Bots?

Phil. Read it, digested it, felt the constant patronising diverted from the actual subject, and ended up being amused by how quickly it took you to pipe up again.

I actually think I'm a passable smartarse. You've cut me to the quick, Phil.

LOL. I was watching football - I thought I was slow.

So was I. Fancy! A shared interest

Conclusion: if Vittorio was as breathtakingly patronising to people in RL, the probability of him being punched in the face on a regular basis would be pretty high.

LOL. I was watching football - I thought I was slow.

Did somebody answer this, and I'm missing it?I haven't tried it with more than five accounts, but it would in fact be fraud to use anything other than truthful RL information when registering. This wouldn't be prosecuted, of course, unless the account were to get in trouble for other reasons, but if the RL identification information is turned over to law enforcement (as in response to a subpeona), and the authorities have to work to track down the identity because the information supplied wasn't accurate, it will not be a friendly game of hide-and-seek.

For more than five accounts, I very much doubt that one would have to change anything, but if necessary, one should be able to get away with non-deceptive changes (different punctuation or abbreviations, with/without middle name and/or initial, etc.).

It's pretty correct, luckily i do have (usually) around ppl with pretty high intellectual skill so they doesn't end their (verbal) arguments, so it often finishes in front of bottle of wine (not it doesn't not end on my head in the end).
Anyway i know i sound "rude", it because i try to expose the concept in a direct way (and my english sure doesn't help sometime ), but when i've repeated you the same thing 10 times, when i've exposed the facts, when i gave you any sort of reasons (that isn't my "idea", it part of my work) i can't continue with the courtesy reserved to a 5yo child, i've invested part of time to explain you something "new", you should learn, if you don't believe what i say, open a book and get informed, but do not continue with a sterile post that ends with: "I don't believe your technical skill because you don't work for Linden Lab"... you should say: "I don't believe your correct because <fill it with a serie of motivation on how it's supposed to work>".
Cheers!

Hmmm? No, missed all that. I'm busy watching Holland go one nil up against France.

Conclusion: if you would read and digest what Vittorio has to say, instead of trying to be a smart ass - and failing miserably - you would be much better off for it.

Vittorio:
You cannot win the argument. You and Colette have different intentions in the discussion. She isn't interested in the topic, or in common sense, or in knowledge, or in understanding. She is only interested in trolling - keeping it going. It's what she does for fun. But you *are* making her look silly

It's pretty correct, luckily i do have (usually) around ppl with pretty high intellectual skill so they doesn't end their (verbal) arguments, so it often finishes in front of bottle of wine (not it doesn't not end on my head in the end).
Anyway i know i sound "rude", it because i try to expose the concept in a direct way (and my english sure doesn't help sometime ), but when i've repeated you the same thing 10 times, when i've exposed the facts, when i gave you any sort of reasons (that isn't my "idea", it part of my work) i can't continue with the courtesy reserved to a 5yo child, i've invested part of time to explain you something "new", you should learn, if you don't believe what i say, open a book and get informed, but do not continue with a sterile post that ends with: "I don't believe your technical skill because you don't work for Linden Lab"... you should say: "I don't believe your correct because <fill it with a serie of motivation on how it's supposed to work>".
Cheers!

Well, someone claimed that people are allowed to have infinite accounts as long as one used a different e-mail per five accounts. Then I cited 2.4 of the TOS, and asked whether registering more accounts using multiple e-mails were possible, if one uses the same exact identifying information for each e-mail. After I asked that question, some people lost interest in the thread.

That, to me, answers the question.

Even if I am wrong, I am not therefore also stupid.

Finally. That's enough for me, thanks.
Next please.

A Damn 1-1 with the Romania... we're in the deep s***t now.

I was wrong.

regardless of your selective editing

You are. Either you, or France, or both are going out. The Holland vs France game was excellent.

Me? Doing selective editing? Hey girl, i'm honest. Anyway, i've said: i'm finished with you (in this thread).

Okay ..

Look ..

We don't

quotes around here.

Where?




You should learn the term "ironic".

Didn't i said i've finished with you? I'm serious, i've explained to you everything, don't make it worse.

Actually we must win and holland has not to loose... we still have some chances.... maybe.. naa....

You used the quoting tool to change what I said. That is beyond rude in a forum.

but you do have to beat France. That will be a game to watch.

If you think they are still crying because of the world cup... yes, prepare the guns!

I've partially quoted what did you wrote. I did exactly whay you did some posts above to me, ignoring parts of them that where uncovenient for you. I NEVER edited your words (ops.. then you are wrong again!).
Beside that, it was clearly ironic. I may continue for ten thousand years with you, but it's getting boring and i've lost interests to you. I'm sorry, we need to stop here, after some "cabaret" it isn't fun amymore.
Bye Colette (i'll ask Phil to remove you from his ignore list, so you may continue with him and have a better luck)!