Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Which Resmod is the Weakest Link?

Vivianne Draper
Registered User
Join date: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,157
07-17-2006 11:05
No. What we have are resmods abusing their powers and closing threads of people they actively dislike. The Linden who reviewed that thread probably backed its closing because s/he was not informed it was OUT OF CONTEXT. I can name half a dozen threads in The Sandbox right now that should be closed based on that sort of determination. Oh and their posters given suspensions.



From: Cocoanut Cookie
I am sitting here with my head shaking no no no back and forth in total and utter disbelief!

The humor intended by that original thread was obvious to me.

And yet, you got a 3-day suspension from the world because of this one little THREAD???

BECAUSE - I assume - it had the acronym NAMBLA in it?

er . . . . yes, yes, this is the Twilight Zone. Who knew that one couldn't use the acronym NAMBLA. I suppose we are supposed to know that for all purposes SL, that organization simply doesn't exist.

And it is SOOOOO relieving to know that while teenyboppers are racing into the grid and shooting up everything, at least the horrible terror of ULRIKA has been REMOVED FROM IN WORLD.

After all, we all know that "what you say in the forums is inextricably tied in with your inworld personna" or whatever the heck nonsense the TOS says.

BALONEY.

The whole SL world can go to hell in a handbasket, and they don't care - they only care that Ulrika not say the acronym NAMBLA on the forums?????

What we've got here, ladies and gentlemen, is total anarchy in world and arbitrary suppression of speech on the forums.

Worse than that, and this goes beyond Ulrika, we've got people here deciding what we should THINK and how we should SAY it.

Worse STILL, we can't know whether our posts actually pass their muster until they pronounce judgment on it.

I suppose we should all feel so VERY protected to know that Ulrika was removed from inworld for 3 days due to such horrible griefing as mentioning NAMBLA in a humor thread.

Nonetheless, Ulrika - you aren't aiming right when you aim at the resmod. Behind the resmods are Lindens, and they are responsible for each and every injustice that occurs here. NOT the resmods.
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
07-17-2006 11:33
From: Kevn Klein
I couldn't vote in this poll as I have never had a run-in with any of them. I'm sure many of my posts were ARed at some point, I just never heard of it. They all seem to be very fair to me.

Allowing Ulrika the power to moderate would be a nightmare, as I already have been under her rule in the Neualtenburg forum, where she deleted my posts for not liking my opinion. That has never happened to me under the Resmod system set up by LL.



Your posts were deleted for being personal attacks, Kevn.
_____________________
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
07-17-2006 13:00
From: Kendra Bancroft
Your posts were deleted for being personal attacks, Kevn.

You know I don't attack people personally, and I have never been warned by LL for my actions on these forums. There were witnesses to her deleting of my harmless opinions. She was even deleting my questioning of the deletes. She continued to do this even after she had resigned from Neualtenburg.

I'm surprised you would make up such a thing to defend her. You are usually the honest/fair one.

Perhaps you can provide an example of a personal attack from me. I know you can't, as I asked you before to show any personal attacks you kept insisting I was guilty of. Your response was "No".
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
07-17-2006 13:16
From: Kevn Klein
You know I don't attack people personally, and I have never been warned by LL for my actions on these forums. There were witnesses to her deleting of my harmless opinions. She was even deleting my questioning of the deletes. She continued to do this even after she had resigned from Neualtenburg.

I'm surprised you would make up such a thing to defend her. You are usually the honest/fair one.

Perhaps you can provide an example of a personal attack from me. I know you can't, as I asked you before to show any personal attacks you kept insisting I was guilty of. Your response was "No".



Clearly you and I will have to disagree on this.
_____________________
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
07-17-2006 13:22
Starting threads to inflame other Residents of Second Life is inappropriate and not allowed here. In addition, this thread has devolved and it's safe to say the constructive discussion ceased. This doesn't help make things any better. :(
Flaming, Spamming, Trolling – Flaming (posting a message that is intended to incite anger or directly attack a person or persons), Spamming (multiple posts of the same topic or discussion), and Trolling (a post with an intentionally contrary opinion written with the intent of inciting or getting argumentative opinions) are strongly discouraged. If you think your post might be over-reactive, or that it might fall into one of these definitions, please reconsider posting.

Private discussions – the forums are a public area for the Second Life community’s use. Individuals who have a dispute with each other have other channels of communication to discuss their differences or communicate – private messaging, IM within Second Life, or chatting within Second Life. Also, threads that are addressed to a single individual or group are inappropriate on the forums, this includes slander or "naming names" in a posts title, starting polls about a particular resident or group, etc.
_____________________
1 2 3 4