Sky News has a go at SL

Realistically I wouldn't even AR someone if they told me they were involved in Sexual Age Play.

Id stop associating with them. But I'm not the arbiter of someone's rights. Supposedly its protected by the first amendment.

Ive spoken out against sexual ageplay. I don't like it. But I'm not going to be the neighborhood watch. And im definitely not going to spy on my neighbor.

Id AR someone who claimed to have child porn. Id probably get someone with concierge support to try to expedite that complaint.

Id Ar a minor who was working as an escort.

I wont be turning in people who have poseballs in their non-adult restricted land. I know people who have sex poseballs on their PG land and I didnt turn them in either.

The rules are there for a reason. I absolutely would AR adult content in PG areas.

<snip>

Interesting idea... an SL neighborhood watch... lol

<snip>

Nope, rules only exist to protect others from harm. Unless you can name a victim, then the rule is meant to be broken.

4. Indecency

Second Life is an adult community, but Mature material is not necessarily appropriate in all areas (see Global Standards below). Content, communication, or behavior which involves intense language or expletives, nudity or sexual content, the depiction of sex or violence, or anything else broadly offensive must be contained within private land in areas rated Mature (M). Names of Residents, objects, places and groups are broadly viewable in Second Life directories and on the Second Life website, and must adhere to PG guidelines.

They can make their rules, doesn't mean I am gonna be a snitch for them. I could care less if a person has an adult pose ball in their home on PG land.

Actually...

That's ok... there are other people who will report it if it bothers them. Though I will never understand why people are so weird about following the terms of service / code of conduct. /shrug

That's ok... there are other people who will report it if it bothers them. Though I will never understand why people are so weird about following the terms of service / code of conduct. /shrug

That's ok... there are other people who will report it if it bothers them. Though I will never understand why people are so weird about following the terms of service / code of conduct. /shrug

They can make their rules, doesn't mean I am gonna be a snitch for them. I could care less if a person has an adult pose ball in their home on PG land.

Right on. PG = Parental Guidance. How do they suppose people get to be parents in RL and know all that stuff they're supposed to give guidance about? If it's indoors with the shades drawn, fits right into the PG principle, seems to me.

Right on. PG = Parental Guidance. How do they suppose people get to be parents in RL and know all that stuff they're supposed to give guidance about? If it's indoors with the shades drawn, fits right into the PG principle, seems to me.

Burnman, many of us use our own judgment as to what is a violation. I don't need LL or for that matter a collection of idiots in a state capital or Washington DC to tell me right from wrong or how to behave.

If no one is being harmed, I don't care what anyone does. If you (in general, not you personally) want to smoke crack and play with yourself while you look at pictures of goat sex. I don't care, it harms no one else.


Activity inside a person's home, even on a PG lot harms no one else. Sure the Lindens could ban the owner, but I am not gonna narc on them.

Burnman, many of us use our own judgment as to what is a violation. I don't need LL or for that matter a collection of idiots in a state capital or Washington DC to tell me right from wrong or how to behave.

If no one is being harmed, I don't care what anyone does. If you (in general, not you personally) want to smoke crack and play with yourself while you look at pictures of goat sex. I don't care, it harms no one else.

Activity inside a person's home, even on a PG lot harms no one else. Sure the Lindens could ban the owner, but I am not gonna narc on them.

The explaination in the TOS/Community Standards for what constitutes PG is what you should go by.

Burnman, why are you camming into some one else's home? How else are you going to see it if it is inside their home?

As for the TOS, it is a contract of adhesion, I follow my own conscience.

LL, the people who allow you to access their service, provides PG sims for people who would rather not watch goat sex. If you have an issue with that, stay in Mature sims. I am not offended by adult content, but I do believe in a time and place for everything... PG sims are not the place, anytime.

I wouldn't AR people for having Goat sex, in the road, in PG sims either

I don't go looking for it, but if I come across it, I have no issue AR'ing people. I personally believe in following the rules put forth by the people who own and provide the service.

Actually... There have been multiple rulings in federal court declaring the EULA/TOS/CS a legally binding contract. Not that some of you care about that... lol

There seems to be a lot you wouldn't do... I am getting an impression of the sorts of things you would do though.

You agreed to the TOS/CS when you signed up, if you are unable to follow them, then perhaps you should rethink your stay in SL.

LL, the people who allow you to access their service, provides PG sims for people who would rather not watch goat sex. If you have an issue with that, stay in Mature sims. I am not offended by adult content, but I do believe in a time and place for everything... PG sims are not the place, anytime.

That's your bag. I carry a different one. I have no issue AR'ing people who can't follow the terms and conditions they agreed to in order to access the service.