Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Handling Neighbors Ban Lines

Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
11-24-2007 23:11
i have dealt with ban line fans that had a 'too bad so sad' attitude before. it can actually be great fun :)
if your IMs dont go well, then its time to take off the gloves.

add him and his visitors to your banlist
erect a wall on his side of the land. make your side pretty. make his side ugly, garish, and fullbright. enable light and use particles and sound. maybe even make up fake adcubes for his side of the wall.
get the anti copybot prim and drop it near the property line.
place a notecard giver and landmark giver near his property.
put a security orb near his property to warn him, even if it doesnt attack.
buy property on as many sides of him as you can.
megaprims can be used so effectively that i dare not outright say how.

wear him down. make his view so ugly and his sl so miserable that he will concede and drop the banlines.
_____________________
SLU - ban em then bash em!
~~GREATEST HITS~~
pro-life? gtfo! slu- banning opposing opinions one at a time
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/zomgwtfbbqgtfololcats/15428-disingenuous.html
learn to shut up and nod in agreement... or be banned!
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/off-topic/1239-americans-not-stupid.html
Ricardo Harris
Registered User
Join date: 1 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
11-24-2007 23:29
Not the ban line thing again.

Again with the ban lines are ugly and ban lines bite and ban lines are spooky theme?

Enough with the whining about ban lines. If they're up and they keep you out then obviously you don't belong and you're not wanted there, plain and simple. Then you're going to be shameless enough to ask your neighbor to put you on their access list? You can't be serious.

You're actually going to ask to be inserted in someones elses place, most likely someone you don't even know to begin with so the big bad mean ban lines don't scare you?

Have you no shame?
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
11-24-2007 23:45
fuck off wanker.
that is all.
_____________________
SLU - ban em then bash em!
~~GREATEST HITS~~
pro-life? gtfo! slu- banning opposing opinions one at a time
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/zomgwtfbbqgtfololcats/15428-disingenuous.html
learn to shut up and nod in agreement... or be banned!
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/off-topic/1239-americans-not-stupid.html
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
11-25-2007 01:09
Nina, Ricardo, this was a friendly thread by a first time land owner asking about something she had not experienced before. It really didn't need either of you pissing in it.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight
William Wallace, Braveheart

“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind”
Douglas MacArthur

FULL
Ricardo Harris
Registered User
Join date: 1 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
11-25-2007 02:06
Ooooo you said a bad word!! Nina, you so cute but I bet you can do better then "wanker" give it a try.

Ban lines are the landowners prerogative and legal at that. I never said anything that's not the truth. I hate sugarcoating things and I stated it as friendly as can be on top of it.
I even smiled when I wrote it.
Ann Launay
Neko-licious™
Join date: 8 Aug 2006
Posts: 7,893
11-25-2007 02:10
From: Chris Norse
To do it to him, you go to about land, then find the ban tab. Click add, and you will get a search box. Put his name in the search box and then add him to the list. Pretty simple and only he has to see the lines. :)


Do this BEFORE checking the 'Ban These Avatars' box...I banned myself from my own land because I tried to do it in the wrong order. lol
_____________________
~Now Trout Re-Re-Re-Certified!~
From: someone
I am bumping you to an 8.5 on the Official Trout Measuring Instrument of Sluttiness. You are an enigma - on the one hand a sweet, gentle, intelligent woman who we would like to wrap up in our arms and protect, and on the other, a temptress to whom we would like to do all sorts of unmentionable things.

Congratulations and shame on you! You are a bit of a slut.
Denise Bonetto
Registered User
Join date: 31 Jan 2007
Posts: 705
11-25-2007 02:12
From: Ricardo Harris
Not the ban line thing again.

Again with the ban lines are ugly and ban lines bite and ban lines are spooky theme?

Enough with the whining about ban lines. If they're up and they keep you out then obviously you don't belong and you're not wanted there, plain and simple. Then you're going to be shameless enough to ask your neighbor to put you on their access list? You can't be serious.

You're actually going to ask to be inserted in someones elses place, most likely someone you don't even know to begin with so the big bad mean ban lines don't scare you?

Have you no shame?


Gosh you have a lot of anger there.

Just because a neighbour doesn't want to have to sit looking at ban lines, doesn't mean they want to go wondering through others homes. I would guess that only new people to SL go around being nosey, probably because they haven't learnt yet about land ownership.

Nothing scary about the ban lines, just hard to live next door to and they ruin your enjoyment of land you pay for and nothing shameful about trying to come to a mutual agreement with neighbours.

Anyway, this thread has worked because if you read it all, OP has said the other landowner has agreed to sort it out.
_____________________
Cherry Czervik
Came To Her Senses
Join date: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 3,680
11-25-2007 03:38
From: Elora Lunasea
Ideally, I'd like him to take the ban lines down, not have to create a false background. I didn't pay nearly $10,000L per lot (3 of them) to have fake water and sky (Ok, I know it's all fake in the grand scheme of things, but in SL it's all real to all of us). I specifically bought this land, because of the natural beauty it had. That, would be the ultimate last resort if all else fails.

Besides at the moment, since his ban lines are already in place and quite visible. As Joey in "Friends" said; "It's a Moo point" (it doesn't matter to the cow).


This is the risk of mainland. I'd like to live on the ground if there weren't patches of 16sqm there. It doesn't bother me I live in the sky instead.

Ultimately, people can do what they like with their land - use of LL's provided tools does not constitute griefing.
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
11-25-2007 04:08
From: Cherry Czervik
....
Ultimately, people can do what they like with their land - use of LL's provided tools does not constitute griefing.


This is true. I don't think that anyone would dispute that.
Ban lines are not griefing.
Ad farms are not griefieng either.

Both are ugly but ban lines are more intrusive because of their nature.
Use of the current ban line implementation displays a lack of consideration for neighbours and/or a lack of clue.
Inconsiderate and clueless behaviour is not illegal in RL or in SL. This is a pity in both cases. :)
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
Kelli May
karmakanic
Join date: 7 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,135
11-25-2007 04:33
From: Travis Lambert
There's a really simple reason why its so common that folks erect banlines on their newly aquired property:

SL has been marketed to a lot of folks as "A place you can OWN virtual land".

Ownership implies control, and to new folks unfamiliar with the social customs of our world, turning on an 'Access List' probably seems no less natural than locking the doors on the brand new car they just bought.

What would probably help some, is if Linden changed the dialog boxes around setting up access lists - so that a new user setting it up for the first time receives a reminder about how its sometimes considered un-neighborly in Second Life to erect access lists - or something to that effect.

Of course, this would be social engineering. And when Linden has attempted social engineering in the past its gone... oh, so well :D


An excellent point... I've heard of new residents (and even not so new) equally concerned that they might come home to find their possessions stolen, or be mugged for their L$. There's a lot we take for granted, but in some virtual worlds these sorts of activities are part of the game.

Another problem with banlines that might lead to some folks carelessly activating them is that you can't see your own. Which is great when you need them, but some people might not even realise how ugly they've made their surroundings just by using what they think is a normal and reasonable security feature.
_____________________
Do worried sheep have nervous ticks?

Karmakanix@Sin-Labs http://slurl.com/secondlife/Circe/170/197/504
Karmakanix on SLX http://www.slexchange.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=61062
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
11-25-2007 04:54
thats why i have created a 'banline prim'. red banline textured phantom prim to face the offending property.
_____________________
SLU - ban em then bash em!
~~GREATEST HITS~~
pro-life? gtfo! slu- banning opposing opinions one at a time
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/zomgwtfbbqgtfololcats/15428-disingenuous.html
learn to shut up and nod in agreement... or be banned!
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/off-topic/1239-americans-not-stupid.html
Cherry Czervik
Came To Her Senses
Join date: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 3,680
11-25-2007 05:54
From: Sling Trebuchet
This is true. I don't think that anyone would dispute that.
Ban lines are not griefing.
Ad farms are not griefieng either.

Both are ugly but ban lines are more intrusive because of their nature.
Use of the current ban line implementation displays a lack of consideration for neighbours and/or a lack of clue.
Inconsiderate and clueless behaviour is not illegal in RL or in SL. This is a pity in both cases. :)


Granted ... but some people may have requirement for that privacy.
Cherry Czervik
Came To Her Senses
Join date: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 3,680
11-25-2007 05:56
From: Nina Stepford
i have dealt with ban line fans that had a 'too bad so sad' attitude before. it can actually be great fun :)
if your IMs dont go well, then its time to take off the gloves.

add him and his visitors to your banlist
erect a wall on his side of the land. make your side pretty. make his side ugly, garish, and fullbright. enable light and use particles and sound. maybe even make up fake adcubes for his side of the wall.
get the anti copybot prim and drop it near the property line.
place a notecard giver and landmark giver near his property.
put a security orb near his property to warn him, even if it doesnt attack.
buy property on as many sides of him as you can.
megaprims can be used so effectively that i dare not outright say how.

wear him down. make his view so ugly and his sl so miserable that he will concede and drop the banlines.


All of which are things you could be reasonably ARd for as harrassment.
Dancien Graves
Not Nice
Join date: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 111
11-25-2007 06:02
From: Cherry Czervik
All of which are things you could be reasonably ARd for as harrassment.



Yes, so when you get AR'd to death you may thank Nina for her wonderful advice on how to be the biggest asshole neighbor in SL.

Back at my old residence I had banlines. When asked by a neighbor to take them down, I asked if they would take down their giant lag monster of a particle weather system. They said no. So did I.
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
11-25-2007 06:06
From: Cherry Czervik
Granted ... but some people may have requirement for that privacy.

You silly girl. SL is meant to be explored, a shiny happy world where we share everything, we all know each other. We should have nothing to hide from rude, prying busybodies...I mean "explorers".
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
11-25-2007 06:07
just as they are free to do with their land as they wish, so am i.
i cannot be AR'd for a wall or a notecard giver or an anticopybot prim, etc.
the door swings both ways hey.
_____________________
SLU - ban em then bash em!
~~GREATEST HITS~~
pro-life? gtfo! slu- banning opposing opinions one at a time
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/zomgwtfbbqgtfololcats/15428-disingenuous.html
learn to shut up and nod in agreement... or be banned!
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/off-topic/1239-americans-not-stupid.html
Cherry Czervik
Came To Her Senses
Join date: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 3,680
11-25-2007 06:09
From: Dancien Graves
Yes, so when you get AR'd to death you may thank Nina for her wonderful advice on how to be the biggest asshole neighbor in SL.

Back at my old residence I had banlines. When asked by a neighbor to take them down, I asked if they would take down their giant lag monster of a particle weather system. They said no. So did I.


Soon as LL manage to purge the classified and group associated with the land I am on, which has suddenly resurrected itself and does not seem to respond to the TP being set on the ground instead of the air ... when I am not beset with people who turn up and ignore the security requesting that they leave, when I stop getting offensive IMs about "why is it in the classifieds then you stupid bee-hatch" then my banlines come down.

My neighbour is ok with the ban lines having to be there ... tho she wasn't cos suddenly one day she was taking her short cut through my place and got de-seated from her helicopter - she assumed it was aimed at her and banned me personally. As soon as I realised this, I sent her a nice IM asking what I had done and assuring her that whatever it was could we sort it out. She replied and said why ... I explained all the screwy things going on and she was pretty shocked as the classified place referred to went a LONG time ago.

I put her on access till the mess is sorted out, she took me off ban, we had a chat and realised we got on very well.

This is what happens if you are reasonable.

***edit*** sorry that looks like I was saying you're not. I wasn't. Saying no under those circumstances is also reasonable.
Cherry Czervik
Came To Her Senses
Join date: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 3,680
11-25-2007 06:12
From: Nina Stepford
just as they are free to do with their land as they wish, so am i.
i cannot be AR'd for a wall or a notecard giver or an anticopybot prim, etc.
the door swings both ways hey.


Actually Nina yes you can. Whether LL take action or not is another matter. It still is on your file.

Spamming objects are still spamming objects. Egregious behaviour is still egregious behaviour. Ban lines are provided as a land management tool.

Totally different thing.
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
11-25-2007 06:17
From: Nina Stepford
just as they are free to do with their land as they wish, so am i.
i cannot be AR'd for a wall or a notecard giver or an anticopybot prim, etc.
the door swings both ways hey.
A notecard giver that's handing out notecards to people not on your own land, objects that chat/shout onto other parcels, particles that leak onto someone else's land, etc. Those are all things that will be cleared up (eventually) when AR'ed or brought up in a support ticket.

You're only free to do as you wish when it concerns your own land.
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
11-25-2007 06:19
well if that were your view then i can ar people for being male, being american, having an ugly build, belonging to groups i disapprove of, etc.

one cannot say one person has a right to do whatever they wish, then out the other side of their mouth tell me that i cannot.
i can ban whom i please, build walls if i wish, texture them how i wish (even with z flicker), i can have notecard givers and security orbs on my land, i can have particle snow if i wish...
_____________________
SLU - ban em then bash em!
~~GREATEST HITS~~
pro-life? gtfo! slu- banning opposing opinions one at a time
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/zomgwtfbbqgtfololcats/15428-disingenuous.html
learn to shut up and nod in agreement... or be banned!
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/off-topic/1239-americans-not-stupid.html
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
11-25-2007 06:23
that has not been my experience, from either side of the issue.
op should not be afraid to fight fire with fire if it comes to it.
_____________________
SLU - ban em then bash em!
~~GREATEST HITS~~
pro-life? gtfo! slu- banning opposing opinions one at a time
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/zomgwtfbbqgtfololcats/15428-disingenuous.html
learn to shut up and nod in agreement... or be banned!
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/off-topic/1239-americans-not-stupid.html
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
11-25-2007 06:37
From: Nina Stepford
well if that were your view then i can ar people for being male, being american, having an ugly build, belonging to groups i disapprove of, etc.

one cannot say one person has a right to do whatever they wish, then out the other side of their mouth tell me that i cannot.
i can ban whom i please, build walls if i wish, texture them how i wish (even with z flicker), i can have notecard givers and security orbs on my land, i can have particle snow if i wish...


Yes, you can, but when your spamgiver or security orb start harassing people not on your land, then you are clearly in the wrong. When your particle snow lands on someone else's plot you are clearly in the wrong.

Ban who you want, put up all the walls you want. But don't trespass on someone else's plot even if it is just with your spambots.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight
William Wallace, Braveheart

“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind”
Douglas MacArthur

FULL
Cherry Czervik
Came To Her Senses
Join date: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 3,680
11-25-2007 07:21
From: Nina Stepford
that has not been my experience, from either side of the issue.
op should not be afraid to fight fire with fire if it comes to it.


This is not good advice to be giving on a forum where people can read it. You're entitiled to your views Nina, if you did any of this to me I'd fight fire with the moral high ground and the OTHER tools provided to residents. The Abuse Report.

As to openly saying that you'd deliberately build with Z flicker, that's tantamount to SL treason on the aesthetic. Makes me very sad to see that people DO deliberately resort to such things - often before attempting a reasonable talk with the other person.
Elora Lunasea
Mrs. Llama
Join date: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,828
11-25-2007 07:43
/me rubs the sleep out of my eyes wondering how this friendly, helpful thread got derailed while I was sleeping, especially since when I last left, I said the other owner would try and work it out with me.
_____________________
eloralunasea.blogspot.com
Have you hugged a llama today?
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
11-25-2007 07:44
From: Elora Lunasea
/me rubs the sleep out of my eyes wondering how this friendly, helpful thread got derailed while I was sleeping.

It's what we do best.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
1 2 3 4 5