = Example of activists circumventing established methodology for bringing about changes. The dream of some fundamentalist. Sorry but Roe V wade is law |
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:27
I wrote a report on 1791 judicary act, got a B+ Try harder |
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:29
From: Reitsuki Kojima Because it circumvented the established procedure for the scope of change they were implimenting. Really, did you read what I posted before? I explained myself fairly well. You did??? Geeee Could had fooled me Oh by the way, I am opposed to your title of Witch Hunter, thats very offensive. |
|
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
03-20-2006 13:30
From: Magnum Serpentine I wrote a report on 1791 judicary act, got a B+
Try harder Please provide proof of this act.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:30
From: Kendra Bancroft What you're doing is second-guessing the Supreme Court's interpretation of The Constitution. Frankly --you're not qualified. Amen there Kendra |
|
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
03-20-2006 13:31
From: Magnum Serpentine Oh by the way, I am opposed to your title of Witch Hunter, thats very offensive. Good to know. Or, not, whatever.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
|
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
|
03-20-2006 13:32
From: Magnum Serpentine The dream of some fundamentalist.
Sorry but Roe V wade is law No, it's precedent. Really, do you understand how the legal system works?
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:32
From: Reitsuki Kojima If the law is not unconstitutional as the constiution stands, yes. Hence, why there should have been an ammendment. Marbury says the court may overrule laws that go against the constitution. Not that go against some imaginary version of the consitution that should exist. No it doesn't |
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
03-20-2006 13:33
From: Reitsuki Kojima No, it's precedent.
Really, do you understand how the legal system works? I don't think you do, Witchhunter |
|
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
03-20-2006 13:35
From: Magnum Serpentine Post reported to the Lindens as an attack on a life style and belief system. In other words, Hate. Dude, Goreans are not covered under hate crime legislation, don't belittle real issue with your fake bullshit lifestyle. |