Ginko Bond ???
|
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
|
08-11-2007 13:22
From: Qie Niangao So, while I was busying wringing my hands about the ethics of holding vs selling, a thought finally seeped through my thick skull. Putting aside the ethical dilemma for a moment, the valuation of these bonds is another double-bind: either way, the original scam artist profits.
- If they go down, he can more easily buy them up and retire the debt for pence on the pound, owning free-and-clear any assets he hadn't already stolen in "salaries" and bogus "investments."
- On the other hand, if they go up, he's just invented a whole new scam with which to attract fresh victims.
It's all fiendishly ingenious... so good, in fact, that I'm led to wonder...
How certain can we be that there really was a liquidity crisis at Ginkos? And if there was, how certain are we that it wasn't engineered by Ginko officers themselves?
Now, I'm not usually one for conspiracy theories, but the first seeds of doubt were sewn by the matter-of-fact way the note to depositors laid the blame for the "crisis" squarely on the gambling ban--surely at most a tiny contributing factor, as evidenced by the negligible effect it had on the L$ exchange rate. I now suspect that the entire "collapse" was already planned and held ready for the first hint of economic entropy to provide the excuse.
Well, he told us we couldn't imagine how complex it all was. Maybe that was a hint, after all. Don't forget they get money from every transaction in the WSE too. They have all the bases covered...
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
08-11-2007 13:35
From: Qie Niangao How certain can we be that there really was a liquidity crisis at Ginkos? And if there was, how certain are we that it wasn't engineered by Ginko officers themselves?
I think there is a simple reason all of the off-world investments were not Liquid and not disclosed. Becuase they were Nick's Stuff. He spent the money on stuff that will benefit him IRL. Maybe he hoped someday they'd be profitable enough to help pay people back, but I think that was just wishful thinking. And I do think he saw this MOUNTAIN of debt , and when the bank run started these bonds as a way to reduce it. Since they are only worth a fraction of face value .. He coudlnt get enough people to buy 100L bonds for 100L account balance when it was optional... But if he forced them to take 1L bonds for 1L of account balance...
|
Chip Midnight
ate my baby!
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 10,231
|
08-11-2007 15:16
From: Gwendolyn Fonck The total lack of remorse for losing the substantial savings of hundreds or thousands of people is interesting. He does have a point. How much right to people have to complain when they put their money into an unregulated, uninsured, extremely high risk investment scheme, and end up losing it all? It seems to me that any rational person would see that as the most likely outcome. It's a bit like coating yourself in honey, walking into a bear's den, and then being outraged at the bear when it mauls you.
_____________________
 My other hobby: www.live365.com/stations/chip_midnight
|
Uvas Umarov
Phone Weasel Advocate
Join date: 8 Feb 2007
Posts: 622
|
08-11-2007 15:26
Maybe they don't have the right to complain about a high risk investment.
But they do have a right to complain about being suckered into an illegal ponzi scheme masquerading as a "bank" where you can store your extra lindens to make a little interest.
They probably also have the right to demand investigation of said illegal scheme, and possible legal recourse.
_____________________
"On the other hand, if you are convinced that I spent all the money on a new sports car, then getting even 2.5% instead of 0% back would be quite a deal, wouldn't it?" ---ginko bank owner on his financial dealings
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
08-11-2007 15:44
From: Chip Midnight It's a bit like coating yourself in honey, walking into a bear's den, and then being outraged at the bear when it mauls you.  Yeah, it's kinda like that, except that in this case the bear has dressed himself up in a banker's suit and painted a convincing, rotating, BANK AT GINKO'S sign over his den. I dunno, but if I walk into my local bank branch and the guy with the nice haircut suddenly slips out of his bodysuit to reveal a bear, coming at me red in tooth and claw, I'm gonna complain, even if the fine print says "not responsible for bear attacks." Plus, in RL, I get to shoot the bear. But seriously, I completely agree with what I take to be the thrust of your post: an "unregulated bank" is an oxymoron. If the SL economy will ever get serious, this kinda crap just has to stop. Otherwise that "economy" is just an expensive game of who can out-scam whom.
|
Annabelle Babii
Unholier than thou
Join date: 2 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,797
|
08-11-2007 15:52
Why don't we invite the staff of Ginko to a nice friendly meeting in SL...
...and also invite every griefer on the grid?
We could make millions selling tickets and concessions.
(ok, maybe not the concessions since AVies don't eat)
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
08-11-2007 15:56
From: Annabelle Babii Why don't we invite the staff of Ginko to a nice friendly meeting in SL...
...and also invite every griefer on the grid?
We could make millions selling tickets and concessions.
(ok, maybe not the concessions since AVies don't eat) Its not fair to expose the griefers to that sort of abuse. 
|
Misfit March
Registered User
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 22
|
08-11-2007 16:46
if u wanna hurt Ginko that bad i suggest sending all griefers to ginko owned rentals lands and make the residence leave giving Ginko land thats costing them to keep with no customers this in turn will force Ginko to sell said land and hurt them even more.. but thats just a dream cos nobody would eh? 
|
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
|
08-11-2007 16:49
This thread now has less value than the bonds.
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
|
Misfit March
Registered User
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 22
|
08-11-2007 16:53
"This thread now has less value than the bonds."
Tell me something new LOL
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
08-11-2007 17:26
From: Raymond Figtree This thread now has less value than the bonds. Thats not true this thread is only almost useless... As opposed to the bonds ..
|
Annabelle Babii
Unholier than thou
Join date: 2 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,797
|
08-11-2007 17:28
From: Misfit March if u wanna hurt Ginko that bad i suggest sending all griefers to ginko owned rentals lands and make the residence leave giving Ginko land thats costing them to keep with no customers this in turn will force Ginko to sell said land and hurt them even more.. but thats just a dream cos nobody would eh?  You know, I'm rather apalled that someone would suggest the harassment of innocent people as a way to get revenge on a third party.
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
08-11-2007 17:53
From: Annabelle Babii You know, I'm rather apalled that someone would suggest the harassment of innocent people as a way to get revenge on a third party. First off, it was an obvious joke. Secondly, they are hardly "innocent"
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
08-11-2007 19:36
From: Colette Meiji Secondly, they are hardly "innocent" Just to clarify, I think the reference was to residents on Ginko-owned rental property, who would indeed be innocent. Apropos no particular post: I don't think "revenge" is at all appropriate. While I'm gravitating ever further toward a quite sinister interpretation of the motives and actions of the Ginko officers, it's not really their fault that the SL ToS leads some to believe that a clever scam is just playing the game by the rules. What's important at this juncture is to make sure the next batch of Ginko investors are fully aware that they're just gambling on getting their money out before the new Ginko pyramid collapses.
|
Misfit March
Registered User
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 22
|
To those who lack humor
08-12-2007 04:16
"You know, I'm rather apalled that someone would suggest the harassment of innocent people as a way to get revenge on a third party."
1st off i was being sarcastic as an involentary bond holder when all i wanted was my deposit i was saving for my wedding in SL i didnt care about the interest and i only put it in Ginko cos friends recommended it as a good place to keep ur money how rong was them so i was foolish to listen to friends and lost 52378L$ and all i got is useless bog paper thats not gonna pay for my SL wedding also my brother who has been saving money ever since he first started SL did the same through other people advice and he was saving to buy a sim he lost 400k he has roughly 64k worth of useless bonds so yes i do have a right to be as sarcastic as i want to be and everyone pointing there holier than thou fingers saying were guilty of supporting a bloody ponzi scheme should be ashamed of themselves cos this is gonna cost SL of talented builders who like me listened to wrong advice old Saying DONT THROW STONES IN GLASS HOUSES.. also those who been shouting the loudest dont think of the big picture some truth in what i say if its true its ponzi IF IF .. always IF then those renting the property of Ginko are just as guilty cos they paying Funds into it knowingly or not so as i watch and read they are more to this than meets the eye so stop attacking innocence as the so called cowboy bankers have more fingers in more pies and a paper trail to match..will i ever get my deposit back NO was i lied to by Nick in IMs telling me it be all right HELL YES is he going to get away with this of course he bloody is...will my brother want revenge you bet oh sorry no gambling allowed but he wont give a fig about his SL account he will seek revenge and payback is a bitch.. am i finished with this mess YES and will the flamers let those who have suffered in this alone NO dont BANK on IT..
|
Raynor Hammerer
Linguistic Rabbit
Join date: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 404
|
08-12-2007 04:23
Ginko was indeed fairly popular with the "earn free lindens without camping" crowd, even as late as end of this year's June ... http://lindens.wordpress.com/2007/06/26/get-and-earn-more-free-lindens-with-ginko-financial/
|
FD Spark
Prim & Texture Doodler
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 4,697
|
08-12-2007 04:25
The crappy thing is now they really are fictional funds. Friend spent real money to get lindens put in 95k in Ginko now as bonds they are worth 15k if she cashes out. She doesn't seem upset. I don't get it. I would be really mad if I lost the equivelent of 350 usd. Just another reason to never spend real money again except for tier in SL for me personally.
|
VooDoo Bamboo
www.voodoodesignsllc.com
Join date: 4 Oct 2006
Posts: 911
|
08-12-2007 04:45
I wonder how many people are now falling for the whole bonds trick now? Some people just never learn... Lick your wounds and move on.
Are you people aware that the same guy who scammed you out of your money the first time owns 35% shares in WSE where your getting these bonds? HHhhhmmmm......
Why don't you just turn over your wallet to him and get it over with.
"Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me"
_____________________
VooDoo DESIGNS www.voodoodesignsllc.com
|
FD Spark
Prim & Texture Doodler
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 4,697
|
08-12-2007 05:01
Voodoo its not that they ginko bank depositers choose to have their funds switched to bonds it was done without their consent. Majority couldn't withdrawal their funds.
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
08-12-2007 08:12
wow Misfit that is really bad you lost so much money  . I wonder about people who recomended Ginko - since im sure thats how it got a lot of its customers. Word of mouth is a big mehtod of advertizing in SL. Is probably a lot of people who trusted the recomendation of SL freinds - and had No real clue how much risk was involved.
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
08-12-2007 08:19
From: Colette Meiji I wonder about people who recomended Ginko - since im sure thats how it got a lot of its customers. That's exactly how I got sucked in, over a year ago: a friend had been doing business there for a long time and pointed out that it would be prudent to salt away some of the weekly stipend to save for a rainy day. (Yeah, I was a struggling n00b back then, with but a lowly First Land 512 to my name.) Only by dumb luck, just a couple weeks before the crash, I happened to withdraw nearly my total balance to buy (then expensive) land. Somehow I'm happier to watch the value of that land plummet than I would have been to lose those L$s into Nic P's megalomania trip.
|
Nicholas Portocarrero
Registered User
Join date: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 237
|
08-12-2007 16:32
From: Misfit March " was i lied to by Nick in IMs telling me it be all right HELL YES Excuse me?
|
Uvas Umarov
Phone Weasel Advocate
Join date: 8 Feb 2007
Posts: 622
|
08-12-2007 18:42
He said that you lied to him when he instant messaged you about him not being able to withdraw his money from your ponzi scheme. You said everything was going to be alright, which was a blatant lie. So he posted here on these forums stating the fact that you lied to him. Seems pretty simple to me. 
_____________________
"On the other hand, if you are convinced that I spent all the money on a new sports car, then getting even 2.5% instead of 0% back would be quite a deal, wouldn't it?" ---ginko bank owner on his financial dealings
|
Celene Ballinger
Registered User
Join date: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 1
|
08-12-2007 18:45
Finally! good to see you participating and answering some of these people's concerns Nicholas Portocarrero!
I wish I owned a bank now in SL.
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
08-12-2007 19:05
From: Nicholas Portocarrero Excuse me? Santa, can I have a Ponzi for Christmas?
|