Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Moderation rules question
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 17:18
From: Siggy Romulus
I was trying to address the issues at hand..

I have one person saying 'well THIS was said and nothing was done' - and that turned out to be false.
I have another saying that nothing is being done dispite countess AR's which they are now saying they didn't file.

I think half the posts are based on speculation and unprovable assertions.

When you ask for clarification you get the runaround 'do as I want not as I do'... which I do find rather amusing to a point to be honest.

So if folks think the resmods are inconsistant - I have to counter - they came from us.. and look how consistent most of us are.



Ahhhh now I see where you got that from. I mentioned the many ar's based on the fact that many ppl in a thread had said that they were ARing the post. Not that I personaly AR'ed it many times. Sorry if there was any confusion there.

I try very hard to not make statements that are "personal" these days. More of an observation type posting just as everyone else does.

Cat.
_____________________
:p
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
02-20-2006 17:21
Ok Nolan - Cat - Cris - Coco listen up:

Can you prove that I was or wasn't sent a warning? Yes or No?

If no - then all assertions fall flat.

If Cris asked me something in world - and I answered him one way or the other - the only thing that proves is that you can't tell Cris something that you don't expect to be repeated in the forums if it helps his argument.. this I already knew beforehand.
(and folks go off at Nolan for his slip up!) - this is not proof, and knowing me, hell shouldn't be taken as it one way or the other.

Saying something has been ARed countless times.. the only way you can know this for sure is if you yourself did it... of course being 'in on it' with someone else does make it funnier as its the self same things folks went off on about the 'two star ratings' fiasco.

If the Prococo and Co. Party Inc. want me banned - they'll have to try a lot harder - but I do think its telling they're using the same tactics that they so vehemently opposed :)

The only thing being uncovered here is a lot of shit - and a lot hypocrasy.

If you can make your points without me being here - cool.. if not - STFU.. thnx
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
02-20-2006 17:31
The redundancy saddens me. :( This thread has been closed.

Once again:
Private discussions – the forums are a public area for the Second Life community’s use. Individuals who have a dispute with each other have other channels of communication to discuss their differences or communicate – private messaging, IM within Second Life, or chatting within Second Life. Also, threads that are addressed to a single individual or group are inappropriate on the forums, this includes slander or "naming names" in a posts title, starting polls about a particular resident or group, etc.
_____________________
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9