Disturbing: - Nazi groups still listed in SL
|
|
Trout Recreant
Public Enemy No. 1
Join date: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 4,873
|
10-08-2007 16:44
From: Victorria Paine It's been pretty clear from numerous posts that she harbours some serious ill will towards the US. She can't possibly bear that much ill-will towards us. We didn't do anything to her. Well, at least I didn't. I've never even met her before, and I've never been to Australia. I'll wait until she chimes in with an answer, because I refuse to believe anyone on here is that ignorant and bigotted. I'm quite sure I misread what she said, and I won't judge her on it, because that wouldn't be fair. Besides, I'm a genocidal punter with dangerously stupid ideas, not a genocidal tosser with dangerously stupid ideas. "Tosser" is just offensive.
_____________________
From: Jerboa Haystack A Trout Rating (tm) is something to cherish. To flaunt and be proud of. It is something all women should aspire to obtain!
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
10-08-2007 16:49
From: Taylor Meness Just let them be?? Sorry, but this sort of talk makes me sick. Some people are saying that they should be allowed to role-play, as long as they aren't affecting anyone else? What do you think they're role-playing? Having cups of tea and cake? I think not. You mention other wars, knights, cavemen. Even America. What the Nazi's did to millions of innocent people was inexcusable and a once in a lifetime happening. Well, we can only hope so. When America invaded Iraq, did they arrest millions of inocent men women, children and babies, lock them away in hellish conditions, and then brutally kill them? I would love to hear an actual comparison to what these bastards did, because to many people, there is none. It's not healthy to have these wannabe bastards RP their sick little fantasies which would more than likely be torturing and killing Jews. To what someone said about Klu Klux Klan and Nazi being ok because it's free speech, that's just bloody ridiculous. Funny how things that incite racism, hate and prejudice can be viewed as 'free'. The swastika HAS been around for a long time, and wasn't introduced by the Nazi's, but the word 'Nazi' and the beliefs that come with it have NO PLACE in modern society, if anything else, out of respect for the millions of people who were murdered by them Baby-killers have no place in our society, and we all know that sometimes things don't stop when we log out of SL. The Nazis were amatuers compared to the Communists. But I see open Communist groups in SL, are you ARing them too? Do you really think that a group spouting Nazi rhetoric in a game is a danger? No, the real danger comes from the ones you don't see, the ones plotting and planning in the dark.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
|
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
|
10-08-2007 16:50
From: Chris Norse The Nazis were amatuers compared to the Communists. But I see open Communist groups in SL, are you ARing them too? Do you really think that a group spouting Nazi rhetoric in a game is a danger? No, the real danger comes from the ones you don't see, the ones plotting and planning in the dark. Communism in and of itself isn't bad. It's misguided, but it's not bad. Perhaps you're referring to the USSR (aka Soviet) Communists?
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
10-08-2007 16:52
From: Mephisto Offcourse I've even seen a complete Hitler skin and shape with complete outfit in a shop in SL ....... and made my first AR in SL
In Germany we have learned what can happen if you leave the nazis room to expand and the whole world had to suffer because of that. We have a saying that to stop something bad from growing you have to pull it out with all its roots and that is the exact way of how most germans want to treat anything associated with the nazis. so no, we don't grant freedom of speech to them.
Regarding the ability to access nazi-pages on the internet: Our government and many other organizations have tried to have at least the most offending ones removed but have failed to do so due to (mostly) american laws. If people only visit those sites, nothing much will happen but if they save those texts and pictures to their HD they can be prosecuted for it.
I know that banning always is like walking a very thin line but I also feel that it is sometimes justified. Have you AR'd the various Communist groups? Would you AR a group playing East German secret police? Censorship is never justified, you beat bad ideas with good ideas not by driving them into the dark there to fester and grow unseen by the masses.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
10-08-2007 16:54
From: Oryx Tempel Communism in and of itself isn't bad. It's misguided, but it's not bad. Perhaps you're referring to the USSR (aka Soviet) Communists? Like I have asked several times with no answer, name me any place outside of a few religious orders where communism has been put in and has stayed in power without terror and killing? Yes, communism is bad in and of itself, it is just another form of slavery.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
|
Maggie McArdle
FIOS hates puppies
Join date: 8 May 2006
Posts: 2,855
|
10-08-2007 16:59
From: Taylor Meness Just let them be?? Sorry, but this sort of talk makes me sick. Some people are saying that they should be allowed to role-play, as long as they aren't affecting anyone else? What do you think they're role-playing? Having cups of tea and cake? I think not. You mention other wars, knights, cavemen. Even America. What the Nazi's did to millions of innocent people was inexcusable and a once in a lifetime happening. Well, we can only hope so. When America invaded Iraq, did they arrest millions of inocent men women, children and babies, lock them away in hellish conditions, and then brutally kill them? I would love to hear an actual comparison to what these bastards did, because to many people, there is none. It's not healthy to have these wannabe bastards RP their sick little fantasies which would more than likely be torturing and killing Jews. To what someone said about Klu Klux Klan and Nazi being ok because it's free speech, that's just bloody ridiculous. Funny how things that incite racism, hate and prejudice can be viewed as 'free'. The swastika HAS been around for a long time, and wasn't introduced by the Nazi's, but the word 'Nazi' and the beliefs that come with it have NO PLACE in modern society, if anything else, out of respect for the millions of people who were murdered by them Baby-killers have no place in our society, and we all know that sometimes things don't stop when we log out of SL. as another poster put it, this is not the real world. this is a virtual society. yes i agree, its annoying. but i have better things to do with my Sltime than worry about what a bunch of pixels decides to do with theirs. in this venue they can do whatever they want, whether you me or anyone else likes it or not. if its not your cup of tea, don't drink it. personally, i'd rather worry about the real life ones than the pixel ones.
_____________________
There's, uh, probably a lot of things you didn't know about lindens. Another, another interesting, uh, lindenism, uh, there are only three jobs available to a linden. The first is making shoes at night while, you know, while the old cobbler sleeps.You can bake cookies in a tree. But the third job, some call it, uh, "the show" or "the big dance," it's the profession that every linden aspires to.
|
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
10-08-2007 17:01
From: Chris Norse Censorship is never justified, I agree Chris. My favorite saying is "Choose your enemies wisely for you will become as they are"
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
10-08-2007 17:02
From: Chris Norse Like I have asked several times with no answer, name me any place outside of a few religious orders where communism has been put in and has stayed in power without terror and killing?
Yes, communism is bad in and of itself, it is just another form of slavery. Communism has never actually been practiced. All those "Communist" governments were technically Socialist. A true communist government cant be totalitarian because there is no government. The State doesn't own property because there is no state. There is no Slavery because everyone is Equal. The Socialist governments are supposed to be the bridge to that Utopian idea.. of course if you build on a rotten foundation...
|
|
Derbor Torok
Lost soul
Join date: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,016
|
10-08-2007 17:17
From: Chris Norse Have you AR'd the various Communist groups? Would you AR a group playing East German secret police?
Censorship is never justified, you beat bad ideas with good ideas not by driving them into the dark there to fester and grow unseen by the masses. Damn Chris, you make it hard to agree with you about censorship when you bring up this tired way of looking at communism... maybe you mean socialism? - Even then I cannot think of a socialist government that made a matter of official policy and philosophy the extermination of a specific group of people. I agree with you and all the other posters that say banning any group because of their ideas is a slippery slope. However, there is a clear line between 'ideas' and actual hate driven action to harrass and persecute people... and that should be banned, banned banned... .d
|
|
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
|
10-08-2007 17:27
From: Chris Norse Like I have asked several times with no answer, name me any place outside of a few religious orders where communism has been put in and has stayed in power without terror and killing?
Yes, communism is bad in and of itself, it is just another form of slavery. Pretty much all of the hunter gatherer tribes on the planet could be considered "communist" in that there is no true personal ownership of objects; rather, any necessary items are owned by the tribe itself, and all are given "fair" shares of food and shelter regardless of ability. Unfortunately, this can only work in very small tribes at low levels of technological advancement. Once ownership of land or items becomes a part of society, communism as a practicing culture goes out the door. I don't know about YOU, but I personally don't consider all hunter gatherer tribes to be slaves to themselves, or harbingers of terror and killing.
|
|
Strife Onizuka
Moonchild
Join date: 3 Mar 2004
Posts: 5,887
|
10-08-2007 17:28
I'll send this along to LR.
_____________________
Truth is a river that is always splitting up into arms that reunite. Islanded between the arms, the inhabitants argue for a lifetime as to which is the main river. - Cyril Connolly
Without the political will to find common ground, the continual friction of tactic and counter tactic, only creates suspicion and hatred and vengeance, and perpetuates the cycle of violence. - James Nachtwey
|
|
Victorria Paine
Sleepless in Wherever
Join date: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 1,110
|
10-08-2007 17:29
From: Trout Recreant She can't possibly bear that much ill-will towards us. We didn't do anything to her. Well, at least I didn't. I've never even met her before, and I've never been to Australia. I'll wait until she chimes in with an answer, because I refuse to believe anyone on here is that ignorant and bigotted. I'm quite sure I misread what she said, and I won't judge her on it, because that wouldn't be fair.
Besides, I'm a genocidal punter with dangerously stupid ideas, not a genocidal tosser with dangerously stupid ideas. "Tosser" is just offensive. Let's see.
|
|
Steve Mahfouz
Ecstasy Realty
Join date: 1 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,373
|
10-08-2007 17:31
I think a huge difference between RL Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia and other murderous regimes, is that in those RL cases, the media was either killed or muzzled effectively. Here in SL, there are no muzzles on our "media". If a Nazi group, for example, actually starts openly preaching extermination of the Jews, it will be publicized and roundly condemned. They may not be banned, but they may WISH they were banned by the time the rest of us get ahold of them.
I strongly believe in a vigorous and independent media to keep governments and corporations in check !
_____________________
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ecstasy/128/129/31 Ecstasy: high quality residential living
|
|
Derbor Torok
Lost soul
Join date: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,016
|
10-08-2007 17:36
From: Chris Norse Like I have asked several times with no answer, name me any place outside of a few religious orders where communism has been put in and has stayed in power without terror and killing?
Yes, communism is bad in and of itself, it is just another form of slavery. Terror and killing is a proven way to stay in power for ANY totalitarian regime. Whether socialist or not.. We (US) have supported plenty of terror and killing in other countries to advance our national interests. I don't see us as trying to drive a communist agenda... Again COMMUNISM is the form of government that would be farthest from slavery that I know. It is also the most unrealistic form of government to try to achieve... but that is another disscussion. .d
|
|
Walker Moore
Fоrum Unregular
Join date: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1,458
|
10-08-2007 17:40
From: Colette Meiji Actually Ive always heard that Nazi iconography was forbidden under the tolerance clause - and was removed when reported. And Nazi groups renamed. Sounds right. I know a guy who used to make the uniforms last year (not just Nazi uniforms either, and it was more for fetishistic reasons than any other) and he got suspended after an AR, and told to remove the Swastika from his designs.
|
|
Derbor Torok
Lost soul
Join date: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,016
|
10-08-2007 17:41
From: Steve Mahfouz I strongly believe in a vigorous and independent media to keep governments and corporations in check !
The times when I lived outside the US in highly 'regulated' countries this is probably the one single thing I missed the most. .d
|
|
Avacea Fasching
Certified
Join date: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 481
|
10-08-2007 17:50
I am staying out of this. I dont think this is the place.........
Strife?
_____________________
post spelling was checked using - Speak & Spell
|
|
Victorria Paine
Sleepless in Wherever
Join date: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 1,110
|
10-08-2007 17:52
From: Derbor Torok The times when I lived outside the US in highly 'regulated' countries this is probably the one single thing I missed the most.
.d LOL, I more or less completely disagree with that. When I have lived outside the US, all I have experienced in the media is that each paper, each magazine, etc., is linked with a political party, either formally or informally. I don't care much for TV journalism (even though outside the US this is normally controlled by the government, so I wouldnt see it as generally "free"  , but the print media outside the US is almost never even trying to be "objective" -- it is all partisan and distorted. You just pick your juice when you choose what to read. To a certain degree this applies in the US as well, when it comes to the Op/Ed pages, but the news reporting -- aside from the "leaders" -- outside the US is all 100% partisan. It can be nice, or annoying depending on what you think. I love The Economist, because it more or less matches my own views on things ... but my own experience suggests that most non-US newspaper readers reflect that experience .. that is, they choose the paper/magazine that represents their own interest and read that, and have their ideas reinforced conveniently. All too often outside the US this means the current Orthodoxy of the Social Democratic movement, in its various flavours.
|
|
Taylor Meness
Registered User
Join date: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 144
|
10-08-2007 18:07
From: Maggie McArdle as another poster put it, this is not the real world. this is a virtual society. yes i agree, its annoying. but i have better things to do with my Sltime than worry about what a bunch of pixels decides to do with theirs. in this venue they can do whatever they want, whether you me or anyone else likes it or not. if its not your cup of tea, don't drink it. personally, i'd rather worry about the real life ones than the pixel ones. And you don't think that there is real, living, people behind those pixels? Who would more likely than not hold the same belief as their avatars? You don't think that SL would be a great place for this bacteria to breed, and gather momentum, simply because people can 'do whatever they want'? And they can't do 'whatever they want', there are certain guidelines in SL, as in the real world, and as we all know 'brodaly offensive' material is not allowed. You may not find it broadly offensive, but I'm sure a lot of holocaust surviver's, and their relatives, would.
|
|
Derbor Torok
Lost soul
Join date: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,016
|
10-08-2007 18:08
From: Victorria Paine LOL, I more or less completely disagree with that.
You just pick your juice when you choose what to read. To a certain degree this applies in the US as well, when it comes to the Op/Ed pages, but the news reporting -- aside from the "leaders" -- outside the US is all 100% partisan. It can be nice, or annoying depending on what you think. I love The Economist, because it more or less matches my own views on things ... but my own experience suggests that most non-US newspaper readers reflect that experience .. that is, they choose the paper/magazine that represents their own interest and read that, and have their ideas reinforced conveniently. All too often outside the US this means the current Orthodoxy of the Social Democratic movement, in its various flavours. Actually I agree with you... I've lived in places like that as well. But the countries I was referring to are the ones that for a week you read serious articles on the evils of silk panties and pie eating and how they are destroying society as a whole... and a week latter there is a law made public banning them... laughs It was so obvious that the government was sowing fear in the press in order to have acceptance of new regulations/laws... The funny thing is that it worked. .d
|
|
Har Fairweather
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,320
|
10-08-2007 18:08
From: Victorria Paine LOL, I more or less completely disagree with that. When I have lived outside the US, all I have experienced in the media is that each paper, each magazine, etc., is linked with a political party, either formally or informally. I don't care much for TV journalism (even though outside the US this is normally controlled by the government, so I wouldnt see it as generally "free"  , but the print media outside the US is almost never even trying to be "objective" -- it is all partisan and distorted. You just pick your juice when you choose what to read. To a certain degree this applies in the US as well, when it comes to the Op/Ed pages, but the news reporting -- aside from the "leaders" -- outside the US is all 100% partisan. It can be nice, or annoying depending on what you think. I love The Economist, because it more or less matches my own views on things ... but my own experience suggests that most non-US newspaper readers reflect that experience .. that is, they choose the paper/magazine that represents their own interest and read that, and have their ideas reinforced conveniently. All too often outside the US this means the current Orthodoxy of the Social Democratic movement, in its various flavours. Boy, that explains a lot.
|
|
Taylor Meness
Registered User
Join date: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 144
|
10-08-2007 18:14
From: Chris Norse The Nazis were amatuers compared to the Communists. But I see open Communist groups in SL, are you ARing them too? Do you really think that a group spouting Nazi rhetoric in a game is a danger? No, the real danger comes from the ones you don't see, the ones plotting and planning in the dark. Any group that wants to wipe out an entire race, simply becasue they don't fit into what they consider 'normal' should not exist, in my opinion, either in RL or SL. Difference is, in SL at least certain things can be regulated. If you think that just because they are in SL, and therefore pose no threat, is the case, I feel that you are extremely naive. I believe in freedom of most things, but Nazi supporters have no place here. IF we can't stop them from preaching their hatred in RL, the least we can do is get rid of it in SL. And I think your views on Communism are somewhat misguided. With Communism, the the theory means well, but there will always be those who take it to a radical level. Whereas Nazi's are a group that simply want to instill hate in their members.
|
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
10-08-2007 18:17
From: Victorria Paine LOL, I more or less completely disagree with that.
When I have lived outside the US, all I have experienced in the media is that each paper, each magazine, etc., is linked with a political party, either formally or informally. This is the way newspapers use to be in the US back when each city had two or more papers. There was no attempt at being objective, for the most part. Each paper had its stance and was open about it. I think it was more honest than today where papers pretend to be objective. It is not possible to be totally objective. The choice of what are the most important news stories is going to be subjective even if the person making the decision is unaware of it. We are human after all.
|
|
Victorria Paine
Sleepless in Wherever
Join date: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 1,110
|
10-08-2007 18:31
From: Bradley Bracken This is the way newspapers use to be in the US back when each city had two or more papers. There was no attempt at being objective, for the most part. Each paper had its stance and was open about it.
I think it was more honest than today where papers pretend to be objective. It is not possible to be totally objective. The choice of what are the most important news stories is going to be subjective even if the person making the decision is unaware of it. We are human after all. In part true, but there is much journalism in the US that tries, at least, to be objective when reporting facts. Outside the US that is not the case .. it is almost all advocacy journalism. I dont see US journalism as dishonest in the least, Brad, sorry about that .. but the level of objectivity, even if it is not perfect here (it can never be) is much higher in the US in print media than it is outside the US in my experience.
|
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
10-08-2007 18:39
From: Victorria Paine In part true, but there is much journalism in the US that tries, at least, to be objective when reporting facts. Outside the US that is not the case .. it is almost all advocacy journalism. I dont see US journalism as dishonest in the least, Brad, sorry about that .. but the level of objectivity, even if it is not perfect here (it can never be) is much higher in the US in print media than it is outside the US in my experience. I didn't mean to imply US journalism is dishonest, just unrealistic for the most part since I think it's hard if not impossible for most of us to be completely objective. One publication in which I think they do an outstanding job is The Christian Science Monitor. As a non Christian I was surprised when I started reading this gem.
|