Why does it seem the SL population hates Christians?
|
Jennyfur Peregrine
Whatever
Join date: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,151
|
04-24-2006 11:49
From: Boliver Oddfellow My dear Mr. Nerd
As a Jew you offend me deeply with your assertions that because I believe Jesus is a man a teacher and perhaps that he had much to share with mankind, but was not the risen son of god, that I ,no matter how hard I try, no matter no matter what good works I do, am condemned to hell. I further am appalled and offended to the core that by your assertions everyone of the 6 million Jews that died in the Holocaust after weeks or even months of torture finds themselves in hell. If your christian god or Jesus, is one that condoms good people who die at the hands of a madman to a life in hell, then you can bloody well keep him! I am so offended I am not ARing you, I am calling LL directly as well as the Bi nae Brith and the JDL. People like YOU make good people like me glad to not be christian. As to the OP I am sorry you are being harassed but you must see it is people like Mr Nerd ( gad what an apropos name) that cause you to be treated as such. Very well said Boliver and I couldn't agree more and I'm one of those pesky heathen going straight to hell without passing go and collecting $200 atheists. BTW on a lighter note, This particular line you mentioned above "If your christian god or Jesus, is one that condoms good people who die at the hands of a madman to a life in hell, then you can bloody well keep him!" sounds kinky. Jesus/God condoms good people?!? and here the church has been opposed to condoms and birth control...if they only knew.
_____________________
~Jennyfur~http://jennyfurperegrine.wordpress.com/ http://slcc2007.wordpress.com/ Deadly Nightshade Design Studio (Indigo 86,61) Jennyfur's Designs on SLBoutique
|
Jellin Pico
Grumpy Oldbie
Join date: 3 Aug 2003
Posts: 1,037
|
04-24-2006 11:51
From: Enabran Templar That's not an acceptable remark to make in public.
I'll be my own judge of what is or is not an acceptable remark for me to say in public.
_____________________
 It's Official! From: Trinity Serpentine Jellin, you are soooooo FIC! Fabulous, Intelligent and Cute
|
Ananda Sandgrain
+0-
Join date: 16 May 2003
Posts: 1,951
|
04-24-2006 11:53
From: Corvus Drake For those who don't know (or missed that one beautiful airing of South Park). $cientology is a pseudo-religion that was founded by a sci-fi writer. I can safely say pseudo-religion as they define themselves as being followers of a philosophy or discoverers of some truth, without laying claim to the existence of any specific God. Similar perhaps to people who take the books of Gor too seriously, $cientologists follow the teachings in their book as if it was a religion. If anyone suggests that they may be wrong or that they are doing something uncouth, they file slander lawsuits and, in rare cases, descrimination suits. This scares some $cientologists into never leaving the pseudo-cult, as they may be sued if they disagree openly. This also allows the group to carry that same 'OMFG descriminated' banner that some Christian and Wiccan groups are known to wear on their sleeves, thus validating the system in the eyes of the believers. So what do $cientologists believe? Well, like the Bible, it's a case of a few good ideas mixed in with a lot of junk, but being told that if you don't believe the junk, you dont believe in the good ideas. $cientology encourages healthy eating, kindness, etc. It also has a few things in it that are senseless, like not treating cancer and a bit of numerology. Once the leader of a group of $cientologists has deemed someone as being with the belief enough (read, brainwashed 1984 style), they are told the Ultimate Truth. This is the part that South Park exposee'd with the help of a couple of former $cientologists who they refrained from naming. Comedy Central was immediately sued and the episode banned from North American distribution via broadcast after airing. The Ultimate Truth. If I get sued for this you people better send L$  . They believe, essentially, that an alien starship scattered the souls of humanity all over the Earth and other places. Essentially, a survey mission to see how Life works. The alien who flew the starship promised to come back and retrieve the souls and learn what humans learned, but that following $cientology and understanding the plan was the only way you'd get to advance in the alien culture when you get there. Otherwise you were just shoved into storage (some groups dont believe the storage bit but it's been more prominent as more people have left the cult). The alien is an interdimensional being and in some texts, there's mention of interdimensional war. There's some pretty wide holes in that explanation for life, obviously, but that's their theory. And to say they might be wrong means you could get sued. So yeah, I'd say they make themselves targets. I've studied a lot of Scientology texts, and examined a lot of the claims of ex- and anti-Scientologists. Most of what you've written here bears no resemblance to what EITHER side claims. But then, why worry about collecting facts when no one likes the group in the first place, huh? This is why the value of tolerance and the principle of innocent until proven guilty are so important. People should not be persecuted on account of such bullshit, even if they are a bunch of weirdos.
|
stpaulsub Clio
Fear the Bubblegum Gurl!
Join date: 2 Sep 2004
Posts: 607
|
04-24-2006 11:55
From: Jennyfur Peregrine Very well said Boliver and I couldn't agree more and I'm one of those pesky heathen going straight to hell without passing go and collecting $200 atheists. BTW on a lighter note, This particular line you mentioned above "If your christian god or Jesus, is one that condoms good people who die at the hands of a madman to a life in hell, then you can bloody well keep him!" sounds kinky. Jesus/God condoms good people?!? and here the church has been opposed to condoms and birth control...if they only knew. umm one small correction you are not a Heathen, you are a heretic because you have heard teh word of God and do not accept that! i take great pleasure in pointing this out to teh "good Christians" who call me a heathen all the time
_____________________
From: someone David Valentino: I think I just like to play with the balls
|
Demian Caldera
..ya, that too...
Join date: 8 Jun 2004
Posts: 249
|
04-24-2006 11:57
From: Ingrid Ingersoll Didn't Jesus preach tolerance? I'm going to hell I guess as well. ..and I'll be driving the bus! 
|
FlipperPA Peregrine
Magically Delicious!
Join date: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,703
|
04-24-2006 11:58
From: Ananda Sandgrain I've studied a lot of Scientology texts, and examined a lot of the claims of ex- and anti-Scientologists. Most of what you've written here bears no resemblance to what EITHER side claims. But then, why worry about collecting facts when no one likes the group in the first place, huh?
This is why the value of tolerance and the principle of innocent until proven guilty are so important. People should not be persecuted on account of such bullshit, even if they are a bunch of weirdos. Ummm, you might want to read through this, including the sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu"In Scientology doctrine, Xenu (also Xemu) is an alien ruler of the "Galactic Confederacy" who, 75 million years ago, brought billions of people to Earth, stacked them around volcanoes and blew them up with hydrogen bombs. Their souls then clustered together and stuck to the bodies of the living, and continue to cause problems today. These events are known to Scientologists as "Incident II", and the traumatic memories associated with them as The Wall of Fire or the R6 implant. The story of Xenu is part of a much wider range of Scientology beliefs in extraterrestrial civilizations and alien interventions in Earthly events, collectively described as space opera by L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology. Hubbard detailed the story in Operating Thetan level III (OT III) in 1967, famously warning that R6 was "calculated to kill (by pneumonia etc) anyone who attempts to solve it." The Xenu story was the start of the use of the volcano as a common symbol of Scientology and Dianetics from 1968 to the present day." There's a lot more detail at the above link. Regards, -Flip
_____________________
Peregrine Salon: www.PeregrineSalon.com - my consulting company Second Blogger: www.SecondBlogger.com - free, fully integrated Second Life blogging for all avatars!
|
Corvus Drake
Bedroom Spelunker
Join date: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,456
|
04-24-2006 11:58
From: Ananda Sandgrain I've studied a lot of Scientology texts, and examined a lot of the claims of ex- and anti-Scientologists. Most of what you've written here bears no resemblance to what EITHER side claims. But then, why worry about collecting facts when no one likes the group in the first place, huh?
This is why the value of tolerance and the principle of innocent until proven guilty are so important. People should not be persecuted on account of such bullshit, even if they are a bunch of weirdos. Can you linky those books? Everything I've read and seen and heard has jived with my explanation perfectly well, give or take.
|
Corvus Drake
Bedroom Spelunker
Join date: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,456
|
04-24-2006 12:01
From: stpaulsub Clio umm one small correction you are not a Heathen, you are a heretic because you have heard teh word of God and do not accept that! i take great pleasure in pointing this out to teh "good Christians" who call me a heathen all the time Actually, in Christianity, a heretic actively fights the concepts of the religion. Someone who has heard their message and does not believe or has left the religion is an "apostate".
|
Dianne Mechanique
Back from the Dead
Join date: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 2,648
|
04-24-2006 12:02
From: FlipperPA Peregrine Nice dodge; you could have at least Googled the response that was already out there, which basically blames it all on the Jews and still says boys kissing is A HUGE SIN. How about I find some, from the new testament, that I have problems with:
1 Peter 2:18 "Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh."
Colossians 3:22 "Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to win their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord."
1 Timothy 6:1 "All who are under the yoke of slavery should consider their masters worthy of full respect, so that God's name and our teaching may not be slandered."
Matthew 10:24 "A student is not greater than the teacher. A slave is not greater than the master."
Revelation 2:22-23 "So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways. I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds."
Killing children? Slavery? Nice.
The vast majority of Christian are good, moral people who use their religion as both inspiration and moral code. Those who are brainwashed are a different entity entirely.
Regards,
-Flip I am also an atheist and was brought up in an extremely religious background (which I rejected), similar to what Flip says later on (perhaps moreso!) I find that despite the smuggery etc. that others have noted in some of the Christians on this thread however, there is also a real "attack" mentality from some of the aetheists here as well, and it isn't very pretty. Why such a vehement attack here? Why even worse ones further down the thread? I don't believe that Christ was a God, in fact I believe that the belief that he was is perhaps the central peversion of the suposed message. Assuming the guy existed as described however, and assuming he was here today, I think he would be more angry at this kind of attack post than he would be at some a fool who simply doesn't understand. In answer to the above quotes I would respond with two others. They are slightly ironic but also get at the root of one of the key messages and could serve to explain the quotes above especially in the context of the time those parts of the Bible were written: "Taste the joy of service" - Young Mormon Women's Improvement Association"You gotta serve someone." - Bob Dylan
|
Ranma Tardis
沖縄弛緩の明確で青い水
Join date: 8 Nov 2005
Posts: 1,415
|
04-24-2006 12:02
From: FlipperPA Peregrine You know what? I bet that is where I got it. I'm a big fan of Bill Maher. Now that I think of it, I'm pretty sure that's where I heard it from, but that it was much ruder and more strongly stated than I did. Ananda, did you read the posts? Most have been commenting on how the person who insulted the original poster is a bigot and an idiot, HOWEVER, we don't like evangelic over-zealous types thrusting religion down our throat. There's a world of difference between the comments made by the original poster and Lewis Nerd's post. Within that difference lies the reaction that has been seen. A Muslim has never harassed me in the street trying to convert me. A Muslim has never told me "You're going to hell." I'm not worried about Muslims running the USA into the ground, leveraging a perversion of a religion to brainwash and rule through fear. Christians have done all these things to me. That said, the great majority of Christians are good people with a moral compass and understanding. Have you ever told someone they're going to hell? Whatever I believe in as an agnostic - you know, my own moral compass - that would be telling someone they're going to hell (and actually believing and taking joy and comfort in it) because they disagree with you is a much greater sin than most considered by many Christians, like boys kissing, female priests, and working on a Sunday. Regards, -Flip You are very mistaken, YES THEY WILL! Have you not heard of those groups of mulsums attacking liquor stores in Los Angles? Yes, they will tell you. Also they have no respect for the non believer and limited respect in christians which they call followers of the book. Dont you remember thr trial of the Christian in Kabual because he converted from a Mulsum into a Christian and the penality for that is death?
|
Corvus Drake
Bedroom Spelunker
Join date: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,456
|
04-24-2006 12:06
I remember a certain incident or 2 where Christendom burned thousands of midwives, pagans, and homosexuals, so let he who has not sinned cast the first stone.
|
Jennyfur Peregrine
Whatever
Join date: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,151
|
04-24-2006 12:07
From: stpaulsub Clio umm one small correction you are not a Heathen, you are a heretic because you have heard teh word of God and do not accept that! i take great pleasure in pointing this out to teh "good Christians" who call me a heathen all the time Good catch. I like being a heretic better than a heathen. Heathen is too prettified and PC. Also, its not so much as I accept or reject " the word of god" I just chose to do my own thing and not be a part of something I don't fully believe or that no matter how much I believe would chose to condemn me to hell for questioning and for life decisions and personal philosophies.
_____________________
~Jennyfur~http://jennyfurperegrine.wordpress.com/ http://slcc2007.wordpress.com/ Deadly Nightshade Design Studio (Indigo 86,61) Jennyfur's Designs on SLBoutique
|
Jillian Callahan
Rotary-winged Neko Girl
Join date: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,766
|
04-24-2006 12:09
From: Andy Enfield Yes, but most atheistic philosophers (e.g. Nietzsche, Mackie, etc.) would argue that with a rejection of any kind of theism goes the rejection of the system of metaphysics built on it. Epistemic honesty requires this, not the kind of lazy hanging onto moral metanarratives that passes for atheism today  I'd argue that "most atheistic philosophers" are (well, were. Your short list is a pair of corpses) being insular. The point of my reply to you was really to show you that you'd started applying absolutes where objectively there are none. There is no metaphysical element to the rejection of slavery, and in fact there are plenty of solid, real-life reasons to stand in the stead of orders from heaven. But I see by your phrasing you're spending more time being smug than you are actually arguing any point - so good day to you.
|
Dale Glass
Evil Scripter
Join date: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 252
|
04-24-2006 12:10
After getting into quite a few debates of this kind, I found a new interesting perspective on the subject: ignosticism.
Weak atheism is lack of belief. Strong atheism is an active denial of the existence of a god. Agnosticism says that the existence or inexistence of a deity is unknownable. Ignosticism states that the concept of "God" is meaningless because theism is incoherent.
|
Boliver Oddfellow
CEO Infinite Vision Media
Join date: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 484
|
04-24-2006 12:11
Jenn - you made me laugh right as I was taking a drink. I wonder if Vanilla Pepsi and Compaq's go well together
_____________________
Infinite Vision: Specialists in Virtual World Projects http://infinitevisionmedia.com
|
Aimee Weber
The one on the right
Join date: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,286
|
04-24-2006 12:12
From: Lewis Nerd The difference is that Aimee Weber isn't the saviour of the world. From: Jellin Pico In my world, neither is jesus Why does it seem the SL population hates Aimeeists?
|
Ananda Sandgrain
+0-
Join date: 16 May 2003
Posts: 1,951
|
04-24-2006 12:13
From: Corvus Drake Can you linky those books? Everything I've read and seen and heard has jived with my explanation perfectly well, give or take. http://www.scientology.org/html/en_US/istore/item/index.html?minisite=10041§ion=10322&item=680 I'd start with this book, or with the What Is Scientology? book. Stuff on the web (including Wikipedia) is mostly just a battleground of unsubstantiated allegations and attempts by each side to smear the other. Flipper- I don't know the whole details of the OT III incident, but I would like to point out to you that it is merely a description of a discovered incident, not the Ultimate Truth in Scientology. The ultimate truths of Scientology are rather basic and can be found in the first few sections of either book I mentioned. Everything else is just things people may run into along the way to trying to achieve spiritual awareness and ability.
|
Jennyfur Peregrine
Whatever
Join date: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,151
|
04-24-2006 12:14
From: Corvus Drake I remember a certain incident or 2 where Christendom burned thousands of midwives, pagans, and homosexuals, so let he who has not sinned cast the first stone. Incident or two? Try like and incident or hundreds. Let's see there were all of those crusades to retake the holy lands, hundreds of years of pogroms against the Jews, blaming Jews for the black death so that they would have an excuse to kill them, those wild and whacky burning times, the spanish inquisition and so on and so forth, heck Pope Pius something or another was a Nazi sympathizer and supporter during the war... In order to be a true Christian, these things have to be accepted as part of the blood stained roads that paved the way for Christianity to be the majority in the world. These historial things can't be glossed over and neatly swept under the carpet they are part and parcel of the past of Christianity. Oh whats the quote again... " Those that do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it" and now THAT is what really scares me.
_____________________
~Jennyfur~http://jennyfurperegrine.wordpress.com/ http://slcc2007.wordpress.com/ Deadly Nightshade Design Studio (Indigo 86,61) Jennyfur's Designs on SLBoutique
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
04-24-2006 12:14
I think the assumption is made based on the writings of a few people.
You could just as easily flip this around and say 'Why does it seem the Christian population hates SL' based on the writings of a few people.
I personally dont subscribe to any religion, but I don't have a problem with those who do. Seems no matter what you practice (Chrisitianity, Islam, any of them) the goal is to be a better person.
Problem I have, religious or not, is there are folks who talk the talk, and walk the walk - A lot of people spend too much effort talking about how they are good people and not enough time being better people.
No matter what your beliefs or lifestyle - what works for you may not work for others - and noone likes anyone trying to force their way of life down the throat of another.
These cases ARE the minority (for and against) - it's just that its much more visible than someone who just practices what they believe in.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
Jennyfur Peregrine
Whatever
Join date: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,151
|
04-24-2006 12:15
From: Boliver Oddfellow Jenn - you made me laugh right as I was taking a drink. I wonder if Vanilla Pepsi and Compaq's go well together Glad to be of service. I fed my keyboard some lemonade earlier. 
_____________________
~Jennyfur~http://jennyfurperegrine.wordpress.com/ http://slcc2007.wordpress.com/ Deadly Nightshade Design Studio (Indigo 86,61) Jennyfur's Designs on SLBoutique
|
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
|
04-24-2006 12:18
From: Chip Midnight No argument there, but I attribute that to the individuals rather than their specific inspirations. I'm certainly a huge fan of religious architecture but religious texts don't teach engineering or material sciences on which those human achievements actually depend. Credit where credit is due.  Well, then, to give you a more practical example, when I had my first job at age 15. , Atlas Shrugged didn't teach me how to be a better supermarket bag boy. It simply made me want to be the best one that I could be and armed with that inspiration, I figured out the rest on my own. Ideas are very powerful motivators. Religion and faith are some of the most powerful of all.
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court. Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
|
Osprey Therian
I want capslocklock
Join date: 6 Jul 2004
Posts: 5,049
|
04-24-2006 12:22
Speaking from my own existence, which is all I can do, I try to improve myself (I need it  all the time. There's much wisdom, I can see, in Jesus, but there is wisdom to be found in many places. I think when I'm open to learning and empathising, I can find important things out - not just from the wise, but from watching and thinking about things. I would like to be unafraid, nonjudgemental, peaceful, generous, humble, helpful, empathetic. I fall into pettiness at times, and I need to keep striving. I applaud anyone who genuinely seeks to be a better person. There are as many ways to travel that road as there are people. I believe it's very important to respect others, not to indulge in the hubris of judgemental thought, and to be open.
|
Haravikk Mistral
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,482
|
04-24-2006 12:23
From: Jennyfur Peregrine not be a part of something I don't fully believe or that no matter how much I believe would chose to condemn me to hell for questioning and for life decisions and personal philosophies. This is one of those things I don't like about any religion I know of. In all of them, if you don't do something, then you are royally screwed. If a god is truly loving and caring, then it doesn't matter who you believe in, and what rules you follow if you are doing good things (e.g helping others, causing no harm and generally aspiring to be selfless...from time to time). If a god (or gods) would condemn you to an eternity in some hellfire for being a nice person but believing in UFOs from Uranus, then they are not worthy of being worshipped (IMO) as I only respect people/entities who are good, ie not arrogant, jealous and hateful. I've not heard of a religion with a god who loves you no matter what you believe in. If there is one then I'd be interested to learn about it! Otherwise I'm sticking to 'meh'-ism, the belief that a god or gods could exist, or there was a big bang, or that generally any theory is pretty cool since no-one was there to say otherwise, at least that I've met or would believe 
|
Corvus Drake
Bedroom Spelunker
Join date: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,456
|
04-24-2006 12:23
From: Ananda Sandgrain http://www.scientology.org/html/en_US/istore/item/index.html?minisite=10041§ion=10322&item=680 I'd start with this book, or with the What Is Scientology? book. Stuff on the web (including Wikipedia) is mostly just a battleground of unsubstantiated allegations and attempts by each side to smear the other. Flipper- I don't know the whole details of the OT III incident, but I would like to point out to you that it is merely a description of a discovered incident, not the Ultimate Truth in Scientology. The ultimate truths of Scientology are rather basic and can be found in the first few sections of either book I mentioned. Everything else is just things people may run into along the way to trying to achieve spiritual awareness and ability. So...hold on....I ask you for your information that contradicts what we've claimed was exposed about Scientology that was kept secret until someone was sufficiently within the system to believe it when they heard it, and you said my sources were all wrong. So then you send me a link to the scientology official website. Run by the very people who would need to contradict that information in order to keep their books selling, then expose more once you're into it enough.... You DO see the error in that right? It's like trying to use the Bible to prove its own validity. If I write "From the desk of Bob" on the top of a memo, and write a memo, does that mean I can claim that Bob had everything to do with it and be considered credible? No, I can't. So give us something that isn't availible on Scientology.org as "approved" and saleable. Oh...wait...there isn't such a thing....because to write one means you get sued.... Edit: I love how the link implies it's not a system of absolutes, then turns around and says YES, THIS IS HOW LIFE WORKS, AND THE REAL TRUTH IS IN HERE!. Comical in its creepiness.
|
Cindy Claveau
Gignowanasanafonicon
Join date: 16 May 2005
Posts: 2,008
|
04-24-2006 12:35
From: Ananda Sandgrain I'd start with this book, or with the What Is Scientology? book. Stuff on the web (including Wikipedia) is mostly just a battleground of unsubstantiated allegations and attempts by each side to smear the other. So, instead, we're supposed to rely on what the Scientologists tell us? Any body of thought that cannot stand the kleig lights of criticism doesn't deserve to survive. Possibly the best - and most damning - collection of data on Scientology Attiki Prefecture vs KEPHE (KEPHE is the Scientology Mission in Greece): From: someone The verdict characterizes KEPHE as "... an organization with totalitarian structures and trends, which essentially despises man, acts freely "in phenomenon" in order to attract members, who are then subjected (with all the above mentioned processes and theories) into a brain wash, aiming at the creation of directable way of thinking and minimizing objections (basic positions of the Scientology founder's theories), so that we are standing in front of beings with no personal will, who have lost the capacity of making decisions as products of their free will, since they have passed through the propaganda filters of Scientology and the suitable processing, become susceptible to the "truths" it applies, without having motives to examine and evaluate". Justice Anderson, Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia: From: someone "Scientology is evil; its techniques are evil; its practice is a serious threat to the community, medically, morally, and socially; and its adherents are sadly deluded and often mentally ill... (Scientology is) the world's largest organization of unqualified persons engaged in the practice of dangerous techniques which masquerade as mental therapy." Kenneth Robinson, British Minister of Health: From: someone "The government is satisfied that Scientology is socially harmful. It alienates members of families from each other and attributes squalid and disgraceful motives to all who oppose it; its authoritarian principles and practice are a potential menace to the personality and well being of those so deluded as to become followers; above all, its methods can be a serious danger to the health of those who submit to them... There is no power under existing law to prohibit the practice of Scientology; but the government has concluded that it is so objectionable that it would be right to take all steps within its power to curb its growth." Federal prosecutor's memorandum to the judge urging stiff jail sentences for 9 top leaders of Scientology who had pleaded guilty to criminal charges: From: someone "The crime committed by these defendants is of a breath and scope previously unheard of. No building, office, desk, or file was safe from their snooping and prying. No individual or organization was free from their despicable conspiratorial minds. The tools of their trade were miniature transmitters, lock picks, secret codes, forged credentials and any other device they found necessary to carry out their conspiratorial schemes." Justice Latey, ruling in the High Court of London: From: someone "Scientology is both immoral and socially obnoxious...It is corrupt sinister and dangerous. It is corrupt because it is based on lies and deceit and has its real objective money and power for Mr. Hubbard... It is sinister because it indulges in infamous practices both to its adherents who do not toe the line unquestionably and to those who criticize it or oppose it. It is dangerous because it is out to capture people and to indoctrinate and brainwash them so they become the unquestioning captives and tools of the cult, withdrawn from ordinary thought, living, and relationships with others."
|