Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Moderation rules question

Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 15:48
From: Siggy Romulus
No but if I'm to sympathise with your statement - or Enabran is to - then they have to believe it, and so I would like to know how long the statute of limitations is on your current witchhunt with me..

Also I think its funny you calling Nolan a stalker while running from post to post of mine to see how fast you can AR them :)


What proof do you have that I am running to each of your posts to AR them? Your speculating that I am is all. Your post is based on that assumption.

What if your wrong?

Cat
_____________________
:p
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
02-20-2006 15:50
From: Martin Magpie
What proof do you have that I am running to each of your posts to AR them? Your speculating that I am is all. Your post is based on that assumption.

What if your wrong?

Cat


If I'm wrong then you're a liar :)

Or your entire 'people getting away with it' is based on speculation.. which


makes you a liar :)

Of course stating that they never got a warning without concrete evidence which you can never get (and he told he who told me is heresay not evidence)

makes you



a liar :)
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 15:51
From: Nolan Nash
Really? Because niether Cristiano no myself EVER spoke to you that way. Yet you did to us, on more than one occasion.


In fact, I don't remember anyone swearing at you until recently, and I still haven't seen the actual quote.

I have never, ever, cussed at you Catherine. I swore at one person on these boards, and that was Korg - I called him an a**hole, and I would have taken my medicine like an adult had I been disciplined for it. I make no excuse for it to this day - it was wrong, and it broke the rules.

As far as your "I put up with so much for so long" - you know Catherine, you were complicit, you routinely attacked individuals, groups, and businesses on these forums for 2+ years. You incited many a flame war.

You got a pushback for it, big deal.

Be an adult, be accountable. Maybe we would let it go, if you ever once took accountability for it, and stopped using excuses like "sexism", "stalking", and being "pushed to the limit".



Dude, let it go. This is unhealthy.

It's no secret we don't like each other but really I'm not going to lie and tell you what you want to hear. Nor will I admit to your lies because you want me to.

Cat
_____________________
:p
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 15:53
From: Siggy Romulus
If I'm wrong then you're a liar :)

Or your entire 'people getting away with it' is based on speculation.. which


makes you a liar :)



What. Give me a break already.

Your still posting. PPL have said they ARed you.
_____________________
:p
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
02-20-2006 15:54
pencils are sissors :)
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 16:00
From: Siggy Romulus
pencils are sissors :)


OH goody we are finally officially off-topic.

_____________________
:p
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
02-20-2006 16:09
From: Martin Magpie
Dude, let it go. This is unhealthy.

It's no secret we don't like each other but really I'm not going to lie and tell you what you want to hear. Nor will I admit to your lies because you want me to.

Cat

That's right Cat, dodge.

Don't address that you stated that you started talking to us that way because we talked to you that way, when that is the REAL lie.

You'll never get closure from me on this as long as you keep making excuses for your own past behavior, while pointing fingers at others, and expecting THEM to be accountable, when you enjoyed the same immunity, for whatever reason. It's absurd, and childish. So know, as long as your crooking a finger and pointing at others, while completely rejecting responsibilty for you own, similar actions, I won't let it go. When I see you point that finger, I will say something about it. Don't like it? Too bad. You'll not stifle me by calling me names like "sexist" and "stalker".

Good grief, the irony is palpable in that.

And yes, I too would like to know, since it's nigh on two weeks now - how long are you going to cry about Siggy's past now, while telling anyone who brings up your past that they're all sorts of awful things?
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 16:10
From: Nolan Nash
That's right Cat,

You'll never get closure from me


Shut your pie hole :D
_____________________
:p
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
02-20-2006 16:17
You bastards ruined my thread! :mad:
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 16:18
From: Eboni Khan
You bastards ruined my thread! :mad:



LOL, sorry Eboni but that really does strike me as funny. :D
_____________________
:p
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
02-20-2006 16:20
From: Martin Magpie
Shut your pie hole :D

Good thing you put a smiley, or one might think you really hadn't changed. :rolleyes:
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
02-20-2006 16:21
From: Martin Magpie
No Enabran more like everyone is accountable but they do not need to be constantly attacked for every thing they ever said. It's been 3 years and these things are still being used as; some sort of weapon.

Give it a rest it's old news.


Betcha the moment you stop preaching is the moment it isn't brought up anymore.

Just a hunch.
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 16:25
From: Enabran Templar
Betcha the moment you stop preaching is the moment it isn't brought up anymore.

Just a hunch.


ROFLMAO wrong-o. Apparently. :D
_____________________
:p
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
02-20-2006 16:26
From: Martin Magpie
ROFLMAO wrong-o. Apparently. :D

You stopped preaching? Thank you Catherine. :)
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 16:26
From: Nolan Nash
You stopped preaching? Thank you Catherine. :)



ROFL! :D Bingo ding ding.
_____________________
:p
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
02-20-2006 16:30
From: Nolan Nash
You stopped preaching? Thank you Catherine. :)


Hah.

So we're clear, I don't mean "stop preaching" as in you stop preaching for seven minutes in order to use the bathroom, only to resume preaching as soon as you've finished.

I mean stop preaching for a period exceeding 30 days.

I keep forgetting the need to enumerate even the most obviously tacit concepts.
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 16:32
From: Enabran Templar
Hah.

So we're clear, I don't mean "stop preaching" as in you stop preaching for seven minutes in order to use the bathroom, only to resume preaching as soon as you've finished.

I mean stop preaching for a period exceeding 30 days.

I keep forgetting the need to enumerate even the most obviously tacit concepts.



*wonders when they will stop?, Oh that's right they never do. "BINGO, ding ding" we have an answer to that age old question. Oh the irony. LMAO :D
_____________________
:p
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 16:38
I'm posting a bunch of non sence because it doesn't matter what I post. These two posters will continue to come at me until I say what they want me to. WHICH I WON'T.

I do want the forums to be a place where everyone can post without that kind of treatment. Period. What ever was said in the past was said we cannot change it. We can move forward if we choose to. Others are damned to repeat the mistakes of the past.

Again, what can we do to move forward?

Cat
_____________________
:p
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
02-20-2006 16:42
There are some things here which would best be continued as a private discussion... please. :)

As in the Guidelines:
Private discussions – the forums are a public area for the Second Life community’s use. Individuals who have a dispute with each other have other channels of communication to discuss their differences or communicate – private messaging, IM within Second Life, or chatting within Second Life. Also, threads that are addressed to a single individual or group are inappropriate on the forums, this includes slander or "naming names" in a posts title, starting polls about a particular resident or group, etc.
Also... like a Nine Inch Nails album, this thread is going into a downward spiral. To paraphrase what I've learned from Jeska, I'd like to remind everyone to please take the high road and focus on constructively progressing the topic here.

It's President's Day. Like Bill and Ted, we can be most excellent to each other! :)
_____________________
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
02-20-2006 16:43
From: Martin Magpie
I'm posting a bunch of non sence because it doesn't matter what I post. These two posters will continue to come at me until I say what they want me to. WHICH I WON'T.

I do want the forums to be a place where everyone can post without that kind of treatment. Period. What ever was said in the past was said we cannot change it. We can move forward if we choose to. Others are damned to repeat the mistakes of the past.

Again, what can we do to move forward?

Cat

What would be nice, is if you applied this evenly, to everyone. As it stands right now, you want it for you (and probably Coco too), but definately not Siggy, and that is why this goes round in circles - it's the basic do as I say not as I do thing. Until you figure out that there isn't a different set of rules for you, we'll be here.

So, you can hypocritically and personally attack me all you want by impugning my character with bogus claims of sexism and stalking, I don't give a damn, I'll be here to check you everytime you serve up more hypocrisy. You can take that to the bank.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
02-20-2006 16:44
From: Martin Magpie
LOL, sorry Eboni but that really does strike me as funny. :D

It did me, too, lol.

coco
_____________________
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 16:49
From: Nolan Nash
What would be nice, is if you applied this evenly, to everyone. As it stands right now, you want it for you (and probably Coco too), but definately not Siggy, and that is why this goes round in circles - it's the basic do as I say not as I do thing. Until you figure out that there isn't a different set of rules for you, we'll be here.

So, you can hypocritically and personally attack me all you want by impugning my character with bogus claims of sexism and stalking, I don't give a damn, I'll be here to check you everytime you serve up more hypocrisy. You can take that to the bank.



You keep bringing up siggy. I don't. His words are used as examples; not him personaly. There is the difference.

The question is then one of consistancy.

As for the rest of your post.

If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck. It must be a duck.
_____________________
:p
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
02-20-2006 17:00
From: Martin Magpie
You keep bringing up siggy. I don't. His words are used as examples; not him personaly. There is the difference.

The question is then one of consistancy.

As for the rest of your post.

If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck. It must be a duck.

You are pissed because he wasn't disciplined, when you enjoyed that same blessing in the past. Your words are being used as examples here too, in contrast to the deal with Siggy. That's because your words also slipped through the cracks. Instead of acknowledging that fact, you attack my character, and call me names - it's bizarre. But no, you don't see it that way, when your words are used as examples of past slipshod forum moderation, it's "stalking". So tell me, at what point do you become Siggy's "stalker"? Where is the cutoff? Yeah, I know you won't define it, or even attempt to, because that would take away some latitude you currently enjoy by being vague, and warping the timeframe for past events.

You can mince words all you like, but that's the score.

Just once Catherine, I'd like you to quote something I've said that was sexist. Once. But you can't, and you'll completely ignore that request, and post some more illogical non-sequiturs and ad hominem personal attacks.

I'm done here, there is no arguing with stones.

Enjoy your life of double-standards.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
02-20-2006 17:12
From: Nolan Nash
You are pissed because he wasn't disciplined, when you enjoyed that same blessing in the past. Your words are being used as examples here too, in contrast to the deal with Siggy. That's because your words also slipped through the cracks. Instead of acknowledging that fact, you attack my character, and call me names - it's bizarre. But no, you don't see it that way, when your words are used as examples of past slipshod forum moderation, it's "stalking". So tell me, at what point do you become Siggy's "stalker"? Where is the cutoff? Yeah, I know you won't define it, or even attempt to, because that would take away some latitude you currently enjoy by being vague, and warping the timeframe for past events.

You can mince words all you like, but that's the score.

Just once Catherine, I'd like you to quote something I've said that was sexist. Once. But you can't, and you'll completely ignore that request, and post some more illogical non-sequiturs and ad hominem personal attacks.

I'm done here, there is no arguing with stones.

Enjoy your life of double-standards.



Are you finished bashing me?
Are you willing to hear anything but what you have already made your mind up to hear?
Are you finished trying to strong arming me into saying what you want to hear. Which would be a bold faced lie and only said to shut you up.

Are you really expecting my real opinions? Here? LOL

When the rules are what they are I wouldn't dare.

Am I pissed that he wasn't disiplined? No one asked me.

You say I enjoyed cussing at ppl in the past. No one asked me if I did or didn't.

You say I didn't say what you wanted me to say and I called you names. What names did I call you today? Stalker. It's true, you follow my posts and always post something rude about me or to me. LIKE THIS POST.

You keep saying "Siggy" not me. Get it straight. Naming names is against the TOS.

Your a bold faced liar and you create this dhrama.


Cat
_____________________
:p
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
02-20-2006 17:14
From: Eboni Khan
You bastards ruined my thread! :mad:


I was trying to address the issues at hand..

I have one person saying 'well THIS was said and nothing was done' - and that turned out to be false.
I have another saying that nothing is being done dispite countess AR's which they are now saying they didn't file.

I think half the posts are based on speculation and unprovable assertions.

When you ask for clarification you get the runaround 'do as I want not as I do'... which I do find rather amusing to a point to be honest.

So if folks think the resmods are inconsistant - I have to counter - they came from us.. and look how consistent most of us are.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9