Stopping Developers Incentive?
|
Rimble Rampal
Rambler
Join date: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 95
|
12-20-2005 15:54
From: Magnum Serpentine I don't own a sim and when I do events like Trivia (Ask Transylvania and The Wilderness for references on this) I do not accept pay I do it for free because I like seeing people have fun.
I am also battleing this argument in the real world.
GOD!!! How many times have I heard a Conservative say they want to do away with Social Security Disability and make even those who have no feeling below their neck work.
I hate the Conservative Movement. SL is not RL. Just because you are battling to get disability in RL doesn't mean you should get money for being..disabled?...in SL. (How is that even possible) It sounds like your personal issues are affecting your views of SL. Being too disabled to work in RL and therefore not being able to buy food unless you have government assistance does not equate not knowing how to make money in SL and therefore being unable to buy new outfits for your AV since you cannot/will not buy off Lindex. Furthmore, if you (general you) are truly too financially strapped to buy some $L off the exchange, how are you managing to afford your computer capable of running SL and your internet connection? Anyone who manages to actually PLAY SL has enough discretionary income to afford the above USUALLY (excepting those at college or living with parents, etc). Don't bitch about how you are too poor to buy $2US of $L when you afford a $50-100 a month internet connection AND a decent PC.
_____________________
________ "One of the advantages of being disorderly is that one is constantly making exciting discoveries." ~AA Milne
|
Sitearm Madonna
Registered User
Join date: 6 Oct 2005
Posts: 535
|
12-20-2005 15:58
yeh! what he sed! (heh heh.. "change is good" From: Boliver Oddfellow Facts 1: The DI is dead 2: The system has been gamed to death 3: Richer more immersive content combined to real money generating revenue streams is the answer to a new economy This is not the death knell of the SL economy but the rebirth of the new stronger more rewarding SL economy...
_____________________
... software packages, acting in society... life creating, and accepted, and widely... spread throughout the world... freeing, liberating... allow... each person individual control and decision making... to create living structure... wherever they are. / Christopher Alexander, 1996
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-20-2005 16:00
From: Jake Reitveld I would be willing to bet you couldn't. A decent skin costs over a thousand. I haven't seen many single skins over L$1000, most are L$500 and less. The majority of the L$1000 and up packages have at least half a dozen skins in them. From: someone Its fun for about 5 minutes and then you want to have the same things everyone else has. You sound like my daughter. I'm more interested in having the stuff nobody else has, and you can't buy that for ready money.
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-20-2005 16:02
From: Jake Reitveld Do you really think that the fact that none of this stuff is at the top of the popular places list is really about money chairs, money balls and dance contests? No, the fact that these places contain the kind of build the DI was intended to promote, and are about to lose the chunk of their rent that was paid by DI, is about money chairs, money balls, and dance contests.
|
Usagi Musashi
UM ™®
Join date: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 6,083
|
12-20-2005 16:08
From: Jake Reitveld I would be willing to bet you couldn't. A decent skin costs over a thousand. And your second position include photoshopping, a technical option not available to everyone who plays. And yes there is some very cool free stuff. its fun for about 5 minutes and then you want to have the same things everyone else has. If free stuff were all that an a bag of chips, most content creators would be out of business.
Also a lot of people happily pay for this stuff. My point was not to say you couldn't do Sl on the cheap, my point was to say that a lot of club goers spend a lot of money to do nothing more than hang out. The so called Tekki-wikiati, lol, want everyone in the sand box and poop the clubs as limited content welfare sites. A lot of posts I see somehow relelgate clubgoers, tringo player and chair campers to the level of uninformed. Like it is some huge shock that people might enjoy these activites and build communites around them. good skins cost over 2000l well the 1500 are not bad. but depending on your likes your might landup with 5000l like the older players way. Yes nora 1500 skins and they are nice and they have mutli-skins in the package. But skins like chip midnight are singles but with a life time support plan.
_____________________
Never Quote People that have no idea what they refering to..It give them a false feeling the need for attention...
|
Yumi Murakami
DoIt!AttachTheEarOfACat!
Join date: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,860
|
12-20-2005 16:21
From: Argent Stonecutter You sound like my daughter. I'm more interested in having the stuff nobody else has, and you can't buy that for ready money.
No. The only way to have quality things that nobody else has is to design them yourself, and then if you want them to be of comparable quality, you have to have already been good at art before you started and then spend a year or so practicing. And unfortunately, since you're out of step with the rest of the grid, you probably won't get much feedback or anything for most of that year... .. well, that or just pay for a custom job and/or just take what you can get with regard to AV.
|
Sitearm Madonna
Registered User
Join date: 6 Oct 2005
Posts: 535
|
12-20-2005 16:34
this makes total sense.. ll has got to be viable cos it's a real-life biz.. sl emulates rl.. IS rl in SOME ways.. so it must be viable too.. the fun is working it out as we go along.. who ever would have predicted 194,000 residents at this point in time?! From: Elex Dusk The elimination of the Developer Incentive Award is due to slower and slower growth in the percentage of residents that pay tier fees. As of December 1st, of 90,000 SL residents only 5,900 residents, or 6.55-percent of the total population, actually paid tier fees as they owned more than 512-sq.m of land. Approximately 7-months ago this figure was closer to 12-percent. As the largest portion of LL's revenues are generated by tier fees and as LL is failing to meet its own revenue targets this is, quite literally, belt tightening. The explosive growth brought on by free Basic accounts is meaningless when one considers that they failed to upgrade their account status to Premium and also acquire parcels large enough to require tier payments. [The net gain from the previous month was a mere 400 more residents paying tier fees while the total population grew by an additional 10,000.] The Developer Incentive Award, in and of itself, was not enough of an inducement for a vast portion of residents to upgrade and the costs associated with free Basic accounts (bandwidth, customer support, etc.) have become burdensome. The flipside though is that those residents who have taken on ownership roles in SL and do pay tier may reduce the total size of their parcels to offset the added expenses brought on by the elimination of this subsidy. The fundamental problem is that there is a readily apparent and easy to implement solution to incentivize land ownership: Make it clear in resident profiles whether they are a Basic account or a Premium account (Basic accounts would feel social pressure to upgrade). However, LL, at its own peril, continues to decline to do so (Better to go broke running a "classless society" platform than create actual shareholder value and meet and exceed revenue targets).
_____________________
... software packages, acting in society... life creating, and accepted, and widely... spread throughout the world... freeing, liberating... allow... each person individual control and decision making... to create living structure... wherever they are. / Christopher Alexander, 1996
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-20-2005 17:09
From: Yumi Murakami No. The only way to have quality things that nobody else has is to design them yourself, and then if you want them to be of comparable quality, you have to have already been good at art before you started and then spend a year or so practicing. I'm starting out by just having regular things that nobody else has. They're more than enough fun. I don't expect the quality bit to come quickly, but then I've been programming since 1972 so I've got a pretty good idea of how long it takes to get good at anything. Expecting to start out with top of the line anything is sheer boneheaded stupidity, or laziness. Or both.
|
crucial Armitage
Clothing Designer
Join date: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 838
|
12-20-2005 17:23
From: Argent Stonecutter Not going to happen.
To make the economy work you have to have "free" accounts able to earn money. The reputation bonus gave them a way... if they played their character well, they got money. It's a perfectly valid in-game feedback mechanism, and it makes sense from an economic standpoint. there are already ways for people to earn money in world. if your like me you will work hard make the best product you can advertise it and sell it. quite honestly i have done fairly well in second life and have worked my ass of to get what i have. although if your just looking to make a few extra bucks to play around with its so easy to make something that my 7 year old could make enough content (if he were allowed to play) to earn a few thousand lindens a week.
|
Jake Reitveld
Emperor of Second Life
Join date: 9 Mar 2005
Posts: 2,690
|
12-20-2005 17:31
From: Argent Stonecutter I haven't seen many single skins over L$1000, most are L$500 and less. The majority of the L$1000 and up packages have at least half a dozen skins in them. You sound like my daughter. I'm more interested in having the stuff nobody else has, and you can't buy that for ready money. You might consider that most of the SL population is more like your daughter and less like you. Its a human dynamic. People what cool stuff and they want to fit in and socialize on a level, they can't or won't in real life. sure people will claim that they play SL to be different, and that is true..different from who they are IRL. Look at how many goth shops there are, and how many vendors sell teh same style of hoochi wear from clubs. This is not all becaus ethey are downloading the same texutres from turbosquid. People in SL conform. For some it may be becuse IRL they do not conform and being in SL is different. For some people its because they wear a mask in real life, and have the opportunity to do so in Sl. For others its that they aren't fashion-model sexy in real life and here they can be. Or maybe its that IRL they work really hard to support families and can afford few luxuries, but damn in SL you can shop till you drop for fifty bucks, and live a bit like J-lo. In SL you can get inot cool clubs that would reject you at the door IRL. What disturbs me about the attitiued that clubs and bling and hoochi hair are second rate content, and the real stuff will be lost, is that it contain an evaluation that what people want to do with SL is wrong. Peopl all seem to want sl to be made in thier image, and on the forums, that has long been by pooh-poohing the so called lowbrow activites. I forone say that if people want to hang out in clubs, and sit in a money chair and talke to thier freinds, and have a complete wardrobe supplied by jonquille, then they should do so, and hey. More power too them. SL is not the provenance of people who want to play in the sand box, or wear mecha suits, or shoot each other with guns. We are all residents here. Some of the resident like to conform. And really, I have yet to see a reasonable sking for less than 1100. And Some skins do have multipe make-ups, but the same skin color with half a dozem make-ups is really one skin. And top of the line skins don't have that. My own was 6k all told and I love it. Its nice to have something and say wow, I have the best. This is a perfectly valid way of playing SL.
_____________________
ALCHEMY -clothes for men.
Lebeda 208,209
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
12-20-2005 17:37
From: Jake Reitveld I forone say that if people want to hang out in clubs, and sit in a money chair and talke to thier freinds, and have a complete wardrobe supplied by jonquille, then they should do so, and hey. . Oh man - thats playing with fire  Actually Jonquille's clothes are the 'anti-hootchie' and are deliberately affordable.. I should know - I watch her make them, and see the 'boarderline hootchie' discards. But thanks Jake for making my RL hell when I get home from work.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
Chip Midnight
ate my baby!
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 10,231
|
12-20-2005 17:40
From: Jake Reitveld What disturbs me about the attitiued that clubs and bling and hoochi hair are second rate content, and the real stuff will be lost, is that it contain an evaluation that what people want to do with SL is wrong. People all seem to want sl to be made in thier image, and on the forums, that has long been by pooh-poohing the so called lowbrow activites. I forone say that if people want to hang out in clubs, and sit in a money chair and talke to thier freinds, and have a complete wardrobe supplied by jonquille, then they should do so, and hey. More power too them. SL is not the provenance of people who want to play in the sand box, or wear mecha suits, or shoot each other with guns. We are all residents here. Some of the resident like to conform. Great post, Jake. The thing I find most ironic about the issue of clubs being considered second rate content is that the people who seem to most base their actions on that assumption are the club owners and entertainers themselves. I think they're selling themselves incredibly short, and money chairs are just the most crystalline example of it. A club with loyal regulars, a nice atmosphere, good music, and good friendly people is worth paying to be a part of, even for just one night. So why is any suggestion that they should charge for their efforts met with such a quick "no one would ever pay us."? I simply don't believe that's true. The problem is that anyone who wants to charge what they're actually worth is hampered by the thousand other places paying people to park their avatars there. The culture shift has to start with the clubs themselves. They can't sit back and wait for their patrons to volunteer to start paying. They just have to be prepared for the fact that the trailblazers will have to make a long term investment because it'll take a while for the perceived norms to change. But it has to start somewhere.
_____________________
 My other hobby: www.live365.com/stations/chip_midnight
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
12-20-2005 17:47
The Cannibus Cathedral was one of my favorite places in SL - it was also one of the laggiest when they decided to have a get together.
But people didn't go there to get paid - they went because it was fun night with a great crowd.. it was like going to the pub on a friday with your buddies.
A good place doesn't need chairs that pay to get folks there - on a good night at the CC you couldn't enter the sim - SL wouldn't let you - AV's would wait on the sim boarder until someone tported and the sim would let them in.
Likewise there are good events that flourish post 'event payments' -- the 'Captions' contest is a good example - from what I've been told it does a lot better now than it ever did under the subsidy system.
Good popular content will remain.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals. From: Jesse Linden I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
|
Keiki Lemieux
I make HUDDLES
Join date: 8 Jul 2005
Posts: 1,490
|
12-20-2005 17:47
From: Jake Reitveld What disturbs me about the attitiued that clubs and bling and hoochi hair are second rate content, and the real stuff will be lost, is that it contain an evaluation that what people want to do with SL is wrong. Peopl all seem to want sl to be made in thier image, and on the forums, that has long been by pooh-poohing the so called lowbrow activites. I forone say that if people want to hang out in clubs, and sit in a money chair and talke to thier freinds, and have a complete wardrobe supplied by jonquille, then they should do so, and hey. More power too them. SL is not the provenance of people who want to play in the sand box, or wear mecha suits, or shoot each other with guns. We are all residents here. Some of the resident like to conform. I don't see any problem with people doing this stuff. The primary question is, "Why should Linden Labs subsidise money give aways, like camping chairs?" They shouldn't. There's no good reason for it.
_____________________
imakehuddles.com/wordpress/
|
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
|
12-20-2005 17:55
A good place doesn't need chairs. But having chairs doesn't mean it's not a good place. coco
|
Alan Kiesler
Retired Resident
Join date: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 354
|
12-20-2005 19:16
Evening again all. Argent, regarding rent - this model does work in the island support business for shared groups, look through the InnerLife external forums in my sig. They never got that far yet, for now IL is sharing land from my 1/4 sim rental while the core technologies get hammered out. Persephone, in your case, why not consider having any Premium regulars not using their 512 to donate to group that the land is on? Yes there are some risks with that, but managed carefully it should work OK. In regards to an island like Numbakulla, myself and the others in the supporting group have been able to keep it up and running for an additional six months now. This is all because of its uniqueness and peacefulness and the want by varying residents to help keep it alive. Plus, I admit to dropping by whenever possible and being a good host and puzzle helper  . Dwell does not help such a big place much, maybe has raised about L$2000 in the months I've held it. I just wish that whatever came to a head in the client during 1.7 release would get fixed, I'm still a semi-casualty of it.  Tier being a core issue? I dunno. There are other threads in Land/Economy that has gone over that, I'd suggest perusing them. Not a mainland customer anymore, so can't give you a qualified answer.
_____________________
Timothy S. Kimball (RL) -- aka 'Alan Kiesler' The Kind Healer -- http://sungak.net
No ending is EVER written; Communities will continue on their own.
|
Surreal Farber
Cat Herder
Join date: 5 Feb 2004
Posts: 2,059
|
12-20-2005 19:39
From: Siggy Romulus The Cannibus Cathedral was one of my favorite places in SL - it was also one of the laggiest when they decided to have a get together.
But people didn't go there to get paid - they went because it was fun night with a great crowd.. it was like going to the pub on a friday with your buddies.
A good place doesn't need chairs that pay to get folks there - on a good night at the CC you couldn't enter the sim - SL wouldn't let you - AV's would wait on the sim boarder until someone tported and the sim would let them in.
Likewise there are good events that flourish post 'event payments' -- the 'Captions' contest is a good example - from what I've been told it does a lot better now than it ever did under the subsidy system.
Good popular content will remain. Damn I miss those days. Having our land in the same sim really sucked though. I remember Darko and us would coordinate party nights to keep from crashing the sim.
_____________________
Surreal
Phobos 3d Design - putting the hot in psychotic since 2004
Come see our whole line of clothing, animations and accessories in Chaos (37, 198, 43)
|
Dyne Talamasca
Noneuclidean Love Polygon
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 436
|
12-20-2005 19:45
Saw this as potentially necessary months ago. When the camping chairs started becoming an issue, I knew its fate was sealed.
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
12-20-2005 19:57
From: Cocoanut Koala A good place doesn't need chairs. But having chairs doesn't mean it's not a good place. coco A good place also doesn't need to artificially boost its dwell rating, and thus its popularity, with a lame thing like money chairs.
_____________________
Cristiano ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. 
|
Dyne Talamasca
Noneuclidean Love Polygon
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 436
|
12-20-2005 20:00
From: Rimble Rampal Don't bitch about how you are too poor to buy $2US of $L when you afford a $50-100 a month internet connection AND a decent PC. That's silly. It's not like "can't afford it at all" or "have surplus money coming out of your ears" are the only two options; there is an entire spectrum covering all possible variations between those points, and more people than you realize are likely to be at the balance point, because it covers both those who literally don't have more money, and those that don't want to spend all of their money on one thing (net activities). At $50-100 per month for an internet connection, I'd not be surprised at anyone that says they don't have enough money for much else. And it's possible to own the computer already ... not everyone is presently financing a new machine or upgrades their machine religiously ... and yes, these people DO use SL.
|
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
12-20-2005 20:02
the funny thing about the dwell discussion is that the most vocal opponents of dwell, know absolutely nothing about creating compelling gathering places.
it's so funny to see pixel pushing geeks like me tell the socialites what is "good events" and what is "cheap crap".
with all the options out there, some people still WANT to sit in camping chairs. (camping chairs are unsustainable event model so no worries). people WANT to hang out at clubs and hoochie clothing. they WANT bingo/slingo/tringo/blingo. people DON'T want to sit around some abandoned build all the time even if it is beautiful. they DON"T WANT to pay for the events they go to.
if you want to see higher quality stuff in SL, it won't come from making end players support it with their L$ from the Lindex at least not until LL is exlpoiting the L$ Mint. it will only come from a large enough population to sustain better developers. and it will require the outsourcing of the platform to give creators more control.
until then, LL must support popular places with the USD money they are skimming off the economy.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/ read my blog
Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate
|
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
12-20-2005 20:04
From: Cristiano Midnight A good place also doesn't need to artificially boost its dwell rating, and thus its popularity, with a lame thing like money chairs. who cares? they are mathematically a failed business model. they are not a threat.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/ read my blog
Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate
|
Ricky Zamboni
Private citizen
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,080
|
12-20-2005 20:09
From: Cristiano Midnight A good place also doesn't need to artificially boost its dwell rating, and thus its popularity, with a lame thing like money chairs. That's silly. Why should a location owner limit herself? If a good location can get solid dwell without camping chairs, and top-level dwell with them, why not go for it? It keeps free basic account holders happy, which will help keep her location in the forefront of their minds when it comes time to do something other than camp.
|
Hank Ramos
Lifetime Scripter
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 2,328
|
12-20-2005 20:15
<joke> Boo...and I was going to script auto-PTP-teleporting camping chairs!  </joke>
|
Phoenix Byrd
Monkeh
Join date: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 77
|
12-20-2005 20:31
From: Cristiano Midnight A good place also doesn't need to artificially boost its dwell rating, and thus its popularity, with a lame thing like money chairs. Yes, cuz anything that give's free money too "worthless" basic account holder's/noob's is just lame. I mean, how dare those people give money to us in return for giving them dwell so us worthless people can buy your worthless junk.
|