Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Thanks Again Cristiano and Eboni

Jeska Linden
Administrator
Join date: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 2,388
07-02-2005 15:57
Moved to Notices and Well-Wishes.
Zapoteth Zaius
Is back
Join date: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 5,634
07-02-2005 15:58
From: Jeska Linden
Moved to Notices and Well-Wishes.


We need a threats and Unwell-Wishes forum :p
_____________________
I have the right to remain silent. Anything I say will be misquoted and used against me.
---------------
Zapoteth Designs, Temotu (100,50)
---------------
Jeska Linden
Administrator
Join date: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 2,388
07-02-2005 15:59
Also, wanted to remind everyone to utilize personal messages, in-world chat, or the SL IM functionality if you wish to have conversations which are not appropraite for the SL Forums.
Catherine Cotton
Tis Elfin
Join date: 2 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,001
07-02-2005 16:01
Bravo Coco I completly agree. You know I never cus in RL but some of these folks have pushed me so far that there are days I sound like a drunken salior in these forums. Out of simple fustration that they will never stop with the insults, belitting and attacks. Absolutly get rid of all that crap this would be a much nicer place if we all could just speak without being called a "cold heartless bitch"or much worse. Yes that has happened to me more than a few times.

Cat
_____________________
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
07-02-2005 16:10
(Never mind the funny acting quote. The below is my response to Cristiano.)

Notices and well wishes? lol OK, I would like to put everyone on notice that I wish everyone well! lol

Cristiano, I am just an example. I don't just fight for me, see. I fight for everyone. To be allowed to say their piece with dignity in these forums. To not be ganged up on. To not have personal things said about them, their mental health, or anything like that. To not be banned from the forums or banned from the game.

I am an example. I never expected to be an example. I never thought that standing up for another poster's rights, and for him to be treated with dignity, would end with myself being the next target. That it happened is all the more shameful for the forums.

NO ONE I have ever seen on these forums - nobody, not a one of us - deserves to be banned from the forums, much less from the game.

You said, ";(ie...Bedazzle members are cheap for showing nudity becomes a full on attack against the members of the group because the poster is scared of nudity)."

That very thing is an exact example of what I'm talking about. A person can be against Bedazzle members for showing nudity, and consider the approach to be a cheap one for the group to partake in.

You can consider it a classy one, or an ok one, whatever, if you like. And say so. But what you SHOULDN'T be able to do is say, "the poster is scared of nudity."

That not only does not follow logically, it is an individual attack.

Do you see at all what I mean?

I am not the only one who thought that Catherine was being rather overlly jumped on in that thread. Read the thread. There are people I have never heard of saying the same thing.

I'm no hypocrite. I ask only that people refrain from personal attacks. Which happens to be exactly what I do - I do not call people names or question their sanity, or say they are martyrs or any of that stuff.

The game will grow, and the influence of certain persons will become diluted. You can call that hyperbole; I call it pretty good analysis.

coco
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
07-02-2005 16:15
From: Cocoanut Koala
Nolan, since I wasn't the author of those terms... <snipped non sequitur>

You defended the use of stereotypes as free speech when your friend was doing it. I even read as you proclaimed he was "diplomatic"! Hah!

Bottom line, It was ok then. It's apparently not ok now. I understand.

You can try to soften the meaning of those labels your friend made up, it doesn't mean that they weren't invented with the intent to make someone less than happy. The fact that some folks were offended speaks to that end. Look me in my virtual eyes and tell me you think that when the author coined the "FIC" phrase, it wasn't in a negative tone? That it's desirable to be "FIC" - this pernicious, Skull & Bones gang that are leading Philip and his crew by their noses? Color me confused. :confused:
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
07-02-2005 16:17
I go off to play WoW and this happens. Geez, a girl can't take an afternoon to slay monsters...


You are more than welcome Catherine. If you can't take questions about your ideas, then you well, stop posting in forums, or make your own forums.


If I were a whiner sissy, I would report this thread as a personal attack.
_____________________
Commerce Leader
Registered User
Join date: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 32
07-02-2005 16:17
Jeska's got her super-secret Linden invisibility mode on again, I see! heh.
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
07-02-2005 16:18
LOL, nolan, no I said - and on more than one occasion - that he was UNdiplomatic.

And yes, he should have the right to make sociological commentary. I have the right to do that, too. I came in on his saga in the middle of it, so I don't know - but I myself would not have mentioned individual members. Would not then, and don't now - can't think of a situation where I would.

coco

Edited to add: BUT . . . if his social commentary devolved into mentioning individuals personally as examples of the FIC, and/or their behavior as being examples . . . that STILL is a hundred times more benign, imo, than the things said back to him.

And - nothing happened to the people saying those things.
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
07-02-2005 16:33
From: Cocoanut Koala

That very thing is an exact example of what I'm talking about. A person can be against Bedazzle members for showing nudity, and consider the approach to be a cheap one for the group to partake in.

You can consider it a classy one, or an ok one, whatever, if you like. And say so. But what you SHOULDN'T be able to do is say, "the poster is scared of nudity."

That not only does not follow logically, it is an individual attack.

Do you see at all what I mean?


The problem, Cocoa, is it was speaking about a finite group of people - a handful that had posed for some nude art shots. The thread that called them cheap, also called them whores and prostitutes. That is what I referred to - the afraid of nudity comment is hardly an aggregious personal attack, but whore is. You can express your opinion that someone is acting cheap, but be prepared for the consequences.

Do you see at all what I mean?
_____________________
Cristiano


ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less.

~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more.

Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
07-02-2005 16:34
From: Cocoanut Koala
LOL, nolan, no I said - and on more than one occasion - that he was UNdiplomatic.

And yes, he should have the right to make sociological commentary. I have the right to do that, too. I came in on his saga in the middle of it, so I don't know - but I myself would not have mentioned individual members. Would not then, and don't now - can't think of a situation where I would.

coco

Edited to add: BUT . . . if his social commentary devolved into mentioning individuals personally as examples of the FIC, and/or their behavior as being examples . . . that STILL is a hundred times more benign, imo, than the things said back to him.

And - nothing happened to the people saying those things.

Actually, on SLH you used the term "diplomatic" I did see the "undiplomatic" comment here, around that same time. I was bemused.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Jeska Linden
Administrator
Join date: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 2,388
07-02-2005 16:44
This thread is inappropriate and is being closed. Please refrain from personally attacking those you don't agree with.
1 2 3