Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Consistent Message: SL is/isn't a game

Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
08-25-2005 18:21
Nolan, you can stop with the "they" business.

I've made my points about the personal attacks, and also about the problem of a Linden correcting a player on his terminology.

It's not my goal to batter these people into the ground, and yet, that is what happens when I stay in the debate, and keep reiterating my points.

Nobody has done a crime big enough to deserve any more battering from me; they've already received more than enough. And so that I don't dish out any more in the course of staying in the debate, I'm going to exit.

coco

P.S. Exactly, Jillian. I'm agreeing with you on that. And also that the Lindens can and should make it clear to the public that it isn't a game in the EQ sense of the word.
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Jillian Callahan
Rotary-winged Neko Girl
Join date: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,766
08-25-2005 18:25
From: Cocoanut Koala
Nolan, you can stop with the "they" business.

I've made my points about the personal attacks, and also about the problem of a Linden correcting a player on his terminology.

It's not my goal to batter these people into the ground, and yet, that is what happens when I stay in the debate, and keep reiterating my points.

Nobody has done a crime big enough to deserve any more battering from me; they've already received more than enough. And so that I don't dish out any more in the course of staying in the debate, I'm going to exit.

coco

P.S. Exactly, Jillian. I'm agreeing with you on that. And also that the Lindens can and should make it clear to the public that it isn't a game in the EQ sense of the word.
I'm confused, how can you agree with me and yet say there's a problem with a Linden correcting someone's terminology?
_____________________
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
08-25-2005 18:39
From: Cocoanut Koala
Nolan, you can stop with the "they" business.

Cocoanut, you don't get to write my posts. You can write your own posts. These forums don't exist for either (a) your critique of my writing style or (b) you to teach me how to write. You don't get to tell me that I can't use examples, or mention any experience I have had.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Cienna Samiam
Bah.
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,316
08-25-2005 18:45
From: Cocoanut Koala
It's not my goal to batter these people into the ground, and yet, that is what happens when I stay in the debate, and keep reiterating my points.


~yawn~

SL is a game. It is a way to pass time, entertain oneself, and generally escape the real world.

LL needs to learn that the fastest possible way to insure that is the label and thought that sticks is to insist no one think so or say so.

If LL wishes to market themselves as something other than a game, they'd do well to come up with a short and easy to swallow label which is used consistantly in all communications. There would be no need to make a pointed statement, the consistancy would speak for itself and, eventually, take root.

That they have not done so is the only reason the label 'game' persists.
_____________________
Just remember, they only care about you when you're buying sims.
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
08-25-2005 19:01
(Just popping in to say - Excellent point, Cienna! That is rather a mouthful, that business about platforms and monetizing.)

(And since I'm here, Nolan - you can stop insinuating that I am a paranoid conspiracy theorist with your "they" stuff. I DO get to tell you to stop that.)

coconotreallyhere
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Catherine Cotton
Tis Elfin
Join date: 2 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,001
08-25-2005 19:14
From: Darren McLuhan
What follows is the perspective of a person new to SL, who doesn't know any of the people on this thread, in game or out of game.

I think that SL falls comfortably within the realm of online games, and also within the loosely defined concept denoted by the word "game." Jake Reitveld was right to cite a dictionary definition. It was pertinent here. Anyone who insists on a more narrow definition for the word needs to cite some sort of authority for that.

It bothers me that the Lindens want to call SL "... a platform that is used to create content, socialize and network and allow residents to monetize their efforts by selling their content and/or services."

That just sounds really unattractive to me, especially the part about creating content and selling it and services. I don't know, it just seems kind of cold, and makes me wonder if I want to hang around SL much longer. Perhaps it is not the absence of the word "game" that bothers me so much, so much as it is the absence of other words like "play" or "entertainment," or "relax," or "fun."

I visit online games to seek play, entertainment, relaxation, enjoyment. For me in SL, that includes the fun of playing around with building, texturing, or scripting. I suppose to someone else, the same activity would be called content creation, and it could then be "monetized," whatever that means, exactly. It wouldn't bother me if others treat it seriously, as long as they don't prevent me from having some of my own fun, in the process.

However, if the proprietors of SL have a view of this place, that is primarily business-oriented, and it is really about helping people make real money selling one other goods and services, then I don't think I want to be here. Well, I expect the Lindens to be about business, since they are running one. But I'm not very interested if their primary offering to me is a business platform. I'd much rather play a game.

I think the concerns of Catherine Cotton and Cocoanut Koala are valid, and those individuals should be treated with respect. I don't see that happening in this thread. Instead, I see a rather disturbing display of bullying by a number of people. I can completely understand why both Catherine and Cocoanut have been driven to yelling in frustration. They've made some good points, expressed some valid concerns, but they're simply being dismissed, and condescended to. No one else has to agree with them, just treat them with respect.



I couldn't IM you presently, but I wanted to personaly say Thank you! for your well written post. I feel a lot of the things you do I realy wish that this sudden change had not advisely affected my over all view of SL but it has.

I have given this subjust a great amount of thought in the past day or so especialy. Again I am left with more questions than answers.
Is SL destined to follow the path of There.com that ultimataly turned off the player base?

Will the next step of being taken seriously as "monetized" to which to make money as the goal. Will that mean that those hiding behind their "gamer" screen names will now be forsed to be viewed as their rl selves in order to "legalize" sl as anything more than a game?

Will we see the leader boads, popular places, picks, events, non traditional av's, non human av's... all go by the way side? Since those are things are offered in "games"


***Exactly how serious are we to take this online CAD with Chat program?

More questions than answers.

Cat :)
_____________________
Lordfly Digeridoo
Prim Orchestrator
Join date: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 3,628
08-25-2005 19:30
Good grief. This thread comes up with a different name every 3 months, with the same results: 325 posts of insane bantering back and forth until eventually it breaks down into personal attacks or it ends without a consensus.

Synopsis: SL is not a game. It's not a world. It's not a developer's platform. It's a THINGIE.

That's it.

Seriously.

Everyone plays SL differently. Some go to clubs. Some build. Some script. Some make their living off it. Some use it to blow off steam.

It's everything and nothing at once.

Ergo, both sides are wrong.

Or, colliquially (I wanted to use that word today), it's a dessert topping AND a floor wax.

LF
_____________________
----
http://www.lordfly.com/
http://www.twitter.com/lordfly
http://www.plurk.com/lordfly
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
08-25-2005 19:33
From: Cocoanut Koala
Oh goodie!

I've now been around long enough to have "history."


I don't see someone saying this before you. Who are you quoting? I see Nolan saying "Your join date tells me that you probably don't know much of the history which brings us to this point in these discussions." , but that is no different than half a dozen other people telling you in other threads over the months that you don't know the history of SL. So I don't get your point in this sentence?


From: someone

In the past, when as a newer player I went to the defense of people getting piled upon for no good reason, I was told there was a "history" I was unaware of, and the inference was, if I just knew that "history," and how horrible those people really were, then I'd jump on the pile, too.


There *is* a history here you don't know about. But knowing that history should never make you be or say what you would not otherwise. That was *never* what people told you. No. You should learn history so you know who *we* are. But honestly, I feel you don't give a flip about us, so I don't think you ever will.

From: someone

It is because I won't jump on it - and ONLY because of this - that I am on the bottom of the same pile.


No. It is because you are full of sell pity, ignorance, and a holier than thou attitude. You refuse for even a moment to think anyone that disagree's with you could *possibly* have a point. You sling insults and threats like they were candy. You do not respect other people, you do not allow others to have an opinion, you contantly remind us of how wrong we are and how right you are, and you never stop complaining.

That is why people may not like you. It is at least why I have grown to not like you. Even though I tried. And hell, I like everyone.

Most new people get along just fine here. There is not this mass picking on newbies that you and a couple of others like to claim. There was no one "picking" on you.

Don't worry about most new people Coco. Most everyone will like "them" just fine (as history proves). Worry about yourself. Worry about why people may not like *you* if you must. But most other "new" people will be just fine. Because they (meaning most new / old / general population of people) don't have an attitude of "Everyone sucks but me" like you seem to.

Sorry everyone. But I'm just sick of Coco condecending everyone and spreading such horrid negativity. I had to say something! :mad:
_____________________
*hugs everyone*
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
08-25-2005 19:39
I just wanted to take a moment to thank Pendari, Weedy, Enabran, Ardith and Cris for making such excellent points! (In other words, your TOPS - because you agree with me!)

Thank you!

Hugs-n-kisses,

Friends for all time, Nolan Nash
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Margaret Mfume
I.C.
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
08-25-2005 19:39
The Thingie is in transition. The best way to get to what it wants to be is not with semantics but to understand in which ways it is a game and to define what steps are needed to get itself past that.
_____________________
hush
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
08-25-2005 19:42
From: Nolan Nash
I just wanted to take a moment to thank Pendari, Weedy, Enabran, Ardith and Cris for making such excellent points! (In other words, your TOPS - because you agree with me!)

Thank you!

Hugs-n-kisses,

Friends for all time, Nolan Nash


Wait for it...


Wait for it...





Hold on...


Boom.

_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
08-25-2005 19:48
From: Cocoanut Koala
And if it is true, that no one ever receives warnings when they make clear and unwarranted personal attacks and character assasinations against other posters, then I will lose faith entirely in the Lindens, and consider that perhaps we might be better off with legal assistance.



Legal action for Forum posts? Even Judge Judy would toss that crap out. LOL
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
08-25-2005 19:49
From: Eboni Khan
Legal action for Forum posts? Even Judge Judy would toss that crap out. LOL

Thanks Eboni!

Hugs!
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
08-25-2005 19:52
From: Pendari Lorentz
There *is* a history here you don't know about. But knowing that history should never make you be or say what you would not otherwise. That was *never* what people told you. No. You should learn history so you know who *we* are. But honestly, I feel you don't give a flip about us, so I don't think you ever will.

No. It is because you are full of sell pity, ignorance, and a holier than thou attitude. You refuse for even a moment to think anyone that disagree's with you could *possibly* have a point. You sling insults and threats like they were candy. You do not respect other people, you do not allow others to have an opinion, you contantly remind us of how wrong we are and how right you are, and you never stop complaining.

That is why people may not like you. It is at least why I have grown to not like you. Even though I tried. And hell, I like everyone.

Don't worry about most new people Coco. Most everyone will like "them" just fine (as history proves). Worry about yourself. Worry about why people may not like *you* if you must. But most other "new" people will be just fine. Because they (meaning most new / old / general population of people) don't have an attitude of "Everyone sucks but me" like you seem to.

Sorry everyone. But I'm just sick of Coco condecending everyone and spreading such horrid negativity. I had to say something! :mad:

This is what I call a personal attack.

I AM you Pendari. There is not an "us" and a "Coco." And Nolan was explaining to that guy that the reason he thought Catherine and I sounded reasonable was because he didn't know the "history" of us.

Are you just trying to drag me back in this thread?

Have I called you - or anybody - "full of self-pity, ignorance, and a holier-than-thou attitude"?

That is a personal attack. That is the sort of thing that needs to stop. You can dislike me all you like, Pendari, but it is far from a universal attitude. It is an attitude fostered by a handful of people here.

I am you. I am not an outsider. You can't use that as an excuse for this personal attack.

THAT is what has happened to the others on the bottom of the pile in this forum.

Note that I have never attacked you.

And don't you dare to tell me what I give a flip for and what I don't. I wouldn't be stating my views on something if I didn't care about it.

And guess what Pendari - I don't dislike you. But if I did, I wouldn't feel compelled to state so here, or to fire off personal attacks to support it, simply cause I don't like what you say, and never have, and wish to hear no more.

Do not decide that there is a "coco" and there is an "us," who disagree with coco. I hate to tell you, but this is not a closed society here where you and a few others get to decide who you like and who you don't like, and that means you get to personally attack those you dislike.

I'm a subscriber here with all the rights you have. And that goes for everyone else who comes onto these forums. They all have the right to speak here without getting personal attacks for their trouble.

coco
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
08-25-2005 19:56
From: Nolan Nash
Thanks Eboni!

Hugs!



Shh...

I told you, not in public.
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
08-25-2005 20:00
Second Life is doomed, accept it.

Pinocchio is wooden and my fish died. Sigh.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
08-25-2005 20:01
From: Cocoanut Koala
This is what I call a personal attack.

I AM you Pendari.


You will NEVER be me. You do not know me, you do not act like me, you do not treat others the way that I do, you have not even the slightest knowledge about what makes me tick. Don't *ever* compare yourself to me. I consider *that* a personal attack. So stick that in your rule book. :mad:
_____________________
*hugs everyone*
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
08-25-2005 20:07
You plural, Pendari.

As in, "you need to learn the history of who *we* are."

As in, "you will never give a flip about us."

It isn't a handful of you and everybody you happen to like, and those are the people who own the forums, and I'm not a part of that.

I am part of you.

As is every subscriber who wishes to post on these forums. Without, I might add, personal attack or piling on.

All are equal.

coco
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
08-25-2005 20:08
From: Cocoanut Koala
You plural, Pendari.

As in, "you need to learn the history of who *we* are."

As in, "you will never give a flip about us."

It isn't a handful of you and everybody you happen to like, and those are the people who own the forums, and I'm not a part of that.

I am part of you.

As is every subscriber who wishes to post on these forums. Without, I might add, personal attack or piling on.

All are equal.

coco


I'm confused now. If what you're saying is true...

Where do the dreaded THEY fit in? :confused: :confused: :confused:
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
08-25-2005 20:09
In your mind, Enabran. Unless you've stuck it in your ear by now.

coco

P.S. I am exiting now, though I'm glad I got the opportunity to cheer on Cienna's astute observation, unnoted by anyone else until she did.

If there is anyone else who would like to show the readers how unpopular Coco must be, and why, replete with personal attacks, have at it; I will just report them.

One more comment. How many people do you think this is going to work on? You can't keep this up forever. You can't just keep trying to bully people off with personal attacks. There are going to be too many people with a sense of fairness coming to this game for you to run them all off.
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
08-25-2005 20:15
From: Cocoanut Koala
I will just report them.



Snitches get Stitches





The above statement is in no way a personal attack, just mocking the hall monitor like attitude of reporting everything you don't like. Clicking your way to power!!!
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
08-25-2005 20:18
Remember, Eboni, I was the one who refused to ever report anybody. I was told, how could I criticize the system if I didn't report?

So I'm reporting.

What to do? Not report - get criticized for not using the system. Report - be a snitch. Or - a third option not mentioned overtly - shut up and go away!

I don't like being a snitch, either, obviously. But I like less this business of piling on people in the forums with personal attacks.
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
08-25-2005 20:18
Nope, all are definately NOT equal, in your eyes.

People like Prokofy and Catherine can spew all the damned personal attacks they want, and you never said "boo" to them. In fact, you posted responses to their crap supporting them. Hypocrite - through and through.

Also, miss revisionist, I never said that you using "they" to bolster your weak arguments meant you were a conspiracy theorist.

I said is an incredibly lame and transparent tactic, and it is.

Simply saying "so and so says" carries no weight whatsoever with out references or quotes, none. I am not going to take what you claim in that manner as fact, sorry. Not now, not ever.

If I did, I would be playing into your little charade.

You do not get to define personal attacks toots. The moderators do, and the last time I checked, you last name was not Linden. Not to mention, per the forum guidelines, you can be called a troll, a jerk, a liar, scam artist, etc. What Pendari said to you pales in comparision. I also happen to agree with her one-hundred percent. There's a reason an orange is called an orange.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
08-25-2005 20:19
Here's an idea. Report all you want. But for the love of God, please stop regaling us with stories about it.
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Margaret Mfume
I.C.
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
08-25-2005 20:21
As many times as she has been told to report and let LL deal with personal attacks? Now it's "snitches gets stitches". Geez.
_____________________
hush
1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16