Why so many whorish types?

503

Well then I submit, as I said before you were implicitly boasting.

Since if it were a small number of lovers theres no way you could reliably rate them based on looks vs performance.

While if it was a large number you must have been boasting.

--------------
Seems more likely you decided whatever your personal experiences are agreed with "conventional wisdom" on the subject.

Which is like saying "Red sports cars are faster"

-------------
-------------

My *GUESS* is that personal appearance has little to do with sexual performance, except where confidence or lack thereof are affected.

But I could count the number of my lovers on one hand and surely wouldn't consider those individuals proof of anything statistically.

My guess is you are probably right FD. In fact I said pretty much the same thing just now.

A naked woman with piercings and stillettos....
ok shoe choice might not be quite as obvious as the on/off switch that guys carry between their legs, but stilletos are a dead giveaway

Well...I guess you took it as boasting, but I didn't see it that way at all. I don't think the amount of lovers one has is anything to boast, or not boast about...it just is. I know a lot of people don't feel or act this way, but it's how I've always felt about it.

I think my point was, in my experience, the more average looking women tend to be more active participants, and therefore, better in bed--I don't think that is boasting in the least to make an observation like this. But now I'm just repeating myself. *shrugs*

And to comment on your assumption that my current GF is not typically beautiful, has nothing to do with my recent replies. For the record, she's definitely a looker.

Sorry about the derail. I was only responding to some one else's comment.

However it is only in your experience - since to be statistically valid you would need an adequate sample size and you would need to eliminate extraneous variables.

You often speak as if your opinion is the "truth" (in fact you use that word in one of your posts); but in this case for it to be so you are implying a lot more than you could reasonably have accomplished.

*THUS* an obvious explanation for foehn's original comment -

To which you replied "Eh?"

Mute is your friend.

In SL at least, I find an angle grinder - or a rusty saw - takes care of this unsightliness

When I used the word 'truth', I was referring to many people agreeing with this observation. I wasn't saying, 'what I say is truth!'

Also, my observation has been the talk of many late night talks between good friends...and [we] all seem to agree. So, I guess you could say it's more than just me who agrees with this idea.

Ok, I think we can move on now.

He? Booby is a guy? A guy complaining about loose females? Complaining? Hmm..very strange. I would think he'd be happy.

Actually according to Booby's profile

Booby looks female, with blue hair

And is a member of "Lipstick Lesbians"

Disgusting isn't it? Not just the ones who run around naked but any guy running a female alt. Shameless males.

Thats what i meant by using the term Conventional Wisdom.

A lot of people think this is the case, thus believe it to be so.

Is it so? There is no reliable way to know.

I am always scantily clad in sl because I wear silks, but I wear them with class and have never been called a whore because of my clothing or lack of it. I do believe that we can wear anything we wish as long as we hold our head high and act like ladies. (this is not directed at you Cherry, I just love dressing that way too) My nipple clamps and chains have bells on them and everyone hears me coming and I have never had a complaint. Some of my silks dont even have a top that goes with them, just some lovely adornments. Of course those I am careful not to wear in pg even though my clamps do cover my nipples. If you look at my profile pic you will see that the silks I am wearing are XXX but still quite elegant.

The troll who started this thread must be delighting in the fact that we are almost up to 200 posts.

Quite right -

How someone dresses doesn't make them "whorish"

Neither does as the OP asserted, having ugly genitals.

Asking for money in exchange for sex makes them "whorish"

Aren't we all just little bit whorish?

Ill answer that for 20L.

These guys need more experience in online gaming as well as in overall dating both here and in rl. There are many ways to find out if its a male or a female. And don't tell me about voice changing devices.

Not every female who dresses in skimpy, sexy clothes is a guy. You have to remember people in sl, especially females will go a lot further in doing things they would never dream of doing in rl.

Nah, we derailed it a while ago...no real satisfaction for him. So stop talking about the OP!

Booby could still be a 14 year old boy in RL though.

Nipple rings, and all types of body piercings, not what I call sexy.

Ohh of course. But the only information we have to go on is ..

Booby is named Booby

the information in the profile - which isn't much.

And the fact that Booby likes to troll on the forums. All threads started are trolling, and the other thread Booby spoke up in was a troll.

Somewhat ironically, if you take Ray's signature post quote and substitute 'attitude' for 'minge,' that pretty much covers what I think of Booby.

I have to agree personally--why mess up a perfectly good nipple with a piercing. I don't even like belly button piercings...

Earrings are an exception, of course.