Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

What are Ginko Bonds worth?

Brodsky Zapedzki
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 337
08-16-2007 11:19
From: Dzonatas Sol
If the bond is valued below L$1 and NP buys them for less than L$1, that will only satisfy the immediate demand on those bonds, but it completely wipes out any chance of liquidation to regain funds for prior investment.

you mean sellers' appetite to sell. and that'd be supply, not demand.
Brodsky Zapedzki
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 337
08-16-2007 11:20
From: Dzonatas Sol
Send me an IM in-world, and we can discuss that.

I believe in market transparency and educating investors. All other posters have a right to the same insight. Please post the answer here.
Ravenhurst Xeno
Consiracy with no purpose
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 147
08-16-2007 11:24
From: Brodsky Zapedzki
I believe in market transparency and educating investors. All other posters have a right to the same insight. Please post the answer here.

Here, here! I have been fascinated by this debate, I would very much like to know too.
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
08-16-2007 11:24
From: Dzonatas Sol
Can investors short a trade based on given open orders, yes.
That's pretty interesting, actually. I wonder if Shaun would loan me a few million shares to sell short. I mean, if there were a margin call, I could just pay him back in Qie Perpetual Bonds. ;)
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 11:27
From: Watermelon Tokyo
In that regard I think it's really, really important to keep hammering the point that this "investment" is suspect. We don't want any more people taken in my this scam, afterall.


As long as the value stays under L$, people are being taken. Since you admit you don't have any investment in Ginko, I don't see you how you can reflect on a possible solution to get the money back.

In that sense being presented (hammering and duck taste), any mutual fund out there can be called a scam at any point it's main value goes under. Hmm. In the real-world, I see these kind of arguments made all the time by day-traders.
Brodsky Zapedzki
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 337
08-16-2007 11:27
From: Qie Niangao
That's pretty interesting, actually. I wonder if Shaun would loan me a few million shares to sell short. I mean, if there were a margin call, I could just pay him back in Qie Perpetual Bonds. ;)

LOL :D
Brodsky Zapedzki
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 337
08-16-2007 11:32
From: Qie Niangao
That's pretty interesting, actually. I wonder if Shaun would loan me a few million shares to sell short. I mean, if there were a margin call, I could just pay him back in Qie Perpetual Bonds. ;)

Forget Perpetuals. Use Non-redeemable Zero Coupon Bonds instead.
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 11:36
From: Qie Niangao
The market isn't pricing them there, so is there an accounting of "real L$ to back-up the investment" in excess of L$1 per share? Or whence did this evaluation arise?


If you have never invested in Ginko or don't have a current investment in Ginko (not by an investment made after the bond conversion), then you would never know if there is any real L$ to back it up. Right?

As for the excess, that appears the intended option for recovery. As long as there are those that want to beat down the value, in that view the potential value won't be achieved, but this is true for any stock.
Brodsky Zapedzki
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 337
08-16-2007 11:38
From: Dzonatas Sol
If you have never invested in Ginko or don't have a current investment in Ginko (not by an investment made after the bond conversion), then you would never know if there is any real L$ to back it up. Right?

Seeing as Ginko isn't releasing any data about where the money is invested to anyone, that's an absurd statement.
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 11:39
From: Brodsky Zapedzki
I believe in market transparency and educating investors. All other posters have a right to the same insight. Please post the answer here.


I agree, but it has nothing to do with market transparency.
Watermelon Tokyo
Square
Join date: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 93
08-16-2007 11:40
From: Dzonatas Sol
As long as the value stays under L$, people are being taken. Since you admit you don't have any investment in Ginko, I don't see you how you can reflect on a possible solution to get the money back.

In that sense being presented (hammering and duck taste), any mutual fund out there can be called a scam at any point it's main value goes under. Hmm. In the real-world, I see these kind of arguments made all the time by day-traders.


Obviously I can't reflect on getting *my* money back since I never put any in there. However, I can reflect on other people getting their money back.

I suppose I can't speak for *all* mutual funds, but the ones I've used like to send me investment performance with shiny charts and tables that show which stocks went up and what went down, which sectors did well, what did not, what the investment breakdown target ranges were, and what the actual breakdown was, how they performed compared to other funds, etc etc. That's a far cry from "I have assets, they just aren't liquid, and I'm not telling you guys what they are, but trust me!"
_____________________
Free eyes and prim sunglasses at the new Second Eyes main store in Plush Theta!
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 11:45
From: Brodsky Zapedzki
Seeing as Ginko isn't releasing any data about where the money is invested to anyone, that's an absurd statement.


No. What is absurd is those that never invested that want the books to open. If you invested, then you know that your investment is on the books.

When there are those to say that there is no real L$ involved, that is like saying that nobody actually ever deposited real L$ into a Ginko ATM. How is this illogical?
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 11:55
From: Watermelon Tokyo
I suppose I can't speak for *all* mutual funds, but the ones I've used like to send me investment performance with shiny charts and tables that show which stocks went up and what went down, which sectors did well, what did not, what the investment breakdown target ranges were, and what the actual breakdown was, how they performed compared to other funds, etc etc.


Yes. Ginko was a private equity and is now *potentially* being converted to a public mutal fund. I'm sure NP would like to keep it all a private equity, but I doubt that is going to be a wise solution now.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
08-16-2007 11:58
From: Dzonatas Sol
No. What is absurd is those that never invested that want the books to open. If you invested, then you know that your investment is on the books.

When there are those to say that there is no real L$ involved, that is like saying that nobody actually ever deposited real L$ into a Ginko ATM. How is this illogical?



You are either prone to the dramatic, or you missed the entire point of everything on every Ginko thread ever.


Those who deposited into Ginko dont know what their money was invested in. Nick wont disclose where 75% of the assets that supposedly are covering his debt even are, even to depositors.
Ravenhurst Xeno
Consiracy with no purpose
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 147
08-16-2007 12:06
From: Dzonatas Sol



Can investors short a trade based on given open orders, yes.


I'd still like to know how to short a bond in SL based on open orders.
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 12:21
From: Colette Meiji
You are either prone to the dramatic, or you missed the entire point of everything on every Ginko thread ever.


Oh no... please save every new person that wants to discuss or otherwise want to educate themselves about this and create the wiki page.

It'll help avoid such accusations.

Heck, maybe there is a thread being archived somewhere that I just didn't know about because I just don't spend that much on the forums like I have in the last two days. The ones I saw didn't prove much.

A wiki page would be very helpful!
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 12:22
From: Ravenhurst Xeno
I'd still like to know how to short a bond in SL based on open orders.


I've been on-line in-world, no one has sent me an IM about this.
Brodsky Zapedzki
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 337
08-16-2007 12:25
From: Dzonatas Sol
The bond is worth about L$2/one, at least. Those who are buying it less than L$1 are really a shame. It's a way out.... I suppose... heh...

Sorry, but I can't believe this.

Before WSE banned Ginko from buying back his own bonds at a discount, we had posters coming in setting price targets of 0.0000001L per bond.

Now that Ginko can only buy them at 1L we've got posters coming in saying they're worth 2L.
Ravenhurst Xeno
Consiracy with no purpose
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 147
08-16-2007 12:30
From: Dzonatas Sol
I've been on-line in-world, no one has sent me an IM about this.

I'm stuck out of world. But the question of how the bonds are being sold short is quite relevent to this discussion. So an explaination in this forum is appropriate.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
08-16-2007 12:30
From: Dzonatas Sol
Oh no... please save every new person that wants to discuss or otherwise want to educate themselves about this and create the wiki page.

It'll help avoid such accusations.

Heck, maybe there is a thread being archived somewhere that I just didn't know about because I just don't spend that much on the forums like I have in the last two days. The ones I saw didn't prove much.

A wiki page would be very helpful!


:rolleyes: Your just playing games now.


w/t/f/e

If you know where Nick put people's money, Why dont you tell them then?

Im sure lots of depositors will be all ears.
Adz Childs
Artificial Boy
Join date: 6 Apr 2006
Posts: 865
08-16-2007 12:36
From: Brodsky Zapedzki
Sorry, but I can't believe this.

Before WSE banned Ginko from buying back his own bonds at a discount, we had posters coming in setting price targets of 0.0000001L per bond.

Now that Ginko can only buy them at 1L we've got posters coming in saying they're worth 2L.
Your disbelief is well-founded. NP can cancel all bonds at L$1 each at any time, regardless of market price. It is impossible for the bonds to exceed L$1 unless NP is not paying attention or he just wants to throw money away.
From: GPB Prospectus
...While the bonds do not expire, it is possible for the company to cancel them by paying a liquidation dividend of L$1 per share...
_____________________
http://slnamewatch.com — Second Life Last Name Tracking — Email Alerts — Famous People Lookup — http://adz.secondlifekid.com/ — Artificial Boy — Personal Blog
From: Tofu Linden
Hmm, there's nothing really helpful there, but thanks for pasting.
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 12:39
From: Brodsky Zapedzki
Sorry, but I can't believe this.

Before WSE banned Ginko from buying back his own bonds at a discount, we had posters coming in setting price targets of 0.0000001L per bond.

Now that Ginko can only buy them at 1L we've got posters coming in saying they're worth 2L.


This threads jumps around a lot. Ya, the forums aren't the best place to discuss this topic. The wiki page will help to get everybody on the same page.

I looked at the GPB, and it was as high as L$26. It went as low at L$0.10. It is on the rise, at the moment.

The point people seem to miss is that the number of shares of GPB is determined by actual L$ investments in Ginko prior to GPB.

Please provide details where there is lack of actual L$ that is being accounted as shares. This is what is critical right now.
Adz Childs
Artificial Boy
Join date: 6 Apr 2006
Posts: 865
08-16-2007 12:41
From: Dzonatas Sol
Please provide details where there is lack of actual L$ that is being accounted as shares. This is what is critical right now.
You want us to provide evidence that something does not exist? *holds out empty hand* There! See? It's nothing!
From: Dzonatas Sol
I looked at the GPB, and it was as high as L$26. It went as low at L$0.10. It is on the rise, at the moment.
You know it split, right? OMG.
_____________________
http://slnamewatch.com — Second Life Last Name Tracking — Email Alerts — Famous People Lookup — http://adz.secondlifekid.com/ — Artificial Boy — Personal Blog
From: Tofu Linden
Hmm, there's nothing really helpful there, but thanks for pasting.
Dzonatas Sol
Visual Learner
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 507
08-16-2007 12:42
From: Colette Meiji
:rolleyes: Your just playing games now.


*sigh*
Brodsky Zapedzki
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 337
08-16-2007 12:43
From: Dzonatas Sol
I looked at the GPB, and it was as high as L$26.

Yes, before the 1:100 split = 0.26 after the split.
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 23