Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Alts becoming government officials

Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-04-2006 12:28
From: Ulrika Zugzwang
You need to read the thread from which the offer came. In short, no one would agree to my terms of usage, so I had to withdraw the offer of structures. Instead I offered to pay for replacement costs without question.

...................

Your offer was to give 2 of us a house the very day of the offer, just for pulling the houses from use. I did it right away, and in a later post you said the house would be forthcoming that very day. Kendra even asked me if I received the house yet, and said it would be in my inventory within a day.

I can locate the offer if you would like.
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-04-2006 12:30
From: Kendra Bancroft
while this exchange is incredibly entertaining, as I'm all out of popcorn at the moment I'm going to ask that the combatants remain on topic and attempt at least the illusion of not attacking each other personally.

love,

Kendra. the moderator who shouldn't but seemingly must.

I am not personally attacking her, I'm reminding her that she hasn't kept her promise to restore the victims.
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
05-04-2006 12:30
From: Kendra Bancroft
Kendra. the moderator who shouldn't but seemingly must.
Thank you! Finally, some moderation in this forum.

I'll cool my jets. Thread closed.

~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
05-04-2006 12:35
From: Kevn Klein
I am not personally attacking her, I'm reminding her that she hasn't kept her promise to restore the victims.



Then take it private. It's not germaine to the topic of this thread.
_____________________
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-04-2006 12:44
From: Kendra Bancroft
Then take it private. It's not germaine to the topic of this thread.

I am the op of this thread, I started it to examine issues surrounding the idea a person banned from from citizenship might create an alt. That topic has blossomed into further discussion.

Could you please post the law/founding document that says an op of a thread must keep the thread on topic? Can you show me an example of a legal moderator locking or moderating a thread only because the topic has wandered?
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
05-04-2006 12:50
From: Kevn Klein
I am the op of this thread, I started it to examine issues surrounding the idea a person banned from from citizenship might create an alt. That topic has blossomed into further discussion.

Could you please post the law/founding document that says an op of a thread must keep the thread on topic? Can you show me an example of a legal moderator locking or moderating a thread only because the topic has wandered?



Your topic which was about alts sneaking into Government has devolved into a private complaint about housing promises.

It is the private nature of the argument that has caused me to issue a reminder to stay on topic.

As I am "legally";(as you put it) the Observing moderator I am not locking the thread, but I am advising you to stay on topic and not get into a personal squabble.
_____________________
vivi Odets
Flibbertigibbet
Join date: 4 Sep 2005
Posts: 698
05-04-2006 13:04
From: Ulrika Zugzwang
... That's because they're all garbage like the ones in this thread. You're always poorly informed and on the wrong side of reason. If every one of your posts disappeared tomorrow, no one would notice.

~Ulrika~


I'd notice the absence of Kevn's posts and input -- and, again, no, I'm not his alt. I'm just becoming a fan of his earnestness. He may be obstinate and annoying at times, but I've not seen him be nasty nor viciously unkind.

Too bad your many, many, many governmental rules and regulations and laws don't contain civility clauses -- a whole lot of nastiness flows forth from N'berg.
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
05-04-2006 13:09
I like to think of Neualtenburg as a great big mirror.
_____________________
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
05-04-2006 13:12
From: vivi Odets
Too bad your many, many, many governmental rules and regulations and laws don't contain civility clauses -- a whole lot of nastiness flows forth from N'berg.
Don't pin this on N'burg. It's a problem with all forums.

~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
vivi Odets
Flibbertigibbet
Join date: 4 Sep 2005
Posts: 698
05-04-2006 13:24
From: Ulrika Zugzwang
Don't pin this on N'burg. It's a problem with all forums.

~Ulrika~


Ah. So, since everyone else is doing it, then we all may as well do it and take no personal responsibility for how we treat others? Just say what the heck we feel, no matter how rude or hurtful or uncalled for?

No thanks.
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
05-04-2006 13:31
From: vivi Odets
Ah. So, since everyone else is doing it, then we all may as well do it and take no personal responsibility for how we treat others? Just say what the heck we feel, no matter how rude or hurtful or uncalled for?
No. I just said don't pin it on N'burg.

~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
Picabo Hedges
Second Life Resident
Join date: 12 Nov 2004
Posts: 262
05-04-2006 15:24
From: Ulrika Zugzwang
((concerning a quote of another person's statement) That's because they're all garbage like the ones in this thread. You're always poorly informed and on the wrong side of reason. If every one of your posts disappeared tomorrow, no one would notice.
Unless I misinterpret the LL forum guidelines COMPLETELY, this being a subforum (or it's own) does NOT mean that TOS guidelines on personal attacks and direct personal insults go by the wayside.

Ulrika, your posts have ALWAYS been on the edge if not over --- in the above, it's WAY over.

I will definitely email LL about you and your posts directly... and point them to this and other threads and posts you have made in recent days. Hopefully, they will agree that you SHOULD be banned, not suspended. Obviously, the mods of this particular subforum don't know what objective review and moderation ARE and need to be helped by LL personnel.
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
05-04-2006 16:28
Yes. This time I've gone too far. :rolleyes:

~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
Kazuhiko Shirakawa
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 58
05-04-2006 23:04
From: Pelanor Eldrich
I think, unless anyone has a better idea, that the only way to verify an official is not an alt is to require:

Dean, All members of RA, and GM to be premium account holder avatars who each own 16m2 of (contiguous?) mainland.

How will this "verify an official is not an alt"?

Is it not possible for someone to have more than one premium account? Or if it is, may only one of those premium accounts hold land?

I thought that you could have up to five avatars, each of which could be a premium account holder as long as you felt like keeping up the monthly base payments, and that each of those five avatars could enjoy all the rights of a premium account, including holding land. So if I felt like paying 3x$9.95 a month, I could have three avatars each with 512 m² of land on the mainland. Or even cheaper if I paid for three or twelve months at a time.

I would rather prefer, in any event, not to make land ownership (and, therefore, a premium account) mandatory for involvement in government. On the whole, I'm fairly happy with my basic account.

Making seats in government available only to the "elite" who can afford to (or wish to) pay for a premium accounts strikes me, personally, as undesirable.
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
05-04-2006 23:08
From: Kazuhiko Shirakawa
How will this "verify an official is not an alt"?

Is it not possible for someone to have more than one premium account? Or if it is, may only one of those premium accounts hold land?

I thought that you could have up to five avatars, each of which could be a premium account holder as long as you felt like keeping up the monthly base payments, and that each of those five avatars could enjoy all the rights of a premium account, including holding land. So if I felt like paying 3x$9.95 a month, I could have three avatars each with 512 m² of land on the mainland. Or even cheaper if I paid for three or twelve months at a time.

I would rather prefer, in any event, not to make land ownership (and, therefore, a premium account) mandatory for involvement in government. On the whole, I'm fairly happy with my basic account.

Making seats in government available only to the "elite" who can afford to (or wish to) pay for a premium accounts strikes me, personally, as undesirable.



I couldn't agree more :) Thank you for stating it so clearly!
_____________________
Pelanor Eldrich
Let's make a deal...
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 267
Alts in Gov't
05-05-2006 07:44
If any of my assumptions below are demonstrably false, please correct me (and cite something).

A)A a single person can hold a maximum of:
1 Premium Account and up to 5 Basic (alt) accounts

B)Only Premium account holders can own land.

C)The only way within world to determine if an avatar is not an alt to is ensure that it is a premium account holder by verifying land ownership on the mainland.

Now I'm not suggesting that we should require premium membership of RA members, Dean and GM. What I am suggesting is that it is the only way I know of to prove that they are not alts.

I also suggest to you that a single human holding seats as Dean, LRA and GM with alts is not democracy, but at best a dictatorship roleplaying democracy with multiple personalities. We could all engage in this sort of roleplay for roleplay's sake, but I don't think citizens here would prefer it, especially those who don't like potential conflict of interest, collusion and corruption.

I don't like the elitism of the premium account requirement idea any more than either of you do. I'm not suggesting it as policy. I'm pointing out a weakness of the current approach and you've pointed out the weakness of an alternative.
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-05-2006 07:50
From: Pelanor Eldrich
If any of my assumptions below are demonstrably false, please correct me (and site something).

A)A a single person can hold a maximum of:
1 Premium Account and up to 5 Basic (alt) accounts

..........

I believe each alt can become a premium account holder by paying $9.95 per month.
Pelanor Eldrich
Let's make a deal...
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 267
05-05-2006 07:54
From: Kevn Klein
I believe each alt can become a premium account holder by paying $9.95 per month.


If that's truly the case then we should change nothing and alts are just a limitation we have to live with. That's a sticky problem. Can I cascade and have more than 5 accounts overall? Or is the upper limit 5 Premiums per person?
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-05-2006 07:56
From: Pelanor Eldrich
If that's truly the case then we should change nothing and alts are just a limitation we have to live with. That's a sticky problem. Can I cascade and have more than 5 accounts overall? Or is the upper limit 5 Premiums per person?

6 accounts per house address I believe.
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
05-05-2006 07:57
From: Pelanor Eldrich
If that's truly the case then we should change nothing and alts are just a limitation we have to live with



yep. It's a non-issue. Seriously.
_____________________
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-05-2006 08:02
From: Kendra Bancroft
yep. It's a non-issue. Seriously.

There are other options.
Pelanor Eldrich
Let's make a deal...
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 267
Other options...
05-05-2006 08:11
From: Kevn Klein
There are other options.


What do you have in mind? Something with UUID? Something using RL ID? Something where each seat requires 6 votes?

BTW: This post is a thought experiment, and an exercise in problem solving, not a policy debate.
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-05-2006 08:12
The government officials could be required to provide a home phone number to the sim owner. Then she could verify their location, possible making a few phone calls in the process.

I certainly wouldn't mind providing my phone number in order to become a government official if I was so inclined.
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
05-05-2006 08:15
From: Kevn Klein
The government officials could be required to provide a home phone number to the sim owner. Then she could verify their location, possible making a few phone calls in the process.

I certainly wouldn't mind providing my phone number in order to become a government official if I was so inclined.



Hell No.
_____________________
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-05-2006 08:18
From: Kendra Bancroft
Hell No.

Are you afraid of the sim owner?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7