The Rapture, of course, duh! Led by Harry Potter, Winston Smith, and Christina Aguilara.
really? I thought it was going to be Sherman Potter, Will Smith and Gwen Stefani.
thanks for enlightening me.
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Atheists who attack Christianity |
|
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
07-13-2006 05:57
The Rapture, of course, duh! Led by Harry Potter, Winston Smith, and Christina Aguilara. really? I thought it was going to be Sherman Potter, Will Smith and Gwen Stefani. thanks for enlightening me. _____________________
|
Maerl Olmstead
Billybobs #1 Fan
![]() Join date: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 341
|
07-13-2006 06:32
this is just interesting..dont label me!!!< lol>..here goes:
Bible codes, also known as Torah codes, are words, phrases and clusters of words and phrases that some people believe are meaningful and exist intentionally in coded form in the text of the Bible. These codes were made famous by the book The Bible Code, which claims that these codes can predict the future. These claims are strongly doubted by skeptics and by many religious groups. The primary method by which purportedly meaningful messages have been extracted is the Equidistant Letter Sequence (ELS). To obtain an ELS from a text, choose a starting point (in principle, any letter) and a skip number, also freely and possibly negative. Then, beginning at the starting point, select letters from the text at equal spacing as given by the skip number. For example, the bold letters in this sentence form an ELS from the word SAFEST. (The skip is -4. Spaces and punctuation are ignored.) Often more than one ELS related to some topic can be displayed simultaneously in an ELS letter array. This is produced by writing out the text in a regular grid, with exactly the same number of letters in each line, then cutting out a rectangle. below is a website that shows all major predictions from 2006-2012 it also explains some other elements of the bible codes. http://www.exodus2006.com/ P.S. aren't these things a little TOO coincidental ...or maybe just TOO SILLY?<grin>..man was i bored _____________________
Running Headlong into the arms of curiosity
********************************************** ...the avatar formely known as Maerl Underthorn... |
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
07-13-2006 08:06
I guess you can chalk me up to this group, please disregard my previous post. Hey at least you can admit when you were wrong on something, and continue to educate yourself. Good on you! |
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
07-13-2006 08:06
Actually, it would be somebody named Joshua. Jesus is a Greek translation of Joshua. No-one would have called him Jesus. Yeshua is also a possibility. |
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
07-13-2006 08:18
Yeshua is also a possibility. Yeshua and Joshua are the same name. _____________________
|
Cindy Claveau
Gignowanasanafonicon
![]() Join date: 16 May 2005
Posts: 2,008
|
07-13-2006 08:25
The Bible code stuff has been well debunked. The Institute of Mathematical Statistics published research 7 years ago that laid this nonsense to rest. The only people defending it are writers selling books and unrepentant literalists who want their book to mean something more than it does.
Major Bible scholars ignore the code because, they note, no one has a letter-by-letter version of the Bible as originally written. The oldest surviving manuscripts include slight variations, any of which would throw off computer test results. In the upcoming edition of Statistical Science, the new study's authors -- Dror Bar-Natan, Maya Bar-Hillel and Gil Kalai, professors at Jerusalem's Hebrew University, and Brendan McKay of the Australian National University -- combine expertise in mathematics and computer science to debunk the theory. Using other spellings and assumptions, they ran hundreds of tests that repeated the experiment with different variations and applied it to more biblical books. "Despite a considerable amount of effort," they write, "we have been unable to detect the codes." This is significant, Bar-Natan said in a Thursday interview, because "truth in science is never based on the results of a single experiment. A significant requirement is repeatability." Their results were no more successful with the Hebrew translation of Tolstoy's "War and Peace." Such letter configurations can be found in any long text, they say. The trick is to find letters in close proximity that form significant words more often than by chance. this is just interesting..dont label me!!!< lol>..here goes: Bible codes, also known as Torah codes, are words, phrases and clusters of words and phrases that some people believe are meaningful and exist intentionally in coded form in the text of the Bible. These codes were made famous by the book The Bible Code, which claims that these codes can predict the future. These claims are strongly doubted by skeptics and by many religious groups. The primary method by which purportedly meaningful messages have been extracted is the Equidistant Letter Sequence (ELS). To obtain an ELS from a text, choose a starting point (in principle, any letter) and a skip number, also freely and possibly negative. Then, beginning at the starting point, select letters from the text at equal spacing as given by the skip number. For example, the bold letters in this sentence form an ELS from the word SAFEST. (The skip is -4. Spaces and punctuation are ignored.) Often more than one ELS related to some topic can be displayed simultaneously in an ELS letter array. This is produced by writing out the text in a regular grid, with exactly the same number of letters in each line, then cutting out a rectangle. below is a website that shows all major predictions from 2006-2012 it also explains some other elements of the bible codes. http://www.exodus2006.com/ P.S. aren't these things a little TOO coincidental ...or maybe just TOO SILLY?<grin>..man was i bored _____________________
|
Zuzu Fassbinder
Little Miss No Tomorrow
![]() Join date: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 2,048
|
07-13-2006 08:55
Actually there is no factual proof Jesus existed. There is a single, non-biblical contemporary source, Josephus, and it has been suggested that the reference to Jesus was edited into the document later. There is, though, no evidence that the existence of Jesus was made up. There is much indirect "evidence" that he existed. The descriptions of everyday life in the Gospels is supported by archeology and historical documents of the time. Random thought. This bit reminds me of R. A. Heinlien's use of the term "Crucifiction". _____________________
I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either. |
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
07-13-2006 09:15
Actually there is no factual proof Jesus existed. There is a single, non-biblical contemporary source, Josephus, and it has been suggested that the reference to Jesus was edited into the document later. ........ Jesus in History - Written Records: Josephus, Jewish Zealot Flavius Josephus (37-98 CE) had been a Jewish zealot fighting against the Romans until Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 CE. He changed sides and became the Roman Emperor's adviser on Jewish affairs. His history book 'Antiquities of the Jews' describes Palestine in the time of Jesus. Jerusalem, where Josephus lived. In his writings, Josephus mentions the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Herodians. He mentions Caiaphas, Pontius Pilate, John the Baptist, Jesus (twice) and James the brother of Jesus. He also mentions the Essenes - the strict religious sect within Judaism that founded the Qumran community, where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found. Historians think one part that talks about Jesus had been added to. With these extra bits taken away they think Josephus wrote: "About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, for he was a performer of wonderful deeds, a teacher of such men as are happy to accept the truth. He won over many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. When Pilate, at the suggestion of the leading men among us, had condemned him to the cross, those who had loved him at the first did not forsake him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct to this day." Antiquities, Book 18, 63-64. He also said that the High Priest Ananias had: "Convened the Sanhedrin (the highest Jewish religious court / governing body). He had brought before them the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ, who was called James, and some other men, whom he accused of having broken the law, and handed them over to be stoned." Antiquities, Book 20, 200. Historians do not believe this second passage has been added to or changed. Josephus was a Jew who was not a follower of Jesus. What did he say about Jesus? He was a real historical person. He was a teacher. He was a worker of wonders (miracles). He gathered a band of followers, who continued to follow him after his death. He had a brother called James. James was executed by the Jewish leaders in CE 62. There were claims that Jesus was the Messiah (that is, the Christ). Tacitus - Roman Historian http://www.request.org.uk/main/history/jesus/Jesus04.htm |
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
07-13-2006 09:16
Yeshua and Joshua are the same name. I know ![]() |
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
07-13-2006 09:24
There are reports and documents of a healer and miracle worker who claimed to be descended from a god. Supposedly he brought back the dead, and healed the ill.
The year? 30 or so BCE (before current era) and the name? Apollynius. Think we need to take historical references about jesus seriously? As soon as you recognize all others referenced, everywhere. |
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
07-13-2006 09:36
Jesus in History - Written Records: Josephus, Jewish Zealot Flavius Josephus (37-98 CE) had been a Jewish zealot fighting against the Romans until Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 CE. He changed sides and became the Roman Emperor's adviser on Jewish affairs. His history book 'Antiquities of the Jews' describes Palestine in the time of Jesus. Jerusalem, where Josephus lived. true so far. In his writings, Josephus mentions the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Herodians. He mentions Caiaphas, Pontius Pilate, John the Baptist, Jesus (twice) and James the brother of Jesus. He also mentions the Essenes - the strict religious sect within Judaism that founded the Qumran community, where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found. Josephus mentions 19 different Jesii. None of them of "Nazareth". Historians think one part that talks about Jesus had been added to. With these extra bits taken away they think Josephus wrote: "About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, for he was a performer of wonderful deeds, a teacher of such men as are happy to accept the truth. He won over many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. When Pilate, at the suggestion of the leading men among us, had condemned him to the cross, those who had loved him at the first did not forsake him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct to this day." Antiquities, Book 18, 63-64. He also said that the High Priest Ananias had: "Convened the Sanhedrin (the highest Jewish religious court / governing body). He had brought before them the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ, who was called James, and some other men, whom he accused of having broken the law, and handed them over to be stoned." Antiquities, Book 20, 200. Historians do not believe this second passage has been added to or changed.. You would be referring then to Jesus ben Ananias. (One of Josephus' 19 different Jesii) Beginning in 62AD, this Jesus had caused disquiet in Jerusalem with a non-stop doom-laden mantra of ‘Woe to the city’. He prophesied rather vaguely: "A voice from the east, a voice from the west, a voice from the four winds, a voice against Jerusalem and the holy house, a voice against the bridegrooms and the brides, and a voice against the whole people." (Josephus, Wars 6:3) Arrested and flogged by the Romans, he was released as nothing more dangerous than a mad man. He died during the siege of Jerusalem from a rock hurled by a Roman catapult. Josephus was a Jew who was not a follower of Jesus. What did he say about Jesus? He was a real historical person. He was a teacher. He was a worker of wonders (miracles). He gathered a band of followers, who continued to follow him after his death. He had a brother called James. James was executed by the Jewish leaders in CE 62. There were claims that Jesus was the Messiah (that is, the Christ). Tacitus - Roman Historian http://www.request.org.uk/main/history/jesus/Jesus04.htm The problem is you are combining what Josephus said about 19 seperate individuals named Jesus. Which as I've mentioned was an incredibly common name. Since the time of Joshua in Exodus it had come to mean hero or 'saviour". An incredibly common honorific name given to all manner of community 'saviours' at the time. _____________________
|
Chip Midnight
ate my baby!
![]() Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 10,231
|
07-13-2006 09:38
LORD RAGLANS SCALE
_____________________
![]() My other hobby: www.live365.com/stations/chip_midnight |
Briana Dawson
Attach to Mouth
![]() Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,855
|
07-13-2006 09:47
LORD RAGLANS SCALE
Perseus is sexy. He was damn good in Clash of the Titants. Briana Dawson _____________________
|
Mickey McLuhan
She of the SwissArmy Tail
![]() Join date: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1,032
|
07-13-2006 09:47
LORD RAGLANS SCALE
Mickey McLuhan scores 78 Wait.. how is that right? |
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
07-13-2006 09:54
Mickey McLuhan scores 78 Wait.. how is that right? cos you're irish ![]() _____________________
|
Mickey McLuhan
She of the SwissArmy Tail
![]() Join date: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1,032
|
07-13-2006 10:01
cos you're irish ![]() That's RIGHT! I forgot. Thanks! |
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
07-13-2006 10:35
true so far. Josephus mentions 19 different Jesii. None of them of "Nazareth". You would be referring then to Jesus ben Ananias. (One of Josephus' 19 different Jesii) Beginning in 62AD, this Jesus had caused disquiet in Jerusalem with a non-stop doom-laden mantra of ‘Woe to the city’. He prophesied rather vaguely: "A voice from the east, a voice from the west, a voice from the four winds, a voice against Jerusalem and the holy house, a voice against the bridegrooms and the brides, and a voice against the whole people." (Josephus, Wars 6:3) Arrested and flogged by the Romans, he was released as nothing more dangerous than a mad man. He died during the siege of Jerusalem from a rock hurled by a Roman catapult. The problem is you are combining what Josephus said about 19 seperate individuals named Jesus. Which as I've mentioned was an incredibly common name. Since the time of Joshua in Exodus it had come to mean hero or 'saviour". An incredibly common honorific name given to all manner of community 'saviours' at the time. Which was the Jesus who fits this...? He was a worker of wonders (miracles). He gathered a band of followers, who continued to follow him after his death. He had a brother called James. ???? |
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
07-13-2006 10:40
Which was the Jesus who fits this...? He was a worker of wonders (miracles). He gathered a band of followers, who continued to follow him after his death. He had a brother called James. ???? you miss the point entirely. There is no single historical "Jesus" that fits your notion of mythic Jesus. The best one can do is patch together an amalgam of Jesii floating around that time period into one archetype. Your "Jesus" was a type of leader back then --not a single individual. _____________________
|
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
07-13-2006 10:43
you miss the point entirely. There is no single historical "Jesus" that fits your notion of mythic Jesus. The best one can do is patch together an amalgam of Jesii floating around that time period into one archetype. Your "Jesus" was a type of leader back then --not a single individual. If that makes you feel better to believe that, great. I would do nothing to purposely crash your beleif system. |
Briana Dawson
Attach to Mouth
![]() Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,855
|
07-13-2006 10:46
beleif . No no no no no.. I before E except after C. Briana Dawson _____________________
|
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
07-13-2006 10:48
If that makes you feel better to believe that, great. I would do nothing to purposely crash your beleif system. And if it makes you feel better to believe you are right, keep doing that! |
Billybob Goodliffe
NINJA WIZARDS!
![]() Join date: 22 Dec 2005
Posts: 4,036
|
07-13-2006 10:49
And if it makes you feel better to believe you are right, keep doing that! You haven't proven him wrong |
Witch Mountain
Registered User
![]() Join date: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 8
|
07-13-2006 10:50
How they Raise and Stir up Hailstorms and Tempests, and Cause Lightning to Blast both Men and Beasts.
|
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
07-13-2006 10:50
If that makes you feel better to believe that, great. I would do nothing to purposely crash your beleif system. Nonsense. You "God-Types" are constantly throwing your beliefs in everyone's faces, operating as if your "Bible" is some sort of flawless non negotiable document of verity. What you don't understand is that I don't have a belief system. I don't even need a belief system. I take nothing at face-value and am quite comfortable with the chaos of the unknowable. I don't need a magical sky-pixie to explain anything, because I don't require an explanation. I actually pity you as being someone who's mind has not evolved beyond childish superstition. _____________________
|
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
![]() Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
|
07-13-2006 10:51
No no no no no.. I before E except after C. Briana Dawson ya know, Briana --if you and I stay away from talking politics and concentrate on notions about religion I do believe we could get along. _____________________
|