Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

"Fixed An Exploit" - whaaaaa?

Prong Thetan
SimCast CEO
Join date: 22 May 2004
Posts: 168
07-18-2005 23:50
From: Jarod Godel
I'm not trying to justify any crimes, but it chills me to the core to look out on Second Life's economy -- an economy driven by people using cracked software, streaming copyrighted music and movies, selling images snagged from the web -- and then see people demanding that someone who exploited the game -- seriously, sue him for IP theft, but he didn't hack into anything -- be sent to jail and pounded in the ass.

I disagree, but have little hope of convincing anyone here of that.


Very interesting point Jarod...

Here is another point that is even MORE chilling...

How many of those people extracting a considerable RL income from Second Life are actually claiming those earnings on their tax returns? If for some reason this went to court, how many people would be charged with tax evasion because they never claimed the extra income on their tax returns?

I would caution against mentioning SL to RL incomes in a public forum :)

Please do carry on...

Just my two cents... I think Martha Stewart is looking for a cell mate - LOL
_____________________
SimCast Entertainment:

Cutting edge game development in Second Life.
Moopf Murray
Moopfmerising
Join date: 7 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,448
07-18-2005 23:51
Wow, I go to sleep and all hell breaks loose in the meantime. Does anybody know what object code has been released at all? I'd obviously be keen to know if anything of mine has been open sourced for me!

I'm going to be really interested to see LL's response to this over the next few days.
_____________________
Shei Domino
hi
Join date: 3 Aug 2003
Posts: 41
07-18-2005 23:52
From: Buster Peel
That's just stupid. Anything that people are willing to pay real money for by definition has value, and in the eyes of the law, is exactly the same as money.

Haha, yeah I guess you've got a point there! Silly me overlooking that obvious fact!
So I guess if the Lindens shut down SL, they'd owe Anshe Chung some US$50,000+, right? Because it's her property, and all. They can't just delete it, right?
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
07-18-2005 23:57
From: Jarod Godel
He's not a theif. He didn't steal anything. Stealing is typically proven when you say, "Hey, I had something, but another person took it from me!" If we're going to play that card, then I think someone needs to charge the Lindens with theft by way of criminal neglect. After all, how many dollars worth of merchandise has been lost, nay, stolen because of the faulty asset server?

He's guilty of invasion of privacy, sure. He's a counterfeiter, if he created any Lindens and if the California legal system recognizes the Linden as hard currency, sure. He definitely violated the terms of service. However, I'm not even sure if what he did can be considered cracking. He found a hole and created a game exploit around it, this happens all the time in other MMOG's. Back in Asheron's Call, people completly devalued several items due to bugs, but no one ever called them theives.

Unless you can prove he (or she) has cost more loss than the asset server has, calling him (or her) a theif is rediculous.

You're wrong. Theft of intellectual property is theft; there are plenty of people in jail for stealing copies of data or source code. You are saying stealing intellectual property is only a crime if you erase the victim’s hard drive or something?

Exploiting a hole in an online service by modifying software supplied by the service provider is also a crime. It is a crime in other MMORPG’s also, equally a crime for any online service of any kind. That such cases are rarely prosecuted does not make them any less a crime.

It is not uncommon for software to have bugs. Bugs in SL are accidents, not "theft". If Linden makes diligent efforts to track down and prevent bugs, which I believe they do, they aren't guilty of gross negligence either.

Your argument that stealing intellectual property from Linden Labs and SL residents should be compared to the effect of unintentional software bugs in order to decide if its a crime or not is absolutely ridiculous.

A couple of people in this thread have serious difficulty understanding the difference between right and wrong. Criminals often say, "the victim had it coming". People who think that's a reasonable argument are themselves just one stupid move away from jail time.

Buster
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
07-18-2005 23:59
From: Shei Domino
Haha, yeah I guess you've got a point there! Silly me overlooking that obvious fact!
So I guess if the Lindens shut down SL, they'd owe Anshe Chung some US$50,000+, right? Because it's her property, and all. They can't just delete it, right?

No, actually they can shut down SL any time they want, and there's nothing Anshe can do about this because Anshe *AGREED* to this under the TOS.
Catherine Cotton
Tis Elfin
Join date: 2 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,001
07-19-2005 00:09
And that is exactly why I won't buy 10 islands.
_____________________
Sunshine Clio
Easily Amused
Join date: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 160
07-19-2005 00:12
From: Shei Domino
<snip>
If someone did something against the rules of SL, I think SL is the appropriate place to deal with that. Pressing federal charges would be entirely bogus. If any damage was caused, it was to people's "property" in SL, which they have basically no right to anyway! But that's not the way it is, so I don't see how criminal charges under the jurisdiction of any nation on earth would be at all legitimate.


Perhaps this arguement could stand if they find no laws were broken and IF they had posted the information to our closed community forums. Instead it was (at least from what I've read on the boards) posted to a publically viewable website for anyone to see & obtain the previously private information. Right there is a blantant crossing the line outside SL. So I disagree with you. If they've broken laws they deserve to be charged.

On the website are these huge grand numbers "Transactions Today (US$): 74,329.54" Eventually finding a way to get some of that may be very tempting to someone with actual hacking abilities and the ability to keep their mouth shut. Unlike many I'm not against hacking* when it's used to make the things we do more secure. Had they hacked the SL client AND gone only to Linden Labs and reported to them security flaws and told noone else I think they would have been doing a favor to the community in the long run.
There are so many above average technically capable people here that I'm a bit surprised it hasn't happened before. Honestly, until they stop advertising SL as a place to make tons of real money we can't be surprised that stuff like this happens. Shocked? Yes. Horrified? Yes. Surprised? No.

-Sun


*ideally when legally employed to be doing so
Vestalia Hadlee
Second Life Resident
Join date: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 296
07-19-2005 00:15
From: Jarod Godel
If someone pays for SL, pays them to maintain their inventory -- many items therein being purchased for real money -- and then SL loses them, that's a breach of contract.

From: Jarod Godel
If we're going to play that card, then I think someone needs to charge the Lindens with theft by way of criminal neglect. After all, how many dollars worth of merchandise has been lost, nay, stolen because of the faulty asset server?

From: Jarod Godel
Two words: criminal neglect.
Three words: breach of contract.
Four words: those are crimes too.

Not if you've previously agreed that all data residing on Linden's servers is temporary, may be erased at any time, and has no intrinsic value its not.
_____________________
"Antipathy...against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. ."-- George Washington, Farewell Address 1793
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
07-19-2005 00:18
From: Catherine Cotton
I said that the GOM was hacked several times. You asked for some links. I gave you a damn good article. Which you apparently didn't read. Just because you would like ppl to jump threw hoops for you doesn't mean they will. I am not providing you with several links. Do your own damn homework woman.



It didnt happen serveral times, you lied.
_____________________
Shei Domino
hi
Join date: 3 Aug 2003
Posts: 41
07-19-2005 00:19
From: Buster Peel
No, actually they can shut down SL any time they want, and there's nothing Anshe can do about this because Anshe *AGREED* to this under the TOS.

When using the Service, you may accumulate treasure, experience points, equipment, or other value or status indicators and contribute to the environment ("Accumulated Status";). THIS DATA, AND ANY OTHER DATA RESIDING ON LINDEN 'S SERVERS, MAY BE RESET AT ANY TIME FOR ANY OR NO REASON. ALL CHARACTER HISTORY AND DATA MAY BE ERASED IN WHICH CASE EACH CHARACTER MAY BE RESET TO NOVICE STATUS. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY COPYRIGHT OR OTHER RIGHTS YOU MAY HAVE WITH RESPECT TO ITEMS YOU CREATE USING THE SERVICE, ALL OF YOUR CONTENT AND ACCUMULATED STATUS HAS NO INTRINSIC CASH VALUE AND THAT LINDEN DOES NOT ENDORSE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS (SUBJECT TO ANY UNDERLYING RIGHTS IN THE CONTENT), ANY VALUE, CASH OR OTHERWISE, ATTRIBUTED TO CONTENT OR ACCUMULATED STATUS.

Looks to me like she agreed to the fact that nothing she could own in SL could be of any intrinsic value! Regardless of whether we all lose all our "accumulated status" due to Linden Labs shutting the place down or due to some illegitimate action in-game, I think there's basically nothing that could happen in SL that would constitute legal damages.
Sunshine Clio
Easily Amused
Join date: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 160
07-19-2005 00:26
From: Shei Domino


Looks to me like she agreed to the fact that nothing she could own in SL could be of any intrinsic value! Regardless of whether we all lose all our "accumulated status" due to Linden Labs shutting the place down or due to some illegitimate action in-game, I think there's basically nothing that could happen in SL that would constitute legal damages.


Since you are digging around in the TOS look up the part about intellectual property rights. :)

-Sun
Vestalia Hadlee
Second Life Resident
Join date: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 296
07-19-2005 00:39
From: Prong Thetan
Very interesting point Jarod...

Here is another point that is even MORE chilling...

How many of those people extracting a considerable RL income from Second Life are actually claiming those earnings on their tax returns? If for some reason this went to court, how many people would be charged with tax evasion because they never claimed the extra income on their tax returns?

I would caution against mentioning SL to RL incomes in a public forum :)

Please do carry on...

Just my two cents... I think Martha Stewart is looking for a cell mate - LOL

Its chilling only if one believes that many people earning considerable income from SL are dishonest and prone to commit a felony.

What I find chilling is that people regularly wonder about this question and appear to relish the gloating-potential of it all.
_____________________
"Antipathy...against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. ."-- George Washington, Farewell Address 1793
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
07-19-2005 00:56
From: Shei Domino
When using the Service, you may accumulate treasure, experience points, equipment, or other value or status indicators and contribute to the environment ("Accumulated Status";). THIS DATA, AND ANY OTHER DATA RESIDING ON LINDEN 'S SERVERS, MAY BE RESET AT ANY TIME FOR ANY OR NO REASON. ALL CHARACTER HISTORY AND DATA MAY BE ERASED IN WHICH CASE EACH CHARACTER MAY BE RESET TO NOVICE STATUS. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY COPYRIGHT OR OTHER RIGHTS YOU MAY HAVE WITH RESPECT TO ITEMS YOU CREATE USING THE SERVICE, ALL OF YOUR CONTENT AND ACCUMULATED STATUS HAS NO INTRINSIC CASH VALUE AND THAT LINDEN DOES NOT ENDORSE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS (SUBJECT TO ANY UNDERLYING RIGHTS IN THE CONTENT), ANY VALUE, CASH OR OTHERWISE, ATTRIBUTED TO CONTENT OR ACCUMULATED STATUS.

Looks to me like she agreed to the fact that nothing she could own in SL could be of any intrinsic value! Regardless of whether we all lose all our "accumulated status" due to Linden Labs shutting the place down or due to some illegitimate action in-game, I think there's basically nothing that could happen in SL that would constitute legal damages.


Did you not catch the "notwithstanding" portion? Or...?
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Catherine Cotton
Tis Elfin
Join date: 2 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,001
07-19-2005 01:00
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catherine Cotton
I said that the GOM was hacked several times. You asked for some links. I gave you a damn good article. Which you apparently didn't read. Just because you would like ppl to jump threw hoops for you doesn't mean they will. I am not providing you with several links. Do your own damn homework woman.



From: someone
It didnt happen serveral times, you lied.
eboni

----------------------------------------------------------
Do not call me a liar. If you had looked it up on Google as I had mentioned you to do you would of found these links. Unfortunately you didn’t do that so I will post 2 more links. Libel noted and saved.

http://www.dragonscoveherald.com/blog/index.php?p=447

You may however imply that the SL Herald is lying all you wish.

Here is a direct quote from that article:


9/22-04
"As Dan Hunter has reported on Terra Nova, the Linden dollar/US dollar money exchange, Gaming Open Market, has been hacked again. Thankfully, the Lindens are working with Jamie Hale (aka Zeppi Schlegel) to rectify the situation. Obviously we are going to see a few of these episodes before we get the kinks out and the security up. Hopefully everyone will have enought patience to see this through."

The word "again" implies it has happened more than once.



6-22-04

http://www.alphavilleherald.com/archives/000302.html

“Our friends at Gaming Open Market have suspended trading in all game currencies except Second Life Lindens after being defrauded for $3K US by a buyer of ISK and SWG credits. As might be expected, it is the usual scam taking advantage of the fact that PayPal refuses to honor purchases of "virtual" goods. (Remember Julian Dibbell's problem with this last October?). Also, as might be expected, the lazy fucks at Sony are doing nothing to help GOM in this matter. Kudos once again to Linden Lab for being supportive of GOM. Jamie Hale's press release follows. “



I shall not reply to you again as IMO you add nothing to these forums but unconstructive hatred. It was a error on my part to ever reply to this type of poster.

------------------------------------
To the poster of this forum I am sorry if this is even a tad off topic. Please continue it's a good discussion :)

Cat
_____________________
Ned Ludd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 33
07-19-2005 04:11
From: Sunshine Clio

On the website are these huge grand numbers "Transactions Today (US$): 74,329.54" Eventually finding a way to get some of that may be very tempting to someone with actual hacking abilities and the ability to keep their mouth shut.


Uhhhh... no. Linden dollars aren't nearly liquid enough to the point where you would see even a hundreth of that 75,000$.

In times of crisis, people tend to imagine things or know things that they don't. There are lots of people making this issue much larger than it really is. The game wasn't hacked apparantly. It was only the client. There is absolutely no way you will get this guy in criminal court because the hacker didn't do anything to deserve it. This exploit is 99% Linden Lab's fault. I don't know what the person edited in the client executable to do this, but under no circumstances should the server have ever sent no modify scripts to clients that do not own them.

I can think of a few ways this could have been accomplished with a client hack:

1. Forging player IDs to trick the server into thinking you owned the script
2. Hidden variable in client that enables "god mode." This means the server's basic administration could be exposed with absolutely no authentication and that administrative packets require no authentication and that the general user client is shipped with hidden administrative interfaces.
3. The server sends all the scripts to the client and the permissions just filter out which ones you are allowed to see. The scripts could still be plucked with a packet sniffer.
4. Script permissions were managed client side.

All of these methods are stupid and the fact that any one of them are allowed by the server means there are probably far worse things lurking in the server software that Linden Labs doesn't know about like buffer issues that would allow an attacker to take over their machines. I say "Linden Lab's doesn't know about" because whoever programmed this game had to have known about this issue before it happened. There is simply no way they couldn't have. And since this game was probably programmed by a team of people who had to develop standards for client/server negotiations the fact that this slipped by multiple people makes me extremely angry.
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
07-19-2005 04:14
From: someone

are lots of people making this issue much larger than it really is


amen.
_____________________
Taken from The last paragraph on pg. 16 of Cory Ondrejka's paper "Changing Realities: User Creation, Communication, and Innovation in Digital Worlds :

"User-created content takes the idea of leveraging player opinions a step further by allowing them to effectively prototype new ideas and features. Developers can then measure which new concepts most improve the products and incorporate them into the game in future patches."
Ned Ludd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 33
07-19-2005 04:24
From: blaze Spinnaker
amen.

I meant in reguards to the action the hacker had to take to do this. The fact he was able to do it is Linden Labs fault. The actions the hacker took with this are a big deal, but nothing you could end up in criminal court for.

We could have some major problems down the road because some of the scripts stolen aren't going to be secure simply because SecondLife residents shouldn't be required to write secure scripts and often don't.

This is a big deal.
Sunshine Clio
Easily Amused
Join date: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 160
07-19-2005 04:28
From: Ned Ludd
Uhhhh... no. Linden dollars aren't nearly liquid enough to the point where you would see even a hundreth of that 75,000$.

In times of crisis, people tend to imagine things or know things that they don't.


Oh no, I realize they aren't that liquid. But an outsider reading the articles that seem to mention SL as the land of money making and then seeing those kinds of numbers is bound to tempt someone smart who may try. My only point was that it's surprising this is the first time (publically anyway, don't want to assume) that anyone has tried anything of this nature.

I'm not chicken little-ing, just talking outloud a bit I guess. :)

-Sun
Katja Marlowe
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 421
07-19-2005 04:34
From: Raudf Fox
All of our avs the moment they hit a PG area?

Actually, the server needs the client to handle a certain amount of info, such as permissions. Either on downloading a "copy" of the most handled items or just bits of character info. Sadly, some 30-something with the mentality of a selfish 2 year old, has to prove they are better than us by seeing to it hard works get poured down the drain...



You know, the thing that always gets me about that stuff, is that the effort put into that, could have been the same effort that others here have put into their codes/scripts/designs etc, and they could be making $ too. Instead, now they could be caught and be in legal trouble. Makes you wonder about genius :P

and yeah it's been awhile, but i'm back *i think*....

kat
Katja Marlowe
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 421
07-19-2005 04:36
From: Sezmra Svarog
What a way to turn a serious issue into a personal pity party.

I'll take TP problems over blatant THEFT any day. :eek:


I don't even develop and i'd sure as hell want tp problems anyday.
Katja Marlowe
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 421
07-19-2005 04:42
From: Chip Midnight
Nah, because she's right and she knows it. How many female hackers or virus writers have been arrested and jailed? I don't know of any.


Actually if a friend I used to have is to be believed, a lot of hackers are recruited by the FBI with a choice of working for them or going to jail.....maybe that's where some our female hackers go to?
Katja Marlowe
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 421
07-19-2005 04:47
From: Chip Midnight
It's not monopoly money to people who are making hundreds of real dollars a week from SL. It's part of their livelihood.



Or their ENTIRE livelihood. And I doubt SL would shut the doors without warning on people, since part of their selling point is that you can make RL money with SL.
Jamie Bergman
SL's Largest Distributor
Join date: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,752
07-19-2005 06:01
From: Escort DeFarge
...someone dumped a few million linden on GOM a couple of days back... I hope there is no connection.


My thoughts EXACTELY!!!!!
Apotheus Silverman
I write code.
Join date: 17 Nov 2003
Posts: 416
07-19-2005 06:12
From: Ned Ludd
The game wasn't hacked apparantly. It was only the client. There is absolutely no way you will get this guy in criminal court because the hacker didn't do anything to deserve it. This exploit is 99% Linden Lab's fault.

You are quite wrong here. As has been proven in courts all around the world countless times now, unauthorized access is unauthorized access regardless of the means taken to do so. Your personal feelings of "the hole was wide open, so it wasn't the hacker's fault" mean nothing.
_____________________
Apotheus Silverman
Shop SL on the web - SLExchange.com

Visit Abbotts Aerodrome for gobs of flying fun.
Apotheus Silverman
I write code.
Join date: 17 Nov 2003
Posts: 416
07-19-2005 06:14
llEmail() security enhancement proposal that allows programmatic verification of the sending object:
/13/2b/54398/1.html

This could help curb security breaches in the future for systems that rely on llEmail().
_____________________
Apotheus Silverman
Shop SL on the web - SLExchange.com

Visit Abbotts Aerodrome for gobs of flying fun.
1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11