Bloomin Campers Again
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-02-2008 08:42
From: Broccoli Curry No they don't.
People want to shop in somewhere that provides a quality product, at a good price, at a good venue.
Somewhere that's lagged to hell because of camping chairs/bots/alts destroys that.
Having to go through 20 places that contain the word 'furniture' in the keywords to actually find somewhere that sells it, rather than simply using the keyowrd because it's popular, means I now have 19 stores I won't go back to.
Even because a place actually sells what I want, it might not sell the style I want. I still might have to visit 5 places until I find a place that sells a glass topped coffee table, instead of just tables generally.
If someone is cheating, or gaming the system, doing the same just means that you have no imagination or sell crap products if you don't get visitors.
I'm sure that "well, everyone else was speeding so I didn't think it was a problem if I did too" will get you a long way when a cop pulls you over. Aha! Now we're in agreement, Broccoli. Except for one small thing. people do want what you described AND they would like it at the top of the results. That's the only difference - I agree with everything else. Incidentally, what I do doesn't cause lag, so you'll be quite happy in my place if you ever want the sort of things I sell.
|
|
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
01-02-2008 08:43
From: Brenda Connolly Something else to consider, more of an abstract sense: We see only the campers sitting, "Doing nothing", and some no doubt are, but how many are organizing their inventories, IMing friends, reading something, maybe even creating something, like many of us do? I sometimes sit at my home for an hour, and outwardly look to be doing nothing. It happens at the hangout, several people sitting around, each doing something on their own, to an uninformed observer it can look like a camp site. But because it's done in a manner that's more socially acceptable, it's not considered a waste. I'm not necessarily defending the presence of camping, but when it's done by actual humans and not by farming bots, it is an activity in SL just as legitimate as any other and we shouldn't judgementally demean those that chose to do it. Perhaps, but 16 people at the same time in the same space for hours on end? I don't think so.
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
01-02-2008 08:46
From: Merchant Ivory Ok, I own a small company in RL, and know a little about how not to go bankrupt  I don't really understand why the "business" owners on this thread gripe about "fairness". Often these are the same people who'll go on and on about how SL isn't a game, but another "reality"  From what I make out, camping chairs, alts and advertising hyperbole are all pretty straightfoward innocuous SL versions of standard RL business practices. There really are no morals or ethics involved here. Unless you have particularly high moral standards and never personally negotiate hard, or stretch the truth, or make yourself look better than you are, in RL of course. Small business in RL isn't for the most part all about egos, or big cars and houses.. most small business owners I know would make more money and have fancier job titles and cars, with less stress if they went back to normal employment. Business, for most people is a lifestyle choice, but which also comes with responsibilities, the biggest of which is to look after your employees. My experience is that you have to use any legal, financially viable lever available to you just to stay in business these days, without having to go the extra mile to screw anyone over. Anyone who thinks otherwise isn't in "business", they're having some fun doing some RP as a business owner. Not to say there's anything wrong with that  Just don't be so holier than thou about people who are actually trying to run a profitable business in SL or RL. However in real life businesses don't pay people to leave their cars in their parking lot to appear full, nor do they go and buy a bunch of cardboard cutout cars to take up parking lot spaces. People would know soon as they got inside it was all fake. "Traffic" doesn't exist in the real world as a Metric, but rather as a perception. The fact that Traffic exists in Second Life as an actual metric changes the dynamics some. Becuase a huge chunk of the potential customers DON'T KNOW that traffic is gamed. They dont let Used car dealers roll back the odometers anymore either. Ethics do apply to businesses.
|
|
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
01-02-2008 08:46
From: Phil Deakins Incidentally, what I do doesn't cause lag, so you'll be quite happy in my place if you ever want the sort of things I sell. I'll make it myself, thank you. I have no desire to line the pockets of someone using alts to artificially inflate their popularity. I don't look at traffic when I'm shopping, I actually look at the shop description, and if it's just a vague list of keywords I'll not even bother to go there. Then if it seems to look as if it will, I'll pull up the map and if I see a huge stack of green dots, then discover it's campers/bots when I get there, I go elsewhere before they get a chance to get traffic out of me. You know, it's sad enough when people in real life pretend to popular... it's even worse when it's virtual.
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
|
|
Lindal Kidd
Dances With Noobs
Join date: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 8,371
|
01-02-2008 08:48
From: Phil Deakins ... Everything else is just principle. I guess that says it all. 
_____________________
It's still My World and My Imagination! So there. Lindal Kidd
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-02-2008 08:49
From: Broccoli Curry What you're doing comes under "Disturbing the peace" in the Community Standards - "other objects that intentionally slow server performance or inhibit another Resident's ability to enjoy Second Life are examples of Disturbing the Peace."... your bots add lag, which is slowing server performance. Your 16 or so alts are using a disproportional amount of the sim allocation on your 8000 sq m - 1/8th of a sim = 1/8th of 40 avatars = 5 people allowed on your land at any one time to not infringe upon the rights of your neighbours. Disturbing the peace??? I don't need to reply to that bit - or the rest of it for that matter. None of what you described actaully exists, except that I have more than 5 agents in the sim. Is that not allowed? How many are allowed if I have only a 512 parcel? Or a 1024 parcel. According to you, if I stand on my land by myself, I'll be disturbing the peace. I think you've taken a sensible discussion, in which people were expressing their genuine opinions, to a very low level, Broccoli.
|
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
01-02-2008 08:51
From: Phil Deakins Typical. I can't make someone agree with me so everybody come with me and we'll report him. Oh, and while we're doing it, let's invent a charge. I know. How about "unfair use of sim resources". If you're looking for 'pathetic', look no further  Well, "unfair" is a generous formulation: the prohibition is actually against *anything* that may "slow server performance or inhibit another Resident's ability to enjoy Second Life." What that says, really, is that one's access to Second Life does not grant permission to deny service to anybody else, so RL laws governing denial of service are applicable. How this applies to campbots, etc., isn't all that well-established, AFAIK. Presumably, if one owns one's own sim, one can fill it with all bots all the time and nobody would much care.
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-02-2008 08:51
From: Broccoli Curry You know, it's sad enough when people in real life pretend to popular... it's even worse when it's virtual. Even lower. Why can't you just discuss it and express your views, like everyone else is doing.
|
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
01-02-2008 08:54
From: Qie Niangao Well, "unfair" is a generous formulation: the prohibition is actually against *anything* that may "slow server performance or inhibit another Resident's ability to enjoy Second Life." What that says, really, is that one's access to Second Life does not grant permission to deny service to anybody else, so RL laws governing denial of service are applicable.
How this applies to campbots, etc., isn't all that well-established, AFAIK. Presumably, if one owns one's own sim, one can fill it with all bots all the time and nobody would much care. I agree with that. It doesn't apply in this discussion though, except that Broccoli invented it.
|
|
Cherry Czervik
Came To Her Senses
Join date: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 3,680
|
01-02-2008 08:55
From: Broccoli Curry Perhaps, but 16 people at the same time in the same space for hours on end? I don't think so. Surely what is more pertinent is that the silent ghoulish feeling from a bunch of people saying and doing nothing is offputting. How often have you gone somewhere and felt awkward as there is almost no conversation in crowded places? Maybe it's just me, if I am in a public place I find it very disturbing to have silence ... it's like being in the land of the dead.
|
|
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
01-02-2008 08:56
From: Phil Deakins Even lower. Why can't you just discuss it and express your views, like everyone else is doing. I think my views on what you are doing are quite, quite clear.
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
|
|
Lion Ewry
Registered User
Join date: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 88
|
Ok Phil--here's a challange
01-02-2008 08:58
If it's not cheating Phil-----prove it.
Pull you alt farm. If your products are so damned good people will come anyway.
I know you will never do that and so does everyone else--because you cannot win unless you stack the deck.
To you business is business means it's ok to do anything to win--if it means stack the search results with traffic (or anything else for that matter) then it's fair because you win.
You are cheating everyone else in SL--my bet is you would not survive if you coud'nt. SO, IF THAT IS NOT TRUE----AND YOU COULD COMPETE ON A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD THEN PROVE IT.
End of story
|
|
Merchant Ivory
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 45
|
01-02-2008 09:01
From: Colette Meiji However in real life businesses don't pay people to leave their cars in their parking lot to appear full, nor do they go and buy a bunch of cardboard cutout cars to take up parking lot spaces.
People would know soon as they got inside it was all fake.
"Traffic" doesn't exist in the real world as a Metric, but rather as a perception. The fact that Traffic exists in Second Life as an actual metric changes the dynamics some. Becuase a huge chunk of the potential customers DON'T KNOW that traffic is gamed.
They dont let Used car dealers roll back the odometers anymore either. Hi Colette, I'm almost sorry to ruin your lovely view of the world. Of course businesses do that sort of thing, they do it all the time. Cars in the car park is a really straightforward one, but also; Alts ---- A new restaurant opens up and every table is booked.. who by? People paid to be there - not on discounts, not friends.. but bought in volume from an agency. A new boutique or store opens and it's never empty, always people "just looking".. where do these people come from? See above. Goodness, even websites. Do you really think that the little ticker that says "visitors to date" started at 0 and is incremented by 1? Camping Chairs ------------------ Any offer, sale, discount, give away you care to think about. Marketing Hyperbole ------------------------ Well you get the idea. "Traffic", or popularity has always been a Metric in RL. The only reason it's actually explicitly quoted in SL, is because for the most part there is no walk by trade. But Marketers have always used phrases like "the country's most popular" etc. to gain credibility. Once again. I'm ever so sorry 
|
|
Soji Slade
Um . . . Hello?
Join date: 28 Mar 2007
Posts: 1,270
|
01-02-2008 09:02
From: Colette Meiji However in real life businesses don't pay people to leave their cars in their parking lot to appear full, nor do they go and buy a bunch of cardboard cutout cars to take up parking lot spaces.
People would know soon as they got inside it was all fake.
"Traffic" doesn't exist in the real world as a Metric, but rather as a perception. The fact that Traffic exists in Second Life as an actual metric changes the dynamics some. Becuase a huge chunk of the potential customers DON'T KNOW that traffic is gamed.
They dont let Used car dealers roll back the odometers anymore either. Ethics do apply to businesses. In real life restaurants place the first few customers in the windows to make it appear busy. There are companies that allow their parking lots to be used for carpoolers to leave their car there. There are also companies that have the employees fill up some obvious parking slots to make it seem fuller (outer edges, near the street, visible to street, tend to be longer walk to store). There are also companies that buy vans, paint a giant arrow on it that mentions the company, and park the vehicle in such a way that it points to the store. All of this, of course, being perception. Oh, and they do allow car dealers to fill up parking spaces at the mall. I find that very annoying. 
_____________________
From: Nimbus Rau Nimbus Score is 9.5 out of a possible 10 - Wow! what a score. What a cat! 300th Post 2/22/08 400th Post 2/28/08 500th Post 3/14/08 600th Post 3/28/08 666th Post 8/05/08 SL music wiki http://exploringvirtualworlds.wikidot.com/music-acts
|
|
Alicia Sautereau
if (!social) hide;
Join date: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,125
|
01-02-2008 09:04
second life hasn`t grown, it just gained more and more bots and traffic alts
remove them and we`ll have 30k less "concurrent" users, less inventory problems, less lag and a better second life in general
defending the use of traffic alts or camping bots is pritty much pointless and shows you have no understanding what problems these resource hogging monstrosities create grid wide
you claim you don`t add lag, but you do, these alts are connected to the SL servers and thus connected to every service, online status, asset server, login server, traffic calculation and network servers, all those clients need to keep sending non used packets trough the system backbone and thus adding unfair system usage along with your fellow camping alt bot runners to cripple the grid at peak times when REAL people are online
wished LL would give us 5 non payment alts and if you want more then have to pay the $9.95 a month atleast to compremise for the unlimited alts 1 month ban if caught the first time and a perma ban for the second time to discurrage cheating
you still don`t get it and you will never get it...
|
|
Karen Palen
That pushy American Broad
Join date: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 140
|
01-02-2008 09:04
From: LillyBeth Filth The bot alts cannot be seen by the naked eye ( no green dots on the maps ) but they are there none the less there for adding false and high traffic to a store and costing the owner nothing but the added electricity of running his 2nd PC 24/7 This intrigued me so I started up a copy TestBot (part of the LibSecondlife development kit) and took a look - fact is you can't tell my alt (actually a friend's AV) running from TestBot from the same Av using the standard viewer, The Nicholaz viewer. or any of my custom "gee whiz I wonder if I can really do THAT" viewers. Sorry, but lets at least get the facts straight. 
|
|
Claire Silverspar
Pokes Badgers With Spoons
Join date: 31 Oct 2007
Posts: 5,375
|
01-02-2008 09:05
From: Lion Ewry If it's not cheating Phil-----prove it.
Pull you alt farm. If your products are so damned good people will come anyway.
I know you will never do that and so does everyone else--because you cannot win unless you stack the deck.
To you business is business means it's ok to do anything to win--if it means stack the search results with traffic (or anything else for that matter) then it's fair because you win.
You are cheating everyone else in SL--my bet is you would not survive if you coud'nt. SO, IF THAT IS NOT TRUE----AND YOU COULD COMPETE ON A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD THEN PROVE IT.
End of story wow! ok lol. i think everyone needs to calm down. Sure this is a hot topic and everything but there is no need for shouting! A discussion is one thing, this is turning into an argument. im not changing my point of view, I still don't agree with what Phil is doing, but even that doesn't deserve abuse, so can we all just take a deep breath? ok now let it out. please just calm down and let it go.
_____________________
 I'll miss this damn place. I'll be over at SCII after the end has come.
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
01-02-2008 09:06
The problem isnt Phil.
Well not this Phil,
Maybe the Linden Phil, but you know what I mean.
The problem is the gamed system as a whole. You are never going to convince enough people that gaming the traffic system is wrong and they need to stop. It will simply not occur.
Therefore you need to get rid of traffic.
At least THIS Phil has some restraint, and says hes considered his neighbors and any resulting lag.
I dont agree with him on concurrency though, its always been a huge issue as soon as we get to peak times, I just haven't heard the Lindens come out and say afk people don't matter.
We have to remember the LINDENS take advantage of a gamed traffic system too, big time.
They game the number of total accounts and they game the online now numbers. They know that the numbers aren't accurate to actual players ...
|
|
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
|
01-02-2008 09:14
From: Brenda Connolly Something else to consider, more of an abstract sense: We see only the campers sitting, "Doing nothing", and some no doubt are, but how many are organizing their inventories, IMing friends, reading something, maybe even creating something, like many of us do? I sometimes sit at my home for an hour, and outwardly look to be doing nothing. It happens at the hangout, several people sitting around, each doing something on their own, to an uninformed observer it can look like a camp site. But because it's done in a manner that's more socially acceptable, it's not considered a waste. I'm not necessarily defending the presence of camping, but when it's done by actual humans and not by farming bots, it is an activity in SL just as legitimate as any other and we shouldn't judgementally demean those that chose to do it. LOL - ah, if only I could make more than L$2/10 to organize my inventory. I spent HOURS doing that just yesterday. If camping paid more, heck, I'd sit around someone's shop while sorting inventory.
|
|
Karen Palen
That pushy American Broad
Join date: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 140
|
01-02-2008 09:16
From: Graphicguru Gustav As for camping I used to camp out over a year ago ...I was a noob then, and needed money. I found THEN I could talk to several campers and they actually talked back. I got curious and tried that randomly in the last few months and NADA! not one camper I tried to talk to ever responded. Either they were (away) or they were bots. Actually I think you can thank a few camping spot owners who would quiz your Av and then throw you out if they didn't like your answers! Now I just ignore everyone except friends for the most part. From: Graphicguru Gustav I had a thought...what if the only way one can sit in a camping chair were to have to fill out a questionnaire with code letters to input at the end. That would bring the number of true campers to a realistic level and eliminate 99% of the bot traffic that is hogging the servers and SL bandwidth ...and monetary resources.
I don't hate camping, I do hate what it has become... There are already several things like that around and at least one "bot" specifically written to answer the questions. It is much easier to deal with that nonsense from a bot than while you are answering email (or typing into a forum LOL) If it gets to be widespread I will simply write a generic one using Lex/YACC and post it as a freebie. For the uninitiated ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yacc ) this approach allows you to define a "challenge/ response" protocol which will respond intelligently to any such stupid questions. In short it would be a self-fulfilling prophecy - no one would camp without running some sort of bot!
|
|
Karen Palen
That pushy American Broad
Join date: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 140
|
01-02-2008 09:26
From: Colette Meiji What camping does .. realistically is take two search criteria:
Classifieds and Places,
and makes your ranking totally dependent on money spent
The Places ranking wasn't supposed to be dependent on money spent, it was supposed to be dependent on how many visitors.
Let me see if I have this right paying someone to camp is CHEATING, but paying for advertising is GREAT. Why do I have trouble with this? In fact I have found that good camping spots correlate very well with places where I find things I want to buy and that are generally well run. I have found that the whiners have good reason to whine for the most part.
|
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
01-02-2008 09:27
From: Colette Meiji However in real life businesses don't pay people to leave their cars in their parking lot to appear full, nor do they go and buy a bunch of cardboard cutout cars to take up parking lot spaces. Actually, read Joan Didion on the subject of how parking lot spaces are marked in California shopping malls. (I think it's in "The White Album" if I remember correctly.) As the OP has stated a few times in this thread, the original concern was with social venues, not product stores, and I think that's where camping chairs/bots do the most damage: some hypothetical "pure" traffic metric could actually be useful in knowing whether such a venue is popular, and "popularity" is of some use in judging whether a place is somewhere one does or doesn't want to go. (So in this way I guess camping might be a kind of cheating, since it destroys a metric that otherwise might have some merit.) For products, though, I'm not sure it really makes much difference because I think merchants who "play the traffic game" are just appealing to different shoppers than merchants who have quality products, and I don't see anything wrong with that. I don't think Search is a useful tool for finding quality stuff anyway, so however "gamed" it is doesn't matter--at least not the way I shop. To get my business, merchants would be wasting their time with camping chairs/bots--I don't go out of my way to avoid them, but I have yet to see them on a parcel where I'm shopping.
|
|
Karen Palen
That pushy American Broad
Join date: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 140
|
01-02-2008 09:30
From: Colette Meiji However in real life businesses don't pay people to leave their cars in their parking lot to appear full, nor do they go and buy a bunch of cardboard cutout cars to take up parking lot spaces. In the city where I live, Police Officers are encouraged to take their cruisers home at night and to park them where they can be seen. I am told it is quite effective, but I will be sure to pass on your concerns about deceiving the poor thieves.
|
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
01-02-2008 09:32
From: Karen Palen In the city where I live, Police Officers are encouraged to take their cruisers home at night and to park them where they can be seen.
I am told it is quite effective, but I will be sure to pass on your concerns about deceiving the poor thieves. Apples and oranges...you can't possibly believe they are the same thing. Maybe you do.
_____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Karen Palen
That pushy American Broad
Join date: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 140
|
01-02-2008 09:45
From: Alicia Sautereau second life hasn`t grown, it just gained more and more bots and traffic alts
remove them and we`ll have 30k less "concurrent" users, less inventory problems, less lag and a better second life in general Actually I agree. Even the LL "statistics" show a total lack of growth for the past 6 months or so. I am sure it would immediately improve things as everyone abandoned Second Life and went elsewhere, for a week or so anyway. From: Alicia Sautereau defending the use of traffic alts or camping bots is pritty much pointless and shows you have no understanding what problems these resource hogging monstrosities create grid wide
you claim you don`t add lag, but you do, these alts are connected to the SL servers and thus connected to every service, online status, asset server, login server, traffic calculation and network servers, all those clients need to keep sending non used packets trough the system backbone and thus adding unfair system usage along with your fellow camping alt bot runners to cripple the grid at peak times when REAL people are online Well according to what LL has published it is total OBJECTS in a sim that causes the lag. In fact if you look at the debug analysis there are a great many causes of lag. Including the compute speed of your system. I also notice that almost 30% of the normal packets are totally superfluous anyway, and if the grid is having problems somewhere the number of packets will go up 10X to 100X - nothing whatsoever to do with "alts" or any such, typically it is a hardware failure or a stack overflow. From: Alicia Sautereau wished LL would give us 5 non payment alts and if you want more then have to pay the $9.95 a month atleast to compremise for the unlimited alts 1 month ban if caught the first time and a perma ban for the second time to discurrage cheating Nice idea, too bad it has so many holes that it would only keep the players that you want around from joining. Lets see how many Starbucks and MacDonald's in my area have wifi ... From: Alicia Sautereau you still don`t get it and you will never get it... I will never "get it" because it simply is not true! I started in this business in 1964, helped build the Arpanet and am now active with LibSecondlife and Opensim - I think I know a little about what goes on here!
|