Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Clueless Gits

Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
06-09-2006 18:26
From: Jack Harker

Now, I'm not one of these people who has red ban lines up everywhere.

In my experience, those red lines are nothing more than a giant sign that simply invites people to find out what the person has to 'hide'.

You've been around long enough to know that with the current set of tools, there is no real privacy in SL, unless you own a private sim.
_____________________
Susie Boffin
Certified Nutcase
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 2,151
06-09-2006 18:40
All I can say is that "gits" haven't forced me to build sky boxes and they never will. I enjoy my houses down on the ground where they were meant to be by god. No loser is going to ruin my Second Life experience though many have tried all have failed.
_____________________
"If you see a man approaching you with the obvious intent of doing you good, you should run for your life." - Henry David Thoreau
Pol Tabla
synthpop saint
Join date: 18 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,041
06-09-2006 19:10
From: Joannah Cramer
So, you don't actually know what you're arguing _for_, and try to rationalize behaviour you don't even understand? Well, that's it then i guess.
I'm talking about privacy. Behavior is your bugaboo.
_____________________
crucial Armitage
Clothing Designer
Join date: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 838
06-09-2006 19:13
I must be one of those mutant people who only ever get unexpected visitors once and a while. I have been here for nearly 2 years and I am online in world more then I am not.
I can count on one hand the amount of unexpected visitors i have received in 2 years.
when i do get visitors i actually enjoy it because first I am alone 90% of the time working or doing some such thing while at my home, and the company is nice :)

Then i am one of the mutants that does not mind an intrusion once and a while and actually encourage it. :D

no offence to the OP because i do agree that if you want privacy you should be entitled to it just has you would be in real life. BUT
because of the nature of second life and the lack of built in privacy controls that really is not practical so if you would like to be left alone in your wooden box then get a security script one that gives an ample amount of notice that they are intruding and will be tp'ed home if they do not leave.

really no use coming here to bitch and moan all that will get you is people telling you are wrong and they are right and you should not bitch and moan about such things yada yada yada yada...........

does this sound like im talking out of both sides of my mouth? well yea it does... because i can see both sides of the issue and realize that this is a very sticky issue in SL.

Cheers
Crucial
Kittie Sparkle
Kittie's Kid Stuffs Owner
Join date: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 14
06-09-2006 19:22
well, actually disturbing the peace is against the SL TOS, so if they are really intruding on someone you could always file an abuse report because it is against the TOS
Cocoanut Cookie
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
06-09-2006 20:08
Well, sometimes you violate someone's privacy without in the least intending to!

I was flying around, with my usual lag, putting up new fences. All of a sudden I was lagged, then flying farther than usual, and then the camera was jerking back and forth and I realized I was stuck IN the house next door. Somehow.

I wasn't taking the time to move my camera around to determine exactly where or how I was stuck in this house, as I could see the NAME TAGS below mine indicating that there were two people inside the house and I was anxious to get out!

Not being a noob, I immediatly clicked to sit on their deck, and thank goodness it worked. From which I immediately flew back, hoping they hadn't noticed.

A minute later I get an IM from the lady of the house - "Hello? lol"

Turned out they had been quite shocked to see me suddenly embedded in their ceiling! I guess with my legs sticking down or something. They had noticed, all right! How embarassing! That's gotta be one of the funniest things that's ever happened to me in SL.

coco
_____________________
Jack Harker
Registered User
Join date: 4 May 2005
Posts: 552
06-09-2006 20:19
From: crucial Armitage
I must be one of those mutant people who only ever get unexpected visitors once and a while. I have been here for nearly 2 years and I am online in world more then I am not.
I can count on one hand the amount of unexpected visitors i have received in 2 years.
when i do get visitors i actually enjoy it because first I am alone 90% of the time working or doing some such thing while at my home, and the company is nice :)

Then i am one of the mutants that does not mind an intrusion once and a while and actually encourage it. :D

no offence to the OP because i do agree that if you want privacy you should be entitled to it just has you would be in real life. BUT
because of the nature of second life and the lack of built in privacy controls that really is not practical so if you would like to be left alone in your wooden box then get a security script one that gives an ample amount of notice that they are intruding and will be tp'ed home if they do not leave.

really no use coming here to bitch and moan all that will get you is people telling you are wrong and they are right and you should not bitch and moan about such things yada yada yada yada...........

does this sound like im talking out of both sides of my mouth? well yea it does... because i can see both sides of the issue and realize that this is a very sticky issue in SL.

Cheers
Crucial


Actually, I wish *someone* would pay enough attention to my replies to see what I'm actually talking about.

1/4 sim is plenty of space to have complete privacy if I want it. With a house in the middle of the 1/4 sim, there's plenty of space to keep the peeping toms out of peeping range. I can turn on the ban lines on the ground, and I can set up a security network in the sky, and no one at all who wasn't on an access list would be able to land or come near my house without being teleported home.

I'd really rather not do that though.

I'm proud of what I have on the ground, and I'm happy to have people visit it. I don't even care if people look at my house in the sky.

*However*...what *does* bother me, is that some guy showed up, started poking around, and got pissy and acted as if *I* was the one who was out of line when I asked him *politely* to move along. Who complained that I was rude and unfriendly, and complained that I shouldn't say anything when I didn't have signs up or someone saying that the place was private.

*That* is what I'm objecting to. When the owner askes you to move along, it's time to go, *not* time to bitch.

I could have just not said anything, just clicked on him, frozen him, and tped him home, but I didn't. I was trying to be polite and civil.

It's *not* that I can't *get* any privacy, I could have that at the price of rendering 1/4 of a sim off limits to *everybody*. However, I don't want to do that. I don't want SL to become a mess of red lines where you can't fly anywhere without finding yourself tped home everytime you cross a property line.

The people who are saying, "You shouldn't have any expectation of privacy in SL unless you buy an island." are missing the point. 1/4 sim is plenty to ensure privacy, *if* I ban everybody. (And the people who say that, "The platform isn't set up for privacy," are missing the point to, because it sure is.) But it's SL as a whole that's going to suffer if people wind up having to resort to that because of a lack of civility from the clueless.
crucial Armitage
Clothing Designer
Join date: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 838
06-09-2006 20:41
Jack I Agree with you 100 % i even said that "i DO agree that if you want privacy you should be entitled to it just as you would be in real life."

but the simple fact remains that this can not and will not happen IN SL There will always be nosy folk that think they can go where ever they choose and at present there is no other way to stop them other then using a security script for your home in the sky. Is this right NO. Is this sad to say. YES is this the reality of the current situation. YES
Jack Harker
Registered User
Join date: 4 May 2005
Posts: 552
06-09-2006 21:12
From: crucial Armitage
Jack I Agree with you 100 % i even said that "i DO agree that if you want privacy you should be entitled to it just as you would be in real life."

but the simple fact remains that this can not and will not happen IN SL There will always be nosy folk that think they can go where ever they choose and at present there is no other way to stop them other then using a security script for your home in the sky. Is this right NO. Is this sad to say. YES is this the reality of the current situation. YES


I apologise if it seemed like I was coming down on you im my reply, that wasn't my intent.

I'm simply frustrated that so many people seemed to be missing the point of my posts, that a lack of consideration and maners is likely to turn SL into a mass of ban lines and security scripts, which is a *bad* thing for SL over all.
crucial Armitage
Clothing Designer
Join date: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 838
06-09-2006 21:22
From: Jack Harker
I apologise if it seemed like I was coming down on you im my reply, that wasn't my intent.

I'm simply frustrated that so many people seemed to be missing the point of my posts, that a lack of consideration and maners is likely to turn SL into a mass of ban lines and security scripts, which is a *bad* thing for SL over all.


indeed i would tend to agree
Merlyn Bailly
owner, AVALON GALLERIA
Join date: 7 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
06-09-2006 23:37
From: Lewis Nerd
Seriously......why not? When I fly round, if I see something that doesn't appear like it belongs where it should, I'll often have a look, and see who the owner is in case it's something that they lost. People have helped me locate lost stuff by doing that, so why shouldn't I attempt to help others?

If you'd just realise that SL is an online game, which means that there are other people there, and stop whining about a non-existant right to 'privacy', and take the sort of stuff you want to do privately elsewhere, SL would be a much better experience. The only rights you have are those that LL permit you to have - and to not be disturbed is thankfully not one of them.

The whole reason SL is online is to interact with other people. Why people want to come here and isolate themselves is beyond me.

Lewis


The whole idea of buying land, virtual or otherwise is called PRIVATE PROPERTY. Some people like it more private than others -- that's their right. If they have to put up ban lines and bounce scripts to boot your *ss home to get some privacy, THAT is their right.
_____________________
SL used to be a game -- now it's a corporate advertising/marketing platform.
Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
06-10-2006 00:00
From: Merlyn Bailly
The whole idea of buying land, virtual or otherwise is called PRIVATE PROPERTY. Some people like it more private than others -- that's their right. If they have to put up ban lines and bounce scripts to boot your *ss home to get some privacy, THAT is their right.


... except in real life there are certain laws like trespass which allow you to pursue that right. SL has no such guarantees.

It's just like the view. You want to protect your view, buy it. You want a security border round your house, buy it.

Blame LL for their lack of tools, not people for following basic human nature.

Ban lines are ugly, security scripts are harrassment and frequently break the ToS. As many have said, in months of gameplay they might have received one or two unwanted guests at inconvenient times - if that. Why is that such a big deal?

Lewis
_____________________
Second Life Stratics - your new premier resource for all things Second Life. Free to join, sign up today!

Pocket Protector Projects - Rosieri 90,234,84 - building and landscaping services
Io Zeno
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jun 2006
Posts: 940
06-10-2006 00:39
From: Lewis Nerd
Quick correction..... just because SL is supposedly for 18+, and you have the ability to have mature content in certain areas, does NOT make it an 'adult' as in 'pornographic' game. Sociolotron is one of those 'adult' games, where 'mature' is its sole purpose.

Lewis


It's a game where people do many things, including those of an adult nature. I never intended that to mean it was a sex game, but obviously, pixel sex goes on here and not everyone is an exibitionist.

But as it's been said here over and over, there are many valid reasons to want to be left alone occasionally, not just sexual (as if that isn't valid, it is) and why some people refuse to accept or respect that is beyond me, I call it simply being rude or a deliberate jerk and that is that. I don't even own property, but it's no problem for me to respect the property of others, jeezus, what is the beef? "Human nature?" Please, we restrain ourselves from random impulses all the time, it's called civilization. And personally, I have no desire to invade the space of others when they ask me not to, or it is rude to do so, I guess that makes me abnormal?
Jack Harker
Registered User
Join date: 4 May 2005
Posts: 552
06-10-2006 00:47
From: Lewis Nerd
... except in real life there are certain laws like trespass which allow you to pursue that right. SL has no such guarantees.

It's just like the view. You want to protect your view, buy it. You want a security border round your house, buy it.

Blame LL for their lack of tools, not people for following basic human nature.

Ban lines are ugly, security scripts are harrassment and frequently break the ToS. As many have said, in months of gameplay they might have received one or two unwanted guests at inconvenient times - if that. Why is that such a big deal?

Lewis


No such thing as "Basic Human Nature", there's this thing called "Free Will". People behave like prats because they decide to, not because nature forced them.

And security scripts are *not* in fact harassment. I can set up a security network that will bounce your ass home anytime you cross my property line and it's not any sort of TOS violation at all.

As for "inconvinent" and "big deal", that's rather up to the property owner to decide, isn't it? And if they decide that it's a big deal to them, not to *you*, but to *them*, then they're going to turn on those ugly ban lines, and those non-TOS violating security networks.

You and the people like you seem to have your heads buried in the sand. You can argue that SL is just a game, and people have no right to expect privacy until you're blue in the face, but the fact is that people *do* expect privacy, particularly when they're paying through the nose for tier, and if they don't get it, then the ugly ban lines, and security scripts show up.

So, what'll it be? Respect people's privacy, or see the ban lines and tp's home all around?
Selador Cellardoor
Registered User
Join date: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
06-10-2006 03:50
From: Pol Tabla
Complaining about the lack of privacy in SL is like complaining because someone is reading your blog.


Yes, indeed. Why do so many people fail to see this?
_____________________
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
06-10-2006 04:20
Why are there people who are missing Jack's point altogether? Are you just ignoring it so you can turn it into a soapbox to rant about your own peeves?

He said he asked him to leave (he said this at least three times in his OP), and he got an argument. His other example was people with guns barging through the door.

Both of these are clearly unacceptable behavior, against the CS, and he has every right to question what sort of dolts argue and bitch when asked politely to leave, or who barge in with guns blazing.

But hey, don't let me interrupt the ad hoc parade.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Elvawin Rainbow
Registered User
Join date: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 172
06-10-2006 05:40
From: Pol Tabla
But it's not really a house, is it? It doesn't serve any of the functions that a RL house does. .... blah blah .

thanks for your view - wanders off to press many mute and ban buttons
_____________________
"Off with their Heads"
Foolish Frost
Grand Technomancer
Join date: 7 Mar 2005
Posts: 1,433
06-10-2006 12:23
I'm really not into this issue, since really... I have no good answers. I can point out this though:

FACT:
SL is a 3d computer interface based on the same technology that makes games such as World of Warcraft, Halflife 2, Quake, and any number of other games.

FACT:
The main point of those games is to explore a 3D world and deal with it's inhabitants.

FACT:
Most of these games lack consiqueces for doing antisocial things such as breaking and entering, vandalism, and even murder. (zelda, anyone?)

FACT:
SL does not offer high-quality security tools for land owners, and several scripted tools that have been created have been misused to the point of being abusive. This leaves land owners with minimal ability to propery deter vistors without banishing them agressivly. Well, that and harsh language...

FACT:
People wander SL to look about. I have wandered into skyboxes before (mostly after harrowing elevator malfunctions), and find that what security I have ran into is so aggressive as to be crashing my SL client. That may deter my coming back, but it also places them on a list of people I am far less likly to be agreeable with.

FACT:
Unless the tools of SL change, you have no privacy, and no amount of complaining will fix it. I'm not saying you can't complain, just that it's not going to do more than make you feel better by venting.

Anyway, none of this helps you, but I hope it offered useful info.

Later!
1 2 3 4