Are Bots Disproportionate
|
Usagi Musashi
UM ™®
Join date: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 6,083
|
03-29-2007 00:34
From: AWM Mars
Well as LL have now released the client as open source, there is nothing stopping anyone using it, driven by a few scripts off game, to actually perform a legit bot. The script can check the account at hourly intervals to make sure it is still logged in and then would cause 99% less load on the servers, than a 'live person'.
Yea that means anything goes now ! free for all! A scary world its going to become.
|
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
|
03-29-2007 00:38
From: Wilhelm Neumann You could and would have more support if you in fact dealt with things more effectively and I will repeat posting threads and when people make their comments and telling them they are off topic and reported is not a way to gain support but to look silly and that is what has happenned here
/shrug The question in this poll has NEVER been asked before. Unlike video drivers, connectivity, ageplay, ripped off by builder, copied textures threads which never end. You don't see me in those threads demanding not to post. It's their right, as it mine to poll for answers in matters of concern. Anyway, it's disappointing that some people ignore the topic, but would rather attack the residents for raising it. No wonder so many threads get locked.
|
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
|
03-29-2007 00:41
From: Usagi Musashi Yea that means anything goes now ! free for all! A scary world its going to become. If this is allowed to continue, eventually the big companies will put a bot in every sim. This is a very steep, slippery slope.
|
Usagi Musashi
UM ™®
Join date: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 6,083
|
03-29-2007 00:48
From: Weedy Herbst If this is allowed to continue, eventually the big companies will put a bot in every sim. This is a very steep, slippery slope. Scary indeed!.....as they say....soon after open source was allowed. Maybe say It will not be long that when entering a sim/island the owner will be able to read everything on the avie, incuding objects and where they logging in from and complete account information.
|
Stylee Streeter
I am not an adfarmer ok!!
Join date: 5 Feb 2007
Posts: 190
|
03-29-2007 02:39
From: Weedy Herbst In the latter of 2004 and early 2005, There was a global land scanner system. It raised alot of eyebrows, mainly because it was sending objects on every sim on the grid and using people's land without their permission. Such a system would be difficult to run nowadays, because since then, LL has introduced higher ban lines, restricted scripting and limited object entry.
Good point.
A year ago, LL removed public land from the grid and thus nullified global land systems. I was put out of work and had to re-adapt.
I think it's completely hypocritical of LL to permit a worse system than the one they nerfed.
I was not the only scanner, the tools used were available to anyone in Second Life (ie) a simple script and were running from land I owned. I did not have access to the entire grid. Since then, Governor Linden has taken the abandoned land business into thier own coffers, which causes land to sit in unpaid tier for extended periods. Guy Linden goes around and cleans off the premium parcels for auction while the smaller lots now go exclusively to bots. What used to be a fully automated system, now requires alot of extra manpower from LL staff and yet the end result, is the land going to bots at the same price we paid then. I resold the land cheap (as any baron will attest) so they could make a profit too. Unlike bots, who mainly sell the land for as much as the end market can handle.
To add insult to injury now, what used to be "First Land", now goes to bots too.
Tell me, you cannot see alot of irony in this? The main difference being, while I scanned, the land market continued as it always did and continued as such for another year.
It's a classic case of robbing Peter to pay Paul, and I was greatly affected by the changes and this is one of the reasons I am calling foul today, when it comes to landbots. you need to get over it and stop blaming bots for your failure
|
Daisy Rimbaud
Registered User
Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 764
|
03-29-2007 03:10
From: Jopsy Pendragon Actually... YES, I would like Resident Answers to be limited to just residents asking residents for help. [edit: Clarification: I would like NEW THREADS in Resident Answers to be limited to "Residents Asking Residents for Help." as the guidelines implies is intended to be for SL usage and how-to's.] And a very boring and tedious forum that would be. Well, I would NOT like this forum to be like that.
|
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
|
03-29-2007 05:52
From: Stylee Streeter you need to get over it and stop blaming bots for your failure I don't need to get over anything because you say so. I am stating the obvious, because what they did to me, is what they need to do with landbots, otherwise it's a clear cut case of hypocricy and favortism. Landbots now get all of what used to be "First Land" as well, and Linden Lab is paying someone to provide it to them. It's just not right.
|
Reverend Herzog
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 111
|
03-29-2007 10:05
From: Wilhelm Neumann okay i dont and am not reading the threads the forums are flooded with them i am commenting on the fact there are too many of them and its going to and IS having a negative impact and as you can see from the posts in this thread about people saying too many threads its pretty obvious the same pairs or eyes are repeatedly coming to these forums remember forums have a very low readership in proportion to the actualy gaming population. So yes there are too many bot threads being started per day also not much common sense is needed with regard to saturating forums with a topic people just stop reading period. Again i'm not actually reading the thread I am opening the forum and seeing more bot threads and commenting on the fact that its overkill and your hurting your cause not likely helping it. In short its quite obvious you can't be reasoned with. Your on a crusade no one can speak to you guys about possibly more effective ways to get the message out when the bulk of the population is not here but elsewhere. If you have ever found a game or platform where 100% of the players who use the game regularly = 100% of the forum readers/posters then this would be a boon and I would give you a medal for being the first human being to achieve this. Two active threads aren't exactly a flood. One of those threads was started three days ago, the other two days ago. I've personally only started one thread here on the subject in the past week. So your argument not only makes little sense, it's flat out wrong. By the way, there's not a single suggestion you've made about other lobbying techniques that we aren't already doing. If you had bothered to read my replies you would have seen that I've told you that already. But then you admit yourself you don't read the threads, you just come here to bitch and moan about them.
|
Reverend Herzog
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 111
|
03-29-2007 10:33
From: Stylee Streeter you need to get over it and stop blaming bots for your failure Well, we're not all willing to work in your profitable field of cutting up 512s and turning them into 16m2 porno ad fields, Stylee, so we have to try to save what we do have.
|
Jopsy Pendragon
Perpetual Outsider
Join date: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 1,906
|
03-29-2007 10:59
From: Weedy Herbst Trolls don't really care about issues, they care about grabbing attention on the backs of other's issues. They don't care that people's livelyhoods are taken away by people who couldn't care less about SL other than to greed, but post about it on a forum, they scream bloody murder. There have been several posts where the proponents of landbots claim to represent the average user while dismissing the claims of the anti-landbot lobby. So to prove them wrong, a few of the questions were put to the population for answers as polls. The polls have clearly indicated, the majority of residents do not like landbots and agree the use of them is selfish and disproportionate. When the reality of the facts slap them in the face, they ultimately resort to the lowest common denominator by suggesting we have no right to particpate in the forums. Then when the polls really go really bad for them, they use the age old tactic of personal attacks and pissing matches to get the thread locked. Weedy- I am NOT a land-bot proponent.  Honest. I am FOR changing the land system to be naturally more resistant to the exploitive behavior of land-bot owners.... I am not for making pointless and hard to enforce laws against land-bots, or burning land-bot owners at the stake like witches. Regarding the "Exploit" you mentioned... I have concerns: If you can show conclusively that the bot did not actually buy the parcel during the legal window of opportunity, then yes, you certainly have detected an "Exploit". If the REAL problem is that the "About Land..." widget isn't getting refreshed the very second that the land bot purchases the land... and hitting (Cancel) isn't properly reporting " The parcel is already sold, you can no longer do that." then that is NOT an "Exploit" it is a "Bug". "Exploit" or "Bug" ... have you posted it in Jira.secondlife.com yet? Following up with it in "Current Version Feedback" to draw more attention to the Bug/Exploit would probably be helpful too. As far as I'm concerned though, being inhumanly fast may be "exploitive", but it is not an "Exploit" in the computer services sense if the transaction is legal. And trying to raise awareness with the Lindens in a forum that is chiefly left to residents to answer is a blatently ineffective way of trying to bring about the changes you're trying to accomplish. There... was that "on-topic" enough to satisfy you? 
|
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
|
03-29-2007 11:13
What we have here at the base of this argument is the same thing we have in so many similar issues in SL: Some people are against the regulation of anything. Some people believe nothing CAN be regulated, ever. Some people believe that if a thing CAN be done, that it will be done, and nothing in the universe can ever stop its power. I've seen that over and over - regardless of what bad thing is going on, people pop up to say, "Well, you can't do anything about it," and of course, "You shouldn't do anything about it." Even I almost get taken in by this line of "reasoning" at times. Generally, if you scratch the surface of any of these issues, you'll find that the people saying "Of course it has to be this way" are the very people who are personally profiting from the way it is. There is nothing special about the "metaverse" that says it has to be total anarchy, with only the fittest (read, most cunning and least ethical) surviving. This particular issue is a prima facie case that calls for regulation. coco
|
Sys Slade
Registered User
Join date: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 626
|
03-29-2007 13:02
Weedy, please tell me this is a joke: /114/84/174253/1.htmlWith all your ranting and raving against the landbot owners and their greed, and claiming to have the interests of the average resident at heart, selling 1000 ad plots is not something the average resident would like to see. Also, your number one suggestion for their use is: From: someone 1- Ideal for putting a secured landbot in every sim. Do you really dislike landbots, or is this a personal issue that you have with certain landbot owners? As for other suggestions you make in that post, it seems you have no problems with disproportionate sim usage. Number 2 on the list is "Scan for avatars, objects or land owners". How much lag do you think will be caused by running scans 3 times a second from 16m plots? From where I'm sitting, land barons are just as greedy and antisocial as the bot owners.
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
03-29-2007 13:13
Another aspect to this is one of competition.
If Landbots make it so theres only 3-4 Landbot operators gettting 99% of the buisness-
As opposed to 10-15 Land Barons,
Then we have a condition of Collusion. Where the whole industry is benefiting a proportonately decreasing number of individuals.
Since humans have limits as SL got bigger we needed more land barons.
A bot, however, isnt a human. An owner can run multiple bots. Thus money becomes concetrated.
If this happens then we have an undesirable condition unrelated to the technology. Lack of ompetition is bad. Period.
|
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
|
03-29-2007 13:15
|
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
|
03-29-2007 13:17
From: Colette Meiji Another aspect to this is one of competition.
If Landbots make it so theres only 3-4 Landbot operators gettting 99% of the buisness-
As opposed to 10-15 Land Barons,
Then we have a condition of Collusion. Where the whole industry is benefiting a proportonately decreasing number of individuals.
Since humans have limits as SL got bigger we needed more land barons.
A bot, however, isnt a human. An owner can run multiple bots. Thus money becomes concetrated.
If this happens then we have an undesirable condition unrelated to the technology. Lack of ompetition is bad. Period. I agree lack of competition is a very bad thing, but at the top of the land market in SL, competition is actually bad. You have so many compettitors bidding on sims to chop up and sell to flippers that the price is always high.
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
03-29-2007 13:24
From: tristan Eliot I agree lack of competition is a very bad thing, but at the top of the land market in SL, competition is actually bad. You have so many compettitors bidding on sims to chop up and sell to flippers that the price is always high. Dont know that competition is bad. Competition driving up the bid prices seems a negative though. I never understood why Sims are auctioned and private islands are a flat rate, except to make LL money.
|
Dnel DaSilva
Master Xessorizer
Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 781
|
03-29-2007 13:26
From: Colette Meiji Sims are auctioned...to make LL money. Pardon the edit to make a point.
_____________________
Xessories in Urbane, home of high quality jewelry and accessories.
Coming soon to www.xessories.net
Why accessorize when you can Xessorize?
|
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
|
03-29-2007 13:26
From: Colette Meiji Dont know that competition is bad.
Competition driving up the bid prices seems a negative though.
I never understood why Sims are auctioned and private islands are a flat rate, except to make LL money. I wasn't blaming the bidders. Just the system. 
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
03-29-2007 13:29
From: Dnel DaSilva Pardon the edit to make a point. Its okay - It occurs to me then, Linden Labs is actually the SOURCE of the Land baron and Land Botter "Greed" so many rail against. If they went to a flat price structure land prices would stabilize somewhat- would they not?
|
Zaphod Kotobide
zOMGWTFPME!
Join date: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 2,087
|
03-29-2007 14:15
That's exactly what I suggested in another post - the "Should Landbots be allowed" post. I don't know that they are the source of the problem, but they are certainly contributing to it with the current auction system. Interestingly, not long ago on the "Business Opportunities" page of the Second Life website, "Land Dealer" was listed. It's not there now, however "Casino Operator" is. I should write the webmaster about that typo. Surely they meant "Camping Chair Operator". But I digress. From: Colette Meiji Its okay - It occurs to me then, Linden Labs is actually the SOURCE of the Land baron and Land Botter "Greed" so many rail against. If they went to a flat price structure land prices would stabilize somewhat- would they not?
|
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
|
03-29-2007 14:16
From: Zaphod Kotobide Interestingly, not long ago on the "Business Opportunities" page of the Second Life website, "Land Dealer" was listed. It's not there now.
Sorry for the edit but they actually changed it to "real estate speculator". Same thing though.
|
Sunspot Pixie
dread heliotrope
Join date: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 493
|
03-29-2007 14:22
From: tristan Eliot Well i'm sorry, but I think LL does know what causes load on their infrastructure and deals with those things accordingly. Yeah, because they've done such a MARVELOUS job of that so far. Get real. The program is barely usuable frequently, and vital components are basically broken much of the tme.
_____________________
If we eat our soup in the rain, we'll never run out...
|
Sunspot Pixie
dread heliotrope
Join date: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 493
|
03-29-2007 14:25
From: tristan Eliot Fine this is your opinion. But you are not a grid monkey so you don't know. From: tristan Eliot That just is not happening Were you trying to be ironic?
_____________________
If we eat our soup in the rain, we'll never run out...
|
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
|
03-29-2007 14:26
From: Sunspot Pixie Yeah, because they've done such a MARVELOUS job of that so far. Get real. The program is barely usuable frequently, and vital components are basically broken much of the tme. A consistant pattern I have seen in my year and a half in SL although i do admit things seem worse with the increased load. SL is constantly evolving so bugs are simply a part of this platform and always will be.
|
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
|
03-29-2007 14:28
From: Sunspot Pixie Were you trying to be ironic? Taking my quotes out of context and yes i'm sure they appear to be very ironic. 
|