I did not see any indication in the OP that any sim's posted rules were being violated.
You did not specify that you were responding to the OP. That isn't a given in board formats such as this one.
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Avatar discrimination |
|
|
Melita Magic
On my own terms.
Join date: 5 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,253
|
11-30-2009 07:32
I did not see any indication in the OP that any sim's posted rules were being violated. You did not specify that you were responding to the OP. That isn't a given in board formats such as this one. |
|
Melita Magic
On my own terms.
Join date: 5 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,253
|
11-30-2009 07:40
And if it were it would be irrelevant anyway. As Chris pointed out there is nothing inherently wrong with discrimination. We speak of people having discriminatory taste as a a positive. There is nothing inherently wrong with denying access to one's private property based on the subjective choices of the property owner. Night clubs do this all the time in real life and it is often a fundamental part of their business model, ditto for some restaurants. Further, in the OPs case, avatar shape is as malleable as and is the equivalent of clothing in real life. It is no more than a chosen expression of self on an extremely individualistic level. It is not an immutable characteristic such as race, gender, age, sexual orientation or gender identification that exists for individuals in real life, nor is it something fundamentally more institutional such as religion or culture. I doubt there is a nation in the world (aside from ones with totalitarian governments) that would force someone to allow him access to their property in an analogous situation in the real world. His POV is a bit self centered and short sighted. Lot of good posts here but this was a standout. First of all - Boxy, you are welcome at my place any time. Anyone is, so long as they follow my rules, which most do not read. Lol. (Just don't be offended if someone tries to sit on you.) This is more analagous to not being admitted or being given a bad table based upon dress (since it's something that *can* be changed, no matter how one feels it might be an aspect of one's psyche/creative/personal expression...it is not an absolute by birth the way...well, what Dagmar said.) I once went to a very 'in' restaurant the stars go to - with someone who chose to wear a lookalike to the Seinfeld 'puffy shirt.' Y'know, I had always said I wouldn't be one of 'those women' who tell their man what to wear...We went in and were seated but suddenly someone dour looking came up and told us we were being 'reseated.' We were unceremoniously shown to the dank corner roomlet. I looked around...it was fashion hell in there. I realised we were put in with 'the tourists.' (gasp) I could've cared less, *if* we'd been put there first of all: we were just hungry and wanted to eat. I don't care about 'table politics' the food tastes the same anywhere. My date had wanted a good steak and that was the nearest and best place. Anyhow, the way it was done - *absolutely no* effort on their part to be discreet - insulted my sense of dignity so - we left. And went to a diner. Did I sue? No, that was their business and they had a no Seinfeld Shirt policy apparently. Interesting topic though. Why can't research students be this creative in their thread writing as the OP here? |
|
Seven Okelli
last days of pompeii
Join date: 4 Dec 2008
Posts: 2,300
|
11-30-2009 07:47
Interesting topic though. Why can't research students be this creative in their thread writing as the OP here? He had a stake in what he was asking. The students generally don't. One who was different and interesting was here: /327/56/342724/1.html I think she is still looking to interview people. Inworld. |
|
Melita Magic
On my own terms.
Join date: 5 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,253
|
11-30-2009 07:52
He had a stake in what he was asking. The students generally don't. One who was different and interesting was here: /327/56/342724/1.html I think she is still looking to interview people. Inworld. Ah. I remember that thread. I meant to give her a buzz. Thanks for the reminder! And well put. Their disinterest shows in their dull as dishwater threads. And lack of follow-up (in the forums at least.) Most read like kids wanting us to do their homework. Or their research shows a blaring lack of knowledge of SL, and its residents. Or is wayyy too vague to know how to reply to. |
|
Esquievel Easterwood
Deer in the headlights
Join date: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 220
|
11-30-2009 17:16
Come on now, what would you say to a nice cup of tea? |
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-01-2009 09:05
We went in and were seated but suddenly someone dour looking came up and told us we were being 'reseated.' _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Kushaba Southpaw
Registered User
Join date: 9 Nov 2009
Posts: 2
|
12-03-2009 21:23
people who discriminate against other odd looking avatars or furry avatars have problems wiht accepting things that THEY CAN NOT CHANGE! and yet thats why they push those rules. its not your fault it their fault. if they can't deal with it then that's THEIR problem. i say F***k them all. if they can't like me for who i am then they must be as shallow IRL as the must be ISL.
|
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
12-03-2009 21:53
people who discriminate against other odd looking avatars or furry avatars have problems wiht accepting things that THEY CAN NOT CHANGE! and yet thats why they push those rules. its not your fault it their fault. if they can't deal with it then that's THEIR problem. i say F***k them all. if they can't like me for who i am then they must be as shallow IRL as the must be ISL. But do we ever liek someone for "who they are"? I mean maybe you arent giving them a chance to explain why they dont liek you. It takes time and effort doesnt it? I cant get to grips liking anyone until I've taken them apart and know as much as I can about them. _____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Maggie McArdle
FIOS hates puppies
Join date: 8 May 2006
Posts: 2,855
|
12-03-2009 21:59
i have several different avatars ranging from a tiny siamese cat to a hulking cyberman. but when i am invited to a place i am not familiar with, i "dress" appropriately. in those cases it is not about my SL, but theirs. as a guest i will put on the human ava until it is appropriate to not do so.
_____________________
There's, uh, probably a lot of things you didn't know about lindens. Another, another interesting, uh, lindenism, uh, there are only three jobs available to a linden. The first is making shoes at night while, you know, while the old cobbler sleeps.You can bake cookies in a tree. But the third job, some call it, uh, "the show" or "the big dance," it's the profession that every linden aspires to.
|
|
Lindal Kidd
Dances With Noobs
Join date: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 8,371
|
12-04-2009 07:01
Well, if you went to a club in real life, and were turned away because they didn't like how you looked, how would you feel? Sure, you can change your appearance on Second Life, but that's not the point. And yes, I understand that Second Life is not entirely comparable to real life, but in this instance, I would say the same principle applies. People should have the freedom to choose how they look, providing it does not have a negative impact on other users. At the end of the day, my avatar does not inconvenience any other user. (i.e. it's not large) In addition, it's not obscene and cannot cause offense. So what's the problem? The fact that they're allowed to ban people for whatever they like, does not change the fact that this is a form of discrimination. In the same way that it would be discrimination if they chose to disallow fat people from accessing their sim. Whilst it may not be a violation of Linden Lab's Terms of Service, it still leads me to question whether or not it's morally acceptable. And that was my motive for creating this thread. Ex It may not be nice, but yes, it's morally acceptable. It's THEIR LAND. They pay the money, they get to make the rules. Sure it's discrimination, by the exact definition of the word, and so what? They can admit anyone or no one, eject or ban anyone they please. You want a place that's accepting of cardboard boxes, buy your own land, my rectangular friend. By the way, there is a nice articulated cardboard Boxbot avatar in your Library. It's one of the basic starter avatars. Wear that and you'll be able to do more cool dance moves. _____________________
It's still My World and My Imagination! So there.
Lindal Kidd |
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-04-2009 07:12
It may not be nice, but yes, it's morally acceptable. It's THEIR LAND. They pay the money, they get to make the rules. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Lindal Kidd
Dances With Noobs
Join date: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 8,371
|
12-04-2009 07:23
Just because someone is paying for the right to be a jerk... that doesn't make them less of a jerk. Agreed. It's why I don't go to Frank's any more...I don't like their dress code or the way they enforce it. But my point is that they're free to be a jerk, because they ARE paying for that right. I don't have to like it, or go there, but it's their privilege. Most of all, there are no societal restrictions or anti-discrimination laws that apply. As for me, my land has no restrictions. Man, woman, furry, or cardboard box, all are welcome. Unless you prove to be a jerk. _____________________
It's still My World and My Imagination! So there.
Lindal Kidd |
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-04-2009 08:06
Most of all, there are no societal restrictions or anti-discrimination laws that apply. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
12-04-2009 08:23
It may not be nice, but yes, it's morally acceptable. It's THEIR LAND. They pay the money, they get to make the rules. .... That's getting close to - It's morally acceptable because it isn't against the law. On the particular issue: I once went to an art gallery opening as a Grendel's Tiger - quadruped. Nobody seemed to notice a tiger in the room. I should have gone as an elephant. However, if the organisers had said to me something like "We're trying to RP a RL gallery here." I'd have departed/changed no problem. Even if they had ejected me, I wouldn't have got into a huff about it, _____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589 |
|
Lindal Kidd
Dances With Noobs
Join date: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 8,371
|
12-04-2009 09:06
I don't think that's related to the fact that it's their property. It's because in SL there are very few societal restrictions and no anti-discrimination laws, period. If it was their property in RL they would have all kinds of restrictions on what kind of jerkiness they could get away with. No, they wouldn't. If I want to run a business in RL, then yes, there are those restrictions. But I can still be a prejudiced, discriminatory jerk on my private property. Hey, you cardboard boxes! Git offa my lawn! _____________________
It's still My World and My Imagination! So there.
Lindal Kidd |
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-04-2009 09:30
If I want to run a business in RL, then yes, there are those restrictions. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Blot Brickworks
The end of days
Join date: 28 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,076
|
12-04-2009 10:04
There are plenty of places to go as a box and not get greif.This is one of them.
![]() see you don't stand out at all. _____________________
![]() Blots Plot @ THE OLD MERMAID INN http://slurl.com/secondlife/Dunbeath /206/85/26 http://phillplasma.com/2009/05/01/blots-plot-the-old-mermaid-inn/ |
|
Lindal Kidd
Dances With Noobs
Join date: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 8,371
|
12-04-2009 10:40
But if you run a business in SL you can refuse service to all the boxbots you want. "They'll have to wait outside" "Huh?" "Your boxes. We don't serve their kind here." _____________________
It's still My World and My Imagination! So there.
Lindal Kidd |
|
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
|
12-04-2009 11:11
There are plenty of places to go as a box and not get greif.This is one of them. ![]() see you don't stand out at all. _____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/ |
|
Seven Okelli
last days of pompeii
Join date: 4 Dec 2008
Posts: 2,300
|
12-04-2009 11:23
There are several businesses in my neighborhood where they will not serve people who are talking on their cell phone.
There is a gym near my house that is open only to women. I think all bars have the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason. (I'm talking RL, btw.) |
|
Innula Zenovka
Registered User
Join date: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,825
|
12-04-2009 11:25
But if you run a business in SL you can refuse service to all the boxbots you want. |
|
Milla Janick
Empress Of The Universe
Join date: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 3,075
|
12-04-2009 12:09
There are several businesses in my neighborhood where they will not serve people who are talking on their cell phone. There is a gym near my house that is open only to women. I think all bars have the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason. (I'm talking RL, btw.) A business that is open to the public has to show a legitimate business concern to refuse service. They may not arbitrarily refuse to serve people. Refusing to serve someone who is yapping on their cell phone may be a legitimate reason. Sooner or later a troublemaker will sue them over it and we'll find out. The gym is probably a private club and not open to the public. _____________________
![]() http://www.avatarsunited.com/avatars/milla-janick All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... |