Everyone in SL should verify using Aristotle ;)

Good one. I'm certain my deceased mom won't mind if I use her passport to verify. *whistles*

I'm assumingit's still in beta and that when implememnted all those false verifieds will be found and kicked or all flushed as we all have to verify when it is implemented.
I've verified 2 fictious alts using a hotmail address, all I had to come up with was a legitimate street address apparently, I made up random drivers licence numbers and random names to go with them.
So when is LL going to fix it/finish it or replace itbecause it's currently not worth much more than an over 18 checkbox, credit card verification is still more effective.

Yes i think they should, but let me explain my thoughts

On the Slapt.me wiki we have a page called "SL Verification (Age & Payment) - Issues and Information"

This page has so far 2 dead peoples details on it that Aristotle recognizes. Please feel free to add others as you come across them

Aristotle only asks for "TRUE" information and *NOT* that the information is yours.

LL gets a token back back from from Aristotle to say the details entered are correct and is happy with that and verifies the account, based on the "TRUE" information given.

.....

.......
What will LL do if a huge chunk of SL has already verified using this flawed system? make everyone verify again? I doubt it personally, as they have enough problems as it is with all of this mess. They may however stop using Aristotle though and find another way, which may be better like a drop down etc.
.......

Aristotle could run that set against its database.

Thats assuming that all the people that verified can be found as Aristotle just sends a token to LL to say the information they were supplied was *True* and apparently no data is retained they say, admittedly you using untrue/fake information then in my mind you broke the rules, but those that stay to the guidelines of the system then i doubt they have anything to fear

I would imagine though Aristotle owners could run a check on all the tokens sent to LL for fake data comparing to the real data that they may hold as in real street names etc. so those using fake data could be found out, whilst those using *TRUE* data wouldn't imho

What will LL do if a huge chunk of SL has already verified using this flawed system? make everyone verify again? I doubt it personally, as they have enough problems as it is with all of this mess. They may however stop using Aristotle though and find another way, which may be better like a drop down etc.

For some this will be giving the finger to LL and its flawed and badly thought out processes.

Just my opinion though

What is so bad about Aristotle?

It is a data mining company that sells the collected data to anyone. Junk mail marketers, telemarketers, spammers, etc...

Ah! If a very large number of people verify using 'popular' data, then the thing becomes mass civil disobedience. The Man can't throw everyone into jail.

The Man could hit the organisers though !

Anyone sticking their head above the parapet has got to be prepared to take the shit that will surely come flying at them.
I know this well

In seeking an active form of civil disobedience, one may choose to deliberately break certain laws, such as by forming a peaceful blockade or occupying a facility illegally. Protesters practice this non-violent form of civil disorder with the expectation that they will be arrested. Others also expect to be attacked or even beaten by the authorities. Protesters often undergo training in advance on how to react to arrest or to attack, so that they will do so in a manner that quietly or limply resists without threatening the authorities.

For example, Mahatma Gandhi outlined the following rules, in the time when he was leading India in the struggle for Independence from the British Empire:

1. A civil resister (or satyagrahi) will express no anger.
2. One will sometimes suffer the anger of the opponent.
3. In doing so, one will put up with assaults from the opponent, never retaliate; but one will not submit, out of fear of punishment or the like, to any order given in anger.
4. When any person in authority seeks to arrest a civil resister, he will voluntarily submit to the arrest, and he will not resist the attachment or removal of his own property, if any, when it is sought to be confiscated by authorities.
5. If a civil resister has any property in his possession as a trustee, he will refuse to surrender it, even though defending it he might lose his life. He will, however, never retaliate.
6. Retaliation includes swearing and cursing.
7. Therefore a civil resister will never insult his opponent, and therefore also not take part in many of the newly coined cries which are contrary to the spirit of ahimsa.
8. A civil resister may not salute the Union Flag, but he will not insult it or officials, English or Indian.
9. In the course of the struggle if anyone insults an official or commits an assault upon him, a civil resister will protect such official or officials from the insult or attack even at the risk of his life.

Actually, that would be going against their and LL's very own statement that NO track of the data is kept. They can't check against databases they're not allowed to keep.

If I remember rightly all they did wask ask residents to test the beta system, so reverifying seems very possible to me [...]

I'm assumingit's still in beta and that when implememnted all those false verifieds will be found and kicked or all flushed as we all have to verify when it is implemented.

all the systems can do is verify data given...

at no point can it verify who is at the computer.

So in effect there is no real user verification, only data verification

all the systems can do is verify data given...

at no point can it verify who is at the computer.

So in effect there is no real user verification, only data verification

If nothing else, this has the potential to kill the whole Adult Policy implementation.

If nothing else, this has the potential to kill the whole Adult Policy implementation.