Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Sex Gen Removed!

Viktoria Dovgal
Join date: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 3,593
06-15-2008 11:49
From: Skell Dagger
I've been thinking about this, and it seems there's no single list of items that their creators *know* have been stolen, such as the list of stolen animations given earlier in this thread.


It's really really messy. Those animations were sold with full permissions, and examples out in the world from buyers who respected their agreements with the seller will be identical to those from the buyers who ignored that. The copies out in the freebie/resale venues are the genuine item, but unlicensed.

All builder components are really in the same boat, the lists of stolen items and those that were OK for (limited) redistribution are going to have many of the same items on them. Some people will gloss over the differences and harass the wrong people without checking, that already happens even without central lists :/ Lots of careful education would have to be glued to anything like this.
_____________________
Amity Slade
Registered User
Join date: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 2,183
06-15-2008 11:50
One of the problems with the Second Life marketplace is that we have no idea if, when, or how Linden Labs actually enforces its DMCA. This thread continues, and will continue, because even the most knowledgeable people when it comes to Second Life generally, or the items at issue in this thread specifically, can at best only guess what is happening with the item deletion, or enforcement of the DMCA, or whether even this round of item deletion is even related to the DMCA.

It's good to try to think of new ways to run the Second Life marketplace that might protect both content creators and consumers. But, if Linden Labs would just choose any set of rules, as long as they could consistently and transparently enforce them, the marketplace would adjust.

If content creators knew what to expect, they could figure out the best ways to protect themselves. If consumers knew what to expect, they could figure out the best ways to protect themselves.

But since no one really knows what to expect when it comes to Linden Labs and the DMCA, then no one can really figure out how to protect themselves.

(Except for the one, absolutely best way to protect onself from the problems of the Second Life marketplace: Don't participate at all.)
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
06-15-2008 11:54
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Prok says LL confirms to her, it is the "illegal sexgens" removed.

[url=http://secondthoughts.typepad.com[/url]

You don't like to read, do you.
From: Prokofy Neva
UPDATE: Some people are saying it is NOT Stroker's bed, but someone else's...awaiting clarification...


Prok is hardly the end-all be-all source of information.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims!

House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60

http://cristalleproperties.info
http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
06-15-2008 11:59
From: Rebecca Proudhon
No one knows what happened or why. All that is known is lots of stuff is missing. Now if it's just a "Borking." then fine that is somewhat forgivable, but if it an action taken by LL, then it is idiotic, no matter what the motivation was.


If you scroll back through the thread there is a post from Stroker Serpentine saying that this isn't a SexGen issue (and he should know!), and I suspect whoever Prok spoke to in concierge probably used the term sexgen as a generic term!

The SexGen case, if I recall, was against someone selling "exact" copies of the SexGen bed (which is clearly illegal), and against people using the SexGen trademark to name their products. It wasn't against anyone selling their own multipose furniture (assuming they had the right to all the scripts, animations, poses etc.)

Miffy (Muffy) sometime ago wrote a multi-pose furniture script MLP and has updated it since. This is freely available both inworld and on the forums under a BSD license which permits it to be reused, resold, copied and modified etc. Although this performs a similar function to the SexGen script - it isn't in itself a copyright/trademark violation of SexGen (putting it in an item with some stolen SexGen animations and/or calling your product with this script in SexGen would be however).

Someone called EC created a new script and copied the MLP code into that script (perfectly legally within the BSD license). It seems that this script was made available in world (again perfectly legally even if EC charged for it). People used this script in their creations - again nothing wrong here. However, EC also used this script in some of EC's creations which did violate some copyright or trademark.

As a result LL over-reacted by deleting not only the items of EC's which violated copyright etc. but also all copies of the MLP script created by EC even when that script was being legally used in object which in no way violated copyright.

Matthew
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
06-15-2008 11:59
From: Nyoko Salome
From: Isablan Neva
I would expect that a replacement product will be available from either Miffy Fluffy or Lear Cale as soon as they themselves are advised of what is infringing - they can't move until LL tells them what the specific issues are so they can work around them.
wait a sec, isn't miffy the original scriptwriter?? and this 'eva' was the infringer? to make it sound as if miffy & co. 'can't make a move until-' paints them as the offenders.
Quite right. And whatever E.C.'s infringements may have been, using the MLP scripts wasn't among them. That the MLP scripts got caught up in this in any way was just a mistake. There is absolutely no reason to suspect anybody using the MLP scripts, people who augmented their functionality, nor their original creator.
_____________________
Archived for Your Protection
Macphisto Angelus
JAFO
Join date: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 5,831
06-15-2008 11:59
There were two ideas that LL floated on the blog (searching the blogs I can't find them now).

One was verifiying "trusted" scriptors. This was during the griefing of 06.

The second was a series of courses that made one a "verified" creator.

Either of these could help in some situations. Unfortunately like most ideas LL pimp, they end up dropping from the face of the earth with zero follow through.
_____________________
From: Natalie P from SLU
Second Life: Where being the super important, extra special person you've always been sure you are (at least when you're drunk) can be a reality!


From: Ann Launay
I put on my robe and wizard ha...
Oh. Nevermind then.
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
06-15-2008 12:00
From: Qie Niangao
Good question. I rummaged around in Inventory and found something that looks relevant--it's MLP-scripted and has the specious "SEXGEN" label--but E.C. wasn't the creator (rather, one "L. F." born 1/28/2007). Bizarrely, it rezzes as "For Sale" at L$2000, but I'm 100% sure I never bought anything like this for L$2000! And the scripts, notecards, and embedded prim show the original MLP creator. Inspect shows the box prim to have been created 10 May 2007. Anyway, inside this thing the anims and their creators are:

(snipped)

Further caveat: In addition to not knowing if these are exactly the same ones in the E.C. bed, I don't know which if any of these anims may be public domain anyway (the Damien Fate ones, maybe?), nor if some may have had names changed (some are mod perm).

This is not Eva's bed. Eva's has a large number more of Nytemyst's animations. As for the ones from Parsalin Gullwing, I noticed that some of them explicitly say they were for resale in the description to the animation. I think Parsalin's may be fair game.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims!

House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60

http://cristalleproperties.info
http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
06-15-2008 12:04
From: Cristalle Karami
You don't like to read, do you.


Prok is hardly the end-all be-all source of information.



Prok was told by LL it was "Illegal Sex Gen" removed. That is not Prok making something up.

That LL obviously has blundered in how they did this is obvious. That you or other Kool Aid kids can't figure out who is really at fault, is no surpirse.
Hypatia Callisto
metadea
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 793
06-15-2008 12:07
From: Qie Niangao
I think the other suggestion also works: copy the open source code into your own script but set it Mod/Copy and No Transfer. The recipient still has open access to the source and can use that source in their own scripts by doing the same thing, but cannot transfer any mods they make to your script and distribute it as a griefing tool. (I suppose they themselves could grief with it, but they'll be the Owner, so determining guilt shouldn't be too tough.) The only minor advantages to this approach are that you don't have to transfer the extra notecard, and the recipient can see the code formatted a little more legibly in a script than in a notecard and can make quick changes for their own use without the extra step of copying the notecarded source back into a new script.


they can still change the script to a money event, and then your name is on the script draining bank accts. No thanks, I don't want the headaches. They will remain no mod and source provided upon request.

From: someone
Good that you mentioned in another post that as open source, the original author isn't responsible for support (except in this case with a special donation, as noted in another post). So, really, to keep people from contacting that author, the scripts really should have been treated this way all along (although, in practice, people contact the prim creator for support, regardless of who made the scripts--a hazard to folks like Ziggy when they distribute great stuff like ZHAO 2).


yeah, the scripts should have always been on notecards for open source, I would suggest if you are an open source scripter - provide your stuff exclusively on notecards and make people at least learn the basics of cut n paste :P
_____________________
... perhaps simplicity is complicated to grasp.
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
06-15-2008 12:10
From: Matthew Dowd
If you scroll back through the thread there is a post from Stroker Serpentine saying that this isn't a SexGen issue (and he should know!), and I suspect whoever Prok spoke to in concierge probably used the term sexgen as a generic term!

The SexGen case, if I recall, was against someone selling "exact" copies of the SexGen bed (which is clearly illegal), and against people using the SexGen trademark to name their products. It wasn't against anyone selling their own multipose furniture (assuming they had the right to all the scripts, animations, poses etc.)

Miffy (Muffy) sometime ago wrote a multi-pose furniture script MLP and has updated it since. This is freely available both inworld and on the forums under a BSD license which permits it to be reused, resold, copied and modified etc. Although this performs a similar function to the SexGen script - it isn't in itself a copyright/trademark violation of SexGen (putting it in an item with some stolen SexGen animations and/or calling your product with this script in SexGen would be however).

Someone called EC created a new script and copied the MLP code into that script (perfectly legally within the BSD license). It seems that this script was made available in world (again perfectly legally even if EC charged for it). People used this script in their creations - again nothing wrong here. However, EC also used this script in some of EC's creations which did violate some copyright or trademark.

As a result LL over-reacted by deleting not only the items of EC's which violated copyright etc. but also all copies of the MLP script created by EC even when that script was being legally used in object which in no way violated copyright.

Matthew



I already get it. LL is absurd and do everything wrong and wash their hands of all responsibility while people chatter on the forums and allow them to get away with it.
Hypatia Callisto
metadea
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 793
06-15-2008 12:16
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Prok was told by LL it was "Illegal Sex Gen" removed. That is not Prok making something up.

That LL obviously has blundered in how they did this is obvious. That you or other Kool Aid kids can't figure out who is really at fault, is no surpirse.


doesn't look very difficult to me to figure out, they disappeared everything from two creator names, with last names ending in Capalini and Arado.

Some folks had scripts from Miffy Fluffy which were also disappeared because they had Ms. Capalini as creator. The original Miffy Fluffy scripts are still in world, functioning fine as ever. All my MLP scripts are untouched.

Sorry, were you trying to figure something out? :P
_____________________
... perhaps simplicity is complicated to grasp.
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
06-15-2008 12:17
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Prok was told by LL it was "Illegal Sex Gen" removed. That is not Prok making something up.

That LL obviously has blundered in how they did this is obvious. That you or other Kool Aid kids can't figure out who is really at fault, is no surpirse.

Your abusiveness doesn't change the fact that Prok was misinformed, and is awaiting clarification. As has been said, the person Prok spoke to was probably using the term SexGen generically.

Who is at fault? Eva Capalini and Lori Arado (from the other thread). It is painful, but RIGHT for these things to be removed from the grid, as a matter of respect to content creators. What is dumb is that LL is leaving inventory copies.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims!

House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60

http://cristalleproperties.info
http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
06-15-2008 12:18
From: Hypatia Callisto
they can still change the script to a money event, and then your name is on the script draining bank accts. No thanks, I don't want the headaches. They will remain no mod and source provided upon request.
Except if they can't transfer it, the only balance that could be drained by llGiveMoney() would be their own. They could put a money() handler in it and lure people to Pay it, I suppose, but it would be quite a stretch to fault the original scripter for how an owner configured what amounts to a vendor.
_____________________
Archived for Your Protection
Hypatia Callisto
metadea
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 793
06-15-2008 12:22
From: Qie Niangao
Except if they can't transfer it, the only balance that could be drained by llGiveMoney() would be their own. They could put a money() handler in it and lure people to Pay it, I suppose, but it would be quite a stretch to fault the original scripter for how an owner configured what amounts to a vendor.


it happened already to Moopf Murray, who made my vendors, because his vendor was used to sell the copybots. As his name was on the vendor prims and scripts, people abuse reported him, not the owner. He got an official warning from LL over something that was not at all his fault. Later withdrawn, but very nerving for him.

I'll play it safe.
_____________________
... perhaps simplicity is complicated to grasp.
Hypatia Callisto
metadea
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 793
06-15-2008 12:25
From: Cristalle Karami

Who is at fault? Eva Capalini and Lori Arado (from the other thread). It is painful, but RIGHT for these things to be removed from the grid, as a matter of respect to content creators. What is dumb is that LL is leaving inventory copies.


it is in fact, what the DMCA says they are obligated to do - to remove the content in question.

LL is stuck in a position where they can do nothing right. I sympathise with them most of all.

Maybe creators will get a bit more careful about sources. I can only hope.
_____________________
... perhaps simplicity is complicated to grasp.
CheerGirl Allen
Registered User
Join date: 25 May 2008
Posts: 22
MLP, NOT SexGen
06-15-2008 12:25
Do not Confuse MLP and the freebe junk scripts with Authentic SexGen, if you have an Authentic SexGen Product Purchased at Strokerz Toyz or one of thier affiliate vendors this problem will not effect you or your items. Only Freebe Scripts you can get in almost any freebe or 10$L reseller store is effected. Serves people right for Ripping off and Stealing others creative ideas! SCORE 1 For Linden Labs against the Content Thief problem!
Dave Herbst
Registered User
Join date: 4 Sep 2004
Posts: 343
06-15-2008 12:26
From: Hypatia Callisto
it happened already to Moopf Murray, who made my vendors, because his vendor was used to sell the copybots. As his name was on the vendor prims and scripts, people abuse reported him, not the owner. He got an official warning from LL over something that was not at all his fault. Later withdrawn, but very nerving for him.

I'll play it safe.


The same thing happened to me over my dance machine.

The code was modified into a money event and alot of people, expecting to dance... got stung.

The person doing it was banned for permissions abuse and they changed the color of the money dialog.

A bandaid solution, yet the underlying problem still remains.
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
06-15-2008 12:29
From: Rebecca Proudhon
I already get it. LL is absurd and do everything wrong and wash their hands of all responsibility while people chatter on the forums and allow them to get away with it.


I was trying to clarify for others - this thread is getting long!

I think LL made a bad call by deleting everything created by a specific avatar rather than things which clearly were in violation, without checking the consequences.

I think they were foolish to do this just before a weekend - when support, and people on the ground to respond are thin on the groud.

However, there may have been legal reasons why this was the case - pressure to take prompt action against someone meaning there was no time to determine precisely which items were or were not violating copyright so LL had to recourse to a broad brush approach.

Matthew
Darkness Anubis
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,628
06-15-2008 12:29
From: Rebecca Proudhon
I already get it. LL is absurd and do everything wrong and wash their hands of all responsibility while people chatter on the forums and allow them to get away with it.


The Problem is that in the final analysis. LL owns SL and everything in it. We agree to a TOS that basically says they can delete anything they want whenever they want and we have no recourse. They do not in any way HAVE to justify thier actions.

That said, I do strongly believe that in an effort to maintain a relationship with its customers LL should provide a concise explaination as to what is happening and why. But Technically they don't have to.
_____________________
Rebecca Proudhon
(TM)
Join date: 3 May 2006
Posts: 1,686
06-15-2008 12:30
From: Cristalle Karami
Your abusiveness doesn't change the fact that Prok was misinformed, and is awaiting clarification. As has been said, the person Prok spoke to was probably using the term SexGen generically.

Who is at fault? Eva Capalini and Lori Arado (from the other thread). It is painful, but RIGHT for these things to be removed from the grid, as a matter of respect to content creators. What is dumb is that LL is leaving inventory copies.



Obviously they used the term Sex Gen in the generic way. Saying the "Illegal Sex Gen," clearly means they are referring to non-Stroker "Sex Gen" that infringes on Stroker.

But instead of attacking just the "Illegal Sex Gen" they have removed, other people's work and done so with no common sense or effort to protect content. LL should have taken responsibility from the beginning---the instant they saw copying going on--and created a system that prevented it.

The offenders are to blame yes, but LL is even more to blame. Instead they wait for it all to explode and then take an even more idiotic action.

And then on top of all this. People will defend LL and say, "they aren't responsible."


As soon as Stroker's creator rights were violated, LL should have dealt with it on the spot.

It's LL that has to police their world, if they have any intention of hanging around. this means they have to REIMBURSE losses and redo SL so this can't happen in the first place.
Hypatia Callisto
metadea
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 793
06-15-2008 12:30
From: CheerGirl Allen
Do not Confuse MLP and the freebe junk scripts with Authentic SexGen, if you have an Authentic SexGen Product Purchased at Strokerz Toyz or one of thier affiliate vendors this problem will not effect you or your items. Only Freebe Scripts you can get in almost any freebe or 10$L reseller store is effected. Serves people right for Ripping off and Stealing others creative ideas! SCORE 1 For Linden Labs against the Content Thief problem!


um, MLP is not a junk script at all. It's a competitor, but nothing wrong with it.

I like MLP because I could mod it to where it wasn't so "sex oriented" making it useable for rezzing poseballs for PG rated items.
_____________________
... perhaps simplicity is complicated to grasp.
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
06-15-2008 12:34
From: CheerGirl Allen
Do not Confuse MLP and the freebe junk scripts with Authentic SexGen, if you have an Authentic SexGen Product Purchased at Strokerz Toyz or one of thier affiliate vendors this problem will not effect you or your items. Only Freebe Scripts you can get in almost any freebe or 10$L reseller store is effected. Serves people right for Ripping off and Stealing others creative ideas! SCORE 1 For Linden Labs against the Content Thief problem!


Errrm, this was precisely why I posted the summary above.

Creating and selling a bed with multiple sex poses is not illegal. Calling it a SexGen is a trademark infringement, selling an exact copy of SexGen bed is illegal, using stolen animations in it is illegal, etc. but creating one isn't.

Moreover, whatever action LL took - it was not aimed at everyone selling beds with sex poses in!

Matthew
Dave Herbst
Registered User
Join date: 4 Sep 2004
Posts: 343
06-15-2008 12:36
From: Rebecca Proudhon
As soon as Stroker's creator rights were violated, LL should have dealt with it on the spot.

It's LL that has to police their world, if they have any intention of hanging around.


My point exactly.

LL was put on notice a year ago. Only when push came to shove did they act, in the meanwhile, they were facilitating illegal distribution.

Given the fact they had to be subpoena'd to divulge personal info means LL was more concerned with protecting the privacy of the violators, rather than protecting the rights of consumers or creators.
Hypatia Callisto
metadea
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 793
06-15-2008 12:38
From: Dave Herbst
The same thing happened to me over my dance machine.

The code was modified into a money event and alot of people, expecting to dance... got stung.

The person doing it was banned for permissions abuse and they changed the color of the money dialog.

A bandaid solution, yet the underlying problem still remains.


nods, I remember. :(

I'm sorry what happened to you, it sucked. I hope more people take the notecard route for open source scripts. It's the best way... it keeps your creator name out of the mix of what people later do with your source. There's nothing in the open source license that says your name has to be on the creator field, its quite enough to provide a notecard with your name on it and where to get the original source.
_____________________
... perhaps simplicity is complicated to grasp.
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
06-15-2008 12:38
From: Rebecca Proudhon
Obviously they used the term Sex Gen in the generic way. Saying the "Illegal Sex Gen," clearly means they are referring to non-Stroker "Sex Gen"

But instead of attacking just the "Illegal Sex Gen" they have removed, other people's work and done so with no common sense or effort to protect content. LL should have taken responsibility from the beginning---the instant they saw copying going on--and created a system that prevented it.

The offenders are to blame yes, but LL is even more to blame. Instead they wait for it all to explode and then take an even more idiotic action.

And then on top of all this. People will defend LL and say, "they aren't responsible."


As soon as Stroker's creator rights were violated, LL should have dealt with it on the spot.

I agree that LL was wrong for waiting so long and being lax about content in general. In this particular instance, however, it isn't Stroker's work being stolen. Do not confuse the MLP with "illegal SexGen" because it's not. Illegal SexGens would be copies of Stroker's work. We are not dealing with copies of Stroker's work being removed.

It involves an open source script. The bed system also tends to use stolen content from animators. Not all of it appears to be stolen, as some are described as "for resell" in the description. But there is some stuff that clearly is stolen.

We all have to wait for clarification. Yes, this is being handled in a very stupid way - but how would you handle it to protect all the other content? Is there any way to do that without continuing the harm to the original animators? Or the folks whose work depended upon Arado's sculpts?
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims!

House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60

http://cristalleproperties.info
http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 29