Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Openspace Announcement Discussion with Jack Linden

Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
10-31-2008 08:52
From: Poppet McGimsie
If you look at some of the websites and ad where people are selling OS sims with "designated ownership" you will see that they specify that this comes with concierge-level support.

I am not sure what the mechanics of this has been, but it is clear that "designated owners" of OS sims have been getting concierge level support.



Again, thank the unscrupulous landlords for gaming the system. A lot of estate managers are upset too because it means they actually have to do some work for the money they receive instead of pawning it off on the Concierge teams.
Barb Carson
Registered User
Join date: 11 May 2006
Posts: 230
10-31-2008 08:53
From: Poppet McGimsie
I think that the "unintended use" that Jack Linden spoke of is not simply utilizing 3750 prims.

The unintended use is for people who own a single full sim to buy a whole bunch of unattached OS sims, advertize them as places where there are no covenants or neighbors or restrictions, even setting up websites for that purpose, and then transferring "designated ownership" of the sim to the person who bought it that included concierge level support and the ability to resell to another resident with transfer of "designated ownership."

It was a way for people who could not afford full sims, to "own" open space simsl with all the rights of sim ownership.

Secondary markets, such as terraforming and sim development, began to flourish.

I feel so DIM for not knowing people were doing this.

It has been what game companies would call an "EXPLOIT":

"In the realm of online games, an exploit is usually a software bug, hack or bot that contributes to the user's prosperity in a manner not intended by the developers." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploit_(online_gaming))

Jack Linden has said this as clear as day actually (now that I can see it, that is): people using the ability to sell detached OS sims to other people and transfer to them "ownership" privileges is an exploit of the policies set up for open space sims last spring.

They are simply doing what all gaming companies do when they uncover an exploit: plugging the hole. And the people who took full advantage of the exploit, those "land barons" who bought up and sold scores and hundreds of detached openspace sims with transfership of ownership rights and concierge level support to go with it, are having their lolly taken away.

Just as in 3D games, exploits ruin the economy. We have seen what this one did to the land economy in SL.

People who got concierge level support with OS ownership could actually have been paying $75 in tier for support at a level that usually costs $125 per month [I think I finally understand something Carl Metropolitan has been saying all along about there being no coincidence that the tier increase matches the level required to qualify for concierge-level support]. OS "designated owners" have been getting this level of support a lot more cheaply; perhaps this was another one of the unintended consequences of the policy changes last spring.

It is right to plug the hole - IF simply raising the tier will plug it. It seems to me that the way to plug the hole, however, is to stop allowing people to purchase detached OS sims as well as raising the tier on them. It has CERTAINLY been the right decision to end the practice of permitting transfer of "designated ownership."

We can't know if LL ever plans to allow individuals to own OSs without a qualifying full sim, or if it was ever a plan B or an ultimate possibility. But regardless, it is clear to me now that it SHOULD cost more to own an unrestricted open space sim.



I disagree designated owner status is an exploited. I wouldn't doubt it's been been scammed just like parcels on private estates have been scammed. By your definition prims are an exploit too when one puts and invisible one over an SLX ATM.

Also how is it an exploit when it is a tool freely given by LL for years, brought up in a discussion BY Jack Linden and I'm sure others to explain HOW exactly to give ownership rights to people (in my case this was the answer to my specific question how do I give ownership rights to my friends who don't want to pay VAT).


I understand your frustration but many of use designated ownership rights fairly, ethically and productively. Because others scammed it doesn't make it an exploit. Now- having said that if LL feels they want to change their minds and not allow it's legit use that's their prerogative. But do we have to burn down the whole town with torches to wipe out anything related to the problem. And honestly I'm still not sure what the problem is. Is it lag? Is it a miscalculation of value where they now see they can get more money for it? I sure as hell don't think the problem is they want to improve our experience or tamp down on scams.

And for the record I would venture to say that the designated ownership tool is used by a minority. Many estate owners (as you have all seen in conceirge chat) dont even know what prim bonus is or how to manage estates. Another product of selling them cheaper was in ainflux in people that don't really know how to use estate tools. Not saying it's an majority just that it is significant. How has that dragged down the cogs of the support wheel? I'm sure a bit.

If this is about lag than mainland price should be increased. If this is about providing better function then a new product should be introduced and priced accordingly. Problem is there are as many tags on the problem here as there are Lindens.


A PS here is for the record many using these designated owner rights didnt mark up sim cost or tier. In my case I often gave these rights to people that paid less than 250 usd for a sim in cases where i could buy them cheaper on the market or who will straight renters.
Barb Carson
Registered User
Join date: 11 May 2006
Posts: 230
10-31-2008 08:59
From: Snowflake Fairymeadow
Again, thank the unscrupulous landlords for gaming the system. A lot of estate managers are upset too because it means they actually have to do some work for the money they receive instead of pawning it off on the Concierge teams.



I am just baffled by the argument this is gaming or exploitive. How is using a tool that was suggested to me by LL themselves gaming the system? This is how a discussion turns unproductive. When statements such as these and others are made it smacks more of uneducated gripe and opinion. And Snowflake I'll just imagine your retort about speaking your opinion and going against the majority. Sincerely I understand your point.
Neptune Shelman
Registered User
Join date: 1 Aug 2008
Posts: 329
10-31-2008 09:00
I cannot believe LL would deliberately have pushed the sale of open spaces just so they could up the prices as a trick, so complete mismanagement must be the answer.

If the open spaces are not proving to be profitable for LL with their increased loading then why was the cost not increased when the prims were doubled? at least the island owners would have known what they were letting themselves in for prior to purchasing OS sims.

Putting up prices on Open spaces will possibly make them unviable, for the obvious –cough ‘abuse of usage they were purchased for’

Ask yourselves why were Open spaces so popular, Jack or any other Lindens involved in this decision making.
They provide a cheap alternative to full Island rental with a limited number of prims, that is the only reason for the OS explosion.
My wife rents one, the ground in the centre was shrunk to become a mini island, she put out a castle and used it to create her own environment to enjoy with her friends.

You must have all seen this was going to become a typical use of these OS sims, the price increase doesn’t concern me, as we can just walk away from the island, but as a reasonable person I must say, I do have concerns for the estate owner who purchased the island on my wife’s behalf.
They will most likely be left with an empty un-rentable space just two months after purchasing it.

This is just one instance of a user choosing not to rent an openspace, at a cost of over 125usd/month remember the estate owner has to make some on top of LL’s tier, our decision is based on value for money, nothing else we never experienced any issues on the OS sim.
I am obviously assuming my wife and I will not be the only ones unprepared to continue renting at the increased prices, I expect this will hurt even the larger estate businesses and drive many smaller ones completely out of business.

In turn as these estates disappear, estates which make up the vast majority of the virtual land in SL the likelihood is that their associated users will to, putting strain on content creators as sales drop etc.

The fall out obviously depends on the full impact to estate businesses, which only the owners will be able to access fully, but if responses from them in the forums previously are to be believed, many are already close to making losses and this could just have been the final straw.

SL’s success relies upon most of it’s inhabitants, these inhabitants range from the standard mainstream non premium account user to the largest of tier paying estate owners.
The mainstream non tier paying users are probably the most important, without them everything falls apart, they may not pay tier directly to LL but still put in the cash to spend L$ inworld, the Estate owners and established content creators stay to earn from these users.

The mainstream users stay because they love SL, SL to them is the friends they have made, the content they have purchased and last but not least the clubs and places they visit or live inworld.

If you destroy estate businesses ability to generate an income they will have no choice but to leave SL, in turn many of their customers will leave, as their homes, favourite clubs and places to visit disappear, some of the best places in SL are located on private islands.
Content creators will also struggle to make any profit as their customers disappear, which begins to create a vicious circle, Second Life is only enjoyable because of the people who choose to invest their time and money here, no content no fun.

It seems as an observer, LL via this price increase are actually attempting to engineer their own virtual recession, which could prove to be disastrous.
Brandon Catteneo
Registered User
Join date: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 5
10-31-2008 09:00
From: Elanthius Flagstaff
If you were planning on investing in SL land and didn't take into account the possibility of a 70% shift in pricing then you're an idiot.


Perhaps, but at least I am mature enough to keep my emotions in check.

I do understand why people are so upset about this though.
Draghan Marksman
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jan 2008
Posts: 20
10-31-2008 09:08
Isn't this thread entitled "conversation with Jack Linden" ?
mmmmm...

Was just wondering: where is Jack ??? lol

The more he waits to answer, the angrier people get...
That is definitely a second big mistake.
If I were him, I wouldn't postpone too much my answer.
It makes the situation worse...
Jini Hammerer
The green chick
Join date: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 196
10-31-2008 09:09
From: Snowflake Fairymeadow
This has happened with an NFL team in RL. The team was losing and many people did not want to go see, so the owners were losing money. They demanded 5 years free rent at the stadium.

What eventually happened was that the city who hosted the team then passed a law that caused all citizens to pay for unused stadium seats through their taxes.

It wasn't popular, but the city government got away with it.


Talking spacificly about stadiums is a whole nother ugly monster LOL . Statiums are build from our tax money, and by the time they are finnally finished being paid off.... its time to build another. The cities that build them never see a penny back from the investment directly. Only from other taxes and increased tourism.

But hey my Phillies won so who cares that they spent $346 million to build Citizens Bank Park with the Phillies paying for $172 million and the public tax payers covering the other $174 million.

LOL

We need people to tax thats what we are missing ;)
Casandra Zolnir
Registered User
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 29
Renters on Open Space that have been there for Month
10-31-2008 09:11
I have 10 houses to a open Space Sim. All Separate islands. I rent most of my houses for $600 a week and give them 300 Prims There are never more then one or two av at a time. And most of my renters have lived there for months. So they must have a great experience to stay that long. and if they had any lag or problems they would have IM me in a heart beat. So some of this overload and lag conversation and all the techie BS I find very "hot winded" and not reality. And if you do the math, I don't make any money just break even, But at least its a lovely place for people to have a place to call home. I am waiting it out, call me stupid, but I still have faith in Linden that they will grandfather out the Tiers. I am giving them till Dec 1st to do the right thing.
Elanthius Flagstaff
Registered User
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
10-31-2008 09:12
From: Casandra Zolnir
I have 10 houses to a open Space Sim. All Separate islands. I rent most of my houses for $500 a week and give them 300 Prims There are never more then one or two av at a time. And most of my renters have lived there for months. So they must have a great experience to stay that long. and if they had any lag or problems they would have IM me in a heart beat. So some of this overload and lag conversation and all the techie BS I find very "hot winded" and not reality.


You're so right! Jack must be crazy to think OpenSpaces are being overused with a shining example like you. Heck, 10 houses is practically the same as open water or green space!
_____________________
Visit http://ninjaland.net for mainland and covenant rentals or visit our amazing land store at Steamboat (199, 56).

Also, we pay L$0.15/sqm/week for tier donated to our group and we rent pure tier to your group for L$0.25/sqm/week.

Free L$ for Everyone - http://ninjaland.net/tools/search-scumming/
Poppet McGimsie
Proprietrix, WUNDERBAR
Join date: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 197
10-31-2008 09:14
From: Barb Carson
I disagree designated owner status is an exploited. I wouldn't doubt it's been been scammed just like parcels on private estates have been scammed. By your definition prims are an exploit too when one puts and invisible one over an SLX ATM.

Also how is it an exploit when it is a tool freely given by LL for years, brought up in a discussion BY Jack Linden and I'm sure others to explain HOW exactly to give ownership rights to people (in my case this was the answer to my specific question how do I give ownership rights to my friends who don't want to pay VAT).

...

A PS here is for the record many using these designated owner rights didnt mark up sim cost or tier. In my case I often gave these rights to people that paid less than 250 usd for a sim in cases where i could buy them cheaper on the market or who will straight renters.


I am referring to people who bought and sold scores to hundreds of detached OSs with "designated ownership" touting them as being free of restrictions or covenants and coming with full estate manager rights and concierge level support. You can see ads for them even today in the forums below, and you can find "company" websites still up where this is being done. I know that not all sellers did these things.

LL may or may not view that as an exploit; I can see how it could be viewed as one. But I can also see that LL recognized from all of it that there is a HUGE market for detached OS sims and they clearly intend to get into that market themselves. The obvious next step, to me, is for them to make it so that people don't need a full sim to qualify for owning them -- but I am sure they will wait to see how well the "product" sells at a more appropriate price.
Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
10-31-2008 09:14
From: Barb Carson
I am just baffled by the argument this is gaming or exploitive. How is using a tool that was suggested to me by LL themselves gaming the system? This is how a discussion turns unproductive. When statements such as these and others are made it smacks more of uneducated gripe and opinion. And Snowflake I'll just imagine your retort about speaking your opinion and going against the majority. Sincerely I understand your point.


From one adult to another:

If you don't feel you were gaming the system or an unscrupulous landlord, don't take it personally. I have not attacked ANYONE personally OR their business in these forums by name so you don't need to take your little swipes at me, either. If you understand my point about my opinion, no need for me to bring it up again TO YOU, and no need for you to keep bringing it up TO ME. I am more than happy to discuss this matter with people who don't attack me personally.

The fact of the matter is that LL has announced their decision to revoke this tool, so landlords now have to provide this service on their own, instead of just saying "Here's your openspace sim, your name is on it as the payor so LL will take care of all your problems" and then happily collecting tier for doing not much more than submitting a ticket to LL.

Those landlords, they have to work for their money now.

Good luck Barb and I wish you all the happiness you deserve.
Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
10-31-2008 09:15
From: Jini Hammerer
Talking spacificly about stadiums is a whole nother ugly monster LOL . Statiums are build from our tax money, and by the time they are finnally finished being paid off.... its time to build another. The cities that build them never see a penny back from the investment directly. Only from other taxes and increased tourism.

But hey my Phillies won so who cares that they spent $346 million to build Citizens Bank Park with the Phillies paying for $172 million and the public tax payers covering the other $174 million.

LOL

We need people to tax thats what we are missing ;)


Someone needs to start another thread about banning free accounts.
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
10-31-2008 09:16
From: Barb Carson
I understand your frustration but many of use designated ownership rights fairly, ethically and productively.
Not sure which bit to quote here, but just to ask an Estate owner who's used designated owner status before: It is really the case that those designated owners routinely get Concierge support? And if so, is that actually an important reason for them to be designated owners? (That is, if it didn't remain, but the other aspects of designated owner were still in place, would that be good enough?)
_____________________
Archived for Your Protection
Laird Townsend
Registered User
Join date: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 6
disingenuous
10-31-2008 09:20
So what you are saying is that you had no idea what uses the OS sims were being put to? You increased the amount of available prims so that the owners of these OS sims could do what? Place more water on them? On what theory would anyone wish to purchase a purely liquid sim? Who would want to own an uninhabited forest? Why should LL charge anyone for this kind of amenity? If you want to provide environmental ambience as part of the SL experience, by all means, do so. But don't expect any individual to foot the bill for this ambience.
Perhaps you wish to eliminate all commercial activity on the OS sims? You should take yourselves for a sail through the SLNE to see the great uses that the OS sims have been put to. If you persist in your raise, I suspect that SLNE will become a bunch of deserted islands with no features of interest whatsoever.
I know that I will pick up my structures, trees, rocks, buoys and waves, and say so long to SL.
Your choice.

Laird Townsend
Sindy Tsure
Will script for shoes
Join date: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 4,103
10-31-2008 09:21
From: Snowflake Fairymeadow
Someone needs to start another thread about banning free accounts.

And ban lines..
Barb Carson
Registered User
Join date: 11 May 2006
Posts: 230
10-31-2008 09:22
From: Snowflake Fairymeadow
From one adult to another:

If you don't feel you were gaming the system or an unscrupulous landlord, don't take it personally. I have not attacked ANYONE personally OR their business in these forums by name so you don't need to take your little swipes at me, either. If you understand my point about my opinion, no need for me to bring it up again TO YOU, and no need for you to keep bringing it up TO ME. I am more than happy to discuss this matter with people who don't attack me personally.

The fact of the matter is that LL has announced their decision to revoke this tool, so landlords now have to provide this service on their own, instead of just saying "Here's your openspace sim, your name is on it as the payor so LL will take care of all your problems" and then happily collecting tier for doing not much more than submitting a ticket to LL.

Those landlords, they have to work for their money now.

Good luck Barb and I wish you all the happiness you deserve.


Good luck to you as well snowflake. I wish you all the happiness you deserve as well. What a tool. Consider your next post the last word on the subject with me.
Jini Hammerer
The green chick
Join date: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 196
10-31-2008 09:22
From: Snowflake Fairymeadow
Here is the current price breakdown for what people must pay for concierge service:

1-Own an estate (private island/region). $295/mo

2-Are the payor for an estate. $75/mo

3-Pay tier for more than a half region's worth of mainland parcels.$125/mo

So what LL has effectively done is to cut concierge service to people who should not have been getting it in the first place, but are because they are the payor at $75/mo.

They have done this in 2 ways, by first raising the price, and 2nd, making certain that the payor is also the owner. They ARE grandfathering to a small extent to allow people who are the payor but not the estate owner keep their concierge status for the time being.

(Effective Immediately

We will no longer allow the Owner of an Openspace to be changed to a different resident than the Payor. Initially we will not enforce this change on Openspaces where the Payor and Owner are already different but in those cases the only change allowed will be to set the Owner back to the Payor. This doesn’t affect the parcel level rentals, this is just focussed on the whole region rental of Openspaces.)

I can definitely see why they are doing this. It has to be a HUGE drain on the resources to provide concierge service to everyone who pays $75/mo, especially when they aren't even the owner of at least a 1/2 sim.



Yea that whole owner/payor thing has me baffled. I have only a couple OS, I made the folks who wanted them managers of the island to allow them to have access to the region tools. But in the end i am still owner of the sim and payor.. how does one become the owner but not the payor?

I guess trying to break the rules never even occured to me but in my opinion LL should not be giving them an option or grandfather on that.. the land owner should be reverted back to the payor reguardless in my opinion.
ArchTx Edo
Mystic/Artist/Architect
Join date: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,993
10-31-2008 09:27
From: BB

Watching the way LL treats OSS owners has reminded me that I need to watch my step with them. They can't be trusted to defend even their own self-interests by keeping some trust with their customers. Their management is like a loose canon on deck, and I'm always braced for the "all hands abandon ship" scream that will finally apply to me.


Well said. I don't own an OS either, although I was getting close to buying one. If I had done so, this latest action by LL would have wiped me out. I empathize strongly with the people who do own OS, knowing that this is probably devastating for many of them, landlords and renters alike. I also know that this is going to hurt the SL economy grid wide. Many people will leave, never to return. Sales were already sluggish and have slowed down more since this announcement. The joy that many people once felt in SL has been eroded away. Every content creator who has invested years of creative effort into SL is having their efforts devalued and diminished by the inane and thoughtless actions of our host.
_____________________

VRchitecture Model Homes at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Shona/60/220/30
http://www.slexchange.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=2240
http://shop.onrez.com/Archtx_Edo
Casandra Zolnir
Registered User
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 29
yes it is. Go look at it befor you make a un educated comment.
10-31-2008 09:28
From: Elanthius Flagstaff
You're so right! Jack must be crazy to think OpenSpaces are being overused with a shining example like you. Heck, 10 houses is practically the same as open water or green space!



Go look for your self it is all water with houses. and seeing is believing. Rainforest Isle Estates. And mine were up and rented way before they even posted what they could be used for. And further more, I have chat logs of conversations with the Linden Concierge on what I was doing with the open spaces, They even came to check them out. So don't make stupid comments, with out data.
Sindy Tsure
Will script for shoes
Join date: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 4,103
10-31-2008 09:30
From: Casandra Zolnir
Go look for your self it is all water with houses. and seeing is believing. Rainforest Isle Estates. And mine were up and rented way before they even posted what they could be used for. And further more, I have chat logs of conversations with the Linden Concierge on what I was doing with the open spaces, They even came to check them out. So don't make stupid comments, with out data.

But your last post said you had 10 houses to an openspace..

/me looks confused.
Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
10-31-2008 09:32
From: Barb Carson
What a tool.

Sorry you don't want to discuss without attacking.
Samaria Kahane
Registered User
Join date: 28 May 2008
Posts: 7
Open Space Sim leading in the wrong direction.
10-31-2008 09:32
I understand the need and wish of the LL to make a profit from the growing trend of open space sims being used as more than a waterway and as more than a forest. Why not make a catergory of open space sims. Residential, commercial, and natural (waterways and forest..which is no habitual). I dont know how much the folks at linden labs get out there but there are alot of beautiful sims out there that are open space, and to say it drains resources is that not a fib.

Open space sims are already alloted with in the server space and capacity already and you can not put more on them then what is not allowed. Now there are those of us that enjoy having a openspace sim as a private residence and i am thankful to the individual that i was renting the space from. The logical thing for linden to do is to make the profit in this and cut out the middle man.

I am sorry to the middle men for this statement. But i am now faced with having to move my home because my middle man decided to leave in light of the change in prices. and if it was not for some of the middle men that most of us use, we would not have had the opportunity to even own land in sl.

The prices for aquiring this land from LL is steep and most of us can afford to maintain them but not to set them up. I think it is a real travesty that LL went about this the wrong way. The direction you are heading is to total destruction of a system that many of us have come to enjoy. We have tolerated much and then for the faithful that have not jumped ship and ran to the competitors is something that LL should take into consideration. There is a solution out there that will appease everyone involve or at least the majority.

As for the Grandfathering in of Open Space sims. Why not? they can be the forefathers of what an open space sim can be. Think about it you want sl to grow an it has and it has proven that there are those as myself that have invested time, money and effort into sl. And why should we be subjected to this.

My solution is a simple one:

1. Set up Residential Open Space Sims for premium accounts. This can be at a reasonable price with reasonable prims. (Do a survey to determine what is reasonable). LL will definitely make a profit from this.

2. Set up Commercial Open Space Sims. This can be at a slightly higher tier rate because it is commercial.

3. Set up Natural Open Space Sims. These are what the open spaces was initially set up to be. (in other words Void sims with low prim)


See as I see it this has become an issue because many of us can not afford the Full prim sims not the set up fees nor do we need that much prim or can we afford the Tier. And you can not get an open space with out getting a full prim....ummm a catch 22 for those that have not noticed. Those of us that have premium accounts we have already taken the time to invest in SL why doesnt LL make our investments worth it. I hate to see many of us in sl leave or lose more than we may already have.

This is something for LL to think about and I think this may not be the solution but definitely a start. Many of us choose open space sims to live for the privacy factor being on the main land and having privacy is impossible. and then you get the occasional griefer and on a private open space sim, you dont have that issue. I really hate to have to give up my private open space sim but it seems inlight of current events I have no choice. will i invest more money in to an another place in sl i think not, may be i have an auction of my items and get out while I can. Sincerely hoping linden really look at the big picture and what it will do in the long haul. you need to consider the people who have been with SL and have foregone and sticked with SL through the thick and the thin. Look
at all the down time issues the grid crashes and updates and yet we still keep coming back. Linden Labs needs to really think about this. Why not pose a survey with a place for suggestions before such a drastic change is made. We are the ones that our funds are what helps and even make sl run. As they say dont burn bridges you never know when you may need to cross one.
Watt Gothly
Registered User
Join date: 19 Jun 2008
Posts: 1
Broad brush
10-31-2008 09:33
So we know some abuse the system, why punish all.........

you have the ability to speak to those with manny estates, and those with heavy traffic,
so deal with them. This huge increase I fear will have looking around at other options.

Please deal with those abusing, but not us all, to deal so broadly just makes me feel like cattle, not an individual.

Oh my traffic is roughly 6 a day, so can i have a discount?

Watt
Poppet McGimsie
Proprietrix, WUNDERBAR
Join date: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 197
10-31-2008 09:33
I don't know how they can do this, but I do hope LL can find a way to allow people who purchased full sims before the price decreases last spring, and converted them to OSs after the price decreases, to convert back free of charge.

I don't think they need to allow ALL OSs to be converted to full sims for free (in groups of 4) -- only a reversion of OSs back to the fulls sims they came from. But in thinking about the logistics and mechanics of this, I recognize it would be virtually impossible to impliment.
Erinyse Planer
Registered User
Join date: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 37
I was told by a linden to psot this here so i am
10-31-2008 09:33
I would suggest to Linden Labs they host a meeting patrolled by NON gteam lindens with powers, with those that want to tell why forcing the openspaces out of business is bad. as many lindens as are willing to be there would be great. I think the four sim amplitheator would be good to hold it and a godshout. If it gets too big split it off into different groups at different theators. Let us tell you exactly what youre doing to us. then maybe you can ask for suggestions from differant people. maybe have us notecard them or something so they can be shared.

We need a real dialogue not just being told "the forums are being read"