Limiting theft by limiting creation
|
|
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
11-09-2009 06:25
From: Lear Cale NPIOFs and PIOFs can make a significant contribution to the SL experience and thus the SL economy, as well as LL's bottom line, by motivating PIU's to put cash in. Your statement that NPIOFs and PIOFs make no contribution to LL's bottom line is false, and even a bit insulting, by implying that we make no economic contribution to SL. All our effort, care, enginuity, and creativity is for naught. (I'm gonna go eat a bullet!  ) How about we collect 1,000 names of random NPIOFs (let's even make them over a year old so they've had plenty of time to learn skills) and then deconstruct to see just how many of them are making all those wonderful products you keep insisting enrich the world and how many are just "there" offering no contribution of any kind? 
|
|
Ceka Cianci
SuperPremiumExcaliburAcc#
Join date: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 4,489
|
11-09-2009 06:31
From: Milla Janick NPIOF and PIOF accounts can spend money. They just aren't getting it directly from Linden Lab. You can buy L$ from other sources. I'm basic account now..i can still buy from the blue button in world.. i never have been a basic right away..my info still shows me as a PIU.. Can basics buy from the blue button if they have never been premiums? i'm more curious than anything..
|
|
Mickey Vandeverre
See you Inworld
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
11-09-2009 06:35
From: Melita Magic No, Mickey. I'm just trying to figure out why you referred to the Christmas Carol story. Do you mean that you see people acting as Scrooge? or Tiny Tim? do I have the right story? lol I can only assume, but you were the one that tossed that out - so I'm asking you, who you are commenting on, before assuming. There has become a huge divide because of only one characteristic - whether you are premium or not - - when expressing an opinion on the challenges we have here. Why? And why so much passion over it? I'm all for passion, as long as it is directed in a positive way. But some of it is downright hostile, and I'm basing that mainly on the thread in the other forum, although I do resent the Scrooge remark, if it was directed toward people like me. Also....if it is so offending to make suggestions that involve paying for a premium account....how can we present that, so that people do not think we are suggesting that there is a difference in "people"....rather than just a difference in payment plans? And that it is not a criticism of "people?" That seems to be the way it is taken.
|
|
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
11-09-2009 06:44
From: Ceka Cianci I'm basic account now..i can still buy from the blue button in world.. i never have been a basic right away..my info still shows me as a PIU.. Can basics buy from the blue button if they have never been premiums?
i'm more curious than anything.. NPIOF = always basic (can't even access the LindeX to sell L$ either) PIOF = if they had a transaction with LL they should have gotten bumped to PIU but that might not (always) be the case so "probably basic" PIU = either basic or premium So in other words: you can't tell the difference between an account that bought L$ at one point in time, or was premium at any point, or is currently premium.
|
|
Lear Cale
wordy bugger
Join date: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,569
|
11-09-2009 06:44
From: Kitty Barnett When I brought up the shadow draft branch here in the forums ages ago I talked enough people who had absolutely no clue as to what they were doing (that isn't meant in a bad way) through it and they all managed to get a functional binary  . Well, every time I've tried it staring in 2007, it's been a frigging nightmare, and if you subscribe to sldev, you'll see that it's a common, or perhaps typical, experience. No offense taken! 
|
|
Lear Cale
wordy bugger
Join date: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,569
|
11-09-2009 06:51
From: Kitty Barnett How about we collect 1,000 names of random NPIOFs (let's even make them over a year old so they've had plenty of time to learn skills) and then deconstruct to see just how many of them are making all those wonderful products you keep insisting enrich the world and how many are just "there" offering no contribution of any kind?  As I said, they also contribute to the SL economy just by being interesting or likeable. Again, you're focusing only on the money supply, and ignoring what *causes* the money supply. People put money into SL because they like it. People like it because of the stuff they can do and the people they can meet. Neither of the above requires PIU. If we were to get rid of all but PIUs, I'm convinced SL would be substantially impoverished, in terms of people we could meet, things we could do, and stuff we could have. And that's ignoring the "loss leader" aspect (NPIOFs that convert to PIUs, but would never have signed up in the first place if payment were required). In any case, this is beside the point of this thread because payment has nothing to do with either the problem or solution of content copying.
|
|
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
11-09-2009 06:59
From: Mickey Vandeverre Also....if it is so offending to make suggestions that involve paying for a premium account....how can we present that, so that people do not think we are suggesting that there is a difference in "people"....rather than just a difference in payment plans? And that it is not a criticism of "people?" That seems to be the way it is taken. I doubt you can  . I don't think anyone would dispute that there is a US$ cost associated with each and every account in terms of bandwidth used, on-call/on-duty Lindens monitoring the grid, inventory and asset storage and backup, etc etc. You can ask who should be responsible for paying for how much an account is costing LL and the answer will be probably boil down to "not me" followed by some excuses that try to point out how they're somehow so tremendously valuable to SL that someone else who isn't nearly as talented/"special" as they are should pick up their costs. In the end though: people always make a lot of noise but when it comes down to it they'll give in. Everyone I personally know who was all vocal about how they'd never age verify and conspiracy theory this and conspiracy theory that all unsurprisingly verified when the time came. Apparantly it wasn't so impossible after all. Same thing with anyone I've ever met who swore high and low that there was no way that they could ever get payment info: when it was convenient they suddenly had a credit card after all, who knew  . LL knows it too but unfortunately they're more inclined to raise tier each time they need more money to run SL since they know most landowners will cough it up in the end. By the same token most of the people who are insisting that they'd never pay for SL will do so if LL were to decide it's needed.
|
|
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
11-09-2009 07:05
From: Lear Cale Well, every time I've tried it staring in 2007, it's been a frigging nightmare, and if you subscribe to sldev, you'll see that it's a common, or perhaps typical, experience. No offense taken!  If you're on Windows and ever want to give it another go just give me a nudge and I'll talk you through it  . Most of all the problems stem from installing the wrong version of some tool the viewer's build process needs.
|
|
Mickey Vandeverre
See you Inworld
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
11-09-2009 07:09
From: Kitty Barnett I doubt you can  . I don't think anyone would dispute that there is a US$ cost associated with each and every account in terms of bandwidth used, on-call/on-duty Lindens monitoring the grid, inventory and asset storage and backup, etc etc. You can ask who should be responsible for paying for how much an account is costing LL and the answer will be probably boil down to "not me" followed by some excuses that try to point out how they're somehow so tremendously valuable to SL that someone else who isn't nearly as talented/"special" as they are should pick up their costs. In the end though: people always make a lot of noise but when it comes down to it they'll give in. Everyone I personally know who was all vocal about how they'd never age verify and conspiracy theory this and conspiracy theory that all unsurprisingly verified when the time came. Apparantly it wasn't so impossible after all. Same thing with anyone I've ever met who swore high and low that there was no way that they could ever get payment info: when it was convenient they suddenly had a credit card after all, who knew  . Ugh! I have to deal with this huge divide based on money every day in RL.....I sooooo did NOT want to deal with it here, and up to now, have not seen the separation. Did ANYONE want to deal with this here??? I don't really think there even IS a separation. Heck! I'm almost convinced now, that I don't even need a premium account! I totally forget about taking advantage of the 512 benefit....the only other advantage is the 300L per week? I would give that up, easily, just to get rid of the scarlet letter P on my chest, now! I totally agree with you, that all these people screaming that there is no value to SL.....(and that is very disheartening, and another topic entirely)....would find a value if they logged off for a month.
|
|
Mickey Vandeverre
See you Inworld
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
11-09-2009 07:20
From: Kitty Barnett
LL knows it too but unfortunately they're more inclined to raise tier each time they need more money to run SL since they know most landowners will cough it up in the end. By the same token most of the people who are insisting that they'd never pay for SL will do so if LL were to decide it's needed.
I'm glad you added this. Part of my reasoning on a paid account across the board....is that it would provide funds that could make a sweeping reduction in tier fees. I know, I know....it's all speculation....that's what we do here. Tier fees are killing me. I'm not asking others to cough up $5 - 10$ - whatever a month, so that I can lower my own personal tier fees....but if the tier fees are killing me, then they are killing everyone else. It is the single most hinderance and obstacle in building the business, that I can think of. And if you don't have a business...it is just as much an obstacle in building your personal residence and life.....if part of that life involves a home. NO....LL is not reading this crap, and they will run their business as they see fit....these are merely just ideas being tossed about. Mostly futile. And in the midst of the futile attempts.....we have a huge divide. It wasn't even necessary. It's all an exercise in Futility for god's sake! 
|
|
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
11-09-2009 07:20
From: Mickey Vandeverre I don't really think there even IS a separation. Heck! I'm almost convinced now, that I don't even need a premium account! I totally forget about taking advantage of the 512 benefit....the only other advantage is the 300L per week? I would give that up, easily, just to get rid of the scarlet letter P on my chest, now! Noone can tell you're premium unless you tell them you are btw so you can just say you renounced your misguided premium ways and stand with the masses and noone will ever know! 
|
|
Mickey Vandeverre
See you Inworld
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
11-09-2009 07:25
From: Kitty Barnett Noone can tell you're premium unless you tell them you are btw so you can just say you renounced your misguided premium ways and stand with the masses and noone will ever know!  LOL! It's too late now!
|
|
Shambolic Walkenberg
Registered User
Join date: 24 May 2008
Posts: 152
|
11-09-2009 07:39
From: Lear Cale Hopefully you got my point above, after you posted this. But I'd like to amplify on this, because it's a common bit of misunderstanding.
Anyone who adds value to the SL experience in any way (even if it's just standing around in a dance club saying clever things and making people happy) *do* matter to LL's revenue, because they make SL more enjoyable to others, who pay (whether in $L or $US) for products and land.
Also:
- LL profits directly from XStreet sales.
- LL profits directly from landlords who rent out land to NPIOFs who earn $L inworld.
- LL profits directly from people who buy $L for poducts made by people who have never transferred a dollar ingame
- LL usually profits indirectly from people who earn $L and then buy products or services, because product makers and service providers usually have expenses that wind up in LL's pockets (e.g., rent).
- LL gets "free money" to use for all $L that are ingame and weren't put there by the monthly account payments (sorry, I don't remember their term for it).
As I said above, an economy is much more than a mere currency.
Personally speaking, I pay in rent to a landlord, I pay commissions on my XStreet sales, and since I have never cashed any Lindens out, all the Lindens I have in my account are essentially free money to LL. At best, that's free capital, at worst (were I to spend them all or transfer them out), it's an interest-free loan. The above saved me the trouble of typing out the reply I had in mind  Fascinating how the language used by those opposed to "freeloaders" copying content appears to be little more than a flimsy veil over the real agenda, which is angst against such "freeloaders" in general.
|
|
Lear Cale
wordy bugger
Join date: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,569
|
11-09-2009 07:47
From: Kitty Barnett If you're on Windows and ever want to give it another go just give me a nudge and I'll talk you through it  . Most of all the problems stem from installing the wrong version of some tool the viewer's build process needs. Nope, not that simple, but maybe that's how it is now. Sure would be nice. There were many problems, different ones at different revs. I shudder each time I contemplate pulling a new one. I did this 3 times. Each time, there were inaccuracies and incompleteness in the instructions, in addition to problems outside the scope of the instructions. Each time, I updated the various pages to include what I'd learned. Thanks for the offer, in any case.
|
|
Shambolic Walkenberg
Registered User
Join date: 24 May 2008
Posts: 152
|
11-09-2009 07:48
From: Kitty Barnett How about we collect 1,000 names of random NPIOFs (let's even make them over a year old so they've had plenty of time to learn skills) and then deconstruct to see just how many of them are making all those wonderful products you keep insisting enrich the world and how many are just "there" offering no contribution of any kind?  OK, as we have now drifted (or more accurately perhaps, done away with the pretence this issue is over content theft) from "some of demographic x are thieves, so all of demographic x must be treated as criminals" to "People who don't pay have no worth", can I ask you a direct question or two? What is your reason to be in SL? To make money, to socialise, to create, to explore a varying quality of virtual environments, or other? Do you feel only people who prove a financial viability should be allowed to exist in the same (virtual) world as yourself? Do you really believe there are thousands of users who log in to not chat, not explore, not build, not in fact do anything at all other than waste their bandwidth and computer time? Because unless you do, your comment of making no contribution is a very materialistic and shallow one. (And once more, any L$ spent has to have come from LL at some point. NPIOF/ PIOF can be considered redistributers of wealth, something that is actually vital in driving an economy even if it is uncomfortable to reduce people to mere mechanisms)
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
11-09-2009 07:56
From: Shambolic Walkenberg What is your reason to be in SL?
To extemporize the diegetic paradigm of musteline psychogenesis.
|
|
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
|
11-09-2009 08:29
From: Argent Stonecutter To extemporize the diegetic paradigm of musteline psychogenesis. For a minute there, I thought you said the dianetic paradigm. <.<
|
|
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
|
11-09-2009 08:41
From: Tegg Bode What if they don't send the real source code?
Does LL actually employ people to look through submitted source code anyway, or just depend on the OpenSource community spotting it? It is pretty easy to tell if it is "real" or not. Probably take no more than an hour to diff, inspect, compile, and test. If it doesn't compile (because something is missing or wrong), the diffs don't result in the expected changes (to implement the differing functionality), or the compiled version is missing the stated features, then you can say "this isn't the source to what you are distributing". In addition, you can diff the resulting binaries. If built the same way, they should be identical, or very nearly identical. So, yeah, it is pretty easy.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
11-09-2009 08:43
And now the Emerald Viewer people have played the GPL card against NielLife.
Should be interesting.
|
|
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
|
11-09-2009 08:47
From: Argent Stonecutter Except there's no inferior materials, no slave labor, and nothing breaks two years later in SL. You can't be serious. >.> Bit rot is alive and well in SL.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
11-09-2009 09:01
From: Talarus Luan You can't be serious. >.> Bit rot is alive and well in SL. You can't be serious, you think bit-rot is any respecter of "quality materials" in SL.
|
|
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
|
11-09-2009 09:22
From: Argent Stonecutter You can't be serious, you think bit-rot is any respecter of "quality materials" in SL. I was referring to the "nothing breaks two years later in SL" part. I've got PLENTY of broken stuff in my inv now. Some of it from inventory loss, some of it from various upgrades. Some of it isn't even two years old.
|
|
Lear Cale
wordy bugger
Join date: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,569
|
11-09-2009 09:28
From: Talarus Luan I was referring to the "nothing breaks two years later in SL" part.
I've got PLENTY of broken stuff in my inv now. Some of it from inventory loss, some of it from various upgrades. Some of it isn't even two years old. Yup, and your objection, though droll and factual, didn't thwart his point, which was that we don't need licenses to create content in SL because there's no safety/quality issue. There's another objection concerning scripts, which can seem to work at first but fail in later circumstances if it's shoddy work. But I still agree that we don't need certification or licensing. LL gave a half-hearted stab at doing that, and the obvious issues drowned out the attempt quite quickly. I'm not a big fan of Ayn Rand, but I have to admit that her admonishment that "caveat emptor is the best certification method" is dead on target for things sold in SL. (My paraphrase, not her words.) It's one of her many good and thought-provoking arguments.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
11-09-2009 09:32
From: Talarus Luan I was referring to the "nothing breaks two years later in SL" part. It's all about this thing called "context".
|
|
Lear Cale
wordy bugger
Join date: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,569
|
11-09-2009 09:33
From: Shambolic Walkenberg OK, as we have now drifted (or more accurately perhaps, done away with the pretence this issue is over content theft) from "some of demographic x are thieves, so all of demographic x must be treated as criminals" to "People who don't pay have no worth", can I ask you a direct question or two?
What is your reason to be in SL? To make money, to socialise, to create, to explore a varying quality of virtual environments, or other?
Do you feel only people who prove a financial viability should be allowed to exist in the same (virtual) world as yourself?
Do you really believe there are thousands of users who log in to not chat, not explore, not build, not in fact do anything at all other than waste their bandwidth and computer time? Because unless you do, your comment of making no contribution is a very materialistic and shallow one.
(And once more, any L$ spent has to have come from LL at some point. NPIOF/ PIOF can be considered redistributers of wealth, something that is actually vital in driving an economy even if it is uncomfortable to reduce people to mere mechanisms) Please take this up here:  . BTW, I think you're being a bit hard on Kitty and putting some thoughts that weren't quite in her head. But I think your questions are worthy of serious consideration. I'm still waiting for someone to propose a method that might work, other than full accountability. I think that full accountability would be a big step in the right direction, but has been argued to death elsewhere. It probably deserves to come up again. But what started this thread was the possibility that there's a middle course with technical limitations. I have yet to see a serious working proposal along these lines, though, and I'd truly love to see a good one.
|