Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
What % of women landing & propositioning other women are actually SGTWOH? |
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
08-10-2009 13:50
Someone mention pie?
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Mickey Vandeverre
See you Inworld
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
08-10-2009 13:55
Interesting. That's quite a claim (of 'lack of' genuine concern for women). Can you provide any actual support for it? Of specific remarks you've 'observed' that constitute proof of lack of genuine concern for women? It's my interpretation based on several months worth of her ramblings. Rarely will I address one of her posts. But she crossed a few lines that provoked a comment. I just want to make sure that she is not calculating the wrong figures in her head as to what determines a majority or minority of women and their thoughts and concerns. And also want to make sure that an observer does not miscalculate either. No - I don't care to go further. I spelled it out very simply without big words and flowery explanations. |
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
08-10-2009 13:59
It's my interpretation based on several months worth of her ramblings. Rarely will I address one of her posts. But she crossed a few lines that provoked a comment. I just want to make sure that she is not calculating the wrong figures in her head as to what determines a majority or minority of women and their thoughts and concerns. And also want to make sure that an observer does not miscalculate either. No - I don't care to go further. I spelled it out very simply without big words and flowery explanations. But I wasn't asking for big words or flowery explanations. I was asking for specific examples that would support the claim that you made. _____________________
War is over---if you want it.
P Low Low P Studio SMALL PARCEL SOLUTIONS: Homes & shops of distinction, with low prim-counts, surprisingly low prices! |
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
08-10-2009 14:00
If anyone here had made the claim that 'depictions of rape are rape', then your comment would be germane. As it is: not so much. Your own post #143 that I quoted implied as such. Pep (The female short term memory is such a delicate flower it seems.) _____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
08-10-2009 14:02
Your own post #143 that I quoted implied as such. Pep (The female short term memory is such a delicate flower it seems.) What words of mine "implied" that depictions of rape are rape? Just quote them, please. _____________________
War is over---if you want it.
P Low Low P Studio SMALL PARCEL SOLUTIONS: Homes & shops of distinction, with low prim-counts, surprisingly low prices! |
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
08-10-2009 14:06
Ha! Unlike you, the sun is necessary! I am, on the contrary, essential. Pep (But you don't have the capacity to understand that, it appears.) _____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Mickey Vandeverre
See you Inworld
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
08-10-2009 14:07
But I wasn't asking for big words or flowery explanations. I was asking for specific examples that would support the claim that you made. I expressed an opinion, Ponsonby. Based on many months worth of reading. If you wish for me to refrain from doing so in one of your threads, just give the nod....several others have done so, and it's been acknowledged. |
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
08-10-2009 14:09
I am, on the contrary, essentially useless. Fixed for you! Pep (But you don't have the capacity to undestand that, it appears.) Well, I certainly don't understand what "undestand" means... _____________________
 |
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
08-10-2009 14:10
What words of mine "implied" that depictions of rape are rape? Just quote them, please. Are you innumerate as well as illogical?  Pep (Or don't you know how to use the forums?  )_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
08-10-2009 14:11
Fixed for you! Well, I certainly don't understand what "undestand" means... You're losing it again, Love.  Pep (Better up the medication dose. )_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
08-10-2009 14:12
Are you innumerate as well as illogical? Pep (Or don't you know how to use the forums? )So....you got nothin'??? (Thank you for that concession!) _____________________
War is over---if you want it.
P Low Low P Studio SMALL PARCEL SOLUTIONS: Homes & shops of distinction, with low prim-counts, surprisingly low prices! |
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
08-10-2009 14:20
You're losing it again, Love. Well, by your own claims, the (quickly corrected) spelling error which you just made automatically means that everything you have ever said (oh, let's just say today for argument's sake) is now obviously meaningless and wrong. Pep (Better up the medication dose. )Seriously Pep, you're a broken record. _____________________
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
08-10-2009 14:20
I expressed an opinion, Ponsonby. Based on many months worth of reading. If you wish for me to refrain from doing so in one of your threads, just give the nod....several others have done so, and it's been acknowledged. In post #131 you wrote: Twisted...but again, confirms what I've observed here, about your genuine concern for women. (lack of) This is a rather strong accusation, which you couch in terms of what you've "observed". In what way is it out of line to ask you to support your accusation with at least a few examples of what you've "observed"? If you cannot do so, then you cannot. (And few readers will be fooled by endeavors to set up smokescreens disguising this failure as some sort of defense of free expression of opinion.) Should you not, then, withdraw your unsupportable accusation? _____________________
War is over---if you want it.
P Low Low P Studio SMALL PARCEL SOLUTIONS: Homes & shops of distinction, with low prim-counts, surprisingly low prices! |
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
08-10-2009 14:21
So....you got nothin'??? (Thank you for that concession!) You are kidding, right? Just trying to evoke an emotional response? Or it is some sort of semantic game, a la 'no actual bodies exist in virtual worlds therefore rape cannot exist' (and we'll pretend that this makes the numberless depicitions of rape in virtual worlds into a non-topic)....? Or maybe you mean that there are none by "numberless depictions"? Pep (Selective amnesia, or simple illiteracy?) _____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
08-10-2009 14:23
Well, by your own claims, the (quickly corrected) spelling error which you just made automatically means that everything you have ever said (oh, let's just say today for argument's sake) is now obviously meaningless and wrong. Seriously Pep, you're a broken record. I think that this post demonstrates quite conclusively that you are the one with nothing to offer on a repetitive basis. Pep (I'd like to say I have missed your meaningless banter recently - but I haven't.) _____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Mickey Vandeverre
See you Inworld
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
08-10-2009 14:25
In post #131 you wrote: This is a rather strong accusation, which you couch in terms of what you've "observed". In what way is it out of line to ask you to support your accusation with at least a few examples of what you've "observed"? If you cannot do so, then you cannot. (And few readers will be fooled by endeavors to set up smokescreens disguising this failure as some sort of defense of free expression of opinion.) Should you not, then, withdraw your unsupportable accusation? OK - I'll do so later this evening. As per your requirements to express an opinion....do I quote only examples from this thread....or shall I go back to others? |
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
08-10-2009 14:26
I think that this post demonstrates quite conclusively that you are the one with nothing to offer on a repetitive basis. You see? You're basically just a parrot. EDIT: anyway, thanks for the distraction today. Sadly, it's not as entertaining as it once was.  _____________________
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
08-10-2009 14:35
OK - I'll do so later this evening. As per your requirements to express an opinion....do I quote only examples from this thread....or shall I go back to others? If you make a claim based on something you've observed, then wouldn't it be reasonable for your support to come from wherever you've observed it? Does that made sense? To me, the only thing that doesn't make sense is posting accusations characterizing some person in some particular negative way, then refusing to support the accusations with any sort of evidence. _____________________
War is over---if you want it.
P Low Low P Studio SMALL PARCEL SOLUTIONS: Homes & shops of distinction, with low prim-counts, surprisingly low prices! |
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
08-10-2009 14:50
You see? You're basically just a parrot. EDIT: anyway, thanks for the distraction today. Sadly, it's not as entertaining as it once was. I am trying very hard not to entertain you in the hope that you will stop your nihilistic prattle. Pep (yawns and logs off.) _____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
08-10-2009 14:50
You see? You're basically just a parrot.  _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Deira Llanfair
Deira to rhyme with Myra
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 2,315
|
08-10-2009 14:54
I am trying very hard not to entertain you in the hope that you will stop your nihilisic prattle. Pep (yawns.) Pep, if you are feeling bored, I suggest you go into the blog and see Cyn Linden's Content Management RoadMap post. Go into the forums on the links there (it's a painful format) - but I think you will be well entertained. _____________________
Deira
 Must create animations for head-desk and palm-face!. |
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
08-10-2009 14:54
I am trying very hard not to entertain you in the hope that you will stop your nihilisic prattle. "nihilisic"? OK, you got me. What does that mean? Pep (yawns) That's OK. You're here to entertain me, not the other way around. _____________________
|
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
08-10-2009 14:57
Trusting ferret. _____________________
|
|
Mickey Vandeverre
See you Inworld
Join date: 7 Dec 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
08-10-2009 15:03
If you make a claim based on something you've observed, then wouldn't it be reasonable for your support to come from wherever you've observed it? Does that made sense? To me, the only thing that doesn't make sense is posting accusations characterizing some person in some particular negative way, then refusing to support the accusations with any sort of evidence. Ponsonby, I told you that I would post those later tonight. There are quite a few, and it's going to take a while. Is this required of everyone? Or just the NON Forum Cartel members? |
|
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
|
08-10-2009 15:04
Is this required of everyone? Or just the NON Forum Cartel members? Wow, this should be the new Godwin. _____________________
|