I bring solution!
http://openlifegrid.com
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Openspace Announcement Discussion with Jack Linden |
|
Thasius Vaher
Registered User
Join date: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 33
|
10-28-2008 16:04
|
ROBYMAGLIONS Beck
Registered User
Join date: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 1
|
Is crazy....
10-28-2008 16:08
I was a preacher of madness cost of taxes ... the advent of openspace has enabled many users to enjoy adequate space in relation to expenditure incurred. Now that we have established that these have become appetizing ... thought it was good to increase the cost ... I am amazed that in a real world where he lives most total chaos because of higher prices and where everyone raises his voice to contain costs and lower the cost of money ... Second life in pointing the contrary ... you think well be the first to raise taxes on open space (like that ... let us do ... pay more under the old rule of the market ... ... increases the demand increases supply) that you want ... I hope that this is the coup de grace, and I hope that by January 1 we all Second Life users to stop spending only a linden ... I find it too what you pay now ... is incredible to think of increasing still.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ero già un predicatore della follia del costo delle tasse... l'avvento delle openspace ha permesso a molti utenti di poter godere di spazi adeguati rapportati alla spesa sostenuta. Ora che si è appurati che queste sono diventate appetitose... si è pensato bene di aumentarne i costi... mi meraviglio che in un mondo reale dove vive il caos più totale a causa dei prezzi sempre più alti e dove da tutti si alza la voce per contenere i costi e abbassare il costo del denaro... in Second life si punta al contrario... si pensa bene di aumentare da prima le tasse sulle open space (visto che piacciono... facciamole pagare di più... secondo la vecchia regola del mercato... aumenta la richiesta... aumenta l'offerta) che volete che sia... io spero che questo sia il colpo di grazia e mi auguro che dal 1 gennaio tutti noi utenti di Second Life smettiamo di spendere un solo linden... io trovo che sia fin troppo quello che si paga già ora... è allucinante pensare di aumentare ancora. |
Irish Handrick
Registered User
Join date: 30 May 2007
Posts: 12
|
Opensim Grids ????
10-28-2008 16:08
Hahahaha if you think your going to do better, you'd better think again. Opensim grids are alpha, and the owners can do anything they like, anytime they like. Right LaLa?
I was in Central Grid (an opensim grid) since Feb 2008. It was bought out and totally taken apart without any warning just after I paid my tier. I have 4 sims somewhere in there but can only find one. Their support is about as good as their attitude....talk about losing money on virtual worlds. I'd stay away from them. As for SL, we all know these things happen here, why are you all so surprised? |
foxmenn Cortes
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jun 2008
Posts: 5
|
ownership
10-28-2008 16:08
I read often and hear often about owning a region....as i see it you own shit, you rent in any way and who thinks logic knows what i mean. LL can do with the sims what they want....so what is owning??? and ypu pay huge money for it for what??
and yes i know about http://openlifegrid.com it is growing and more like those games will come so not a good idea from LL as i see it |
Tony Upshaw
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 21
|
10-28-2008 16:08
Let me simply echo those who see this as a reaction to slumping mainland sales, to force people back to "Linden owned" land. As many have pointed out, if Open Space was meant to be "open", why was the prim limit doubled? Why was placement away from existing full sims permitted? Why were single sim purchases allowed? It's clear Linden envisioned these spaces becoming extremely popular as private residences, then dropped the bombshell. Was it all pre-meditated? Ummm, seems reasonable to ask the question doesn't it? How was one expected to utilize the prims? With 3,725 shrimp and a small boat? Well, I for one am done. LL will be getting my open sim back next month. Instead of getting $75 of my money each month, I'll reduce my costs to around $40 or so with a nice 4096 plot somewhere. SL is fun, but it's not THAT fun. Way to go LL..... not. Yes! Yes! Yes! Thanks for putting it more professional than me. Ohh, dont' forget. They streamlined that land portal for us too. Made it all quick and easy! |
Burnman Bedlam
Business Person
![]() Join date: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,080
|
10-28-2008 16:08
lol, and in time... you will be able to move from grid to grid. Tear down the garden walls! ![]() _____________________
Burnman Bedlam
http://theburnman.com Not happy about Linden Labs purchase of XStreet (formerly SLX) and OnRez. Will this mean LL will ban resident run online shoping outlets in favor of their own? |
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
10-28-2008 16:09
I wasn't really surprised to see this move by LL and I really have no sympathy for people who have been abusing the system but nowhere have I gloated. It was mentioned at office hours how they were being used, it was mentioned on the forums, Linden Lab did nothing whatsoever to address the issue. The idea that this is all the fault of residents is really taking the biscuit. There has been an explosion of Openspaces, how many forum threads or complaints have been seen about their ability? Just who has been having so much trouble with them because if they were as problematic as is being suggested, then surely they wouldn't have sold in such great numbers. |
Pathfinder Scribe
Registered User
Join date: 5 Sep 2008
Posts: 2
|
Banking self-sabotage followed by Linden self-sabotage. What are they all drinking?
10-28-2008 16:10
I am sure there are plenty others, but clearly, the main factor in the problem facing Open Space sims is the fault of Linden Labs not properly providing end users with the tools for self regulation. Without the ability for self regulation on the micro level, it is affecting everything on up. Raising tier prices in no way changes the ongoing problem of avatars not being able to self regulate, it only frustrates responsible users, causes many to leave SL and is not addressing the real problem. Improve Estate Tools and allow self regulation, for a better, more efficient grid! This is the key to the solution. I think LL have made a knee jerk reaction to a handful of abusers. The strength of feeling will increase not decrease and, combined with the current economic crisis, there will be a mass exodus from Second Life - and not by the abusers - but the quiet, low-prim, low-script, low budget residents whose regions will disappear or whose landlords will have to increase charges. This could be a 'Gerald Ratner' moment for Linden Labs and a turning point for their competitors. I cannot believe LL won't re-think this. |
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
![]() Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
|
10-28-2008 16:12
This sucks because there are a lot of fair landlords who offer smaller players a good deal. This is nothing more than exploitation of an established resource. I love my open space, it never lags and I'm proactive with script times. What exactly do you hope to achieve with this apart from upsetting a huge number of your customers who pay your wages. But did you have to go out and create -SOS- to flood every welcome area and infohub for what is ultimately the result of resource abuse? Three wrongs don't make a right. |
Rhonan Morrisey
Registered User
Join date: 31 May 2008
Posts: 108
|
10-28-2008 16:12
Hahahaha if you think your going to do better, you'd better think again. Opensim grids are alpha, and the owners can do anything they like, anytime they like. Right LaLa? I was in Central Grid (an opensim grid) since Feb 2008. It was bought out and totally taken apart without any warning just after I paid my tier. I have 4 sims somewhere in there but can only find one. Their support is about as good as their attitude....talk about losing money on virtual worlds. I'd stay away from them. As for SL, we all know these things happen here, why are you all so surprised? Irish, everybody moved back to the guys that ran central grid, at Avatar Hangout. theres no more estates in legend avatarhangout.com |
Alisha Matova
Too Old; Do Not Want!
Join date: 8 Mar 2007
Posts: 583
|
10-28-2008 16:12
I have always limited openspaces sims to what I considered sensible. It takes 4 Openspaces to equal one full sim, in price and prims, so therefore a openspace has 1/4th the power of a full sim, thats not rocket science. If a full class 5 sim fully developed runs at 8.0 MS on top scripts, then it makes sense that a openspace should run at 2 MS top scripts, anything over that, and scripts have to be cut back... Any Estate owner that is worth thier meddle knows about this and shouldnt be cowing on what is the Mystic number... YOU WANT A MYSTIC NUMBER its 2.0 MS, of your opensim is running over 2.0 MS in top scripts your part of the problem, fix it and maybe, LL will shut up about it.... We cant fix a problem unless we are educated, and sadly LL has failed us greatly on educating us Yes, You and I understand that, and I'm sure both educate as we can. But anyone renting an OS does not have top scripts(unless you give them estate controls). So even with education the tools are not there to even monitor. ((didn't mean to get ya excited. I suppose my question was rhetorical, to point out there is no information readily available.)) |
Thasius Vaher
Registered User
Join date: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 33
|
10-28-2008 16:13
I understand http://openlifegrid.com is alpha and what not, but jump ship now and in 6 months a year when the grid opens up, we can all enjoy some freedom, oh and some competition in regions such as PRICING.
|
Fredy Kyong
Registered User
Join date: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 28
|
10-28-2008 16:14
YOU CAN NOT OVERUSE A OPENSPACE SIM!
Prim Limit is prim limit, traffic limit is traffic limit. Maybe host 11 OS sims on one server instead of 16! This is a Linden problem, not a customer problem while "overusing" OS sims! A technical issue and there should be technical solution and not a rise in costs! _____________________
www.slnextgeneration.de
|
netrider Writer
Registered User
Join date: 26 Dec 2007
Posts: 3
|
its al about money
10-28-2008 16:14
Its just all about money....Lindens want more more more more. This is the beginning of the end. What about the money that is invest in my openspace sim? Do you return it to me?
|
Thasius Vaher
Registered User
Join date: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 33
|
10-28-2008 16:15
It's never been about usage. It's all about monies.
|
Babe Daligdig
Registered User
Join date: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 27
|
10-28-2008 16:15
I really wonder if Linden Lab has an active policy of killing the private owned Estates? I would prefer honesty above tricks if this is to be true. If we, as large Estate owners, are not fitting in the policy anymore, please be frank about it and we can move on. To OpenSim for example. Large private estates are still struggling to recover from the last blows by Linden (lots of smaller estates simply died): 1. The change from 1875 to 3750 prims which made normal sims less valuable. 2. An enormous increase of new mainland sims and dieing small estates overfludded the grid and did put the simprices down to way below newprice. But as the two above can be seen as "just consequences", this new one feels like a direct attack on private estates as it only influences private estates. The use of opensims did not change at all. It only got more popular to live in openspace sims. Living in openspace sims was around already long before the last changes. Infact only LL herself used openspaces for pure water. Saying that openspace sims are meant for water, traveling and trees only, is also total bull after increasing the primlimit to 3750. The 1/4 burden is already mentioned in many comments. No need to add to that. Really the only reason I can think of is that LL really wants the Private estates out and as manager of a 153 sim large estate which is one of the oldest around, I can tell you that LL might succeed this time ![]() It is not only the price increase. It is the changes without any regards of the effects, that make it simply way too risky to have a RL company invest in this grid. Whats next? Or should we see SL not as a platform, but as a game after all? Price increase in a time where OpenSim gets better by the day? I calculated and tested serverburden and datatraffic using a testsetup of OpenSim regions at servers in a high quality hosting location. LL prices seem not based on any reality. Price increase seem like a way to outprice LL from the new grid market, but why? I just don't get it? Maybe I am the stupid one here? We are owners of a 155 estate regions and took the blow of the price decrease of Q2 pricing and bit our lip and moved on gracefully , We are lucky enough to have loyal tentants and they stayed with us through this change. But as the weeks went by YES the sims were emptying out and we were forced to go with the new trend ** Open Space Sims *** like many estate owners did to save there years of hard work in SL. Why we did this? ........ Cause as private estate owners WE CARE for our tentants and deliver what they ask for and give the best customer service for there money. We pay approx 16,000usd Monthly to Lindens labs in tier alone , You would think they would give us the same respect as we give our tentants? Have they thought about why people stay in SL? It's cause the private estate owners make it a better place. Just reading the thread here no one likes mainland and would rather be in a private estate , so I'm guessing this isnt a attack on a single open space owner, there attacking large estates to slow down or even close down so mainland will pick up again. Look I recently had a fradulent linden purchase inworld ..woke up to find my account closed my lindens i had bought taken out of my account and all they could say was sorry. I lost 1500usd that day and LL wouldnt help me . Instead protected the guy who got hacked due to his stupidity to giving out his account info. Let the guy who sold me the lindens get my RL money and then told me to fight it with paypal. we all know what paypal thinks of SL?? Its a virtual world , intangable items which they wont cover. I have lost total faith in LL and now this !!! How much do you expect us to take LL? we are paying you for a service with RL dollars. I own a RL buidling company and if we treated our customers like this we wouldnt be in business today. You say Secondlife is created by the Residence and your 100% right . WE MAKE SL WHAT IS IT!!! ...... We work hard long hours to only get bitten in the butt at the end of it GET REAL LL ..... Customers are always right.. I hope your reading everyones posts here , you have some serious issues and Ive been in sl 3 years now and ive never seen it this bad? Our open spaces dont lag .... if anything its the normal sims that lag. maybe you need to fix the issues with lag in SL or non ressing items or non recieved items that we spend daily answering IM's and replacing them to customers before expecting people to pay more for your products! |
Juliett Beaumont
Registered User
Join date: 8 May 2007
Posts: 2
|
Linden will ruin their own business
10-28-2008 16:18
If an increase about 67% must and will happen, Linden does not manage their cost well a long time and the openspace model allready has gone down the drain.
I resident at a community of 8 openspace sims and all of them will be closed. So not more money will flow - a lot money will get lost. Additional - if living in SL doesnt make sense anymore - whats the premium account good for? - will get canceled, also my little business here - canceled. Would you buy a car, thats price will raise by 67% in minutes? Never! Only thing i mention: Some crazy shareholders dictate the Linden management to do so. To get their money out of it before closing down the whole thing. |
Adaarye Shikami
Registered User
Join date: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 15
|
What about ...
10-28-2008 16:18
the subscribers that "bought" OS's from Estate owners. Under normal circumstances the typical user would have no clue that these sims were only intended for minimal use so here they are with a shiny new OS to build a business or home upon and they do so, taking full advantage of all that came with the package. They bought, or leased these sims in good faith with a hefty upfront fee involved. They were given the option to resell, or transfer this leased property. Umm .. talk about real life and second life mirroring each other. These sims are worth diddly now.
In many cases, these are people that moved from mainland to get away from the gaming farms and unpleasent scenery placed there by others who were abusing the mainland and their neighbors with that stuff. By the way .. why weren't those people policed? There are sim killers all over the mainland still. So here we are. Many many paying customers are going to be ousted. Even if the upgrade from OS to full sim is done for free, the person that invested in the OS in the first place is STILL going to be standing there holding the bag with nothing to show for their investment or the time put into developing their home/business. To do that to subscribers is really beyond unethical on so many levels. I know this is not a constructive comment but it is a TRUE one. |
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
![]() Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
|
10-28-2008 16:18
LL should change SL's tagline... "Your world, our way of stabbing you in the back" Nobody's forcing you to buy land, and it's not like you weren't warned that this kind of thing might happen in the Terms of Use. Since you use SL, you agreed to be a party to that contract. Your injury is self-inflicted. |
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
![]() Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
|
10-28-2008 16:21
A quote from that page. What challenges does Second Life face? Linden Lab faces the same challenges as any other business, retaining and attracting quality staff and customers or users, Great way to retain customers ![]() I read that as that they're looking to attracting and retaining /quality/ customers. |
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
![]() Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
|
10-28-2008 16:23
Not that it will do any good but it might make a statement, here is a great freebie on SLX for the growing OS protest:
http://uncensored.xstreetsl.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&file=item&ItemID=987598 Enjoy ![]() _____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.
http://slapt.me ![]() slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26 |
Jini Hammerer
The green chick
Join date: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 196
|
10-28-2008 16:24
Nobody's forcing you to buy land, and it's not like you weren't warned that this kind of thing might happen in the Terms of Use. Since you use SL, you agreed to be a party to that contract. Your injury is self-inflicted. And that makes it ok? I'll bet you thought that gass price gouging was a good thing too huh. |
DeadheadDMT Infinity
Registered User
Join date: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 5
|
Openspace boredom!
10-28-2008 16:25
I am surprised that the Lindens would think an openspace would ONLY be used for small parks and ocean beaches..... Do they truly think that people have money to give up each and every month for tier costs (not withstanding the initial cost) only to have a piece of openspace that is not going to bring them anything in return... the bulk of most people can't be expected to pay money each month without the opportunity to get into commercial or residential development to recoup their investments.
If they want only parks and beaches then they should offer those up for free development, or at least significantly diminished costs and if there is excessive traffic then those openspace owners should be told that their creations are moving beyond the idea of openspace and that they should invest in a regular sim to continue their enterprise. SL is about building and creating and that takes prims and traffic re-enforces that the artist/owner is doing something good that is appreciated by other SL guests. SL is not about a bunch of boring openspace sims that offer nothing to the populous except a pretty tree and a park bench. SL users want to visit museums, malls, concert halls, educational institutions, and other such things that have included in their landscapes the self same trees and park benches that are proposed for the intended use of openspaces. Openspaces for the most part are boring and are just a waste of RL monies for anyone who does not make $250,000 a year and can afford to throw away the cash. People want a chance to be a part of SL, but with this recent proposal, they are deciding that SL is not anything that they want to be a part of anymore, because it is not fun, but rather only a collective of boring openspaces that serve no one but the owners of openspaces that can afford to build a park that does nothing and a beach with endless waves and no one willing to watch them. I think the new proposal is the most detrimental thing I have seen happen to SL. I have been gearing up to be more land oriented, but at this point, I think that decision will be delayed indefinitely for now. |
Bella Posaner
Just say it how it is FFS
Join date: 8 May 2008
Posts: 615
|
10-28-2008 16:25
Hmm well I live in an openspace sim and it works just fine without lag
My friend and I were about to purchase an opensim and have half each, for nothing in particular, just a couple of houses and our own creative landscaping. We will not be purchasing one now as we will not be paying your ludourious maintance fees. Where I live US dollars cost almost double..............so your loss toss pots, I can not see how this is going to be good for your economy. Can't one of you smart people in these forums creat us a better world and go in competition with SL? And people sadly, if you keep paying them they will keep ripping you off, if you don't buy the sims and they are not getting sales they will be forced to do something about it. |
Baloo Uriza
Debian Linux Helper
![]() Join date: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 895
|
10-28-2008 16:26
I think you should provide a money back guarantee in this case. I will for sure abandon both my openspaces, and I know several of my friends will do the same. They will have no value because noone would be interested in them anymore.\ You should have read the terms of service more carefully before agreeing to it. Why blame Linden Labs for exercising their end of the contract? If the terms were not agreeable to you, you should not have agreed to them by using Second Life. |