Sexual Animations banned in future?
|
|
Johan Durant
Registered User
Join date: 7 Aug 2006
Posts: 1,657
|
08-08-2007 12:08
From: Abraham Attenborough has nothing to do with the thread itself, should be deleted as spam Here's something I'll never understand: people who think they can be overbearing mods in a thread they started.
_____________________
 (Aelin 184,194,22) The Motion Merchant - an animation store specializing in two-person interactions
|
|
Strife Onizuka
Moonchild
Join date: 3 Mar 2004
Posts: 5,887
|
08-08-2007 12:12
*moves*
_____________________
Truth is a river that is always splitting up into arms that reunite. Islanded between the arms, the inhabitants argue for a lifetime as to which is the main river.
- Cyril Connolly
Without the political will to find common ground, the continual friction of tactic and counter tactic, only creates suspicion and hatred and vengeance, and perpetuates the cycle of violence.
- James Nachtwey
|
|
Vladmire Torok
Registered User
Join date: 4 Jul 2007
Posts: 2
|
08-08-2007 12:34
Ok heres my take if you care.
1) This NOT REAL! unless you merge it with RL
2) Anyone entertaining thoughts of action including pediphile weather RL or virtual is sick and needs help or a bullet.
3) Although I have noticed a severe lack of interest on the part of LL concerning customer satisfaction, you would at least think the would be concerned about membership (revenue) loss if they removed what makes up probably 80% of site activity
4) In any society I know of sex between consenting adults is not illegal. So, if two members are engauged in a sex act (consenting) without the intention of braodcast for entertainment, how could it be illegal.
5) And lastly, the whole thing is set up on the basis of forming relationships of any type with other people. As adults I assume we all understand that the forming of a relationship between two adults frequently includes sexual contact at some point in it's growth.
I lied, one more thing: many of us are very tallented at "writing" erotica. So though the animations are exciting some of us would servive "sexualy" without them.
|
|
Draco18s Majestic
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 2,744
|
08-08-2007 13:25
From: Bree Giffen So..... when porn gets removed from the internet I suppose we'll have to start worrying. The internet is for porn. The internet is for porn. Why you think the net was born? Porn porn porn! |
|
Abraham Attenborough
Registered User
Join date: 4 Feb 2007
Posts: 96
|
08-08-2007 13:35
From: Michael Bigwig Give me a freakin' break. It has a LOT to do with the thread. And why is it ME that people flame when there is a tons of crap posted everywhere.
Sheesh, you guys...never cease to amaze me.
If you look earlier up in this thread, there is someone that says the same thing I did...why doesn’t HE get your “this is spam” comment?
Why do you guys love to troll so much? tell me at how many threads did you answer that way u did and maybe i tell u y u got "sandbagged". man, if it seems it was personally against u than i say borrowing sorry because i dont know u at all. u r right if u ask y i didnt told that the person that answered b4 u: because i can look over one complaining but if the second is, u 2 r enuff to make ur own thread for complaining and i swear i will not write anything in it that dont takes the point of the thread. |
|
Tid Kidd
Registered User
Join date: 8 Jun 2007
Posts: 191
|
08-08-2007 13:41
If one of your poll options had been:
"Live and let live. I'm not personally interested in SL sex but have no objection to those who do, provided they leave me alone"
then I would have voted. But it wasn't, so I haven't.
Goodnight.
|
|
Daz Honey
Fine, Fine Artist
Join date: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 599
|
08-08-2007 13:45
yeah, virtual sex in a setting that you have to say that you are over 18 to see is extrememly unlikely to be banned considering the sheer quantity and accessability of porn on the internet.
isn't is amazing that people in this enlightened day and age still consider sexuality as a 'sin', somehow dirty and shamefull and thus eligible to be suppressed.
Where's John lennon when you need him..geeez
_____________________
All children are artists. The problem is how to remain an artist once he grows up. - Pablo Picasso
|
|
Missy Malaprop
♥Diaper Girl♥
Join date: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 544
|
08-08-2007 14:51
From: Jessica Elytis Meh! Law is a fubared as SL. Missed the takedown in 2002.
I still, classify it under the "common sense" edict. Child porn is wrong. The only people that raised a voice on that ban were the ones wanting LL to grow a brainstem and define "ageplay" as pediphile acts, not just having a child avatar. No one here advocated it's return. Why? Because everyone knows it's wrong. Ageplay existed before SL. SL doesn't like the word so they have banned all use of the word, but not of Ageplay itself. They have also only banned child looking AVs being used in sexual manners. Real Ageplay has nothing to do with children, just adults roleplaying. I'm glad we can get rid of the creepy kid AV's from sex areas, where some people who really like Sexual Ageplay can still do it, the real wayjust like in RL, with an adult dressed up and acting like a kid, not really turning into a kid... don't know what the fun was about seeing a kid... its about seeing an adult pretending to be a kid. I dont agree with them banning the word as much, but I'll go along with it because hardly anyone knows what the word means, and it seems most everyone in SL believes the word means pedophile. So those that like Ageplay will keep using less proper terms since everyone likes to fight about word usage. |
|
Ami Lang
Registered User
Join date: 9 Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
08-10-2007 03:14
Personally, anyone who can get or be sexually excited by children, needs proffesional help.
|
|
Tod69 Talamasca
The Human Tripod ;)
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,107
|
08-10-2007 06:37
From: Daz Honey
Where's John lennon when you need him..geeez
About 6' under ground 
_____________________
really pissy & mean right now and NOT happy with Life.
|
|
Wiseguy Capra
Resident Wenzel Hopper
Join date: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
08-10-2007 06:39
they wont ban sexual attachments.. but they will ban female AV's lol
|
|
Michael Bigwig
~VRML Aficionado~
Join date: 5 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,181
|
08-10-2007 07:15
From: Abraham Attenborough tell me at how many threads did you answer that way u did and maybe i tell u y u got "sandbagged". man, if it seems it was personally against u than i say borrowing sorry because i dont know u at all. u r right if u ask y i didnt told that the person that answered b4 u: because i can look over one complaining but if the second is, u 2 r enuff to make ur own thread for complaining and i swear i will not write anything in it that dont takes the point of the thread. Abraham. Please, for the love of Linden, try a little harder in the written language department. I take it you're foreign, but that does not excuse complete and utter jibberish and internetisms. I have to hire a linguistic specialist to even decipher what you mean--I think your cognitive deficits and strategies are in need or an overhaul. It would greatly help if you used capitalization, proper punctuation, and slimmed down on your internetisms. I'm just trying to help you out for future forum fiascos. 
_____________________
~Michael Bigwig __________________________________________________Lead Designer, Glowbox Designs 
|