Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Content Creator Union

Hiro Queso
503less
Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
12-30-2005 12:47
From: Aimee Weber
You do bring up a great point that we would have to define exactly who a Content Creator Union would support.

In many ways I think the nature of the issues presented and voted on would cause members to decide for themselves if they even want to be members. For example, a Content Creators Union my very well allow landlords to join. But would landlords be willing to participate in a one-week boycott of SL in hopes of obtaining reparations for lost sale content? At some point members are likely to decide they would be better off in a different organization that targets THEIR needs.

Well this is very true. I am certainly not shy of putting my money where my mouth is for things I feel strongly about, but I am also in a position where any actions I take would have consequences for not only 250 residents, but their partners, friends etc who also use the land.

To be honest I am more trying to make a point than try to get involved, my time is pretty much tied up at the moment. I am just pointing out that this content creator v land owner thing that comes up all too often is probably not hugely disliked by LL.
_____________________
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
12-30-2005 12:51
From: Hiro Queso
Yeh that's cool, I just find the whole land owner vs content creator thing counter productive and ridiculous. I felt that way when it was approached from the other side of the fence, I feel the same now.

Well, I wasn't thinking of it at ALL as a content creator vs land owner type thing, even if that may have been the inspiration for the idea.

Besides, there are people who do both.

But I HAVE often thought that it would be great if we had a more powerful, combined voice for getting attention to the things content creators could use most. Like the content backup someone mentioned (which doesn't much matter to me) and something that will cut roofs (which matters a lot to me!).

And getting various ridiculous bugs fixed. Since 1.6 several building things take lots longer to do, for instance, cause you have to keep backing out of that section of edit and back into it again. (Probably a feature, not a bug, lol.)

coco
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Lo Jacobs
Awesome Possum
Join date: 28 May 2004
Posts: 2,734
12-30-2005 12:53
I'm on the fence.

I'm also not big on sharing the cost in anything, unless it was something I felt strongly about. I don't personally feel slighted by any one thing -- forming a union is taking a precaution; it's thinking defensively. We're all enrepreneurs here, and by that token, are mostly uninclined to work together using one voice. A union would mean one demanding job for one very determined person who is willing to kick down the door and drag our lazy asses together to change some rule or some injustice that may or may not be perceived as bad, and using our money to do it.

So: it's hard to say. Could do some good, could be useless. I'll hang around and see.
_____________________
http://churchofluxe.com/Luster :o
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
12-30-2005 12:56
From: Hiro Queso
Or maybe a Union for Brits with high tier...and a dog.


Now, Hiro, cut the crap.

We all know that is a farting dog, whose flatus causes the preview grid to lag the main grid. Who is going to unite around such a creature?
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Aimee Weber
The one on the right
Join date: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,286
12-30-2005 12:58
From: Hiro Queso
To be honest I am more trying to make a point than try to get involved, my time is pretty much tied up at the moment. I am just pointing out that this content creator v land owner thing that comes up all too often is probably not hugely disliked by LL.


Another great point. I really hope a Content Creator Union will not be purely defined by opposition to landowners. In the case of reparations, for example, this union would never want to TAKE AWAY the reparations for telehub landowners. Instead, telehub reparations serve as a precedent upon which we would launch our own efforts to recoup our losses.

While taking away telehub reparations would eliminate the precedent and destroy our case, it better serves content creators if the reparations remain so that we have a foot-hold for our own efforts.
_____________________
Hiro Queso
503less
Join date: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 2,753
12-30-2005 12:58
From: Enabran Templar
Now, Hiro, cut the crap.

We all know that is a farting dog, whose flatus causes the preview grid to lag the main grid. Who is going to unite around such a creature?

ooo so now you're trying to ensure those with flatulence problems can not get involved! You....you....you fartist!
_____________________
Aimee Weber
The one on the right
Join date: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,286
12-30-2005 12:59
From: Chip Midnight
After soundly ridiculing earlier special interest lobbying efforts I can't in good conscience support this. Sorry :)


I still love you but my love may involve more spanking now.
_____________________
Moonshine Herbst
none
Join date: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 483
12-30-2005 12:59
I am all for special interest lobbying groups. It is the best way to influence and put some pressure on the government.
_____________________

TalisDro Molinari
Second Life Resident
Join date: 6 Nov 2004
Posts: 27
12-30-2005 13:04
Just kind of reposting something I put up earlier today, heh.

Now see, personally think alot of things in $L would benefit from 'unions' and the like. Especially as it seems Linden Labs keeps pulling more and more of their in house staff away from tending things in world. Lesse, Event $upport? Check. Developers Incentive, hmm...check. Forum $upport? Hmm, deffinately a check there unless you're counting the generic responses that don't answer much of anything. But, suppose they have to arrange priorities, and they really do need those $taffers on the important task of counting money.

So, in lieu of Linden support on various things, rather think it would be an interesting project to tend alot of these things in a content provider run system. Make stuff? Band together and rail away next time you get some of the myriad glitches that screw off your sales line. Or hey, band together and run the guy who's making near duplicates of whatever designs people are currently selling. Collective bargaining power and ad power is a great thing. Club owners? Band together and set common grounds in the new DIless world. General event guidelines, 'cover charges', you name it. Alot of things can be accomplished with the right organization.

And then, $L can truly be the 'digital country' they mention now and then. As we band together and rise up against our Linden overlords! And now that I've made my union spiel, which yeah wrong forum I know lol. But now, I humbly wait for the Linden Cosa Nostra to Hoffa me beneath Candlestick Park.


Today's episode of Linden Lane has been brought to you by the letter $.
Torrid Midnight
Work in progress
Join date: 13 May 2003
Posts: 814
12-30-2005 13:07
Count me in.
_____________________
Cory Edo
is on a 7 second delay
Join date: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,851
12-30-2005 13:14
I really like the idea of joining forces in terms of affecting change - addressing bugs, LSL changes, inventory loss, etc. that would more specifically effect content creators. Before I would join, I would have to see who the public spokesperson is and what kind of organization this would turn out to be. The populace can turn on you in a red hot second if you slip up publically (stakeholders v. tourists, anyone?) and to me, giving my support to such a union would essentially mean that I'm giving my support to the people in charge of the union.

Do project development teams count as content creators?
_____________________
www.electricsheepcompany.com
Lizbeth Marlowe
The ORIGINAL "Demo Girl"
Join date: 7 May 2005
Posts: 544
I voted for Union, as a non creator
12-30-2005 13:15
Although I have created a few things, nothing as nice as other's have available.

I think it would be a great idea for all the established creators to form a union. Then, as Aimee suggested, go on strike to get what you want from LL. I see Aimee's idea thru her eyes...now let's look at it thru mine...

I enjoy helping folks that are new, creative and talented, get a start in here. I provide a free mall for them and do what I can to help them out. I also shop a lot from the established creators out there...

But I would encourage you all to strike! Give the not so established folks a chance to be noticed! You'll see that you will leave a hole in SL for only a short time...it will be filled...and quickly.

I do see how the union "might" be helpful to the creators, but I also think that the day of the union is over. There are so many other ways to get information out to the masses...

I agree that we need organizations to form and help make policy, but unions are not the answer...As Cristiano stated, many will join but only a few will work the union...just like RL.

I hope you will all find a way to come together and make your voices heard...you are an important part of my SL experience and I am also tired of only the land owner's bending the ear of the Lindens...Good luck in whatever it is you do...

Strike! Strike! Strike! ;)
_____________________
Vote to add a button to verify Deleting Items! Prop 903
I've updated my BLOG!
Luth Brodie
Registered User
Join date: 31 May 2004
Posts: 530
12-30-2005 13:19
While I think that this could be potentially a good idea, I doubt that it would work. Unions started out to be something good, but have snowballed into something terrible.

For instance, this new years eve in London instead of the tube being open and free all night long, there is a strike and will be CLOSED for 24 hours. Many people come into the city for the holiday. Most people go out. The bus service can not handle the mass amounts that will be out. Who is this hurting? The general public.

Ok ok. SL would never suffer from a content creators strike. Or any strike for that matter. But *if* you could get a few people to go on strike, many would not. Is everyone able to get into this? Even the ones that resell freebies? They won't strike. The problem is is that a lot people are so centered around the cash that they wouldn't ever strike.

Would only a few people striking actually make any sort of difference? For some reason, I doubt it.

Yes many things need to change. Personally I wish that they would crack down on people not actually making the things they sell, but I know they never will no matter how much we fight.
_____________________
"'Aarrr,' roared the Pirate Captain, because it seemed a good way to end the conversation."
The Pirates! In An Adventure With Scientists.

Reel Expression Poses and Animations:
reelgeek.co.uk/blog
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
12-30-2005 13:22
Nah, pass - I've never had a problem getting points/issues/addressed, and I think 99% of the time I've gotten back fair and honest information.
Most things that have come to pass decisionwise I've more or less seen the reasons for after looking at the 'big picture' (doesn't mean I like them - or always agree with them , but eventually see why things come to pass).

So having a union - just like the other special interest groups I saw form - doesn't really give me anything in return.. those that want to, knock yoruselves out.

Sorry - but my time in SL is limited and fairly precious and I really don't want to waste it running around to meetings and cutting through political red tape. Been there, seen that, and in the end very little got done.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Aimee Weber
The one on the right
Join date: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,286
12-30-2005 13:25
From: Lizbeth Marlowe
Although I have created a few things, nothing as nice as other's have available.

I think it would be a great idea for all the established creators to form a union. Then, as Aimee suggested, go on strike to get what you want from LL. I see Aimee's idea thru her eyes...now let's look at it thru mine...

I enjoy helping folks that are new, creative and talented, get a start in here. I provide a free mall for them and do what I can to help them out. I also shop a lot from the established creators out there...

But I would encourage you all to strike! Give the not so established folks a chance to be noticed! You'll see that you will leave a hole in SL for only a short time...it will be filled...and quickly.

I do see how the union "might" be helpful to the creators, but I also think that the day of the union is over. There are so many other ways to get information out to the masses...

I agree that we need organizations to form and help make policy, but unions are not the answer...As Cristiano stated, many will join but only a few will work the union...just like RL.

I hope you will all find a way to come together and make your voices heard...you are an important part of my SL experience and I am also tired of only the land owner's bending the ear of the Lindens...Good luck in whatever it is you do...

Strike! Strike! Strike! ;)



If this union were to form, newer / less established content creators would be very welcome and encouraged to join. As it stands now, less established content creators have virtually no voice at all. I would like to see well known content creators standing shoulder to shoulder with these newer folks and lending their voice to help them. Of course it would mean newer folks would have to strike too.

The choice would be up to the individual. If it was more beneficial to NOT be a member of this Union, then the Union has no right to survive. I am hoping it will be benficial to ALL content creators.

Thanks for your support!!
_____________________
Chip Midnight
ate my baby!
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 10,231
12-30-2005 13:26
From: Aimee Weber
I still love you but my love may involve more spanking now.


:D Sounds like fair trade to me
_____________________

My other hobby:
www.live365.com/stations/chip_midnight
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
12-30-2005 13:33
From: Luth Brodie
Even the ones that resell freebies? They won't strike. The problem is is that a lot people are so centered around the cash that they wouldn't ever strike.
.


I'd hope they wouldn't be in any 'content creators union' - maybe they should form a 'scumsucking parasitic leech bastard' union.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Margaret Mfume
I.C.
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
12-30-2005 13:36
How would a strike in SL be executed? All content which is for sale would be taken back into inventory? I assume vendor and mall space rentalswould cease. Would shop land which is owned be sold or would LL receive tier payments during the strike?
_____________________
hush
Chip Midnight
ate my baby!
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 10,231
12-30-2005 13:43
From: Lizbeth Marlowe
But I would encourage you all to strike! Give the not so established folks a chance to be noticed! You'll see that you will leave a hole in SL for only a short time...it will be filled...and quickly.


The idea does have a very John Galt stopping the motor of the world appeal to it (even if that's not at all what would happen). I'm a sucker for Ayn Rand :) I think you're absolutely right though.
_____________________

My other hobby:
www.live365.com/stations/chip_midnight
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
12-30-2005 13:45
From: Margaret Mfume
LL receive tier payments during the strike?


Thats an easy one to answer - Yes.. because they'll just bill your credit card.
And if you put a stop on that - they'll reclaim your land - and rightfully so.

Also why shouldn't they? Your paying for a service whether you use it or not is your choice - choosing to sit and do nothing doesn't change the fact you're renting 'space' from them.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
12-30-2005 13:46
From: Chip Midnight
The idea does have a very John Galt stopping the motor of the world appeal to it (even if that's not at all what would happen). I'm a sucker for Ayn Rand :) I think you're absolutely right though.


LOL - union isn't even formed and scab advocacy has begun :) talk about ahead of the curve! THAT'S EFFICIENCY!
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Carl Metropolitan
Registered User
Join date: 7 Jul 2005
Posts: 1,031
12-30-2005 13:46
I see a number of practical problems with your proposal.

How do you define a "content creator"? Is it based on how people make their money in SL? If so, what's the cut-off point? Can Prokofy Neva rez a prim and sell it to me for 1L$ and thus be a content creator? Would he then be welcome in your proposed union? Or would you have to require a certain percentage of someone's income to come from sales of content? And if did that, how would you enforce or audit such a requirement?

On the other hand, if being "content creator" is based self-identification, then anyone who wants in, is in. You could easily see such a union taken over by people who's interests run counter to those that you believe content creators share.

And how do you define "content"? You've already had someone ask if renting land is content. What about the various SL service industries? Is creating and running events considered content? Financial services? Resalers? Club owners? Escorts?

Even calling your organization a "union" raises a number of issues. How can you have a union made up of a group of self-employed designers, craftspeople, and contractors? Your membership almost exclusively sells to the public, rather than working for LL in an employee/employer relationship. How do you collect dues? And if you are a union, do you expect to make membership compulsorily (as is the case in states without "right-to-work" laws)? If you do, get ready for the mother of all sh*tstorms.

How would you manage this organization? As a SL group? The SL group system is fatally flawed. Consider the example of a recent attempt by landowners to create a similar organization as a SL group.
Aimee Weber
The one on the right
Join date: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,286
12-30-2005 13:49
From: Margaret Mfume
How would a strike in SL be executed? All content which is for sale would be taken back into inventory? I assume vendor and mall space rentalswould cease. Would shop land which is owned be sold or would LL receive tier payments during the strike?


To be honest, I can't think of a Linden infraction that would result in a Content Creator strike. We have been delt some losses but I haven't seen anything THAT bad ... YET. But the "strike" option should always be available and this is how I think it would be executed:

1. All content creators would close off / hide / inventory their creations. For example, Midnight City (and island sim) would forbid entry. Mainland attractions would simply be inventoried leaving bare land behind.

2. All sale items would be removed. The boxes MAY be left behind with a notice "item not for sale in protest of..." but you wouldn't be able to buy anything.

3. Third party server products would shut down. So sites like SL Universe and Snapzilla would be replaced with a notice of grievances.

4. Services would cease. Custom building, club events...who knows, maybe TRINGO events would stop!

5. The timing of the strike would be selected to generate the most impact. For example, if Second Life is featured on the six o'clock news, every effort would be made to ensure the rush of new visitors find only a barren wasteland.

As I said, this is the nuclear option. Also, we would never even attempt this kind of action without widespread support. The worst case scenario would be if a strike hurt the content creators MORE than Linden Lab. We would never allow that to happen.
_____________________
Jake Reitveld
Emperor of Second Life
Join date: 9 Mar 2005
Posts: 2,690
12-30-2005 13:53
I love ya Aimee, but I can't jump on ths band wagon. The causual players are told "you must a get a job to participate in SL, and the opportunities for success are open to all with hard work and determination. well I gotta say the same about land barony: work hard and spend enough RL cash and you too can be anshe chung. Its a free market and maybe someone can do it better than she did, thats competition.

Of course I am vehemently opposed to the buy back of telehub land. In a society where asking for a small increase in stipened has branded my a communist lazy welfare inciter, I cannot see the buy back as anything but a hand out to an ailing group that lost thier edge.
Besides my guess is that handful of content creators is every bit as influential with the lindens as anshe chung,

Its just that from an administrative stand point Real-estate issues are easier to deal with than the issues affecting content creation. YOu can throw a bit of money at them , and land barons will shut up, whereas most of the issue sfacing content creators are not so simple.

A union is a lot of obligations beyond the usualand I am busy enough in SL without worrying about stikes and such.
_____________________
ALCHEMY -clothes for men.

Lebeda 208,209
Margaret Mfume
I.C.
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
12-30-2005 13:56
From: Siggy Romulus
Thats an easy one to answer - Yes.. because they'll just bill your credit card.
And if you put a stop on that - they'll reclaim your land - and rightfully so.

Also why shouldn't they? Your paying for a service whether you use it or not is your choice - choosing to sit and do nothing doesn't change the fact you're renting 'space' from them.

I'm trying to evaluate the effectiveness of a strike action in SL. The targetted company or organization or company needs to suffer a financial loss for the strike to be effective. Content creators will sacrifice their earnings so that LL will experience what? Unless this brings about a resultant downsizing and significant loss of tier, how will this effect LL?
_____________________
hush
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9