Thanks for that *hangs head*
Seems they tried to hide it XD
It's a single word in the last paragraph of the blog post, and blends in nicely. Evil, evil single-word linking.
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
we got an answer from the lindens on our strip club. |
|
Keira Wells
Blender Sculptor
Join date: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 2,371
|
04-22-2009 02:20
Thanks for that *hangs head* Seems they tried to hide it XD It's a single word in the last paragraph of the blog post, and blends in nicely. Evil, evil single-word linking. _____________________
Tutorials for Sculpties using Blender!
Http://www.youtube.com/user/BlenderSL |
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
04-22-2009 02:37
"A Region may be designated PG so long as it does not advertise or make available any content that ..... or references to ..... or alcohol usage. Wait until I tell my Dad that he's got to remove the beer from his pub in a PG region. Come to think of it, the word "pub" has got to go too. Maybe he can have waterboarding. That's not torture. It's probably PG. _____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589 |
Innula Zenovka
Registered User
Join date: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,825
|
04-22-2009 03:20
Yes, kinda. Private Estates that wish to have activity now considered 'Adult' need to be tagged as Adult. They don't have to move, or anything, just set that flag. Where does this leave a private residential estate? On the one hand, I'm unwilling to constrain what friends and tenants may or may not get up to on their own land -- and I'm certainly unwilling to be myself constrained -- but I'm also very loath to say people can't invite their friends over to their properties -- whether to participate in "adult" activities or not -- unless their friends are age-verified. From my reading of https://support.secondlife.com/ics/support/default.asp?deptID=4417&task=knowledge&questionID=6010 it seems that the rating system is primarily aimed at how you advertise (that's OK; we don't) but we get a fair few random explorers appearing and wandering round the place, and I'm a bit worried that someone might stumble into my land, discover the castle, be rather perturbed by the dungeons or the fine collection of tentacle monsters living in the garden, and complain. And I would be really cross if someone turned up and disturbed me and my friends while we were playing with the monsters (or swimming in the nude, come to that, which I gather causes offense in some parts of the world) and then added insult to injury by complaining we were behaving inappropriately. My concerns are hightened by the fact we host a free resource centre for builders, in a skybox well above the land. That I certainly want to keep as accessable as possible, but we do get a number of people coming there and then exploring the ground below (sometimes as a result of failed tps) though they're not encouraged to. We've experimented with various solutions in the past -- with a view to protecting people's privacy and quiet enjoyment of the property rather than protecting unknown third parties from seeing anything that might shock them, admittedly -- and come to the conclusion that ban lines, security orbs and the like aren't a very good idea and that, so long as people don't make a nuisance of themselves and leave when asked, it's best to let everyone wander around at will and enjoy our builds. I'd like this to continue, and I certainly don't want to cause inconvience to friends can't come to visit if they're not age-verified -- I've asked, and flagging the places as "adult" would inconvenience some people. But nor do I want to risk running into problems because some hypothetical person has found his or her way to our lands and feels aggreived at what's to be found there. |
eku Zhong
Apocalips = low prims
Join date: 27 May 2008
Posts: 752
|
04-22-2009 03:37
well ................................................................
seems that 90% of the grid will be adult. so much for their sex in private places is ok,sex furniture in mature is ok,skins are ok etc... the new and unimproved FAQ leaves less as mature, more as adult and a lot more grey areas for LL to allow ARing to blossom in... everybody start keeping good Excel records of sales and we can all start before and after the debacle blogs... mainland is going to be a total wasteland populated by throwaway ID griefers with huge wangs..... Ursula and Adult private estates will be staid by comparison... all this reminds me of a movie about the Kelloggs empire... the discouragement of sexual thought or need by the forced eating of cornflakes.. meanwhile back at the ranch Mr Kelloggs was getting these racy enemas with **** shaped apparati _____________________
|
Kelli May
karmakanic
![]() Join date: 7 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,135
|
04-22-2009 03:56
@Innula: Content in private homes is exempt from being rated Adult. I've no idea if LL extend that definition to private homes rented from a landowner. The impression I got was that they will, but in practice it may not be so clear. All the discussion was aimed at content that is advertised for use, not that which is provided for the owner & friends.
So (to take an extreme example) a bondage & torture room set up in a private residence would be fine, inviting friends back there would be fine, but advertising it in Classifieds, Events or Groups would shift it to Adult. Where adult content or conduct on a Region is publicly advertised or promoted, that Region must be designated as Adult (or such content must be removed). We will re-designate such Regions if adult content is not removed. _____________________
Do worried sheep have nervous ticks?
Karmakanix@Sin-Labs http://slurl.com/secondlife/Circe/170/197/504 Karmakanix on SLX http://www.slexchange.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=61062 |
Innula Zenovka
Registered User
Join date: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,825
|
04-22-2009 04:31
@Innula: Content in private homes is exempt from being rated Adult. I've no idea if LL extend that definition to private homes rented from a landowner. The impression I got was that they will, but in practice it may not be so clear. All the discussion was aimed at content that is advertised for use, not that which is provided for the owner & friends. So (to take an extreme example) a bondage & torture room set up in a private residence would be fine, inviting friends back there would be fine, but advertising it in Classifieds, Events or Groups would shift it to Adult. I would just feel rather more comfortable if I knew for sure that the proposed rules are restricted to (as opposed to "probably won't be applied to anything other than" ![]() I've put in a support ticket asking for guidance on this matter, and will report back as and when I get a reply. |
Ralektra Breda
Template Painter
![]() Join date: 7 Apr 2008
Posts: 1,875
|
04-22-2009 04:38
SO there you go, A simple strip club that doesnt even have naked girls on the wall is deemed adult. Since you are only a simple strip club, removing 'escort' from your keywords might help. The way I am reading the blog, to have a club with 'burlesque' dancers is ok...to have a club with 'burlesque' dancers who emote sexually and/or sell sex to customers is not. So I think maybe on the mainland there will be a call for dancers who are intelligent enough to master euphemisms ![]() _____________________
![]() Mainstore: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Phantasm/51/164/501 http://rbzdesign.blogspot.com/ I'm not a designer IRL, but I RP one on SL! |
Kelli May
karmakanic
![]() Join date: 7 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,135
|
04-22-2009 04:48
Innula: When you mentioned "al-fresco entertainment" I looked back at your other post. Tentacle monsters in the garden, if they're what I think they are, might push you over the boundary. This is a problem in SL that what constitutes a home isn't as obvious as it is in RL. Previous LL opinion was that such content shouldn't be on open display (in accessible areas), and should be hidden indoors. I know people can cam inside and look (and probably gain access), but I guess that implies that they are trying to be exposed to it, rather than passing by and just happening to see it.
My reading, and as this is all up in the air, likely to change. As you've said, best get an answer from LL. _____________________
Do worried sheep have nervous ticks?
Karmakanix@Sin-Labs http://slurl.com/secondlife/Circe/170/197/504 Karmakanix on SLX http://www.slexchange.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=61062 |
Windsweptgold Wopat
Registered User
Join date: 24 May 2007
Posts: 1,003
|
04-22-2009 05:32
Its very sad when so called adults need to be wrapped in cotton wool and blinders placed on so they cant accidentally see anything that they may be offended by. Pity those who many be offended by some of the things in SL cant have the mind set to TP out ..
Wind welcomes Mary Whitehouse , Rev Nile and friends to SL |
Innula Zenovka
Registered User
Join date: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,825
|
04-22-2009 06:49
Innula: When you mentioned "al-fresco entertainment" I looked back at your other post. Tentacle monsters in the garden, if they're what I think they are, might push you over the boundary. This is a problem in SL that what constitutes a home isn't as obvious as it is in RL. Previous LL opinion was that such content shouldn't be on open display (in accessible areas), and should be hidden indoors. I know people can cam inside and look (and probably gain access), but I guess that implies that they are trying to be exposed to it, rather than passing by and just happening to see it. My reading, and as this is all up in the air, likely to change. As you've said, best get an answer from LL. Naively, perhaps, I'd thought a private island was about as private as you can get. Perhaps also naively, I'd thought that one of the benefits of owning one would be that I could freely invite my friends there without having to ensure that their virtual papers were in all order, as it were. I now rather fear that I'm going to have to restrict access to my islands, thus causing actual inconvenience to actual people (especially people who use the free resource centre we host up in a skybox, well away from ground level), in order to protect the hypothetical sensibilities of some hypothetical, and certainly uninvited, person who may teleport in by accident. |
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
![]() Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
|
04-22-2009 07:49
Indeed. Naively, perhaps, I'd thought a private island was about as private as you can get. Perhaps also naively, I'd thought that one of the benefits of owning one would be that I could freely invite my friends there without having to ensure that their virtual papers were in all order, as it were. I now rather fear that I'm going to have to restrict access to my islands, thus causing actual inconvenience to actual people (especially people who use the free resource centre we host up in a skybox, well away from ground level), in order to protect the hypothetical sensibilities of some hypothetical, and certainly uninvited, person who may teleport in by accident. Well, this appears to be the impetus for people to buy Homesteads - as a landing point gateway to your adult island. _____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims!
House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60 http://cristalleproperties.info http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog |
Void Singer
Int vSelf = Sing(void);
![]() Join date: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,973
|
04-23-2009 00:01
I just find it funny that Pirates of the Caribbean Online (a fun little Disney number that has LOADS of technical issues) would be considered adult by LL's new standards... it has violence (sword fights, knives, guns, cannons, voodoo curses that suck the life out of people, lots of killing), some sexual themes(although mild and hard to find), Alcohol, drunkenness, and gambling! (complete with cheating!)... all this in a game marketed as 13+ from a company (and not their more adult oriented subsidiary) that is known for CHILDREN'S entertainment
_____________________
|
| . "Cat-Like Typing Detected" | . This post may contain errors in logic, spelling, and | . grammar known to the SL populace to cause confusion | | - Please Use PHP tags when posting scripts/code, Thanks. | - Can't See PHP or URL Tags Correctly? Check Out This Link... | - |
Ava Velde
Registered User
![]() Join date: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 310
|
04-23-2009 00:52
I work in a BDSM club as a deejay. After a few chats with the owner, the conclusion is this: you can have a strip club, provided you leave on the panties, and you don't use overtly sexual emoting. Our club is going to remain where it is, but our dancers will no longer be allowed to strip completely or do what amounts to phone sex in local chat. The owner and I both agree we're going to lose dancers, but at this point, it's no big loss. We would prefer the club to be more social than about the sex anyway. Nudity, by itself, is not "adult". Sex is. Dying while laughing. SL is so much fun! |
Ian Nider
Seeds
Join date: 20 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,011
|
04-23-2009 02:12
I wonder when or if they will start interfering with Adult ratings.
I just wish they had kept the kids on their Teen thingie and left it be. |
Sera Lok
Lok's Low Prim Furniture
Join date: 5 Sep 2006
Posts: 169
|
04-23-2009 13:57
maybe if someone started making pimply bottomed skins with saggy breasts and stretchmarks... unshaven legs and pits... chipped toenails, bitten fingernails, frizzed raggedy hair and plucked to hell eyebrows with fake eyebrows drawn in waaaaaaaay above them on the forehead.. then you might have nudity without overt sexual tittilation???? nope... that's still bound to give SOMEBODY a boner O_O _____________________
Lok's Low Prim Furniture
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Low%20Prim%20Furniture/174/93/22 |