Bots?

I guess if LL ever do enforce that by account verification people who are running extra alts by using false details are going to get cheezed off when those accounts are suspended, or perhaps they discover those accounts being unverified can't cross to other grids.
One more reason I can't be bothered creating more than the allowed registerered alts
And I only really use 3 of the 5 accounts I have anyway.

One problem with the sleeping RP thing is who do you feel if the other 40 Avatars in the sim do the same thing and you can't get into your home sim because the neighbours are Roleplaying sleeping? Of course if you have your own sim or a sim with few users this isn't a problem. But in some sims you could have 6 campers at one store, 5 trafficbots at another store a club of 6 people dancing, 4 couples sleeping and yourself finding your rezday celebration isn't going to work be cause you last 2 friends can't get in.
If you're not at the keyboard, your not really Roleplaying are you?
I mean if an avatar wearing a Balacklava jumps in the window roleplaying a burgulary scene are you ready to participate?

Please, learn how to make hyperlinks working here.



You wrong again. I did not.
Part of your post:



my quote:



I did NOT changed any single word. I quoted and evidenced part of the phrase, and i have commented that part. I'm sorry if you got it (again) wrong.



Me too, i were not bothering of your "even if i was...", i've commented the fact that you were wrong.



Sorry, i don't know Phil.

Indeed, this is a whole different problem.. and i agree, if you are affecting other ppl accessing you haven't only to not leave your av there, you should not run bots at all, since mainland sim supports only 40av, having just 10 bots would mean reduce the capacity of the sim, so if i want to have a "party" i can't because you are filling up the place with 10 zombies.



I am, mentally. It's like sleeping after a good news, you know it's happening, you feel better.



I don't know, the SIM where i sleep is usually closed to the other residents access.

I would be - I'd sleep through it

Is it just me or does Vittorio argue like a Creationist?

I was thinking Scientologist. And not for nothing, but taking that "I am Wrong" quote out of context was a cheap shot.

LOL, maybe I should have specified a loud clumsy incompetent Burglar

Yesh, that's called "quote mining" and it's common to both Creationists and Scientologists and other bottom-feeders.

No, i'm not. (you are wrong...lol).

I'm not sure if this was a plea to our Linden overlords, or a criticism of Strife's greasemonkey script, or a suggestion that Colette use the IMG tags. If it's the IMG tag thing, I for one used to use those (with the trailing "?" in the URL), but apparently for some combination of browser and OS, this generates just a broken picture icon with no link at all, so I usually don't do it anymore.

it's skewing the truth which is done by everyone at some point in time to win some kind of argument or debate..
the worst part of the internet besides spam is liberal and conservatives extremists out to get points in debates about religion and science pulling bits and pieces from posts to put words in the mouth of their adversary..
if this thread goes evolution discussion i'll nuke it with so many kitten pictures people will all think we came from a cat that was immaculately conceived called basement cat..later to evolve into ceiling cat..
And you don't want Ceiling cat getting involved here people!!!

For the record then.

I did not say I was wrong to you on this subject.

If you feel that stooping to slimy, dirty tricks is the appropriate way to deal with someone who disagrees with you - then I feel sorry for you.

Go slither off somewhere and log in with yourself.

Yeah I don't mess with it.

"Computer Experts" should be able to cut and paste.

Too late now

Hmm now I'm intrigued ...........I want to see ceiling cat!

Look I'm the GM here and if it's now 6 trolls instead of 2 then it is because I say so

No it wasn't. It was making and demonstrating a point, and it did it very well. The point was that people like Colette, who just argue for the sake of it, don't reply to parts of posts where they have no answers, so they quote selected bits of posts where they think they can score points, and argue with those. Vittorio quoted the entire sentence in a previous post. Cutting it down later was a means of making and demonstrating a point - that's all.

As chance would have it, his revised version was exactly right

You can't turn time back. I've slept and I'm up again this morning. I slept through whatever happened.

Sorry it was an obscure Dungeons and Dragons reference GM = GameMaster, and often Gamemasters when the bad guys are loosing badly when they aren't suppossed to they add more opponents somehow, I should have called Orks instead of Trolls, troll being a forum reference too
But damnit you weren't suppossed to sleep through, now the bad guys have the data disc when that wasn't supposssed to happen for another 4 pages and I have to completely retwist the plot because you failed a wake up listen check
I'll have to try and rebook all the evil mastermind and his entourage of 12, airtickets and accomodation for 4 days earlier, it's cost thousands in earlybird airfare bookings lost. Ow gawd his main 3 henchmen are deep in the jungles of the Amazon on some Crystal skull job, I won't get them back in time, where am I going to find 3 arch nemises on such short notice? Ill have to replace them with 3 random noobs from waterhead............

Then actually someone noticed it! LOL... anyway i'm gonna change my signature with this:

You'll need to bring in the heavy brigade, with nukes, to wake me up once I've dropped off - or some annoying rap music might do it

This explains a lot.

Oh yes I said in advance that that's what they do - ignore the parts they have no answers for - so it was fun to see you turn it against her after she did it.

I've been doing an experiment today. My bots use the thinnest client possible (I wrote it - they log in to a specific location and do nothing else - no sending of any data), but they receive about 3 times as much bandwidth than the viewer does. I'm standing on top of a skybox, 3000m in the sky, and using the RC10 viewer, and I'm receiving around 2kB/second. Each of my bots normally receives around 6kB/second. I have them all in on RC10 viewers right now, and the total they are receiving is about a third of the total they receive when using the ultra thin client. That surprised me.

Interesting, has anyone checked if the rc10 client sends filtering information to SL to limit the amount of data they recieve? that would alow some smart guy to write a low consumtion client rather then a thin client.