From: StoneSelf Karuna
it could improve enforcement of the tos/cs by having move people authorized to do something about. there are only so many lindens to go around, and only so much us$ to hire new ones.
We all know this.
But still this is not a strong enough point to elicit a government.
Especially one that can be manipulated like oh so many other programs like Ratings.
Ratings were a great idea until someone figured out how to game it and destroy the very foundation that it was built to represent so please
From: someone
it could improve the flow of information between ll and residents.
Why is a government needed when simply modifying the informational exchange tools would be a much better way to gage and to communicate with LL with it’s current society.
How?
By setting up polling tools within world when a major issue is brought up.
For instance: Making mandatory polls when a person logs in.
How would these polls be determined?
Who would advocate them being posted?
Simply put a Linden would based on setting up a forum of debate on specific topics that have come to light to linden lab that needs addressing across the board.
However doing this would enlighten quite a few of what’s being discussed.
If they fail to communicate back appropriately through those mandatory polls it will be of there own undoing and not a select panel of government officials that deem what is and what is not important.
From: someone
it could help ll run projects like the mentors, live helpers, and instructors without having to use paid employee hours to run those kinds of programs.
Um, that’s what those positions are made for and I am sure that a Linden Liaison would be rather upset to know your advocating the removal of their job especially in an environment where people are loosing jobs every day. Additionally in the first part of your post did you not just say that there were not enough lindens to go around? Please explain the reasoning behind this 180-degree turn about.
Do you think Linden Lab does not have the capital to maintain these vaulted salaries?
Again this is a weak response considering LL Liaisons have access to information that none of the rest of the world has.
This makes them viable to dispute resolution and to verifying who is and who is not a valid candidate for these positions in the Mentors or Live Help.
Thus what could a player controlling these programs offer or put on the table to enhance it?
Please do elaborate.
From: someone
it could provide an organized means of directing all the people who would love to do things on a voluntary basis for ll.
Is this not simply a rewording of the aforementioned reply without the conjecture of removing a Linden from office so to speak?
From: someone
all of those things could make sl better.
With my reply thus far how?
So far you have eluded to increasing communications without offering a solution, latter on though you offer adding an additional layer of communications which through interpretation most times is lost on the final presentation.
You have alluded to removal of Linden employee’s without substantial reason for their replacement. Yet you offer the debate there is only so much money to go around thus eliminating an already short staff you expect for things to get better.
You have reiterated your post twice and yet offer no substance to your argument thus far.
From: someone
However, as people have knee-jerked over and over, there is a down side to all this.
but that also means a government could mitigate these problems.
Again, to mitigate you need authority and with authority comes power and with power considering our past experiences within the frame work of Second Life it’s truly not a viable option.
From: someone
casting the issue in terms of power is a fair way to light one aspect of the problem. and it is a fair light to cast.
but it is not the only light.
No, it may not be the only light to cast but it’s the first stepping stone in casting down why a government is not needed.
From: someone
while i don't hold to the paranoid position that a fic exists as unified conspiratorial cabal, it is true that those people who can get the attention of the lindens for whatever reason (e.g. association, friendship, yelling the loudest, being popular, paying lotsa money, contracting for the lindens, etc) can get better results from the lindens.
I find this rather funny considering your other post that outlines where the “common Joe” elicited a request and in turn received a response from a Linden where as none of your usual suspects for the FIC were involved. Thus I firmly believe the opposite of your statement here that you are concerned that there may be a FIC and that you hare deeply rooted in the analogy that Prokofy/Unsung or what ever their name has proclaimed.
From: someone
this does raise the question, why should those few get the most benefit from the lindens? why not find a way to give everyone a greater voice in how the sl commons are run?
This so far has been the only valid statement you have made thus far.
I have no argument on this statement as its something I wonder myself but the method to solve it is not a player run government over the entire world of Second Life.
Personal thoughts
I do believe you are confusing government for the ability to communicate.
But that’s the thing a government will do is add an additional dimension to communications with LL
Unfortunately, hampering or impeding any future progress due to the aforementioned layer.
Why because a government layer between players and LL is not needed. If it were then why was it not established from Jump Street?
Adding a layer will merely bog down communications versus helping it in the future.
I’m sorry I thought I had posted the points previously and apparently after reviewing the forum I may have arbitrarily set them aside until as Ulrika stated I calmed down.
Currently my understanding of your post is simply this.
A. You noted not enough lindens to handle issues as they stand.
B. You initiate that it will improve communications but you offer a layer to impede it.
C. With the knowledge that there are not enough lindens you tout that we should let players do for free what some lindens are getting paid to do thus eliminating their jobs. (Invoked twice even.)
D. You discuss mitigation, which directly points to players being in control over other players.
E. You correlate the FIC with being the harbingers of bending LL’s ear when in another thread you directly counter that with a link to other posts that show that anyone can bend their ear.
F. In other posts you initiate the claim that I don’t understand your point of view but ironically its quite clear when you’re talking in circles.
As for me my points are quite simple.
1. Poly-Sci forum opens the doors to circular rhetoric such as this
2. Player run governments where players have control over others has no place in SL Period.
3. Debating semantics of the terminology of the word “Government’ illicit heated debate at its very mention when in essence the word for the most part considering SL proper is misused.
Do these sort of clear things up for you Stone?
Shadow