Casinos - dead and gone w/ new policy?
|
Lenny Jester
Registered User
Join date: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 24
|
07-25-2007 17:27
From: Ciaran Laval So they move their servers to somewhere that doesn't run a gaping whole through a huge part of the Sl economy. They have corporate presence in the UK, move the servers here. It's not that difficult a concept. They can still have their board meetings in the US. Possible solution. But as LL, you have to weigh the options. Move the entire corporate environment to a more gambling friendly country, which is going to take a great deal of time and money, or simply don't allow gambling any longer. Considering that the gamblers are only a small part of the SL community, I don't think there really is any argument over what the right course of action is.
|
Object Pascale
moshi moshi
Join date: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 648
|
07-25-2007 17:28
From: Ciaran Laval They move the servers to Europe or somewhere that doesn't have such draconian laws, maybe Nevada is ok, it's not difficult in this day and age. That sounds like a mammoth task Ciaran. How many servers are there nowadays? Somewhere between 5,000-6,000? Guessing because it's been a while since I counted. Anybody with more technical knowledge care to speculate how big a task this would be?
|
RobbyRacoon Olmstead
Red warrior is hungry!
Join date: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,821
|
07-25-2007 17:28
From: Slim Pippen Well I for one have suddenly found myself without purpose in SL. I wonder how many there are like me that will not continue playing the game I imagine that regardless of the numbers, those whose sole purpose in SL was gambling won't be missed very much by those who never gamble in SL. I admit I'm pretty curious what this is going to do in the short term for land valuation and the in-world economy, though I personally doubt it will have much effect over the long term. Should be very interesting to watch how this all falls out. .
|
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
|
07-25-2007 17:29
From: Object Pascale You think it'll have any impact on land value Raymond? It depends. If every casino owner complies with the ruling then odds are about half would dump thier land. But this will happen as a slow roll-out over time, so I don't see a huge one day panic selloff or anything like that. But over time this policy change will certainly increase the supply and lower the demand of land overall. I could see the base price dropping L$1 per meter as a result.
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
07-25-2007 17:30
From: Lenny Jester Possible solution. But as LL, you have to weigh the options. Move the entire corporate environment to a more gambling friendly country, which is going to take a great deal of time and money, or simply don't allow gambling any longer. Considering that the gamblers are only a small part of the SL community, I don't think there really is any argument over what the right course of action is. Moving the corporate environment to Europe would cost peanuts, like it did with the banking. They have a corporate presence in Europe already, it would take hardly any time and very little money. There's a lot worse stuff than gambling going on, prostitution is illegal in how many US states?
|
Bree Giffen
♥♣♦♠ Furrtune Hunter ♠♦♣♥
Join date: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 2,715
|
07-25-2007 17:31
From: Kenny Rogers You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done. I agree.
|
Jack Sakigake
Registered User
Join date: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 150
|
07-25-2007 17:32
From: Object Pascale the servers where all of Linden Lab's virtual "land" is hosted, where all our scripts are executed, is located in the United States of America where these gambling laws apply. how do they get around that? Actually I don't think it does matter where the server hosts, as long as you accept bet from US resident you are in violate of federal law. I dont know why people is angry against LL for the ban. It's the US senate and congress who passed those laws. If you are so unhappy about it, make sure you dont vote for the guy who support the law and you can call them and let them know you are not happy..
|
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
|
07-25-2007 17:32
From: Raymond Figtree It depends. If every casino owner complies with the ruling then odds are about half would dump thier land. But this will happen as a slow roll-out over time, so I don't see a huge one day panic selloff or anything like that.
But over time this policy change will certainly increase the supply and lower the demand of land overall. I could see the base price dropping L$1 per meter as a result. I disagree. People are still rushing to buy whole sims at crazy prices, I don't see land falling more than .2- .4L/m2. Any fire sale to get rid of the land will only result in a minor, temporary adjustment. LL is still turning out a lot of land, and casino owners cannot be the vast majority of landholders.
|
Kenbro Utu
Registered User
Join date: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 483
|
07-25-2007 17:33
From: Ciaran Laval It's a gamble whether your letter comes out, If they're going down this conservative bullshit agenda they need to be consistent. You are not wagering anything with a lucky chair. All the conditions of the rule must be met: 1. A wager. "AND" 2. Chance or random number. 3. Payout. No wager? No gamble :^)
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
07-25-2007 17:33
From: Object Pascale That sounds like a mammoth task Ciaran. How many servers are there nowadays? Somewhere between 5,000-6,000? Guessing because it's been a while since I counted.
Anybody with more technical knowledge care to speculate how big a task this would be? It's just moving data, it's hardly a mammoth task. They start by replicating data to new servers outside the US.
|
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
|
07-25-2007 17:33
From: Ciaran Laval Moving the corporate environment to Europe would cost peanuts, like it did with the banking. They have a corporate presence in Europe already, it would take hardly any time and very little money. Why do you think LL would be motivated to keep gambling going inworld? If anything, they probably want it gone so they can keep improving their image as they prepare to sell to Disney.
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
07-25-2007 17:35
From: Raymond Figtree Why do you think LL would be motivated to keep gambling going inworld? If anything, they probably want it gone so they can keep improving their image as they prepare to sell to Disney. Because a lot of land owners who pay them tier fees own casinos. If they're looking for a disney buy out they'd deal with sex first.
|
Lenny Jester
Registered User
Join date: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 24
|
07-25-2007 17:36
From: Ciaran Laval Moving the corporate environment to Europe would cost peanuts, like it did with the banking. They have a corporate presence in Europe already, it would take hardly any time and very little money. There's a lot worse stuff than gambling going on, prostitution is illegal in how many US states? I agree that the law that has made all this possible is completely idiotic. That said, I believe you are completely underestimating what it would cost to move the entire corporation overseas. It's not just the servers. They need to move the ENTIRE corporation...they cannot have any presence in the US at all. And how many of their current employees are going to be willing to move to Europe? And how long is it going to take? 6 months...a year? All this for a very small segment of the SL population that wants to see gambling continue.
|
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
|
07-25-2007 17:38
From: Ciaran Laval Because a lot of land owners who pay them tier fees own casinos. If they're looking for a disney buy out they'd deal with sex first. They can't stop sex. It's too prevalent and hard to track. Casinos they can find and eliminate. I think the ship has sailed on this. They already are letting us know they are willing to lose that tier in order to protect SL as a whole and their asses from the Feds.
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
|
Lenny Jester
Registered User
Join date: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 24
|
07-25-2007 17:38
From: Ciaran Laval It's just moving data, it's hardly a mammoth task. They start by replicating data to new servers outside the US. Agreed. But they need to purchase the server and network infrastructure in Europe first. Without knowing a whole lot about what hardware LL uses to run SL, I would think that would be the most serious hurdle.
|
Isablan Neva
Mystic
Join date: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 2,907
|
07-25-2007 17:39
While the loss of casinos in SL doesn't exactly break my heart....colo facility in Nevada? hello.....
_____________________
 http://slurl.com/secondlife/TheBotanicalGardens/207/30/420/
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
07-25-2007 17:40
From: Lenny Jester I agree that the law that has made all this possible is completely idiotic. That said, I believe you are completely underestimating what it would cost to move the entire corporation overseas. It's not just the servers. They need to move the ENTIRE corporation...they cannot have any presence in the US at all. And how many of their current employees are going to be willing to move to Europe? And how long is it going to take? 6 months...a year? All this for a very small segment of the SL population that wants to see gambling continue. Of course they can have a corporate presence in the US, they need to have one, if the servers are outside of the US and Americans are told they shouldn't be gambling then the onus is on Americans not to gamble, the same as it is now with online gambling sites. Alternatively they do what Blizzard have done with World of Warcraft and have SL Europe and SL US.
|
Object Pascale
moshi moshi
Join date: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 648
|
07-25-2007 17:42
From: Raymond Figtree But over time this policy change will certainly increase the supply and lower the demand of land overall. I could see the base price dropping L$1 per meter as a result. I hope so. I do wonder though if the obliteration of sim lagging casinos will make mainland more desirable, resulting in little or no fluctuation at all? Aak, I prefer your scenario. I'd like to see land prices back to last September's level really. 
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
07-25-2007 17:42
From: Ciaran Laval It's completely a conservative agenda, online gambling is not illegal in the UK. There are ways around this, this is bowing down to conservatism. This is an 18+ environment. Come off it, the liberals are just as likely to tell people what they can or cannot do as any conservative is.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
|
07-25-2007 17:43
From: Ciaran Laval Of course they can have a corporate presence in the US, they need to have one, if the servers are outside of the US and Americans are told they shouldn't be gambling then the onus is on Americans not to gamble, the same as it is now with online gambling sites.
Alternatively they do what Blizzard have done with World of Warcraft and have SL Europe and SL US. NO, they cannot have a corporate presence. That is the whole point. You have to leave completely - no buildings, no staff, no nothing, or else you are doing business here and subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Duh. Now, creating SL US and SL Everybody else... maybe that would work. But wow, how to divide up such a cosmopolitan grid? We are too deeply intermingled. They'd have to reissue all the land and separate the servers.
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
07-25-2007 17:44
From: Chris Norse Come off it, the liberals are just as likely to tell people what they can or cannot do as any conservative is. I don't disagree but this anti gambling policy is a conservative agenda, liberals have their own agenda.
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
07-25-2007 17:45
From: Cristalle Karami NO, they cannot have a corporate presence. Yes they can. Blizzard do it with World of Warcraft, they hold competitions, if the local laws forbid the competion, then people in that country cannot enter, but they can still have a corporate presence in that country.
|
Lenny Jester
Registered User
Join date: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 24
|
07-25-2007 17:46
From: Ciaran Laval Of course they can have a corporate presence in the US, they need to have one, if the servers are outside of the US and Americans are told they shouldn't be gambling then the onus is on Americans not to gamble, the same as it is now with online gambling sites.
Alternatively they do what Blizzard have done with World of Warcraft and have SL Europe and SL US. But that would mean not allowing US citizens to pay money into SL, since any $L purchased has the potential to be used for gambling (and that is all the feds need to make an arrest.) I don't know if that would be good for business.
|
Lenny Jester
Registered User
Join date: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 24
|
07-25-2007 17:47
From: Ciaran Laval Yes they can. Blizzard do it with World of Warcraft, they hold competitions, if the local laws forbid the competion, then people in that country cannot enter, but they can still have a corporate presence in that country. Those competitions are competitions of skill, which are not subject to the current anti-gambling laws.
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
07-25-2007 17:48
From: Lenny Jester But that would mean not allowing US citizens to pay money into SL, since any $L purchased has the potential to be used for gambling (and that is all the feds need to make an arrest.) I don't know if that would be good for business. So by that token then no US citizen could use paypal because if I sell something to someone on ebay and then withdraw my paypal money and go to the bookies, oopsie I've used it for gambling?
|