Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Attention : Windows Genuine Advantage = Spyware

Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-19-2006 11:19
From: Christopher Omega
I'm suprised that you're making this statement about any open source Unix-based system. Darwin, the kernel running under and powering OS X's prettyness is regularly worked on by hundreds, if not thousands of developers around the world. Linux, as the most popular of these opensource operating systems (in terms of diverse developer commitment) refutes your statement to an even greater degree.


Actually, it doesn't refute my statement. Linux is the "most popular" next to, well... things nobody has ever heard of, by and large, but as far as being a consumer level OS, it's not even on the radar.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
06-19-2006 11:24
From: Zonax Delorean
Allofmp3 DOES pay the royalties:
The site AllOfMP3.com does regularly transfer substantial amounts of royalties to the Russian organizations for collective management of rights such as ROMS and FAIR, which have granted the site licenses to legally deliver music through the Internet


That is all well and good, except that those organizations do not have licenses from the music companies to distribute or license their music to web sites. Those organizations have no connection whatsoever to the music companies whose products the AllOfMp3.com site is selling without authorization.
_____________________
Cristiano


ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less.

~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more.

Zonax Delorean
Registered User
Join date: 5 Jun 2004
Posts: 767
06-19-2006 11:25


I would point out that this IFPI is an American site, which sides with the opinion that 'Allofmp3.com is stealing'. They're impartial, and their press releases lie, or hide the truth.

From the article:
From: someone
Yet ROMS has no rights from the record companies whatsoever to licence these pieces of music. ROMS and allofmp3.com are well aware that record companies have not granted authorisation for this service.


According to Russian law, they do NOT need rights from the record companies. So these sentences are logically true, yes, but they paint Allofmp3.com in bad light.

The two sentences should be:
From: someone
Yet ROMS has no rights from the record companies to license these piece of music, according to Russian law, it doesn't need any licenses, and it thus LEGAL.


And no, I don't feel too good (while acting legally, but) paying the wrong people, however, I have no other options. My portable players (iPod, etc) don't play WMAs, my Linux doesn't play WMAs. It, however, plays MP3 nicely.

More info on the legal status:
http://www.museekster.com/allofmp3faq.htm
From: someone
The legal status of Allofmp3

Russian copyright legislation allows phonograms to be performed publicly without the authorization of the copyright owner for broadcasting and cable transmission. (Article 39) The Internet could be deemed to fall under this exemption. The copyrights involved have to be paid to a collecting society. This is the 'loophole' that is referred to in several articles on Allofmp3.

New legislation will come in to effect as of September 1st 2006. We are not sure if this new law will close the loophole. A translated copy of the amended copyright laws can be found at Roms.ru.

Allofmp3 has signed agreements with the collecting society, Russian Organization for Multimedia & Digital Systems (ROMS). According to license № ЛС-ЗМ-02-36 the Internet-project www.allofmp3.com, has the right to use musical compositions by providing downloads. Under the license agreement Allofmp3 pays out fees to ROMS for downloaded materials that are subject to the Russian Federation Copyright And Related Rights Law.

ROMS manages intellectual rights in the Russian Federation. All third party distributors licensed by ROMS are required to pay a portion of the revenue to the ROMS. ROMS in turn, is obligated to pay most of that money (aside from small portion it needs for operating expenses) to artists who have registered, both Russian and foreign.

We have received this confirmation from ROMS:

I can confirm the legality of allofmp3.com You can legally buy/download mp3-songs from this site if it does not breaks the law the national legislation of the country in which you will be during that moment. Sorry for my english.
Yours faithfully, the assistant to the lawyer of the Russian society on multimedia and to digital networks (ROMS) www.roms.ru.

Bahanets Roman Igorevich
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
06-19-2006 11:27
*reads back in thread*

Wow, I will argue about anything sometimes.
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-19-2006 11:30
From: Zonax Delorean
According to Russian law, they do NOT need rights from the record companies. So these sentences are logically true, yes, but they paint Allofmp3.com in bad light.


So they deliberatly exploit a loophole in Russian law (even by that artical you post, the loophole is rather shaky), ignore the wishes of the legal copyright holder by hiding behind questionable loopholes... And it's someone elses fault they are painted in a bad light? :rolleyes:

AND, from that artical - You can legally buy/download mp3-songs from this site if it does not breaks the law the national legislation of the country in which you will be during that moment.. That would not be America, and I don't think most of the EU nations either, given the fact that Italy shut them down in their country and is persuing legal action.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Zonax Delorean
Registered User
Join date: 5 Jun 2004
Posts: 767
06-19-2006 11:39
From: Reitsuki Kojima
So they deliberatly exploit a loophole in Russian law (even by that artical you post, the loophole is rather shaky), ignore the wishes of the legal copyright holder by hiding behind questionable loopholes... And it's someone elses fault they are painted in a bad light? :rolleyes:


While morally questionable, they're legally fine. IFPI is trying to spread the word that Allofmp3 is illegal, which is A LIE.

From: someone
AND, from that artical - You can legally buy/download mp3-songs from this site if it does not breaks the law the national legislation of the country in which you will be during that moment.. That would not be America, and I don't think most of the EU nations either, given the fact that Italy shut them down in their country and is persuing legal action.


It's not illegal to buy/download music from local or foreign sites in my country (EU), so I'm legally OK.

I hope it's not illegal to buy/download music in the USA (whether from a local or foreign site) either :)

And I repeat: show me a similarly priced -- can be a bit higher, though a full quality lossles album is around is around 10-14 USD on allofmp3 --, and equally usable (!!!) service, and I'll be glad to pay!
Tsukasa Karuna
Master of all things desu
Join date: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 370
06-19-2006 11:39
From: someone
That's your fault. I keep my desktop running for a week+ before I even think of restarting, and normally when I do its to configure some app that needs it. The days of windows crashing by looking at it funny are in the past if your reasonably competent with windows.


Competence has nothing to do with it. Between poorly written apps, spyware, viruses, bloatware, etc the list goes on - ms doesnt stand much of a chance. Not entirely their fault, given, but the apple folks still have em beat on stability.

Remember apple's old "Switch" campaign? Sure, it was MS bashing, but every single point they made was true. Apple's software and hardware "just works". Its built to meet that specification, and they succeeed. And the major drawback of appleware vanished with OSX and the move to a nix based system. Apple makes their code user friendly, but dumbed down? Pah. Give me a terminal and you can do anything you want with OSX.

About the only MAJOR thing i can see wrong with apple is that they still dont get all of the cool games that the MS/DirectX crowd do. This can only change for the better.

Not a fanboy. Run both systems, love both, but the mac has serious advantages over pc's. Simple fact.
_____________________
".. who as of 5 seconds ago is no longer the deliverator.."
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-19-2006 11:48
From: Tsukasa Karuna
Competence has nothing to do with it. Between poorly written apps, spyware, viruses, bloatware, etc the list goes on - ms doesnt stand much of a chance. Not entirely their fault, given, but the apple folks still have em beat on stability.


Competence absolutely does have something to do with it.

I don't get viruses - I download from trusted sources, dont open email attachments, scan every file I download before I run it, etc.

I don't get spware - I avoid ActiveX, unmodified Internet Explorer, ad-supported "freeware", etc.

I don't instally crappy software - The most unstable program I have is SL.

I don't let my caches and temp directories fill up boundlessly.

I don't let programs connect to the internet without asking me.

I don't let windows try to take over for the jobs I should be doing myself, such as updating drivers.

I keep my hard drive defragmented.

And you know what? I don't have problems with windows. I just dont.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-19-2006 11:51
From: Zonax Delorean
While morally questionable, they're legally fine. IFPI is trying to spread the word that Allofmp3 is illegal, which is A LIE.


No, it's a partial truth. It's legal in Russia, but unless your in Russia...

From: Zonax Delorean
It's not illegal to buy/download music from local or foreign sites in my country (EU), so I'm legally OK.


Italy and Germany would seem to disagree with you.

From: Zonax Delorean
And I repeat: show me a similarly priced -- can be a bit higher, though a full quality lossles album is around is around 10-14 USD on allofmp3 --, and equally usable (!!!) service, and I'll be glad to pay!


So, your ethics are for sale to the lowest bidder? Hogwash. Nobody is making you download those MP3s - you could buy the CDs and rip them, or download them from iTunes and unDRM them (This is questionably legal, granted, but once its on your computer, my feelings change on the subject).
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Zonax Delorean
Registered User
Join date: 5 Jun 2004
Posts: 767
06-19-2006 12:37
From: Reitsuki Kojima
So, your ethics are for sale to the lowest bidder?


No. My ethics is to pay for a product that I can actually use. There's no 'lowest bidder'. Just one bidder. However, it's not my ethics on debate here: it's the legality of allofmp3.com. And it's legal.

From: someone
Italy and Germany would seem to disagree with you.


I tried to research on the web for anything that would support what you say, but I can't find anything. The most I can find is 'IFPI says Allofmp3.com is illegal', yeah, yeah, we already heard that, and it's still a lie, no matter how much they repeat it.

Could you link a German law (in English, eh :) that says or implies downloading from Allofmp3.com is illegal?

I don't think there can be such law. The thing is, the end user has NO MEANS to verify whether an online shop is licensed or not. If go to Urge.com, or MP3.com, or any website, I can only hope that they pay royalties, but I have no way to verify it. This is the exact reason why no law can cover the case of an user downloading a song, which has been put on the web illegally. How would the user know?

One thing I did find:
From: someone
A Court in Munich has now prohibited allofmp3 to make copyrighted data publicly available within Germany.

However, this is more than funny. Russia does NOT fall under German jurisdiction, so it's not bound by German laws.

But overall, I've checked news and press releases in my country, and here it's not illegal (yet) do use Allofmp3.com.

From: someone
Nobody is making you download those MP3s - you could buy the CDs and rip them, or download them from iTunes and unDRM them (This is questionably legal, ranted, but once its on your computer, my feelings change on the subject).


iTunes is not available in my country. Most of the other services aren't available either. But even if they were, what could I do with a DRMd WMA? Stick it up my ***?
CDs are too pricey for just that one or two song I need, and I would just put it on my shelf after grabbing, anyway.
Devlin Gallant
Thought Police
Join date: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 5,948
06-19-2006 17:49
To the lowest of the nine hells with all ye Microsoft haters! Ye bastiches!! I LIKE my Windows. :p
_____________________
I LIKE children, I've just never been able to finish a whole one.
Tsukasa Karuna
Master of all things desu
Join date: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 370
06-20-2006 02:38
So what we've established, is that windows doesnt suck. Ok, fine. But apple still beats em, imho.

Security, for one. No matter how fast you download the fix, there's a time lag between the time an exploit is published, to the time a fix even exists. Most exploits target basic windows sofware.. I.E, outlook, etc. Theres the JPG file GDI exploit that was out a few months ago. All the precautions in the world aren't gonna keep you from seeing a "harmless" picture and possibly giving your system to a hacker.

Lesee.. MS also has a reputation for getting bogged down after a few months/years with its registry getting full, slow, etc, and needing a good total reinstall every now and then. Trust me, mk? I run a pc shop, i'm also MS certified, and most windows machines i see have the exact same set of problems.

Customer: Computer's running slow, crashing a lot, etc.
Me: Do you use Internet Explorer on the internet?
Customer: Yes, it came with the computer.
Me: (oh shit) - Please tell me your running something like Spybot S&D or AdAware
Customer: Uhh... running what?
Me: And you're seeing advertisements on your machine, even when you're not online?
Customer: Why yes!
Me: *Reinstall OEM verison of windows onto machine, slightly modified to include antivirus and antispyware apps. Oh, and running firefox.*
--
The simple reason apple has MS beat on this, is that SUCH NONSENSE DOES NOT HAPPEN ON APPLE MACHINES. OR NIX MACHINES.

And let's not even go through the obscurity argument.. how the hell is apple and OSX, let alone NIX "obscure"?
_____________________
".. who as of 5 seconds ago is no longer the deliverator.."
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
06-20-2006 05:00
From: Tsukasa Karuna
So what we've established, is that windows doesnt suck. Ok, fine. But apple still beats em, imho.

Security, for one. No matter how fast you download the fix, there's a time lag between the time an exploit is published, to the time a fix even exists. Most exploits target basic windows sofware.. I.E, outlook, etc. Theres the JPG file GDI exploit that was out a few months ago. All the precautions in the world aren't gonna keep you from seeing a "harmless" picture and possibly giving your system to a hacker.

Lesee.. MS also has a reputation for getting bogged down after a few months/years with its registry getting full, slow, etc, and needing a good total reinstall every now and then. Trust me, mk? I run a pc shop, i'm also MS certified, and most windows machines i see have the exact same set of problems.

Customer: Computer's running slow, crashing a lot, etc.
Me: Do you use Internet Explorer on the internet?
Customer: Yes, it came with the computer.
Me: (oh shit) - Please tell me your running something like Spybot S&D or AdAware
Customer: Uhh... running what?
Me: And you're seeing advertisements on your machine, even when you're not online?
Customer: Why yes!
Me: *Reinstall OEM verison of windows onto machine, slightly modified to include antivirus and antispyware apps. Oh, and running firefox.*
--
The simple reason apple has MS beat on this, is that SUCH NONSENSE DOES NOT HAPPEN ON APPLE MACHINES. OR NIX MACHINES.

And let's not even go through the obscurity argument.. how the hell is apple and OSX, let alone NIX "obscure"?


But thats the thing.... MS expects the user to be educated and aware.

Spybot, AdAware, couple other small ones, screw Nortons- too much of a resource pig- AVG has been working like a charm. Add a Javascript blocker on Firefox and you're pretty good to go. Oh! And use a router people!! Software firewalls are software- it can be cracked. From what I've experienced, most computer users are totally oblivious to HOW to protect themselves.

I have yet to see the jpeg vunerability.

I'll give ya the registry bit.

Its also unbelievable how many computer users dont know how to defragment a hard drive, run scan disk, and stuff that comes WITH Windows.

Also, the amount of people with wireless who're totally clueless about it!! OY!! I can drive around town & just hop on about 40 different connections!

But the main reason Apple machines are pretty safe for now- If you're a "Haxxor" why would you bother with a small market with fewer users?? You'd go for the "BIG Evil Corporation" with the large market/world share.

Also, do you think "Joe Average" in his/her low paying job will pay $2000 or more for a computer that might become obsolete or expensive to up keep when Apple switches hardware/software? Pffft! I've known people who wouldnt buy a $400 Dell just because "its too expensive" or "it'll be out dated 6 months after I buy it".

BTW- the whole "Windows Genuine Advantage"- Old news. Not that I'm surprised. All Microsoft does is make the OS. It gets pirated, they lose money, so of course they're paranoid.
Jeffrey Gomez
Cubed™
Join date: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,522
06-20-2006 05:49
The problem is pretty simple, folks.

People refuse to educate themselves about computers. They just don't care. Microsoft is in the business of making things just work. There is an adage: "Make something so idiots can use it, and only idiots will use it."


While not completely true, Windows is the PC of the masses. By default, the thing comes with crap you don't need. Not because they expect you to actually use it half the time, but because some idiot did in the past, and they'd rather save the tech support.



Mac and Linux have one advantage: they force you to think about the problem. Linux even makes you fix the problem yourself.

So the pissing contest of which operating system is better really has no point, even if it's a heck of a lot of fun to watch. Windows is best for people that have no clue and just want things to work. It's built for that. Mac is for people that like their desktop simple, while not mainstream. I can respect that. And Linux and BSD are for super geeks that like unfiltered control over their computer. Guilty as charged!


The important thing is, despite running Windows XP or GenFedoraHatIHaveNoClueWhatDistroBuntu, we can still all connect here, have a conversation, and choose whichever one we like. Choice is great!

Which brings the whole thing full-circle. As long as we can choose what goes on with our machines, life is good. My sole fear is that corps are in a position to take that choice away. Windows Genuine Advantage is just the tip of the iceberg.
_____________________
---
Billybob Goodliffe
NINJA WIZARDS!
Join date: 22 Dec 2005
Posts: 4,036
06-20-2006 05:55
lol i blocked my WGA with the windows firewall :D
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-20-2006 06:54
From: Tsukasa Karuna
And let's not even go through the obscurity argument.. how the hell is apple and OSX, let alone NIX "obscure"?


Because it is.

Most people do not use any variation of *nix, OSX included. Most people don't know anything about them, beyond that they exist. A few more "average users" use OSX than default *nix, but compared to the userbase for windows, it just isn't there. Apple seems to want it this way, too, because at every turn that could increase their user base, they decide to remain obscure.

If your going to design somethint to target a system - I don't care what it is, be it legit software, virus, spyware, or otherwise - you're going to do it for a system that's well known, most likely. This is the same reason why I can go to any store and buy shelves of software that work on windows, but not macintosh.

So the reason macintosh doesn't get as many buggy apps (and, apps infected with stuff) is that there just arent as many apps in general for it.

Now, am I saying OSX is not inherently more secure for the average, uneducated user? No, I'm not saying that - it absolutely is. But it is not inherently any more dangerous for an educated user of both systems.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-20-2006 07:02
From: Jeffrey Gomez
Windows is best for people that have no clue and just want things to work.


Or, for people who have a clue, and STILL just like things to work. :) I can use linux. I have in the past, and one of my two laptops runs Linux excusively. I've also used OSX and love it, but refuse to support Apple as long as it maintains it exclusive-to-OUR-intel-hardware cartel. But windows has one thing going for it that the other two don't - not only does it just work, without any futzing like I have to do with linux, unlike both linux and OSX if I need something, I can get it for Windows. No hassle. No futzing with emulators (hide behind your recursive acronym all you like, I'm going to call it an emulator :p ), or tracking down a store that sells the mac version of program X.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Skye McArdle
Resident Dragon
Join date: 26 May 2006
Posts: 132
06-20-2006 08:16
From: Tsukasa Karuna
Would this be a bad time to point out to all of the OSX-bashers in this thread that OSX is nothing more than a customized version of linux, built on custom hardware? Same engine is under the hood, folks.

Actually OSX is BSD. BSD!=Linux

From: Tsukasa Karuna
Now look at windows. The core has changed, yes, but the last major change in windows was the jump from 3.1 to 95.

The last major change was the release of NT, which was originally coded to be IBM's OS/2.

From: Reitsuki Kojima
Actually, it doesn't refute my statement. Linux is the "most popular" next to, well... things nobody has ever heard of, by and large, but as far as being a consumer level OS, it's not even on the radar.

I guess this is why MS is having a kicking and screaming tantrum about it, worse than any 2yr old I've ever seen? Reality check, they're scared stiff.

Oh, and the security through obscurity thing.. well, I don't think that means what you think it means. It certainly has *nothing* to do with the size of the target, but more that the vulnerabilities are not published when they are found out. That has MS written all over it.

From: Tod69 Talamasca
But thats the thing.... MS expects the user to be educated and aware.

LOL!! Thanks, that's the funniest thing I've read in a loooonnng time. MS do no such thing. They build to the lowest common denominator. They want everyone using their system, and they *would* rather you pirate their system than use anything else. That's one of, if not *the* main reason they grew so fast in the beginning to start with... userbase, userbase, userbase.. and we don't care HOW we get it.. which is the attitude that caused them to do a bunch of not so nice stuff also. They care not about your user ability, just that you use their stuff.
Tsukasa Karuna
Master of all things desu
Join date: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 370
06-20-2006 08:30
O_O
From: Jeffrey Gomez
Windows is best for people that have no clue and just want things to work.


I always figured that this was the mantra of the mac crowd!

From: someone

But the main reason Apple machines are pretty safe for now- If you're a "Haxxor" why would you bother with a small market with fewer users?? You'd go for the "BIG Evil Corporation" with the large market/world share.


Correct me if i'm wrong, but ever notice how vulnerabilities in nix/bsd/whatever based systems are always in apps that talk to the internet? Servers and whatnot. Usually, the core OS is pretty safe. Same with OSX.. it serves nothing, its bundled webbrowser doesnt support activeX, and there are.. 2? known viruses that target nix platforms. And those are pretty tame, as viruses go.

I dispute the above statement. MS only gets targetted because they have a nasty habit of leaving attack-able services running in the background, BY DEFAULT. Blaster worm? Check. UPnP? Check.

It could just be possible that running on the most stable core known to man and not running any nonessential apps in the background, and having well written programs to boot, could be what makes OSX rock so hard :)

I will now shut teh feck up, pretty sure i sound like a mad raving OSX loving apple fanboy. ^^
_____________________
".. who as of 5 seconds ago is no longer the deliverator.."
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-20-2006 09:04
From: Skye McArdle
I guess this is why MS is having a kicking and screaming tantrum about it, worse than any 2yr old I've ever seen? Reality check, they're scared stiff.

Oh, and the security through obscurity thing.. well, I don't think that means what you think it means. It certainly has *nothing* to do with the size of the target, but more that the vulnerabilities are not published when they are found out. That has MS written all over it.


Not scared, annoyed. *nix is a competitor in the server market - never disputed that. We weren't talking servers, last I checked, but desktop OSes.

Considering the phrase was my own (regardless of if anyone else uses it or not), I know exactly what it means.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Skye McArdle
Resident Dragon
Join date: 26 May 2006
Posts: 132
06-20-2006 09:50
From: Reitsuki Kojima
Not scared, annoyed. *nix is a competitor in the server market - never disputed that. We weren't talking servers, last I checked, but desktop OSes.

You might want to remove your blinders on that one. No offense, but it's pretty obvious.

From: Reitsuki Kojima
Considering the phrase was my own (regardless of if anyone else uses it or not), I know exactly what it means.

Unless you are one of the ones who coined it waaayy back in the day when it referenced the overly paranoid Multics systems, which I'm guessing you aren't, since you don't seem to be aware of it's proper usage, I find it hard to imagine that it's your own. Otherwise, you will be using it contrary to how it has been for many, MANY years, and are likely to confuse people.

You might want to google that one, feel free to enlighten yourself :).
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-20-2006 09:55
From: Skye McArdle
Unless you are one of the ones who coined it waaayy back in the day when it referenced the overly paranoid Multics systems, which I'm guessing you aren't, since you don't seem to be aware of it's proper usage, I find it hard to imagine that it's your own. Otherwise, you will be using it contrary to how it has been for many, MANY years, and are likely to confuse people.


Just you :) My usage is my own, thanks.

From: Skye McArdle
You might want to google that one, feel free to enlighten yourself :).


No thanks :) I'm not going to google every phrase I use to see if someone has beaten me to it.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
06-20-2006 09:56
From: Skye McArdle
You might want to remove your blinders on that one. No offense, but it's pretty obvious.


Which part is so obvious?
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Skye McArdle
Resident Dragon
Join date: 26 May 2006
Posts: 132
06-20-2006 13:26
From: Reitsuki Kojima
Just you :) My usage is my own, thanks.


Hey, whatever floats your boat. If you really enjoy using such a commonly used term incorrectly, that's your business.

I would also say that it's not "just me" since I was not the only person in this thread to point it out to you.
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
06-20-2006 14:15
From: Reitsuki Kojima
Competence absolutely does have something to do with it.

I don't get viruses - I download from trusted sources, dont open email attachments, scan every file I download before I run it, etc.

I don't get spware - I avoid ActiveX, unmodified Internet Explorer, ad-supported "freeware", etc.

I don't instally crappy software - The most unstable program I have is SL.

I don't let my caches and temp directories fill up boundlessly.

I don't let programs connect to the internet without asking me.

I don't let windows try to take over for the jobs I should be doing myself, such as updating drivers.

I keep my hard drive defragmented.

And you know what? I don't have problems with windows. I just dont.


Heh, I do the same and have a Windows XP Pro system running ALMOST 24/7. I restart once in a while for maintenance reasons, I only shut down when I'm away for more than 5 hours.

OH! And add to your list "Avoid Questionable Web sites"- porn sites, warez, etc.
1 2 3 4 5 6