https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/land/blog/2009/04/23/conclusion-to-the-blog-post-on-bots
So the question -- how will this affect your Second Life?
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Bye bye traffic bots |
|
Marianne McCann
Feted Inner Child
![]() Join date: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 7,145
|
04-23-2009 11:30
https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/land/blog/2009/04/23/conclusion-to-the-blog-post-on-bots
So the question -- how will this affect your Second Life? _____________________
![]() "There's nothing objectionable nor illegal in having a child-like avatar in itself and we must assume innocence until proof of the contrary." - Lewis PR Linden "If you find children offensive, you're gonna have trouble in this world ![]() |
Damien1 Thorne
Registered User
Join date: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,877
|
04-23-2009 11:37
https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/land/blog/2009/04/23/conclusion-to-the-blog-post-on-bots So the question -- how will this affect your Second Life? Phil will be lonely? _____________________
As we fade into the darkness...
|
Tex Nasworthy
Udder Disgrace
![]() Join date: 2 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,330
|
04-23-2009 11:43
Thanks for the link Mari!
I had a chuckle at Damien's comment. First thing I thought of is "I wonder what Phil will have to say about this?" _____________________
.
Forums Users Love Lustfully |
Conifer Dada
Hiya m'dooks!
Join date: 6 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,716
|
04-23-2009 11:45
I once turned up at a beach club where there was just one person dancing - another woman. Presently a man turned up - a profile check showed that he was a newbie.
Anyway he started asking the other woman for a dance. I happened to know that she's a dancebot who's always there. He asked a dancebot to dance, but he didn't ask me!!!!! _____________________
|
Whimsycallie Pegler
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,003
|
04-23-2009 11:46
I am personally glad they are trying to crack down on gaming the system, but like most LL policies it ends up to vague. I am sure the enforcement of this will be just as erratic as the enforcement of most.
What exactly is too many bots? What are legitmate uses? Personally a large clothing store (1/2 sim to full sim) having six model bot with different outfits is reasonable, but the same amount for a 512 or 1024 store would not be. Now that is completely based on what I think is reasonable. It is totally subjective. I have no clue what others think reasonable or what LL thinks is reasonable. I have no guidelines to go to and figure out what is reasonable as far as I know. Heck if I am a noob I have no idea there are other rules outside of the T.O.S., but it seems to me that LL is begginging to make a bunch of these hidden rules. Yes, I think some rules and guidelines are good and neccesary. I just think the way they have been done so far is atrocious. |
Meade Paravane
Hedgehog
![]() Join date: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 4,845
|
04-23-2009 11:55
/me claps!!
_____________________
Tired of shouting clubs and lucky chairs? Vote for llParcelSay!!!
- Go here: http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SVC-1224 - If you see "if you were logged in.." on the left, click it and log in - Click the "Vote for it" link on the left |
Desmond Shang
Guvnah of Caledon
![]() Join date: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 5,250
|
04-23-2009 12:01
Hm. This just makes The Game a bit more difficult and a bit more interesting for bot runners.
I suspect that traffic bots will be easily dealt with, but land bots? That's going to be interesting. It doesn't take much... games like Lineage2 still suffer from botting and so forth, where bots can earn you a permaban. It's like unlawful drugs ~ as long as people keep paying for drugs, there will be a drug war. As long as there is profit in bots, either direct or via customers... there will be bots enabling illicit activity. Watch for the rise of prim landscanners again ~ high speed, high altitude invisible things too fast to even see. Wow, I wish I was Weedy right now with those hundreds of microparcels. I remember the old days where certain oldbies (not Weedy) would launch swarms of those things from microparcels, which could report available parcels quickly and easily. Voight Kampff tests, anyone? _____________________
![]() Steampunk Victorian, Well-Mannered Caledon! |
Ralektra Breda
Template Painter
![]() Join date: 7 Apr 2008
Posts: 1,875
|
04-23-2009 12:06
Well I don't use bots, so the only affect it would have on me would to move me a bit higher in search, I think. Depending of course on the other changes that will affect search. I'm waiting to see what those are!
_____________________
![]() Mainstore: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Phantasm/51/164/501 http://rbzdesign.blogspot.com/ I'm not a designer IRL, but I RP one on SL! |
Osprey Therian
I want capslocklock
![]() Join date: 6 Jul 2004
Posts: 5,049
|
04-23-2009 12:09
I remember the old days where certain oldbies (not Weedy) would launch swarms of those things from microparcels, which could report available parcels quickly and easily. I had one of those on my doorstep, literally. When things changed and it was put on sale the for sale sign looked like it was MINE. I (over)paid for 16m2 and tiered up to accomodate it. _____________________
|
Tim Gagliano
Registered User
Join date: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 95
|
04-23-2009 12:14
https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/land/blog/2009/04/23/conclusion-to-the-blog-post-on-bots So the question -- how will this affect your Second Life? It is about BLEEPING TIME! OMG!!! I can think of a few places that will finally suffer and come back to earth in respect to search as well as a user heading for a populated area just to find out that.. hey... they are just standing not doing anything! Sure the ARs are now going to increase... ok I can see how the Lindens are going to be busy for a while.. but I can assure you SL will be a different place real soon when it comes to overall load ![]() |
Scott Savira
Not Scott Saliva
Join date: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 357
|
04-23-2009 12:15
From what I'm reading so far I think it looks good. I was especially happy to see this line:
"Going forward we are going to look at ways to allow you to voluntarily identify to us that an account is a Bot, so that we can remove it from Traffic completely." That let's people keep things like bot "models" in their stores and can keep them as long as they identify them as bots. |
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
![]() Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
04-23-2009 12:17
I'll run out of people to throw LOLCubes at until they crash. (>_<
![]() _____________________
Somewhere in this world; there is someone having some good clean fun doing the one thing you hate the most. (^_^)y
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ferguson/54/237/94 |
Lightwave Valkyrie
Registered User
![]() Join date: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 666
|
04-23-2009 12:18
lol this is typical no real answers and after all this time they still dont get it.
bots are ok and traffic is staying so we have no change except now people will be abuse reporting more _____________________
L$ is the root of all evil
videos work! thanks SL ![]() |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
04-23-2009 12:24
I'm actually concerned about this:
We know that being able to safely transfer Land between accounts is very important and so we have decided to provide a safe way to do this on the website, later in 2009 . In addition we also intend to move other forms of Land sale to the website, including allowing auctions between residents for the first time which we're really excited about. We'll be talking more about this soon. So for now we are not going to remove Land Bots; we expect that as we develop the web tools further, by the end of 2009 Land Bots will cease to work as far as buying up parcels is concerned. ![]() They're increasingly moving towards having the "2d web" take over from the in-world "3d web" they originally promoted. What's next... eliminating in-world sales in favor of XStreetSL? _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
04-23-2009 12:25
It's just a fig-leaf.
LL are just slapping down the most inescapably obvious form of Search-gaming. No more than that. _____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589 |
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
04-23-2009 12:30
I'm actually concerned about this: This implies that they're eliminating in-world land buying and selling completely. It's going to be pushed to their auction site, and every time you want to transfer land you'll have to go through their eBay site even if you're just trying to swap parcels with a friend. ![]() They're increasingly moving towards having the "2d web" take over from the in-world "3d web" they originally promoted. What's next... eliminating in-world sales in favor of XStreetSL? It's silly. Moving land sales to a website just changes the buying interface from an in-world bot to a web-based bot/program. _____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589 |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
04-23-2009 12:35
Moving land sales to a website just changes the buying interface from an in-world bot to a web-based bot/program. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Meade Paravane
Hedgehog
![]() Join date: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 4,845
|
04-23-2009 12:36
It's silly. Moving land sales to a website just changes the buying interface from an in-world bot to a web-based bot/program. Do we know how much that sort of change would impact in-world services? Could be zero, could be a lot - I honestly don't know.. _____________________
Tired of shouting clubs and lucky chairs? Vote for llParcelSay!!!
- Go here: http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SVC-1224 - If you see "if you were logged in.." on the left, click it and log in - Click the "Vote for it" link on the left |
Eric Stuart
Registered User
Join date: 5 Jul 2006
Posts: 203
|
04-23-2009 12:47
Thank god.
The DCWF gets bogged down all the time by people who put "wrestling" in their land info (like mud wrestling, arm wrestling, or whatever else) and then have nothing but bots. We pull 15k on most days with no bots at all, pure legit traffic, and yet we're 5th on the list at times, under 2 clubs with bots, a store with bots, and a wrestling/boxing "club"...with bots. However, LL stating that people can't report when they notice botting it just ridiculous. Your users are the best way to get this info and handle it. Instead, they're going to monitor traffic numbers? How will they know which is legit and which isn't? If they want to be effective, allowing reporting by others will need to happen. Beyond that, good job...its about 3 years too fucking late...but good job. |
Ashe1 Writer
Searching & Seeking
![]() Join date: 20 Jul 2007
Posts: 1,138
|
04-23-2009 12:49
Thanks for the link Mari! I had a chuckle at Damien's comment. First thing I thought of is "I wonder what Phil will have to say about this?" Yes ![]() ![]() _____________________
Ashe
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
![]() Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
04-23-2009 13:02
https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/land/blog/2009/04/23/conclusion-to-the-blog-post-on-bots So the question -- how will this affect your Second Life? It depends. How will LL manage to F**k up implementing it? _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
Rhaorth Antonelli
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 7,425
|
04-23-2009 13:07
I also like how they will let us tag an account as a bot, so it can be used without affecting the traffic (ie models and such)
I have a feeling if someone is running 6 models or whatnot, they will end up being told to shut them down until they can tag them as a bot, to remove them from search. Otherwise stores will use "models" to game the traffic, instead of hidden bots, we will see them. It is nice to know they are thinking ahead on this. how will it affect my SL, well I think it will make things more interesting to see what happens with search with the bots removed. _____________________
Morpheus Linden: But then I change avs pretty often too, so often, I look nothing like my avatar. ![]() They are taking away the forums... it could be worse, they could be taking away the forums AND Second Life... |
Kazimir MacMoragh
Registered User
Join date: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 34
|
04-23-2009 13:07
I don't want to imply that I speak for Phil, nor attempt to put words in his mouth, but if *I* were a self-proclaimed "bot runner", here is what I would say.
OK, the traffic bots in the sky are gone. So long, farewell, it's been good to know you. But since traffic is still a metric, and there is still value in having traffic a high number because it drives volume to the business, then other means will be employed to increase traffice. So say hello to camping pads, lucky chairs, paid models, etc., and all their lag-heavy prims, attachments, and scripts. |
Rhaorth Antonelli
Registered User
Join date: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 7,425
|
04-23-2009 13:09
Thank god. The DCWF gets bogged down all the time by people who put "wrestling" in their land info (like mud wrestling, arm wrestling, or whatever else) and then have nothing but bots. We pull 15k on most days with no bots at all, pure legit traffic, and yet we're 5th on the list at times, under 2 clubs with bots, a store with bots, and a wrestling/boxing "club"...with bots. However, LL stating that people can't report when they notice botting it just ridiculous. Your users are the best way to get this info and handle it. Instead, they're going to monitor traffic numbers? How will they know which is legit and which isn't? If they want to be effective, allowing reporting by others will need to happen. Beyond that, good job...its about 3 years too fucking late...but good job. they did not say we "can't" report it, they said we do not need to I am sure many many folks will still report it, thinking they are helping LL _____________________
Morpheus Linden: But then I change avs pretty often too, so often, I look nothing like my avatar. ![]() They are taking away the forums... it could be worse, they could be taking away the forums AND Second Life... |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
04-23-2009 13:13
It depends. How will LL manage to F**k up implementing it? _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |