Taco Rubio suspended for 3 days according to source.

Disclaimer: This is from a source that cannot be proven via evidence nor fact, therfore; by protection of privacy, I retain the right not to make assumptions and or validity of this information.

The truly amazing thing is that this ISNT a poll! WTG Blake, you are improving!

"...suspended for 3 days for 'sexual harrasment', via a form letter. The letter included the violation of the community standards quote, except the letter was NOT the same as the definition on the community standards webpage. They added several lines to the letter, and the lines they added are the 'rules' I broke. I'm appealing of course but not hopeful. "

If this is indeed true, shame on LL!! Someone, or some few, apparently have some real pull with the Lindens.

Sexual Harrasment? Who was harrassed? He took pictures of pixels..that anyone can see at any time. Sheesh...

Wait for it...

Yeah I did probably speak too soon, but Im an optimist... First step, not posting polls, next step not posting trolls, one thing at a time.... He's healing...

There will be no further Poll Thread concerning this issue.

Although the convoluted "I saw an episode of Perry Mason once" junk is still here:

"I retain the right not to make assumptions and or validity of this information."

He retains the right not to assume or to validity! The last time I validitied, I was too busy retaining the right not to assume and tripped over a poll.

SUSPENDED! Ouch.

I doubt it, he seems addicted

It is not a matter of addiction, it is a matter of education a learning together to come to a closer solution to solve issues regarding the future of this metaverse and how it effects us.

Let's see what have here....

1. A 'Quote' from 'someone' (no name or specific given)
   
2. A claim of a TOS violation letter (but not included in the post)
   
3. Reference to new text added to TOS in letter not in general TOS text
   
4. No quoting of new text in TOS
   
5. Claim that extra text is the TOS violation
   

So we have an unknown quote from an unknown person about an unknown TOS violation in an unknown letter. What's to make a person give any credence to this posting, or consider it anything other than pure conjecture?

Your question was answered within the disclaimer.

Blake is just being...well...BLAKE. The source WAS Taco. I got CCed on that same message from him.

-aimee

LMAO yall made my day,


Id post more but I can't stop laughing at the fact he was the one that complained about his own build and got himself busted.....Truly a work of art near Christmas...again thank you for making my day.

Not sure who I should be disappointed with....

ME! Pleeeeease..?

Let me first say that I've known Taco for awhile and I consider him a friend. If he hadn't stirred up this particular hornet's nest, I am sure it was just a matter of time before someone else did so.

I think the line between RL and SL is becoming just a tad bit too blurred. In RL, if someone was going around displaying "upskirt" photos of people without their permission, I'd agree that would certainly be sexual harassment. In RL, it would take a fair amount of effort and trouble to obtain such photos however. A person would pretty much have to stand under a ladder with a camera and wait until someone wearing a skirt came along and obligingly climbed it.
In SL, it's extremely simple to obtain such photos. Anyone can get an "upskirt" view at any time just by using "Alt" camera view. It's just a matter of hitting keys on the keyboard. "Alt" view can pretty much afford your avatar of view of anything in SL--in fact, you can even look through walls, and that's normal for SL. I'm not saying it's normal to want to get "upskirt" photos, I'm just saying that the ability to do so is normal for SL.
Therefore, I don't see how those sorts of photos can be considered any different than, say, RL photos used in newspapers that show random people doing every day things like walking down the street or shopping in a mall. Those people don't have to give permission to have their images shown. If you are out in public in RL, you are giving consent to having your photo taken, basically. In RL, it's just as easy to take photos of people walking down the street as it is to take "upskirt" photos in SL.

I just think this is one of those cases where RL rules cannot be applied. It simply does not make any sense.

Ah yes ... you are treading a well-worn path. Very nicely put however.

Give it ten or twenty years...

Nolan, Contact me in world tonight Please.

Ty
Shadow

Taco may not know the real reason why he was lead to reveal what has transpired, only that he was; and that we will gain knowledge and wisdom from it for the future and beginnings of a Metaverse.

Knowledge? Ok. Wisdom? My ass.

We=Plural He=Singular

We will gain wisdom from his knowledge.

<<<has frightening image of Preacher in the pullpit with Bible in one hand and the glaring look of contempt towards his audience in spouting said text.>>>>

Wakes up realizes its just Blake again...Laughs and goes back to sleep.

You had your photo taken as well?

Heheh I couldn't resist.

Aside from that - well all I see is a consistancy then - another player did exactly the same thing and received exactly the same treatment.

If this *didn't* happen then I would say that 'a handful of players have sway' - as it stands I see a consistancy.

Siggy.