Is Voice Chat the end of Role Play in SL?
|
Fiona Branagh
... or her equivalent.
Join date: 1 Feb 2007
Posts: 156
|
05-16-2007 11:01
No, a voice changer doesn't replace RP typed speech, and here's why:
It's not just about gender.
Are you a great actor? Is everyone that RPs online a great actor? Acting was my second major in college and *I'm* not a great actor. When we type, we can say that someone's voice is sultry, or hoarse, or squeaky... we can say that someone has said a thing with heartrending sadness, or emptiness, or subtle tension.
But it'd be a terrific challenge for people to say it that way for real. Some can do it, which is why they're probably getting paid for acting in RL. Most can't, in the same way that authors may be able to write an emotionally charged scene but be completely incapable of reading it aloud with the same effect.
Typing out your voice effects allows people to pretend things they can't personally do with voice, even with voicechanging software. That's the core of roleplay, and people who don't get the allure of roleplay in the first place aren't going to understand how voice mucks up the entire point of it.
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
05-16-2007 12:19
From: Jadem Gruppman If people are so worried about their RP, they could get some voice changer software. But whatever, to each their own. I don't mind it though. Shhhh! Don't mention the voice changers. Then thy'll start to get paranoid again.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
|
RP is Safe!
05-16-2007 13:10
I really don't think there will be any v-chat RP in SL...except for between a few couples on an individual basis...if they can find a secret area (which will be hard).
RP will be safe because everyone that has any clue about it recognizes the literary qualities needed for RP that cannot be done with v-chat. I've personally gone through many scenarios in RP where the majority of the interaction was "/me" descriptions of actions. You can't do that with a straight face in v-chat!!
_____________________
Semper Fly -S1. Pow
"Violence is Art by another means"
Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
|
Brenda Archer
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 557
|
05-16-2007 19:28
From: SqueezeOne Pow I really don't think there will be any v-chat RP in SL...except for between a few couples on an individual basis...if they can find a secret area (which will be hard). RP will be safe because everyone that has any clue about it recognizes the literary qualities needed for RP that cannot be done with v-chat. I've personally gone through many scenarios in RP where the majority of the interaction was "/me" descriptions of actions. You can't do that with a straight face in v-chat!! Besides, why muck up a perfectly beautiful illusion? One of the prettiest kajirae I know is a man RL, and in a particularly masculine type of job at that. But she's amazing at creating the illusion of a delicate, almost ethereal sensuous beauty. It's like interacting with magic energies. Why on earth would I ever want to shatter that by trying to voice chat while in the middle of RP? Kinda dumb really. We'll save voice for the OOC.
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
05-16-2007 20:33
From: Brenda Archer Besides, why muck up a perfectly beautiful illusion? One of the prettiest kajirae I know is a man RL, and in a particularly masculine type of job at that. But she's amazing at creating the illusion of a delicate, almost ethereal sensuous beauty. It's like interacting with magic energies. Why on earth would I ever want to shatter that by trying to voice chat while in the middle of RP? Kinda dumb really. We'll save voice for the OOC. Even outside of RP within SL. A person in an "alternate "avatar is creating that character, and many put all they have into it. I don't want to take that away from them, destroy their illusion. To do so, is just plain mean. (And their undoubtedly be some that will take delight in outing the "fakers" 
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
Brenda Archer
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 557
|
05-17-2007 01:46
From: Brenda Connolly Even outside of RP within SL. A person in an "alternate "avatar is creating that character, and many put all they have into it. I don't want to take that away from them, destroy their illusion. To do so, is just plain mean. (And their undoubtedly be some that will take delight in outing the "fakers"  All the while calling them "bad people" and ignoring their creativity. I was over on the voice grid tonight with a good friend. We talked so long I forgot the screen and it became a telephone call. When my attention came back to SL to give him a hug, it was an odd feeling at the transition from RL back to SL. It was actually awkward, and this is someone I've hugged dozens of times before.
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
05-17-2007 07:00
From: Brenda Connolly Even outside of RP within SL. A person in an "alternate "avatar is creating that character, and many put all they have into it. I don't want to take that away from them, destroy their illusion. To do so, is just plain mean. (And their undoubtedly be some that will take delight in outing the "fakers"  There will be some fakers using voice mask programs who sound more "REAL" than some actual women using voice chat. So this will go back to the same old paranoid people making stereotypical assumptions and deciding this person is this and that person is that - And getting a lot of their "outings" wrong. I know one woman in particular, everyone thought she was faking her online gender - until she met her Online BF irl, which led to a 2 year RL long distance relationship, LOL.
|
Draco18s Majestic
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 2,744
|
05-17-2007 07:10
From: Brenda Archer All the while calling them "bad people" and ignoring their creativity. Creative minds have been shunned by the masses for ages, while their works are praised. It seems that happyness in life is inversely proportional to one's intelligence (with the exception of falling below "average" at which point happyness falls again). Wikipedia has this to say, From: Wikipedia: Social Attitudes to Creativity Although the benefits of creativity to society as a whole have been noted, [42] social attitudes about this topic remain divided. The wealth of literature regarding the development of creativity [43] and the profusion of creativity techniques indicate wide acceptance, at least among academics, that creativity is desirable. There is, however, a dark side to creativity, in that it represents a "quest for a radical autonomy apart from the constraints of social responsibility". [44] In other words, by encouraging creativity we are encouraging a departure from society's existing norms and values. Expectation of conformity runs contrary to the spirit of creativity. Nevertheless, employers are increasingly valuing creative skills. A report by the Business Council of Australia, for example, has called for a higher level of creativity in graduates. [45] The ability to "think outside the box" is highly sought after. However, the above-mentioned paradox may well imply that firms pay lipservice to thinking outside the box while maintaining traditional, hierarchical organization structures in which individual creativity is not rewarded.
|
Brenda Archer
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 557
|
05-17-2007 20:56
From: Draco18s Majestic Creative minds have been shunned by the masses for ages, while their works are praised. It seems that happyness in life is inversely proportional to one's intelligence (with the exception of falling below "average" at which point happyness falls again). Wikipedia has this to say, The ability to "think outside the box" is highly sought after. However, the above-mentioned paradox may well imply that firms pay lipservice to thinking outside the box while maintaining traditional, hierarchical organization structures in which individual creativity is not rewarded. Sooo true. It's Dilbert's universe for a little while yet. But we're gaining headway I think. Pandora's box is open with technological change and I'm idealistic enough to think it makes the difference that can't be rolled back. Yesterday's gone.... I don't know if SL is in that future or if we'll all be hunting for rats at the edge of the high shoreline raised by global warming... But one way or another nothing is static.
|
Draco18s Majestic
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 2,744
|
05-18-2007 05:37
From: Brenda Archer But one way or another nothing is static. "Change is the on constant." I'm idealistic enough to think that it is possible for everyone to have what they want with SL, but LL isn't making it easy.
|
Broken Xeno
~Fething Alt~
Join date: 9 Mar 2007
Posts: 632
|
05-19-2007 05:22
I've been reading this thread, and several times I've seen people mention "landowners will have to pay a fee for the voicechat." Okay... So I have a few questions in this regard; One; Where did Linden Labs say this at?? I can't seem to find it, and if someone could link me to an official statement about this, I'd appreciate it  Two; Do we have the option NOT to have voice on our land, and if so then we wont have to pay said fee? As far as voice chat itself goes... I doubt I'll use it. Occassionally, probably, with close friends, definitely with my girl... But beyond that, I can't see myself even having it turned on when I go somewhere. Too annoying.
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
05-19-2007 07:35
From: Broken Xeno I've been reading this thread, and several times I've seen people mention "landowners will have to pay a fee for the voicechat." Okay... So I have a few questions in this regard; One; Where did Linden Labs say this at?? I can't seem to find it, and if someone could link me to an official statement about this, I'd appreciate it  Two; Do we have the option NOT to have voice on our land, and if so then we wont have to pay said fee? As far as voice chat itself goes... I doubt I'll use it. Occassionally, probably, with close friends, definitely with my girl... But beyond that, I can't see myself even having it turned on when I go somewhere. Too annoying. They said it back in MArch when Voice chat was announced, on the Blog. Yes you will be abel to turn it off in your land settings.
|
Haravikk Mistral
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,482
|
05-19-2007 08:34
I thought it only cost money if you want it on your own private island? If it costs money regardless of where you are then it better NOT default to on and be an 'opt-out' because a ton of people won't know it has been added to their land settings. And what about people who own large amounts of small plots all over the place? For example rental areas on the mainland, or a plot that for whatever reason was subdivided?
_____________________
Computer (Mac Pro): 2 x Quad Core 3.2ghz Xeon 10gb DDR2 800mhz FB-DIMMS 4 x 750gb, 32mb cache hard-drives (RAID-0/striped) NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb)
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
05-19-2007 09:11
From: Haravikk Mistral I thought it only cost money if you want it on your own private island? If it costs money regardless of where you are then it better NOT default to on and be an 'opt-out' because a ton of people won't know it has been added to their land settings. And what about people who own large amounts of small plots all over the place? For example rental areas on the mainland, or a plot that for whatever reason was subdivided? correct Its free on Mainland Parcels Its Free on the $295 a month Islands It will cost money for the $195 a month islands. It may even cost $100/month (theyd have to go to "normal pricing" 
|
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
|
05-19-2007 10:48
You can also assume it'll be free on $150/month educational sims since they've repeatedly stated they're willing to loose money on those to attract educators.
|
Farallon Greyskin
Cranky Seal
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 491
|
05-19-2007 23:10
From: Colette Meiji It will cost money for the $195 a month islands. It may even cost $100/month (theyd have to go to "normal pricing"  Pbbt, pay the same price as a class 5 sim for class 4 hardware? I doubt they'd have any takers with that  (and yes class 5 simes are considerably better than class 4. Scritps run about twice as fast on a full sim) In fact I seriously doubt they'll have many sim owners PAYING for the "privilage" of voice :/ Farallon
|
Broken Xeno
~Fething Alt~
Join date: 9 Mar 2007
Posts: 632
|
05-19-2007 23:15
Depends really, I mean... I was talking to my girl about it, and we both thought it'd be pretty freaking cool to be able to talk to each other on voice-chat. We're going to try out the betagrid together, and see how it actually feels, but really, if we owned a class 5, we might want it. It's steep, sure, but in the end it's about how people really feel about it.
I've noticed that when it comes to SL, sometimes money is not object. To be able to have your spouse/partner or friends over and have voice? That's cool. In larger places with lots of people, I wont use it, but in more intimate settings like that, I would be more inclined to want it, even at a cost. If it cost, say an extra few bucks maybe, then I wouldn't mind ponying up the money for it.
|
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
|
05-21-2007 11:57
From: Draco18s Majestic "Change is the on constant."
I'm idealistic enough to think that it is possible for everyone to have what they want with SL, but LL isn't making it easy. LL isn't making it easy? How? By providing another feature for people to use? I don't get it. Has anyone thought of the possibility for comedy clubs, poetry readings and live music? I plan on using v-chat extensively with the mute window up and ready! I'll talk to you until you determine for me that you're a waste of my talking/listening time! As far as RP, no one will use v-chat...I'll turn it off for RP myself. I also tend to keep most RP people I interact with completely seperate from my regular social circle in SL. I'll probably never v-chat with anyone I know from RP.
_____________________
Semper Fly -S1. Pow
"Violence is Art by another means"
Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
05-21-2007 12:15
From: SqueezeOne Pow
Has anyone thought of the possibility for comedy clubs, poetry readings and live music?
I can totally destroy this arguement with one word. Karaoke ! 
|
Draco18s Majestic
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 2,744
|
05-21-2007 12:20
From: SqueezeOne Pow LL isn't making it easy? How? By providing another feature for people to use? I don't get it.
Has anyone thought of the possibility for comedy clubs, poetry readings and live music? I believe that there is already at least one of those on the grid already using the streaming media. Also: How is one supposed to HEAR the [above events] when there are 20+ people in the audience ALSO chatting about? You'd never hear a damn thing. From: someone with the mute window up and ready! Somehow I think that needing the Mute window up all the time indicates a problem with the implementation. There is a very explicit use for voice chat and it can already be achived by anyone for free (see: Linden Labs to Charge Landowners) by downloading Skype.
|
SuezanneC Baskerville
Forums Rock!
Join date: 22 Dec 2003
Posts: 14,229
|
05-21-2007 14:11
You get a window that shows folks in voice range, right?
Why not get a similar window for people that are in typing range?
_____________________
-
So long to these forums, the vBulletin forums that used to be at forums.secondlife.com. I will miss them.
I can be found on the web by searching for "SuezanneC Baskerville", or go to
http://www.google.com/profiles/suezanne
-
http://lindenlab.tribe.net/ created on 11/19/03.
Members: Ben, Catherine, Colin, Cory, Dan, Doug, Jim, Philip, Phoenix, Richard, Robin, and Ryan
-
|
Twii Dryke
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2
|
05-23-2007 08:45
Yawn...........................
|
Twii Dryke
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2
|
05-23-2007 08:45
From: SuezanneC Baskerville You get a window that shows folks in voice range, right?
Why not get a similar window for people that are in typing range? There is already sumthing like that in SL
|
Tybalt Brando
Catalyst
Join date: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 347
|
05-23-2007 09:00
So, I have a question. If Voice chat is going to ruin roleplaying....if any of you table top rp (you know, where it all started). Do you write what you're doing/saying on a piece of paper and hand it around?
|
errUh Oh
Registered User
Join date: 1 Mar 2007
Posts: 233
|
eh whatever
05-23-2007 09:30
I didnt read the replies. imho you take the good with the bad when it comes to voice. i wont be using voice publically or in rp because i dont want my voice to determine my experience in sl. Also im a bit judgemental in rl (least im honest) and i can see myself snubbing someone because i dont like how their voice sounds. So im a bit disheartened about that. You can lose some pretty enriching experiences when you blow people off and dont give them a chance. I will only use voice with close friends and my partner, which i can count on one hand. And i probably wont be using it alot since i love to listen to music loudly when i play sl. One thing that really concerns me is alot of people out there who will use voice to escort or whore around or have alot of voice sex with different people. If you do these things in front of me im gonna treat you the same way i would someone in rl doing it because thats your rl voice. If you wouldnt do phone sex for work in real life dont you dare do it in sl. I will treat it as the same thing because thats what it is. And if you dont care about me calling you a whore then i guess that warning isnt for you anyway. My point being i am pretty sure alot of males think its gonna be a voice sex free for all . . well think again buddy.
|